Bitcoin Forum
May 26, 2024, 10:06:20 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 [86] 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 ... 197 »
1701  Bitcoin / Mining / Re: NAMG - North American Miner Group - New Concept, NEED INPUT from YOU! on: October 13, 2015, 07:20:27 PM
Greetings, I currently I run a small farm of 70Th, I was thinking about an idea of a consortium, or group, or club with members, that Combine their equipment in one managed facility, the electric bill is paid without markup by the members, the members all pay a monthly mandatory donation to the club of 20% of what their miners made that month or flat membership dues.  This btc or dues goe into an operating budget for the club.  The club has a board that makes decisions.  Cost of the club are covered by the members..   I have lots of idea's, but lets hear yours, and yes I would be willing to build and or manage the facility, and yes I already have a facility I own and operate but with this club Idea i'm thinking a new facility, I can build it no problem as Ive built 3 datacenters before.  Each members would be an owner who could sell their share to someone else later if they choose, and we have max membership of 100 members. Who own minimum hashing power of 10TH

Lets have an open discussion with lots of input from miners and what everyone thinks of this idea?

Some specs, in chicago .06 cents per kwh, warehouse rent at about $6-8 sq ft.  power would be at least 800 amp 480v 3/phase $.06 per kwh, and maybe less on volume.  Off the top of my head without doin the math, I'd aim for about 500Th - 5 Ph facility.

What would you be willing to do, or specs you's like to see.


ok, go..


I like the price but I think you need to refine the buisness plan.  There is a HUGE difference your range "500Th - 5 Ph facility.".   The electricity requirements just are not close, or same on gear.

You need to start lower and work up.    I dont see jumping into a 5 PH facility you have lots of cooling to ad and many other things.  I would start on low end and see how it goes and upgrade higher if you max capacity.

I would have to agree that the main missed point here is the cooling situation.  500 TH/s is a lot to cool, and 5 PH/s needs pretty much a dedicated facility built from scratch to maintain that.

Also, you are quite a new member, and no offense, but in the past new members who come right out and say send me miner gear/money usually don't end up doing to well.
1702  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: NEW: Hashnest PACMiC V3 - 0.666 BTC/THS on: October 12, 2015, 01:45:03 PM
v4 got an update (correction) now it is based on the S7
Still a bad deal either way.

At least its a better deal.  You will make back your investment as opposed to not being able to recover your funds.  Interest sucks compared to V3, but its better than nothing.
1703  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: HASHNEST Discussion and Support Thread on: October 11, 2015, 03:21:10 AM
Hi,

I'm just typing some figures into the bitcoin mining calculators and i can't seem to see the s7 on hashnest making a profit in a year. Am I doing something wrong here ?

I've used :

http://jblevins.org/btcmpc/

and

https://tradeblock.com/bitcoin/mining/

using the dats :

Hash power - 4870 Ghs
Power consumption : 1210 watts
Maint fees : 0.0976
hardware cost - 1923.

Am I doing something wrong here ?



Nope, you seem to be doing the math correctly. There is other value besides what the miner mines as well though, like residual value of the miner.
1704  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Hashnest 's newest PACMiC Cloud Mining Contract on: October 09, 2015, 09:38:50 PM
Looks like the description of V4 has been changed to using the S7 for hashing.  Not a great return, but at least you can now get your money back before the unit becomes unprofitable to run.

I will now be buying a few.
1705  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: HASHNEST Discussion and Support Thread on: October 09, 2015, 09:38:27 PM
Looks like the description of V4 has been changed to using the S7 for hashing.  Not a great return, but at least you can now get your money back before the unit becomes unprofitable to run.

I will now be buying a few.
1706  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Hashnest 's newest PACMiC Cloud Mining Contract on: October 08, 2015, 02:28:25 PM
Pacmic v4 is a shame.
The ROI is the same as the Pacmic v2 !
With the Antminer S7 (low electricity cost), it will be a lot better that Pacmic v3.

I am very disappointed !

In addition, with these unattractive conditions, the 20,000 contracts will take a very long time to sell (at least as long as Pacmic v2): no hope for Pacmic v5 before long time :-( !

Edit : at the curent rate, 80 daysminimum  to sell the 20,000 Pacmic v4 contracts (no Pacmic V5 before Noël).

I still don't believe my eyes when I see that people actually is buying the contracts. v4 is a joke!

Ehh only very few are buying, probably the same people who are going to come back in 120 days, when the S5 is no longer profitable to run, and complain that they are being screwed by Hashnest and its all a big scam instead of admitting that they made a bad investment.

