On the non-logarithm scaled chart, Ethereum broke down through the February pump support, and the next support is from the January support line which currently extends to about 0.0164 BTC ≈ $7: https://dc-charts.com/chart_eth.php?ex=16&cu=0&tz=6&ar=1On the logarithm scaled chart, Ethereum broken down through all support lines and there is no support. |
|
|
|
On the non-logarithm scaled chart, Ethereum broke down through the February pump support, and the next support is from the January support line which currently extends to about 0.0164 BTC ≈ $7: https://dc-charts.com/chart_eth.php?ex=16&cu=0&tz=6&ar=1On the logarithm scaled chart, Ethereum broken down through all support lines and there is no support. |
|
|
|
More FUD.
More factless, vacuous, spam pumping FUD. |
|
|
|
Paypal, like all transaction-intermediaries, are required to provide fraud protection. They sometimes freeze accounts, and also there are sometimes misinterpretations and odd statements made. They long ago unfroze those assets, just like they did for Notch at Minecraft.
This is the benefit of credit cards: fraud protection and monitoring. They will need to do less of it when transactions are secured. In the meanwhile I'm glad, for one, that they do it.
Paypal locked my account because I sold some Bitcoin for Paypal on localbitcoins and that person apparently was using a stolen Paypal account, so then Paypal reversed the payment so I lost $600. But not only did I lose $600, but Paypal locked my account which is already verified and which has many years of many transactions with no fraud. If crowdfunding was with a non-repudiable payment such as Bitcoin, then the contributor can't later claim they didn't understand that the payment is non-repudiable and thus their only recourse to a broken contract is in the correct venue of a court-of-law. In this case, the repudiable payment is incompatible with what is being paid for. This is one of many examples where crypto-currency is superior to credit cards. Now we have an example of Indiegogo ostensibly knowingly aiding an ostensibly illegal unregistered investment security being sold to non-accredited USA investors, and I conjecture they are hesitating to cancel the campaign because of the ostensibly huge risk of chargebacks if they taint the prior $151,300 in contributions. |
|
|
|
Gresham's law - all alts are dumped for BTC. No stores will accept them until they get their own dollar pegs and then they might climb the ladder of store of value.
Good point. Note r0ach I think I will do something about this, but we will see...
58:00 - Block chains can't out perform Tx/sec of Visa w/o losing the trustless attribute. I will challenge him on that with my white paper and argue that we can't have the trustless attribute w/o scaling! |
|
|
|
Gresham's law - all alts are dumped for BTC. No stores will accept them until they get their own dollar pegs and then they might climb the ladder of store of value.
Good point. Note r0ach I think I will do something about this, but we will see... |
|
|
|
smooth are you not understanding my logic? Everything Evan is writing in that document appears to me to be incriminating. Here is another example:
Did you see me disagree? Incriminating or not, at best it is obviously all double-talk, half truths, and speculation presented as fact. That alone is enough to make any sane person want to stay the fuck away. It is either fact that he could know what he claims to know, in which case they need to disclose all the facts they knew. For example, if they can know what all first miners did, then they must disclose the numbers. Else it is speculation painted as fact which is a violation of proper disclosure for investment securities. So either way, it appears to be incriminating w.r.t. securities law in the USA, but note IANAL. The House of Cards known as XCoin, DarkCoin, DRK, Dash, Dashpay, appears to be nearing its deathstar destiny. |
|
|
|
smooth are you not understanding my logic? Everything Evan is writing in that document appears to me to be incriminating. Here is another example: 6. These early mined tokens had no value at the time and many people just traded them OTC or sold them in exchanges very early on. There was no benchmark and no way to know Dash was going to grow and become a bigger project so most first day miners just sold their coins.
