I have not sold any tokens to the public. I realize your IQ is only 90, but I've written this already in this very short thread.

How does one prepare to fund their retirement if they don't work for both an idea they believe in and for money  

How do we reward a meritocracy if we don't account for higher productivity with money  

I like to work for an ideal/idea also, but I also want to know that my collaborators and users will be more profitable from it.

Perhaps we will reach an abundance economy one day, and then we will work only for reputation and a gift economy. But for now that is definitely not the case because TPTB (the power-law wealth, power vacuum reality) prevent us from achieving our maximum productivity.

No.

Note CfB claims he showed his passport in the past. I haven't seen it and IMO his passport is irrelevant. What I wanted to know is what he accomplished before Nxt and JINN/Iota.

Note when I asked him, I was thinking I wanted to know this to see if he is worthy of proposing collaboration and vice versa, if I am worthy relatively speaking. But as I have thought more about this, I realized that the lack of LinkedIn account makes him unsuitable for the route I want to go with crowdfunding a startup corporation. I need developers who have strong reputations (stronger than mine, because I stopped working in 2006 for the most part although I did continue researching and learning, it is hard to show that because I didn't publish much since 2006. Also I realized that he probably wouldn't be so interested for a too ambitious project that demands a longer-term commitment. And I realized I would be having doubts about whether he would be truly concerned about the value of the software he is creating. I take a huge pride in the software I create and I don't want to knowingly produce something which I think is not going to do what is purports to do. The reason I quit Coolpage, is because after several attempts I was unable to figure out a way to marry pixel-perfect placement with generalized HTML import and export. Thus I realized I was making crap software and I became disillusioned. I really want to believe in what I am working on, which is one reason I've been slow to make an altcoin because I wasn't satisfied that the issues that plague the altcoins could actually be fixed (and I still have doubts even for my own design).

Eastern European and Russian programmers are an enigma to me. I was told (in May or June 2015) they try to find a way to earn the most money with the least work. I was told this by one of them, when I explained why I was having trouble understanding the way they approached my offers to collaborate.


I must admit I also try to be clever with efficiency of code sometimes. And also with priorities and organization.

But I am also recognizing that I no longer have the sole capability to code 24 x 7 as I did for CoolPage and thus I need to collaborate. And I think this is a normal pattern as someone ages, they become more valued for their management skills and experience than their raw coding productivity.

I am hopeful that my coding productivity will still be high. Getting off this forum is the first step for me.

I am not trying to control.

I intended to stop posting and still do intend to.

I just decided I wanted a poll that asked the question the right way and allowed everyone to vote for as many coins as they wish so we can get a more accurate reflection of the sentiment on the forum. I am pleasantly surprised to see that the forum actually does reasonably understand that most of the altcoins are scams (although they needed some help from me to see that for example Factom is hyping a nonsense design).

So this further confirms to me that I need to leave this forum because it is very unprofessional and is for people who have addiction issues.

I want to get back to working with professionals in the industry. I let myself slide away from that over the past decade. I want to create software for users, not for addicted people or people who want to steal from others by trying to be the winner in the greater fool theory of investing that causes most to be losers. I am interested in speculators who invest to better the world.

So this poll is a way of confirming to me that I am wasting my time here.

We end up like what we chose to work on, invest in, and be involved in.

Mix yourself with low lifes, and you will end up a low life also. I speak from first-hand experience of seeing my life disintegrate based on a choice who to associate with in my 30s.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4-k2JCV4TCs

My health problem is physical, not mental. I assure you. I am eager enough about life. I have all the motivation I want here in the Philippines. The problem is my body is physically messed up and I am trying to find a cure.

Can we stop this off-topic discussion now.

Analyzing technology and pointing out egregious flaws is an accomplishment and those egregious flaws mean they haven't delivered anything but scams and hype.

You resent the truth. Sorry for that. You can complain to the Universe.


It is a possibility. I have seriously entertained the possibility that my testosterone is too low and reinstated my barbell workouts this week, which seems to really help a lot.

But the problem was all during 2015, after I did a barbell workout, I crashed into Chronic Fatigue Syndrome the next days. Lately on the herbal tea, I have good energy most of the time. But my legs are still not performing normally (extreme weakness to the point of pain while sitting and don't have ompph often when try to run). Will test for testosterone level soon.

rangedriver thinks fungal infection turning the hormone system estrogen. I am also considering a cancer on the endocrine region of the pancreas which could affect hormones. The decline I have is not normal for my age. It is like what I man might face past the age of 90.

