Bitcoin Forum
May 27, 2024, 12:53:47 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 »
161  Economy / Reputation / Re: S_Therapist = mdayonliner on: January 13, 2019, 04:35:40 PM
2 different addresses  Huh

Yes, but S_Therapist admits in this post (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5096681.msg49212865#msg49212865) that utlptc is his other account, and the one he initially used to buy the S_Therapist account.
S_Therapist isn't a bought account and it's irrelevant here. You are discussing about mdayonliner= or ≠ me aka S_Therapist.
162  Economy / Reputation / Re: S_Therapist = mdayonliner on: January 13, 2019, 03:59:26 PM
Side note for S_Therapist, I have stated in the bustadice campaign thread that with all the new changes to DT, I will give users til I grade the campaign this week to get their negative rep sorted out or they lose their spot and pay for the week. You need to work on proving your case if you can
I have been tagged for several cases. The only thing which is wrong here is- I'm alt of mdayonliner.
163  Economy / Reputation / Re: S_Therapist = mdayonliner on: January 13, 2019, 03:53:10 PM
So when did that house visit happen? I'm thoroughly confused by your timelines.

Not that it matters much anymore. Just curious.

And I thought he came by to repay a loan, not to buy sell BTC.

Please read the response for o_e_l_e_o

Ok, let me ask this another way. Please post the TX ID of that BTC purchase.
https://www.blockchain.com/btc/tx/bfd316f507fca8eaa96e71d0af56d42a08d82c5c66aeb777f1d234cd70fa878c
I had shared it earlier.
164  Economy / Reputation / Re: S_Therapist = mdayonliner on: January 13, 2019, 03:43:25 PM
I bought that account.
It's enough. I don't see any point of further discussion. Account buyer can't be trusted.
Come on, we are talking about whether alt of mdaypnliner or not.

I bought that account.
Buying hacked account and then gets hacked.

I suppose you need forum account to buy account which means that you have at least one more account somewhere.
Yes, it's - utlptc
165  Economy / Reputation / Re: S_Therapist = mdayonliner on: January 13, 2019, 03:26:21 PM
I had mentioned in my previous post. I can give signed message from address which is adjusted in my profile.
Privcy

Privcy and DeepOnion shilling happened later. I'm interested in the change of ownership between 2014 and 2018. Please tell us more about that.
I bought that account.
166  Economy / Reputation / Re: S_Therapist = mdayonliner on: January 13, 2019, 03:22:39 PM
I had mentioned in my previous post. I can give signed message from address which is adjusted in my profile.
Privcy

We have a lot of similitudes so far but not a real proof, but we have a precedent who can tell truth.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3032057.msg31217052#msg31217052

Upon investigation, alia == favours via IP evidence and a now-deleted mistaken bump of one of alia's threads. Info in favours' posts disproves alia's claimed identity.

IF the boss will look at their IP history it may be confirmed or not.
That's can work. Most of the time I log in from my pc and it's a broadband, therefore, it will be same. Although I sometime I use from my mobile which ip can be change(I have little idea about those)
167  Economy / Reputation / Re: S_Therapist = mdayonliner on: January 13, 2019, 03:15:15 PM

Is this it? https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=156044

So you got hacked and you went to mday's house to talk about it and never posted anything about it on the forum, is that right?
Yes that is.
I never posted because I didn't had a staked address which may LoyceV know because I asked him about bitcoin core. I never had used a qt wallet.
As far as I can remember, I had talked with him for exchanging something like $117/$119. Also I had lost my account. You can say both.
I'm trying to collect the tx of that transaction too.

Here it is- https://www.blockchain.com/btc/tx/bfd316f507fca8eaa96e71d0af56d42a08d82c5c66aeb777f1d234cd70fa878c

I can give you a signed message from the privcy address adjusted in my account.
168  Economy / Reputation / Re: S_Therapist = mdayonliner on: January 13, 2019, 03:01:37 PM
Perhaps krogothmanhattan could check (without revealing the members location) if mdayonliner and S_Therapist have the same addresses. They both had taken part in the "Daily free raffle".

Please provide full address with zipcode. Other than that It will not be shipped properly.



