|
Message escrow.ms, escrow.ms is on DefaultTrust and due to trusting the person who has given you negative feedback, it shows up with that warning on your profile.
|
|
|
|
|
Trust is not (note; NEVER, you WILL not be able to change this like the MANY people before you) removed on request. Moderators can't remove trust anyway as far as I'm aware, you'd need to ask an admin. People like me have received much worse in spam trust, quit complaining and just deal with it. If people could easily delete trust then the system would be pointless.
|
|
|
|
|
Your faucet is currently broken? I always get the "Invalid captcha, try again!" error even after trying about 10 times. I would like to add the faucet to freebitcoins.pw but I don't want to add a broken faucet to it.
|
|
|
|
|
In response to your PM, I'm not removing my negative reputation until you sort this business out. At the moment you do indeed look like a scammer and I simply can't allow you to just rebuild your reputation without dealing with ALL of the people involved in this.
|
|
|
|
If some newbies are stupid enough to trust other newbies and junior members, then what do you think is going to happen when they then say "Yeah, I'm officially trusted by Stunna, the owner of this massive gambling website who is really trusted..." (and so on)?
Then it's their own fault really and there's nothing we can do to prevent idiots getting scammed. And they're not trusted by Stunna. He hasn't put them on his trusted list, he just left people feedback for partaking in the sig deal and he clearly stated that and it's there for everybody to read and to make their own minds up whether that particular user should be trusted or not. It's not like our pages are glowing green right now and the community can't be expected to babysit idiots all the time. I didn't say they were trusted by Stunna. But for people new to Bitcoin it's very easy for their minds to be swayed by something like that. I don't see how you should suddenly get trusted feedback because you made some posts and got paid, that's not a "trustworthy" action. |
|
|
|
|
If some newbies are stupid enough to trust other newbies and junior members, then what do you think is going to happen when they then say "Yeah, I'm officially trusted by Stunna, the owner of this massive gambling website who is really trusted..." (and so on)?
|
|
|
|
|
OP is sending unsolicited PMs to people (I have received one) with the exact same text as in this OP. Seems funny that he needs a loan of 5 million satoshis to make 20 thousand satoshis a day...that's some pretty bad ROI.
|
|
|
|
Once the game is released, you should think of linking it to a signature program.
How will you generate your income? {Subscription or Donation or Ad's} ?
Would be great if you could add everyday objects, like Coca Cola cans, which players can drink as a health potion. Coca Cola or Pepsi or whatever can pay you for the in-game Ad's.
Just an idea.
Like I have told you previously, it's being sold off. Stop asking him to make a signature campaign lmao. Would be great if you could get someone to fund a signature program on this forum, to promote the game here. I only got to this thread by chance. I seldom browse this part of the forum. You would draw so much more attention to this game, with a paying "Signature" program. Hope to see you soon, under "Services"  And include us "Noobers" even if it's for 1 satoshi per day... We feel left out in the cold. It's actually being sold off. You have to remember that the costs of funding a project like this can run extremely high...funding a signature campaign was probably out of the question for the OP. |
|
|
|
IMHO I don't think dishing out feedback to those who participate is a good idea at all, especially with someone on DefaultTrust like Stunna. It's only going to make us see a rise in scammers with inflated trust scores. I did receive feedback from Stunna for participating but personally I'd rather all the participants (including me) have the feedback taken away from them than me just keep quiet and keep my extra positive trust rating.
Just quoting this to bring it back into Stunna's eye. In my opinion this is an issue that does need to be addressed, rather than ignored - the longer it is left for the higher the chance of it being abused. |
|
|
|
I do believe he was trolling  Anyway, I sent a PM to the OP. If you don't like my rate then I understand, it's a take it or leave it offer. |
|
|
|
Bitcoin address: 1C8t6WoNCoJkXiH56xGGUGzGPXSfZBoEBF
Starting posts: 114
You're in Are you accepting members with -ve trust too ? Hi newIndia, We will accept players with negative trust on a case-by-case basis. In this instance we didn't feel there was any evidence that should prevent the member from being a part of our campaign. Cheers, Dennis Cloudbet You think that the fact a forum administrator previously gave this person a scammer tag for scamming isn't evidence enough? That's quite surprising in my honest opinion. |
|
|
|
|
I want to like it - I really do - but I just don't think it's morally right for me or anyone to support a show which is sponsored by funds from BFL, the well known "let's screw our customers over" company.
|
|
|
|
Nah, he's still there, on the 2nd depth on DefaultTrust. My trust list is this: dooglus
Maged
Vod
Tomatocage
SaltySpitoon
BadBear
KWH
escrow.ms
DefaultTrust
|
|
|
|
He's one of the 195 people under CanaryInTheMine. I'm not particularly surprised that you're unable to find him (it's like looking for a needle in a haystack ), CTRL+F should help you. |
|
|
|
|
IMHO I don't think dishing out feedback to those who participate is a good idea at all, especially with someone on DefaultTrust like Stunna. It's only going to make us see a rise in scammers with inflated trust scores. I did receive feedback from Stunna for participating but personally I'd rather all the participants (including me) have the feedback taken away from them than me just keep quiet and keep my extra positive trust rating.
|
|
|
|
The Trust System works fine, but one of the things I have a beef with is where people who CLEARLY have no idea how to handle DefaultTrust get onto DefaultTrust. A prime example of this is LittleD - I can appreciate his/her intentions - they're good (personally I think Inaba is a scumbag too) - but holy crap LittleD enjoys trust spam. It takes ages to even find negative feedback left by others on Inaba, for instance, because there must be 10+ negative feedback consisting of "SCAmmer" repeated over and over left on him just by LittleD. Seriously - look at that Sent Feedback. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=144519IMHO the idea of "oh this person participated in a trade/whatever that involved me, let's put them onto DefaultTrust" is terrible. There are people who are trusted by people who have never even left trust on them. This inevitably means that those who have no idea how to use the system get put into a position of power in it. |
|
|
|
|
I've already left negative trust. This is getting ridiculous now and in my opinion this should be classified as a scam until they pull their pants up and actually start paying dividends. Good luck getting IceDrill to buy back shares.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
