Bitcoin Forum
May 03, 2024, 03:45:20 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 [53] 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 ... 391 »
1041  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Satoshi,BCNext = TPTB_need_war? on: April 09, 2016, 06:41:33 AM
even fundamentalist extremists like you

It is a veil for racism. He is able to be a bigot and side-step rascism because for example (inner-city) blacks have a much higher incidence of the types of issues that he claims makes people no better than animals. He takes no culpability to for bringing them to the USA as slaves and then handing them welfare to corrupt their work ethic.

He is emulating Manny Pacquiao's recent snafu of saying that the act of homosexuality makes them no better than animals (he specifically used the word 'animal' upthread).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_anti-discrimination_acts#.C2.A0United_States

My Shelby clan has been fighting these bigots and racists:

http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/12pdf/12-96_6k47.pdf

My grandfather's family (my great grandfather was a Baptist minister) gave free food in New Orleans to the indigent. Here is my grandfather (the most generous person I have ever met! and who was a CPA) and myself from 1985:



As for his lie about my parents disowning me, here is a photo with my brother and father from 2001:



I guess he doesn't realize that the man in the middle was the West Coast Division Head Attorney for Exxon (during the Valdez Alaska incident). Let's see if he will slander my father, lol.

Does this look like my mom abandoned me?



I'll let the viewer judge if this guy looks dumb or studious:

1042  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Satoshi,BCNext = TPTB_need_war? on: April 09, 2016, 06:14:10 AM
How many times do I have to tell you to stop lying and slandering someone who is not even here to defend themselves. I didn't marry nor impregnate anyone who was a drug addict. That is provably false. So be very careful. I do know how to file a lawsuit.

Last word from me is anytime you are ready to stop being a pussy and lets do a face-to-face challenge testing our discipline, will power, or what ever, then I am game. Until then, you are blowing lies out of your ass, so do not justify my further response.

If you continue incriminating yourself, that is your perogative. I am going to be quite wealthy again soon and I will be able to afford lawyers.

I am messaging Theymos now and asking what I need to do in order to obtain your IP address so I can trace your identity.

Edit: Mr. Presumptuous, I didn't get married at 51. My son is age 20.
1043  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Satoshi,BCNext = TPTB_need_war? on: April 09, 2016, 05:48:47 AM
Sleeping with drug addicts doesn't qualify you as a genius.

No it does not, but it also does not mean you are stupid either.
It only means you cared enough about that person to be intimate with them , nothing else.

Did you fail to read upthread where I specifically stated I am not a high genius. Accusing me of pretending to be something which I specifically said I am not, makes you either blind or dumb.

The fool doesn't seem to understand that sometimes you will sacrifice for your kids, because the hope that the kids will have a normal family.

Also I have already stated that I did not know what you claim I knew or should have known. I did not have an indication of what you claim I should know. I was only in the USA for brief period in 2006 and it had changed so much and I was under the impression that all the youth are smoking pot and going to rave parties. For example, I went to a concert and some teenagers were throwing pencils at me from the adjoining car as we drove into the concert parking lot. I just viewed the entire USA as having lost the values of my generation. I didn't have time during my brief stay in the USA in 2006 to be exposed to other youth who might have inspired me to see any distinction. From 2000 - 2002, I was so busy on eye surgeries and programming CoolPage, that I didn't get any exposure outside of New Orleans and Corpus Christi and all that I saw was that country had gone to hell (or a culture that was one I wanted to get away from). I didn't view it as a certain stepping stone to other drugs, because I am busy on other matters and never bothered to research about that. I was very busy at that time and I did not plan out and think about that possibility. I don't need to share the further details of my private life with you in order to prove why you are wrong. I have to consider the privacy of the other person involved here. From 1996 to 2000, I was not in the USA.

Also I have already told you that I have taken every STD test available and they are all negative, including HIV, Syphilis, Chlamydia, and Hepatitis B & C. I have told you that I have positive test for Dengue Fever markers from a past infection. I also was confirmed to have had H.pylori in the past. Those are not STDs. So it is not 100% clear what sort of illness I have. One theory is I have now have an auto-immune condition. Most of the time, a human body is already to clear out HPV but it also depends which strain you have as some are more virulent.

I have never had warts.

One day when this fool contracts a chronic, terminal, or debilitating illness and he "should have known" to avoid people with that illness, then we can give him a taste of his own cruelty. I have inkling the universe is going to teach him a lesson. Karma is that way.