How can he know what the first day miners did on OTC unless he was buying all the coins that were sold or was in communication with all the first day miners. He claiming or admitting that the first day miners were a close knit group. smooth are you not understanding my logic? Everything Evan is writing in that document appears to me to be incriminating. Here is another example:
Did you see me disagree? Incriminating or not, at best it is obviously all double-talk, half truths, and speculation presented as fact. That alone is enough to make any sane person want to stay the fuck away. It is either fact that he could know what he claims to know, in which case they need to disclose all the facts they knew. For example, if they can know what all first miners did, then they must disclose the numbers. Else it is speculation painted as fact which is a violation of proper disclosure for investment securities. So either way, it appears to be incriminating w.r.t. securities law in the USA, but note IANAL. The House of Cards known as XCoin, DarkCoin, DRK, Dash, Dashpay, appears to be nearing its deathstar destiny. |
|
|
|
smooth are you not understanding my logic? Everything Evan is writing in that document appears to me to be incriminating. Here is another example: 6. These early mined tokens had no value at the time and many people just traded them OTC or sold them in exchanges very early on. There was no benchmark and no way to know Dash was going to grow and become a bigger project so most first day miners just sold their coins.
How can he know what the first day miners did on OTC unless he was buying all the coins that were sold or was in communication with all the first day miners. He claiming or admitting that the first day miners were a close knit group. |
|
|
|
And unfortunately Indiegogo hasn't replied further and appears to be doing nothing about this. More people have been allowed to contribute to the campaign since I reported the Prohibited Perks to Indiegogo.
Indiegogo is now knowingly facilitating this investment fraud.
So many days have transpired and Indiegogo has not stopped this campaign which continues to receive new contributions which are ostensibly being offered rimbit tokens in exchange: https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/a-better-bitcoin-will-you-wait-till-its-to-late/x/13712033#/fundersThe last response I had from Rimbit was dated April 3: Brian Sunday at 08:19 Hi Shelby, Thank you for sharing your concern with us. At this time, the campaign is under review to ensure that it adheres to our Terms of Use ( http://www.indiegogo.com/about/terms). So what happens now? We will include the information you have provided along with all other information at our disposal in our review of the campaign. In some cases, we will contact the campaign owner to have them edit their campaign and it will remain on our platform. If the project doesn't follow our rules, we may remove the campaign. We may also restrict the campaign owner's future activities on Indiegogo. To protect our users' privacy, we're unable to share the action we take. At Indiegogo, we take the trust and safety of our community very seriously, and we greatly appreciate your patience and understanding throughout this review process. To learn more about Indiegogo’s Trust & Safety effort, please visit: www.indiegogo.com/trustPlease note that you do not need to contact us again. Doing so would create a new ticket and prolong the process. Thank you again for taking the time to get in touch with us and for helping to keep Indiegogo a safe and secure platform. Regards, Brian Trust and Safety |
|
|
|
And unfortunately Indiegogo hasn't replied further and appears to be doing nothing about this. More people have been allowed to contribute to the campaign since I reported the Prohibited Perks to Indiegogo.
Indiegogo is now knowingly facilitating this investment fraud.
So many days have transpired and Indiegogo has not stopped this campaign which continues to receive new contributions which are ostensibly being offered rimbit tokens in exchange: https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/a-better-bitcoin-will-you-wait-till-its-to-late/x/13712033#/fundersThe last response I had from Rimbit was dated April 3: Brian Sunday at 08:19 Hi Shelby, Thank you for sharing your concern with us. At this time, the campaign is under review to ensure that it adheres to our Terms of Use ( http://www.indiegogo.com/about/terms). So what happens now? We will include the information you have provided along with all other information at our disposal in our review of the campaign. In some cases, we will contact the campaign owner to have them edit their campaign and it will remain on our platform. If the project doesn't follow our rules, we may remove the campaign. We may also restrict the campaign owner's future activities on Indiegogo. To protect our users' privacy, we're unable to share the action we take. At Indiegogo, we take the trust and safety of our community very seriously, and we greatly appreciate your patience and understanding throughout this review process. To learn more about Indiegogo’s Trust & Safety effort, please visit: www.indiegogo.com/trustPlease note that you do not need to contact us again. Doing so would create a new ticket and prolong the process. Thank you again for taking the time to get in touch with us and for helping to keep Indiegogo a safe and secure platform. Regards, Brian Trust and Safety |
|
|
|
And unfortunately Indiegogo hasn't replied further and appears to be doing nothing about this. More people have been allowed to contribute to the campaign since I reported the Prohibited Perks to Indiegogo.
Indiegogo is now knowingly facilitating this investment fraud.