I think they are still on holiday until tomorrow, so perhaps when people start getting back into the office and noticing that it either wasn't offered correctly or something, they will take another look at make a better offer for V4.
1707  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: HASHNEST Discussion and Support Thread on: October 06, 2015, 02:50:14 PM
Bitmain just now deleted a thread in its forum where a user was calling hashnest a scam. in this thread we came to the conclusion that hashnests "luck" is too low and there must be some reason for that. maybe they claim to have more hashrate than they actually do have.

not the point.

THEY CENSORED US!





Or maybe it was off topic and not pertinent to the discussion/untrue.  Can you share the hard facts that were brought forth in that thread that specifically pertain to them being a scam?  This starts up every couple of weeks about how it is impossible to have as bad as luck as they do, but no one ever presents hard facts, and they only seem to complain in the downtrends, but are perfectly happy to accept the times where luck is above 100%.
1708  Economy / Service Announcements / Re: [ANN] HaoBTC, mining dividend paid out hourly on: October 06, 2015, 01:41:34 PM
Going to give this a try. I'm assuming the finance part is a fixed term loan with higher interest rate?



Also more initial capital.  I believe you must put in 10 bitcoins minimum.  But yes higher interest rate, but still the ability to withdraw at any time, you just lose the interest accumulated for the current month.
1709  Economy / Service Announcements / Re: [ANN] HaoBTC, mining dividend paid out hourly on: October 05, 2015, 01:36:43 AM
How many confirmations normally does it take to get coins in?  I have 10 confirmations and they haven't shown up yet.  Will email support.

it's actually pretty fast. 10 conf is way too long.

Update, my deposits have shown up.
1710  Economy / Service Announcements / Re: [ANN] HaoBTC, mining dividend paid out hourly on: October 05, 2015, 12:20:21 AM
How many confirmations normally does it take to get coins in?  I have 10 confirmations and they haven't shown up yet.  Will email support.
1711  Economy / Digital goods / Re: what should be price of my account on: October 04, 2015, 05:35:29 AM
Your account is worth what someone is willing to pay for it.  Not a penny more nor a penny less.
1712  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: NEW: Hashnest PACMiC V3 - 0.666 BTC/THS on: October 03, 2015, 05:16:24 PM
I think investors are showing that they know its too risky and are not buying much of the V4 contracts.  Over a day running and less than 400 TH/s sold. The V3 had petahashes sold in the first 24 hours.  Hopefully Bitmain will get the message and structure this better.  Even basing it off of the S7 will allow me to buy some of them knowing I will be getting a return, although less, I will at least have a chance of getting my funds back before its unprofitable to run.
1713  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: NEW: Hashnest PACMiC V3 - 0.666 BTC/THS on: October 02, 2015, 01:57:10 PM
It doesn't look like they have posted a new thread yet, so my analysis will go here for now...

I always start by looking at how long the contract will take to pay off at a 5% diff increase.  At current price level and 5% increase, 1 TH/s will pay back 1 btc in about 170 days.  Much higher than where we used to be for V3 and V2.

Then, I look at how much longer the underlying machine backing the asset will be profitable for at the same 5% diff increase.  At the same conditions, the S5 will no longer be profitable to run after about 120 days.

So right off the bat, this contract will take longer to pay back the initial investment than the unit will be profitable for.  Of course, 5% difficulty is on the higher side of things lately, but I actually think it will be under a few changes we are about to see in October and November due to releasing of the S7 by Bitmain and whatever Spondoolies has up their sleeves with their new monster hasher.  Either way, its not giving me a great vote of confidence right off the bat for the V4.

And finally, based on my spreadsheet here...
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1zbKKyXtW0vcfGDufk_UIRg_gAi0JzjsFwvB7LGj8bOI/edit?usp=sharing
The V4 contract has an APR of roughly 7.15%, which is right in line with V2 and about 5% lower than V3.

Conclusion: I have really liked the PACMiC's since they first launched, they have been a great sort of CD that have provided better rates than a normal CD and have allowed me to park my funds in them for some easy profits.  With V4 though, it seems less thought out than the other versions and presents a much higher risk that the underlying hashpower will become unprofitable to run before it has paid back the entire principal amount.  I will not be buying V4 contracts at the current offering they are being presented as.
1714  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: NEW: Hashnest PACMiC V3 - 0.666 BTC/THS on: October 02, 2015, 01:03:55 PM
First impressions suggest this contract is not as good as V3, and is more in line with V2.  Will have to run the numbers through a spreadsheet once I get into work to find what the APR would be.  They are claiming 14.1912% annual ROI for V4, they claimed over 25% for V3.