Again in my case, we are not even sure if my illness was caused by not avoiding a specific human. Could have been due to mosquito bite or what ever caused the H.pylori infection, etc...

Also I should warn you since you claim to live in the USA:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyberstalking


DE make sure you continue humping the ego tree. Ego masturbation is clearly what you do best.
1044  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Satoshi,BCNext = TPTB_need_war? on: April 09, 2016, 05:36:23 AM
Your rational thinking skills are very poor.  Sorry to break it to you, but you aren't that smart.

This is not going to help you. I am continuing to work and it will be quite clear later that you lost.

You've already lost by humiliating yourself here, and showing everyone how much you prefer to waste your time rather than do productive activities. And you've shown everyone how you will lower yourself into the gutter instead of doing something useful with your time.

It is hilarious. Feel free to continue doing this for the rest of 2016.


I strongly believe that you could not last one day trying to keep up with my daily discipline. Even in my weakened condition, your tongue will be dragging on the pavement if you try to keep up with my daily activity at age 51.

I'd love it if you weren't too afraid to challenge me to some test like this. Not necessarily violent. We can merely spend the entire day running up the mountains in tropical swelting heat until you collapse like a little pussy.


Yeah, I doubt that.  Probably almost anybody who isn't afflicted with half of your aliments has better physical endurance.

Prove it.

You'll be surprised what will power can do.

Talk is cheap. Show me the action.

If an escrowed BTC bet is necessary to justify your time, effort, and travel expenses, then I am game. We can set the parameters now and then once I have the BTC, the challenge is on.
1045  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Dash: The Future Internet Of Money? on: April 09, 2016, 05:27:01 AM
In the last half hour, I got 20 more visitors to www.rebelmouse.com/dashnation.

That ought to be good for another $20,000 additional market cap, assuming some of them weren't going there to see how much you are misrepresenting truth of disclosure in investment securities.
1046  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Dash: The Future Internet Of Money? on: April 09, 2016, 05:25:07 AM
Hey, I heard that you can break InstantX. When can we expect that to happen? I will personally tip you if you do it. Don't disappoint me. Generalize this said you could.

I found a high school level probability math error in the InstantX white paper that had been there for a guess roughly a year and nobody had done the peer review. So this tells you there is no world-class development team.

The white paper was claiming astronomical odds of colluding masternodes able to corrupt the InstantX transactions. I showed the probability was much more reasonable. I forget the exact quantification, but it roughly dropped in the range of a some akair double-digit percentage of the masternodes would enable corrupting afair single-digit x% of the InstantX transactions.

So the difficulty in attacking that version of InstantX (assuming it hasn't been somehow improved in some yet undocumented manner) is I need to acquire the masternodes and then I need to do the development coding. I would thus risk destroying the value of all that DRK locked up for masternodes because the price of DRK would likely plummet if I attack it. I don't know if there is any way for me to short DRK with sufficient size and liquidity and also why would I want to risk a short position on trying to prove this? I have neither the funds nor time to waste on that when working on my project is worth $millions to me in opportunity cost. I have said that in the future if Dash is not already dead and I have $millions, then I will likely pay a hacker to destroy Dash because I view it (my opinion) as an major scam that is defrauding our community.

The reason the InstantX flaw (and other flaws) matter is because:

1. It exemplifies how inept the Dash development team is. There are surely more flaws lurking that no one has peer reviewed.

2. If Dash scales up, then there will be many hackers with the motivation to attack it and short it. So these flaws although not worth any of us attacking now, actually insure it is quite implausible that Dash could ever scale up to do anything in real adoption. Also the masternode scam violates the principle of trustless, non-centralization which is necessary to promote network effects (i.e. for others to invest their company in your technology).

On top of that, afaics (based on limited information Evan has released) Evolution is flawed and really doesn't solve any problems of scaling. I will wait until after it is released to explain why. So that will be hanging over your head.

Nice post. You know your shit. But I will tell you the same thing I told generalize this. Until someone actually attacks Dash and breaks it, these statements are conjecture.

No the conclusions are from math. Math is not conjecture (there are theoretical conjectures made in research math but that is not the applied math employed here). I understand math is something your worm-class development team doesn't do, so I do pardon your misconceptualization.

But another thing while we're on the topic... Why don't you present these findings to Dash for a reward? If you are right and this is an attack vector, I will personally submit a proposal to pay you for your trouble. See, Dash isn't all bad.

Because I don't want to join you fools in jail. Besides I have an ethical position against helping scams. And you couldn't pay me enough any way to take me away from my opportunity cost and passion to actually create a decentralized solution, not this lie masternode scam that you refuse to admit is not decentralized. Distributed != decentralized.