So many days have transpired and Indiegogo has not stopped this campaign which continues to receive new contributions which are ostensibly being offered rimbit tokens in exchange: https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/a-better-bitcoin-will-you-wait-till-its-to-late/x/13712033#/fundersThe last response I had from Rimbit was dated April 3: Brian Sunday at 08:19 Hi Shelby, Thank you for sharing your concern with us. At this time, the campaign is under review to ensure that it adheres to our Terms of Use ( http://www.indiegogo.com/about/terms). So what happens now? We will include the information you have provided along with all other information at our disposal in our review of the campaign. In some cases, we will contact the campaign owner to have them edit their campaign and it will remain on our platform. If the project doesn't follow our rules, we may remove the campaign. We may also restrict the campaign owner's future activities on Indiegogo. To protect our users' privacy, we're unable to share the action we take. At Indiegogo, we take the trust and safety of our community very seriously, and we greatly appreciate your patience and understanding throughout this review process. To learn more about Indiegogo’s Trust & Safety effort, please visit: www.indiegogo.com/trustPlease note that you do not need to contact us again. Doing so would create a new ticket and prolong the process. Thank you again for taking the time to get in touch with us and for helping to keep Indiegogo a safe and secure platform. Regards, Brian Trust and Safety |
|
|
|
3. Once the issue was recognized, the founder of the coin issued a fix within a few hours to adjust the difficulty more quickly than the algorithm included in the Litecoin code.
Appears they've just incriminated themselves, by admitting they didn't immediately halt the mining by informing the public and declaring a fork with a restart was forthcoming, but instead let the instamine run on for several hours. 4. The only two members of the development team at the time were Evan Duffield and InternetApe. InternetApe sold all his coins early on, and is no longer involved with the project. All other members of the current team joined later. InternetApe was able to accumulate 160K DASH over the first weeks of the project so that should provide an idea of the range a founding member was able to accumulate. So the launch issues and high rewards happened to everyone equally and there was no bad intention, just part of a young hobby project that later became a much more serious project.
How can Evan know that Kyle Hagan sold all his DRK unless Evan was controlling Kyle's mining equipment. Notice how Evan refused to disclose how many DRK he mined. He also doesn't disclose who Kyle sold his DRK to and for what price. |
|
|
|
That was a thought provoking article, thanks! I agree with much of that analysis for small amounts as he suggested, but for larger amounts I'm not sure. I think we can break tipping into two groups - passive tipping, where you tip someone for content they already produced like a blog, and interactive tipping, where you tip someone for a response they give you. I think the 2nd type has much more potential to generate meaningful income
@TPTB, you for example, could open a Q&A thread for tech & other advice. An answer that takes you a few minutes to write *might* be worth thousands to the questioner. That type of thing would probably fall under 'tipping' but it's different to a fractional penny, and if it was easier to do it might take off.
Problem is that maybe only the person who asks tips you and the rest just decide you've already been paid. The problem with that model is opportunity cost. I am not going to waste my time for $10 per Q&A answer, because my opportunity cost is potentially $millions (for myself, and $billions for society) and I answer for other reasons that pertain to me attaining that $millions goal. |
|
|
|
|
ProfessionalGoogler put on my Ignore list so his numerous vacuous, hypocrite ETH spam (FUD/pumper) threads are greyed out, so I won't bother clicking them anymore. Suggest others do the same. He has nothing to say that is factual.
There is only one thread you need to read, which is Ethereum Paradox. ProfessionalGoogler is afraid to post there, because he knows he has no valid technical argument.
|
|
|
|
The damage done by selling unregistered, ostensibly illegal, investment securities to non-accredited (n00b) lunch money speculators: [...]
I warned you upthread that I don't hate you or Synereo's group, yet you were trying to make me hate you. Well you failed. I pity you, but don't have time for that either.