You have not made any technology argument, because you can't.

I have not claimed terminally ill. I said unknown illness; and I was so ill in Q3 of 2015 that I started to consider the possibility of it being terminal. I have some improvement past week or so, perhaps due to this multi-herbal tea I am drinking several times daily. Also my diet and defecation has normlized recently with oatmeal and stopped eating fried foods after I was diagnosed with fatty liver and sludge in my bile (which wasn't a complete explanation for my symptoms but did motivate me to modify my diet).

How much BTC are you willing to bet that I don't have a chronic illness in my gut and peripheral neuropathy? I can then produce notarized medical documents and take your BTC from the escrow.

Are you betting or not?


Liar. No one has refuted my technology points in 2016. No one. Zilch. Not even once in 2016.

Nxt and JINN Labs. Selling illegal unregistered IPO/ICO securities to US investors.

I have never done that in my entire life. I have instead more than once coded software which attained more than million users. Real world accomplishments. And not shady.

Try reading my post again to see the various methods I can employ to build a preponderance of evidence that you are important in software.

Knowing a language is not the same as being highly proficient and is not a metric of producing major accomplishments. I don't doubt you can code, rather I don't know whether you've always been working on shady stuff or if you actually done mainstream important work ever.

I want to see your entire career and education history so I know who you are and what you have accomplished. Anyone can claim to know several programming languages. I do too. But accomplishments are what demonstrate that someone would want to hire you.

Also to see that the people you've worked for/with in the past, do maintain a link with you on LinkedIn and thus that your career wasn't a script kiddie hacker stealing codes. And to see what sort of accomplishments the people you have worked with, have made. To get some feel for if you have been important in software.

Lies and hype. Thus proving why they are scams.

No evidence of strong teams. Where is the career history and accomplishments.

Note I asked CfB if we could be contacts on LinkedIn, and he doesn't maintain a LinkedIn profile. What professional programmer these days doesn't maintain a LinkedIn profile. For public figure and to have a solid reputation, I think this is a must. Who is this David that is the principle behind Iota? What is his history and background?

This altcoin arena is dominated by scams because we don't demand that the lead developers are public figures and responsible for opening themselves up to scrutiny. We have no idea what these developers have accomplished in the real world over their careers.

I became more amenable to Monero, when fluffypony was shown on video recently at the Satoshi Roundtable. But I still lack information about the Monero devs backgrounds and history.

I think we should all demand our developers come out from the shadows and put themselves at-risk of public scruntiny.


Edit: the major pumpers of a coin, e.g. qwizzie, should also make their LinkedIn profiles available. Does Evan @ Dash have a LinkedIn profile?

qwizzie the known #1 Dash pumper (and thus scammer),


The definition in the OP requires tokens to be for sale. I have no tokens for sale.

I know you Dash thieves don't like clear logic.

I said they are highly correlated if a smoothing filter is applied. Gold does a dead-cat pump, then BTC does, repeat. And the overall trend of the two is down since start of 2014 (gold's decent started 2011 but BTC hadn't yet matured and was in the early adopter phase).

The mistake of the above chart is the same reason that Armstrong's computer can detect patterns that humans miss. The above chart only considers one-dimension for the time axis. Whereas, my explanation has 2 dimensions for the time-axis.

I said they are highly correlated if a smoothing filter is applied. Gold does a dead-cat pump, then BTC does, repeat. And the overall trend of the two is down since start of 2014 (gold's decent started 2011 but BTC hadn't yet matured and was in the early adopter phase).

The mistake of the above chart is the same reason that Armstrong's computer can detect patterns that humans miss. The above chart only considers one-dimension for the time axis. Whereas, my explanation has 2 dimensions for the time-axis.

You did not solve the The Faster Algorithm Attack (FAA). Your proposed solution is incoherent and it doesn't matter what you propose, it will always be flawed because the problem is insoluble:


Also the attacker can DDoS the system by submitting a verification algorithm that is orders-of-magnitude slower than the attacker's proving algorithm.

This entire concept is insoluble and flawed and any fool who invests in this shit deserves to lose their money.