And another thing. These scams that you guys are screaming everywhere about? I wasn't here for the instamine, was I scammed?

Yes. But since you appear to be an accomplice, you are also scamming by promoting lies or half-truths to investors (make sure you understand securities law).
1047  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Why the darkcoin/dash instamine matters on: April 09, 2016, 05:15:57 AM
TaoOfSaatoshi deleted this information from his illegal Dash hype thread:

The Tao/Satoshi Index

Quote from: Bitcoin Forum
A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic. There are no rules of self-moderation, so this deletion cannot be appealed. Do not continue posting in this topic if the topic-starter has requested that you leave.

You can create a new topic if you are unsatisfied with this one. If the topic-starter is scamming, post about it in Scam Accusations.

Quote
True index is 1/663 = 0.0015

If it is any consolation, Dash's coinmarketcap.com marketcap is closer to its "Adoption-adjusted Market Cap" than Ethereum's and Litecoin's are.

I thus suggest an idea for a new metric for ranking altcoins.

Sqrt(M x H)

M = Mean transactions fees paid per unit time to decentralized proof-of-work miners
H = hash rate (normalized in electricity cost per hash to SHA256).

Using M = Sent avg. per hour, H = Hashrate (normalized):

Coin |Relative Adoption |Ratio |Adoption-adjusted Market Cap
1.Bitcoin6.5×10¹²1$6.4 billion
2.Namecoin8.6x10¹⁰1/76$85 million
3.Ethereum6.6x10¹⁰1/99$65 million
4.Litecoin1.3x10¹⁰1/500$13 million
5.Dash9.8x10⁹1/663$10 million
6.Blackcoin7.4x10⁸1/8784$0.7 million
7.Dogecoin6.1x10⁸1/10656$0.6 million
8.Auroracoin5.8x10⁶1/1120690$5,931

I edited the table above so readers can see the "Adoption-adjusted Market Caps".

You can see how pitiful the altcoins are.

Edit: your investment money is being siphoned off into the pockets of the insiders of these coins. None of it is achieving any significant adoption.
1048  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Dash: The Future Internet Of Money? on: April 09, 2016, 05:14:31 AM
TaoOfSaatoshi deleted this information from his illegal Dash hype thread:

The Tao/Satoshi Index

Quote from: Bitcoin Forum
A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic. There are no rules of self-moderation, so this deletion cannot be appealed. Do not continue posting in this topic if the topic-starter has requested that you leave.

You can create a new topic if you are unsatisfied with this one. If the topic-starter is scamming, post about it in Scam Accusations.

Quote
True index is 1/663 = 0.0015

If it is any consolation, Dash's coinmarketcap.com marketcap is closer to its "Adoption-adjusted Market Cap" than Ethereum's and Litecoin's are.

I thus suggest an idea for a new metric for ranking altcoins.

Sqrt(M x H)

M = Mean transactions fees paid per unit time to decentralized proof-of-work miners
H = hash rate (normalized in electricity cost per hash to SHA256).

Using M = Sent avg. per hour, H = Hashrate (normalized):

Coin |Relative Adoption |Ratio |Adoption-adjusted Market Cap
1.Bitcoin6.5×10¹²1$6.4 billion
2.Namecoin8.6x10¹⁰1/76$85 million
3.Ethereum6.6x10¹⁰1/99$65 million
4.Litecoin1.3x10¹⁰1/500$13 million
5.Dash9.8x10⁹1/663$10 million
6.Blackcoin7.4x10⁸1/8784$0.7 million
7.Dogecoin6.1x10⁸1/10656$0.6 million
8.Auroracoin5.8x10⁶1/1120690$5,931

I edited the table above so readers can see the "Adoption-adjusted Market Caps".

You can see how pitiful the altcoins are.

Edit: your investment money is being siphoned off into the pockets of the insiders of these coins. None of it is achieving any significant adoption.
1049  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Beyond Bitcoin (BitShares) Hangout w/ Bytemaster Tomorrow @ 10AM EST on: April 09, 2016, 05:10:20 AM
It just all doesn't serve any purpose that any sane mainstream person would care about, outside of a SHTF scenario.

Disagree. It is just that the use case is a fairly small % of the population. No one has yet focused on the masses use case. As you know, I am focused on that with my non-existent vaporware.

We don't disagree. I'm just rounding 0.01% of the population down to "nobody" for simplicity. Okay, as originally stated by me above, we disagree by about 0.01%. Fine.