0 - mdayonliner

2 - S_Therapist


Because shipping was not available for Bangladesh. Check OP from that raffle. I can provide PM too which I had with krogoth.
169  Economy / Reputation / Re: S_Therapist = mdayonliner on: January 13, 2019, 02:59:18 PM
Sadly it shows that mday is capable to contribute in a positive way without getting into shady shit but just doesn't want to.
It was/is not mday, it's me. S_Therapist.

What's your hacked account and why did you need to visit mday's house?
We had frequently exchanged btc/bdt.
account- pkmoney
170  Economy / Reputation / Re: S_Therapist = mdayonliner on: January 13, 2019, 02:55:13 PM
Sadly it shows that mday is capable to contribute in a positive way without getting into shady shit but just doesn't want to.
It was/is not mday, it's me. S_Therapist.
171  Economy / Reputation / Re: S_Therapist = mdayonliner on: January 13, 2019, 02:34:58 PM
I have a question to @mdayonliner, why you are defending instead of  @S_Therapist. I don't think you are worried about tag to mdayonliner because already tagged it. But why we can't see any defensive reply from @S_Therapist ?
I'm here.
If anyone still think that I'm not an alt of mdayonliner, please drop me a pm.
Thank you.
172  Economy / Reputation / Re: S_Therapist = mdayonliner on: January 13, 2019, 01:51:30 PM
I have nothing to say here except "I am not mdayonliner or alt of mdayonliner".
Thank you everyone for your judgment.
173  Other / Meta / Re: [Infographic] Leaving Feedback vs Custom Trust List on: January 13, 2019, 12:54:18 PM
Updated. Text was corrected by eddie13. Thank you for your contribution. Appreciated.
174  Other / Meta / Re: [ LIST ] Banned users on: January 13, 2019, 06:13:10 AM
Has anyone ever tried to list the signatures campaigns that those banned users where participating? It would be interesting to know which campaigns and which projects these users help promote. And even more important, who are the managers who hire these users ...
As far as I can remember, there was a thread where iasenko (not sure) was trying to list the bounty managers who accept shitposters. Don't know it is maintained now or not.

Edit:
Here it is, not maintained nowadays.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5036753.msg46111905#msg46111905
175  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: [Explained] Importance of Custom Trust List on: January 13, 2019, 02:36:41 AM
~snip~
Updated and moved to B&H. Thank you for the suggestion.
176  Economy / Reputation / Re: I was blackmailed on: January 13, 2019, 02:26:51 AM
It was nothing personal for me. This thread is about the blackmailer who might also be someone else in the forum.
Yeah but jeremypwr should not remove you. It's not professionalism. It's nothing to remove someone from a campaign. I agree with what suchmoon said.
177  Other / Meta / Re: How centralized is the forum? on: January 12, 2019, 02:42:10 PM
Once back in 2014, theymos received a subpoena for the DPR case to release the deleted posts and PMs (though not really sure of the latter).
Theymos can access users PMs but like as others mentioned, he will not check PMs until users have done something extreme. I have read somewhere theymos to say something like, "I don't read anyone's PM unless it is necessary. I have once provided some PMs for the requirement of FBI (Or something same) for an investigation."
I can't find that post though.

this is one, searching the other one-
I don't read PMs for fun. Very very rarely, I need to read PMs for technical, administrative, or legal reasons, but I try to avoid this as much as possible. I don't want to spy on anyone's personal business.

Update- Didn't find the one I am searching  Angry

this post?:
Nah, it was close enough what I said.
178  Other / Meta / Re: forum thread views on: January 12, 2019, 02:37:05 PM
Use different browsers for multiple clicks. Maybe that will boost the counts.
Sometimes it seems Jet Cash is a bot, lol.
179  Other / Beginners & Help / [Explained] Importance of Custom Trust List on: January 12, 2019, 02:35:28 PM
Bitcointalk is bigger than we think. There are a lot of people from around the world. Among those, some are here to learn about bitcoin and cryptocurrency in general, some for having trading or exchanging goods, currency and some are here for earning money through bounty. Besides those, there are some people who are here for scam people's money. When we go for a trade, how will we judge a user whether we should trust that person or not? To help you sort out this, people are giving feedback based on their previous trades, experience. We may find some feedback valid while some are invalid, bogus. If someone gives a user positive feedback and you go first while trading, you may be scammed because you don't know whether the feedback was valid or invalid. Here is the necessity of having a custom trust list. While you surf bitcointalk, have trades, exchange goods or coins or currency, you need to save yourself from the possible scam or frauds and custom trust list will help you to do so.