Edit: what is really sad is that you claim to be ideologically driven for the betterment of mankind, yet you waste precious time on nonsense when in fact I have a good chance of being the one who can help us achieve that. All because of those stupid AMPs. This is the damage that preselling ICOs does. Because you were fooled and made an error and now associate your angst/disappointed/disbelief with me.
|
|
|
|
Dash apparently continues to deny transparent disclosure: More deceptive and misleading statements about the instamine that Dash continues to use to scam investors even now, this time an in "Official Communication". https://dashpay.atlassian.net/wiki/display/OC/Dash+Instamine+Issue+ClarificationRepeats many of the unsupportable or false claims mentioned in the OP from the old Darkcoin FAQ such as coins being redistributed, the nature of the distribution, and where and how large holders obtained their coins. Omits critical information about key events surrounding the instamine such as the early launch and the deliberate withholding of development plans until after the instamine was complete. Also mischaracterizes the origin of the instamine coins as being the Litecoin difficulty adjustment algorithm which is absolutely false. Most of the "extra coins" came from the absurdly-high block rewards due to a "bug" (500 coins/block IIRC, roughly 285 times higher than now). If Dash had constant block rewards as did Litecoin (for four years), its instamine would have been very small, as Litecoin's was (in fact even smaller, since the Dash had a difficulty adjustments at 4x the frequency of Litecoin).
3. Once the issue was recognized, the founder of the coin issued a fix within a few hours to adjust the difficulty more quickly than the algorithm included in the Litecoin code.
Appears they've just incriminated themselves, by admitting they didn't immediately halt the mining by informing the public and declaring a fork with a restart was forthcoming, but instead let the instamine run on for several hours. 4. The only two members of the development team at the time were Evan Duffield and InternetApe. InternetApe sold all his coins early on, and is no longer involved with the project. All other members of the current team joined later. InternetApe was able to accumulate 160K DASH over the first weeks of the project so that should provide an idea of the range a founding member was able to accumulate. So the launch issues and high rewards happened to everyone equally and there was no bad intention, just part of a young hobby project that later became a much more serious project.
How can Evan know that Kyle Hagan sold all his DRK unless Evan was controlling Kyle's mining equipment. Notice how Evan refused to disclose how many DRK he mined. He also doesn't disclose who Kyle sold his DRK to and for what price. |
|
|
|
DE, I have work to do. Please stop demanding my time with your unproductive, childish trolling. Find some other ego tree to hump. After years of frustration, I decided to crowdsource the cure to my illness. You are trying to pump unregistered AMPs investment securities for a decentralized social network which is a copy of so many that already came before it, yet you claim crowdsourcing is a pathetic and perverted activity. Then you allege my original artwork is a copy of everything that came before it. Hypocrite. Anonymous trolling prick. Dumb. Disgrace to our brave ancestors. End of story. Ignored. I warned you upthread that I don't hate you or Synereo's group, yet you were trying to make me hate you. Well you failed. I pity you, but don't have time for that either. Edit: what is really sad is that you claim to be ideologically driven for the betterment of mankind, yet you waste precious time on nonsense when in fact I have a good chance of being the one who can help us achieve that. All because of those stupid AMPs. This is the damage that preselling ICOs does. Because you were fooled and made an error and now associate your angst/disappointed/disbelief with me. |
|
|
|
"Not very smart"? Who's got the STD?
Thanks for again proving my point that you are not very smart. Let's see how many years it takes for you to figure that out. Hint: Beethoven and Abraham Lincoln Edit: how is someone stupid for getting an STD when making love to their spouse  And I have not tested positive for any STD. I have no idea how you've concluded I have an STD. I'm not going to beat up the mentally incapacitated.
You would get your ass kicked (presuming you start the fight and I must defend myself). Don't delude yourself. Any way, you are still an anonymous trolling prick who refuses to stand behind his real name. |
|
|
|
...because I (and my ancestors, if they were still alive) would run your STD ridden husk of a body out of town.
You will accomplish nothing with that. In which town are you in the USA? I will come test your threat. Also please reveal your real name. Otherwise stop talking trash from behind an anonymous username. I'm not telling you where I live, because I don't want your disgusting, perverted STD riddled body around me. Get lost loser. Excuses define your life. You know pricks throw rocks from behind a fence. Real men show their face-to-face.
You are a disgrace to our BRAVE ancestors who "don't shoot until you see the whites of their eyes". Familiarize yourself with the inaccuracy of musket fire during the formative USA wars. Go cry to moma now. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