0.01% for Bitcoin makes going "beyond Bitcoin" (the title of this thread) rather silly, unless you are the Larimers and looking for more hype to sell to investors and keep getting paid for another year or two.

And put the altcoins are nearly 1/1000th of that 0.01%:

I thus suggest an idea for a new metric for ranking altcoins.

Sqrt(M x H)

M = Mean transactions fees paid per unit time to decentralized proof-of-work miners
H = hash rate (normalized in electricity cost per hash to SHA256).

Using M = Sent avg. per hour, H = Hashrate (normalized):

Coin |Relative Adoption |Ratio |Adoption-adjusted Market Cap
1.Bitcoin6.5×10¹²1$6.4 billion
2.Namecoin8.6x10¹⁰1/76$85 million
3.Ethereum6.6x10¹⁰1/99$65 million
4.Litecoin1.3x10¹⁰1/500$13 million
5.Dash9.8x10⁹1/663$10 million
6.Blackcoin7.4x10⁸1/8784$0.7 million
7.Dogecoin6.1x10⁸1/10656$0.6 million
8.Auroracoin5.8x10⁶1/1120690$5,931

I edited the table above so readers can see the "Adoption-adjusted Market Caps".

You can see how pitiful the altcoins are.

Edit: your investment money is being siphoned off into the pockets of the insiders of these coins. None of it is achieving any significant adoption.
1050  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Dash: The Future Internet Of Money? on: April 09, 2016, 05:00:04 AM
I wouldn't be aspiring to imitate Dogecoin:

I thus suggest an idea for a new metric for ranking altcoins.

Sqrt(M x H)

M = Mean transactions fees paid per unit time to decentralized proof-of-work miners
H = hash rate (normalized in electricity cost per hash to SHA256).

Using M = Sent avg. per hour, H = Hashrate (normalized):

Coin |Relative Adoption |Ratio |Adoption-adjusted Market Cap
1.Bitcoin6.5×10¹²1$6.4 billion
2.Namecoin8.6x10¹⁰1/76$85 million
3.Ethereum6.6x10¹⁰1/99$65 million
4.Litecoin1.3x10¹⁰1/500$13 million
5.Dash9.8x10⁹1/663$10 million
6.Blackcoin7.4x10⁸1/8784$0.7 million
7.Dogecoin6.1x10⁸1/10656$0.6 million
8.Auroracoin5.8x10⁶1/1120690$5,931

I edited the table above so readers can see the "Adoption-adjusted Market Caps".

You can see how pitiful the altcoins are.
1051  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Better metric for altcoin market size than manipulated market cap & volume? on: April 09, 2016, 04:57:14 AM
I thus suggest an idea for a new metric for ranking altcoins.

Sqrt(M x H)

M = Mean transactions fees paid per unit time to decentralized proof-of-work miners
H = hash rate (normalized in electricity cost per hash to SHA256).

Using M = Sent avg. per hour, H = Hashrate (normalized):

Coin |Relative Adoption |Ratio |Adoption-adjusted Market Cap
1.Bitcoin6.5×10¹²1$6.4 billion
2.Namecoin8.6x10¹⁰1/76$85 million
3.Ethereum6.6x10¹⁰1/99$65 million
4.Litecoin1.3x10¹⁰1/500$13 million
5.Dash9.8x10⁹1/663$10 million
6.Blackcoin7.4x10⁸1/8784$0.7 million
7.Dogecoin6.1x10⁸1/10656$0.6 million
8.Auroracoin5.8x10⁶1/1120690$5,931

I edited the table above so readers can see the "Adoption-adjusted Market Caps".

You can see how pitiful the altcoins are.

Edit: your investment money is being siphoned off into the pockets of the insiders of these coins. None of it is achieving any significant adoption.
1052  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Why the darkcoin/dash instamine matters on: April 09, 2016, 04:30:12 AM
Hey, I heard that you can break InstantX. When can we expect that to happen? I will personally tip you if you do it. Don't disappoint me. Generalize this said you could.

I found a high school level probability math error in the InstantX white paper that had been there for a guess roughly a year and nobody had done the peer review. So this tells you there is no world-class development team.

The white paper was claiming astronomical odds of colluding masternodes able to corrupt the InstantX transactions. I showed the probability was much more reasonable. I forget the exact quantification, but it roughly dropped in the range of a some akair double-digit percentage of the masternodes would enable corrupting afair single-digit x% of the InstantX transactions.