For creating a custom trust list-
1. Go to trust setting.
2. Include username/userid of those persons who leave valid feedback in your opinion.
                  a. For including someone in your trust list, type the username or userid in the box. While you include someone to your trust list,
                     remember to use the correct username. There may have some persons with the almost same username. For avoiding this issue,
                     you may use the userid.
                  b. For excluding someone who doesn't provide valid feedback (you think), use a tilde(~) before his/her username.
3. Now update. You also can set the depth level which is also important because if you add someone to your custom trust list and if your
    depth level is set at 1, you are trusting that user's custom trust list. If you set depth level 2, you are trusting a lot of users. You may check this thread for better understanding the depth level.

What benefits are you getting if you use custom trust list-

1. Safe trade, safe surf, Happy ending
   If you create a custom trust list, you will see only those feedback on any users profile left by your custom trust list. You may check other
people's feedback by visiting untrusted feedback. When you want to have a trade or exchange goods or whatever, if you see negative feedback on that user's profile left by someone from your custom trust list, you will not definitely go for a deal and will not be scammed. And at the same time, if you see positive feedback left by your custom trust list, you may have a safe deal/exchange with that person. Beside this, you will also have safe browsing. For example, if someone uses an evil software/URL which may compromise your data if you click. But if you see the trust score (not possible sometimes because trust score isn't visible in all section) and find out someone from your trust list has already left negative feedback, you definitely will not click on that link. You are having a safe trade and safe surfing.

2. Judgment will be easier
   Assume that you have not built a custom trust list and your depth level is set to 2, that's mean you are trusting people's feedback who are in DT1 and you are also trusting feedback who are in the trust list of DT1. So, based on their feedback, you may find someone's score is 100 and you think that user as trusted which may be wrong at some point. Your judgment on that user will be wrong but when you are using custom trust list, you will only have almost accurate judgment.

3. Help the forum
   While you are having safe trade/browsing, it's your responsibilty to ensure safe trades for other persons too. If someone includes you in his trust list and his depth level is set to 2, he is also trusting feedback from people of your trust list. So, you should add only those persons to your trust list whom you trust with their feedback.

4. DT1 selection
   DT1 member selection requires people to be included in other people's trust list. That means we are responsible to select DT1 member. Therefore, we should include persons who leave valid trust to ensure we are not going to have a bad DT1 member.

5. Custom trust list is required for the inclusion in DT1
   With the new changes, the trust system of bitcointalk has become more decentralized. Before this, DT1 memeber was only included by theymos directly although based on their trust in forum. Now, whoever meets the criteria, will be incuded in DT1 except scammers or someone with bad reputation. Therefore, for being included in DT1, you should use custom trust list.

Some criteria you should maintain while choosing people to include in your trust list- by suchmoon.
1. People you've traded with are not necessarily good candidates. You have to trust person's judgement as well.
2. Review the feedback sent by people you're including/excluding. (You've mentioned this a little bit)
2. Never include people who ask to be included. Perhaps exclude them instead. Be skeptical about inclusions suggested by other users (possible shilling).
3. Don't include people merely based on their merits or if you like/agree with their posts.
etc

Including wrong people in the list would negate any advantages and might make it far worse than just leaving the settings at DefaultTrust.

I think you have now a little awareness about creating a custom trust list. I highly encourage people to use a custom trust list.
Remember, there are a big differences between leaving a feedback and custom trust list.

Please, write if anything is misguided, what to include or exclude. I will appreciate that. I have tried my best to highlight custom trust list but there may be some errors since I am not a senior one.

And I am extremly sorry for my bad English. Trying to learn though.
180  Other / Meta / Re: Reason of my ban on: January 12, 2019, 10:00:39 AM
Pajeet you probably have been banned either because of copy/pasting a.k.a plagiarism or spamming here. I found you here in a list of ANN thread bumper although you were not banned for this.
  95. 1: hirokazu (BPIP)
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!