The V3 is looking closer to a little over half of that, so I would estimate V4 to be around 8% annual ROI maybe, just based off of a rough guess.

Either way, it doesn't matter as the S5 is at 60% maintenance, which worries me, with the current difficulty jumps we have been having, about how long it will continue to remain profitable.

Let me run some numbers and I will post here a little later.
1715  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Smart Miner 3.0 on: October 01, 2015, 03:16:00 PM
I was searching Craigslist and found a guy selling some S5's and a few Smart Miner 3.0 miners ...

So I looked up what a Smart Miner 3.0 is  and came across the website:

https://www.minerslab.com/product/smart-miner-3-0-rack-mount-20ths-bitcoin-miner/


I also came across some board chatter from skeptics and whatnot who were commenting that it has to be a scam. These comments were posted months ago...  HOWEVER, no proof. I have not run across any comments or rants that people have been scammed, nor have I run across any comments about how the Smart Miner 3.0 works in the real world ( not just on the minerslab.com site )

I'm assuming some people have purchased these units... at lease one person did, the person selling them on Craigslist.

So, is there any definite proof the Smart Miner 3.0 is a scam?
If someone bought some, how are they working for you? (screen shots would be awesome)





I think I remember reading about the SMART miner awhile ago.  If you look at their website, they are offering 20TH/s for 2100 watts of power.  That is half the power consumption of Bitmains brand new chip.  I find it hard to believe that a company no one has ever heard of has somehow developed a chip that beats the leading manufacturer in the Bitcoin space, not by a little, but literally blowing their machines out of the water.

Contact the guy on Craigslist and ask to see the miner and see them in action.  I would not buy a thing unless he can verify in person that it indeed gets 20TH/s while using 2100 watts of power.  That sounds way to good to be true, and usually when it is too good to be true, it usually is.

EDIT: I am also fairly sure that the picture they are using on their website is a stock photo that many scams have used time and time again of an old computer, can't remember the name off of the top of my head though.  Also, not sure why they would mention you can plug a mouse and keyboard into it, that means nothing and shouldn't really do anything.  Also, have 2 Ethernet ports is a little weird.  Personally, just too many little weird things that collectively add up to equaling scam.
1716  Economy / Service Announcements / Re: [ANN] HaoBTC, mining dividend paid out hourly on: September 30, 2015, 09:22:34 PM
I think Haobtc is becoming more legit day by day, since they have partnered with Antpool to become more transparent Smiley There are so many scam sites with "Too Good To Be True" schemes but here I feel that they are actually making money. Keep it up guys! Smiley

Link to where they partnered with Antpool?

Head on to Antpool.com and see the footer links Wink

Nice, not sure on what that means though.  Certainly they are not vouching for the authenticity of Haobtc?
1717  Economy / Service Announcements / Re: [ANN] HaoBTC, mining dividend paid out hourly on: September 30, 2015, 09:20:00 PM
I think Haobtc is becoming more legit day by day, since they have partnered with Antpool to become more transparent Smiley There are so many scam sites with "Too Good To Be True" schemes but here I feel that they are actually making money. Keep it up guys! Smiley

Link to where they partnered with Antpool?
1718  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: BITMAIN AntRouter R1: 1st wireless networking device with bitcoin mining chip on: September 30, 2015, 03:16:07 PM
Shipping is too expensive.  Why pay more for shipping than the device actually costs.  The ones shipping to US residents should already be in the US and can be shipped out for 5 dollars max.
Definitely need a batch sent to the US for resale here, there is no decent way of buying this in the US currently.

I think the price is fair for the unit, for what it is capable of doing, but paying more than the device cost to have it shipped to me just seems wrong.
1719  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: BITMAIN AntRouter R1: 1st wireless networking device with bitcoin mining chip on: September 30, 2015, 02:33:38 PM
Shipping is too expensive.  Why pay more for shipping than the device actually costs.  The ones shipping to US residents should already be in the US and can be shipped out for 5 dollars max.
1720  Economy / Service Announcements / Re: Bitmain Launches New Product: BTC Wallet on: September 30, 2015, 02:20:49 PM
Very interesting development.  I will have to take a look at the wallet a little later.
Pages: « 1 ... 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 [86] 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 ... 197 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!