So the difficulty in attacking that version of InstantX (assuming it hasn't been somehow improved in some yet undocumented manner) is I need to acquire the masternodes and then I need to do the development coding. I would thus risk destroying the value of all that DRK locked up for masternodes because the price of DRK would likely plummet if I attack it. I don't know if there is any way for me to short DRK with sufficient size and liquidity and also why would I want to risk a short position on trying to prove this? I have neither the funds nor time to waste on that when working on my project is worth $millions to me in opportunity cost. I have said that in the future if Dash is not already dead and I have $millions, then I will likely pay a hacker to destroy Dash because I view it (my opinion) as an major scam that is defrauding our community.

The reason the InstantX flaw (and other flaws) matter is because:

1. It exemplifies how inept the Dash development team is. There are surely more flaws lurking that no one has peer reviewed.

2. If Dash scales up, then there will be many hackers with the motivation to attack it and short it. So these flaws although not worth any of us attacking now, actually insure it is quite implausible that Dash could ever scale up to do anything in real adoption. Also the masternode scam violates the principle of trustless, non-centralization which is necessary to promote network effects (i.e. for others to invest their company in your technology).

On top of that, afaics (based on limited information Evan has released) Evolution is flawed and really doesn't solve any problems of scaling. I will wait until after it is released to explain why. So that will be hanging over your head.
1053  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Dash: The Future Internet Of Money? on: April 09, 2016, 04:26:06 AM
Hey, I heard that you can break InstantX. When can we expect that to happen? I will personally tip you if you do it. Don't disappoint me. Generalize this said you could.

I found a high school level probability math error in the InstantX white paper that had been there for a guess roughly a year and nobody had done the peer review. So this tells you there is no world-class development team.

The white paper was claiming astronomical odds of colluding masternodes able to corrupt the InstantX transactions. I showed the probability was much more reasonable. I forget the exact quantification, but it roughly dropped in the range of a some akair double-digit percentage of the masternodes would enable corrupting afair single-digit x% of the InstantX transactions.

So the difficulty in attacking that version of InstantX (assuming it hasn't been somehow improved in some yet undocumented manner) is I need to acquire the masternodes and then I need to do the development coding. I would thus risk destroying the value of all that DRK locked up for masternodes because the price of DRK would likely plummet if I attack it. I don't know if there is any way for me to short DRK with sufficient size and liquidity and also why would I want to risk a short position on trying to prove this? I have neither the funds nor time to waste on that when working on my project is worth $millions to me in opportunity cost. I have said that in the future if Dash is not already dead and I have $millions, then I will likely pay a hacker to destroy Dash because I view it (my opinion) as an major scam that is defrauding our community.

The reason the InstantX flaw (and other flaws) matter is because:

1. It exemplifies how inept the Dash development team is. There are surely more flaws lurking that no one has peer reviewed.

2. If Dash scales up, then there will be many hackers with the motivation to attack it and short it. So these flaws although not worth any of us attacking now, actually insure it is quite implausible that Dash could ever scale up to do anything in real adoption. Also the masternode scam violates the principle of trustless, non-centralization which is necessary to promote network effects (i.e. for others to invest their company in your technology).

On top of that, afaics (based on limited information Evan has released) Evolution is flawed and really doesn't solve any problems of scaling. I will wait until after it is released to explain why. So that will be hanging over your head.
1054  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Dash: The Future Internet Of Money? on: April 09, 2016, 04:11:49 AM
Taoway is that you? you're the guy that first broke the darkcoin scam are you not? Are you the same person? I heard that you are.

You are the one we should all be thankful too for bringing the outright scam to our attention. You probably helped us stop Dash becoming a MUCH larger problem.

Was he bought off to stop attacking? Attack to force Evan to sell you some cheap DRK and in exchange you agree to become a pumper. Not beyond the realm of plausibility. Only they know.
1055  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Dash: The Future Internet Of Money? on: April 09, 2016, 04:05:53 AM
...how vertoe quit because of Dash's one-man dictatorship, etc.

Kyle Hagan (aka InternetApe) quit. Apparently vertoe is a different person. Vertoe was quoting Kyle.

Eventually Dash will be taken down by one of its clones that have no scam start to forever hold it back.

Incorrect, because the only reason for Dash's existence is the scam. Clones would have nothing worth speculating on, unless they copy the masternode scam.

I believe what I am working on will kill Dash and most of the other altcoins, but we will have to see if that ever comes to fruition.

Dash eventually dies by eating itself. Meaning once the insiders run out of sufficient new virgins to rape, they will turn on each other. That when they will reveal the dirty inside secrets especially as plea bargains to escape jail time if the prosecutions begin.
1056  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Dash: The Future Internet Of Money? on: April 09, 2016, 03:51:29 AM
...with Dash currently having the upper hand due to superior technology with self governance and funding.

Liar. Illegal hype.
1057  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: The altcoin topic everyone wants to sweep under the rug on: April 09, 2016, 03:48:49 AM
By running all investment through a funnel which siphons the community wealth through the masternode scam, he is actually killed the network effects.

The instamine means nothing.  Not only were most of those coins sold off, and bought and sold multiple times, it really doesn't matter.

IANAL, yet appears the end game is perhaps jail time for him and perhaps all you pumpers as well who continue to spread illegal prospectus.

...with Dash currently having the upper hand due to superior technology with self governance and funding.

Liar. Illegal hype.

Taoway is that you? you're the guy that first broke the darkcoin scam are you not? Are you the same person? I heard that you are.

You are the one we should all be thankful too for bringing the outright scam to our attention. You probably helped us stop Dash becoming a MUCH larger problem.

Was he bought off to stop attacking? Attack to force Evan to sell you some cheap DRK and in exchange you agree to become a pumper. Not beyond the realm of plausibility. Only they know.


TaoOfSaatoshi deleted this information from his illegal Dash hype thread:

The Tao/Satoshi Index

Quote from: Bitcoin Forum
A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic. There are no rules of self-moderation, so this deletion cannot be appealed. Do not continue posting in this topic if the topic-starter has requested that you leave.

You can create a new topic if you are unsatisfied with this one. If the topic-starter is scamming, post about it in Scam Accusations.

Quote
True index is 1/663 = 0.0015

If it is any consolation, Dash's coinmarketcap.com marketcap is closer to its "Adoption-adjusted Market Cap" than Ethereum's and Litecoin's are.

I thus suggest an idea for a new metric for ranking altcoins.

Sqrt(M x H)

M = Mean transactions fees paid per unit time to decentralized proof-of-work miners
H = hash rate (normalized in electricity cost per hash to SHA256).

Using M = Sent avg. per hour, H = Hashrate (normalized):

Coin |Relative Adoption |Ratio |Adoption-adjusted Market Cap
1.Bitcoin6.5×10¹²1$6.4 billion
2.Namecoin8.6x10¹⁰1/76$85 million
3.Ethereum6.6x10¹⁰1/99$65 million
4.Litecoin1.3x10¹⁰1/500$13 million
5.Dash9.8x10⁹1/663$10 million
6.Blackcoin7.4x10⁸1/8784$0.7 million
7.Dogecoin6.1x10⁸1/10656$0.6 million
8.Auroracoin5.8x10⁶1/1120690$5,931

I edited the table above so readers can see the "Adoption-adjusted Market Caps".

You can see how pitiful the altcoins are.
1058  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Why the darkcoin/dash instamine matters on: April 09, 2016, 03:34:15 AM
Do they have a world-class dev team and a professional, devoted community?

Correct, Dash does not have.


...its creating a self-supporting and self-expanding ecosystem as well.

Like Tao said, the team Dash has gathered is amazing.  They're nice enough to let me hang around and watch what's going on, and I gotta tell you, it's hard to keep up with their brilliant ideas.  Evan just posted this:

You're on the right track! Imagine instead of just proposals and contracts, we also have category, group, user, company, project, project-report and project-milestone. Then the governance system (what was previously the budget system) will explicitly have a system for tracking what's happening in our economy that we're funding. Imagine the system knows when reports are due, if companies are behind on their milestones...etc. It's the autonomous part of our decentralized autonomous organization. Next we fund other DAOs into existence. I think we'll be able to manage thousands.

This whole structure I'm building is done using a self-referencing tree, so we'll have companies, that can own companies, that have people working for them. These are also the same users for evo, parts of this tree can be flagged to be stored in DashDrive instead of our governance mempool.

This is a huge upgrade by the way. If I'm going to touch the budget system, I'm going to make it as perfect as possible before we continue on. This is a vastly important part of our system.

Now if that doesn't send shivers down your spine, well.... you must not understand.

Shudders not shivers. Evan doesn't understand how to generate network effects.

By running all investment through a funnel which siphons the community wealth through the masternode scam, he is actually killed the network effects.

Dalmation Dogecoin imitation gimicks notwithstanding.

It is really hiralious. Please let Evan continue to clusterfuck his Dash scam.

The instamine means nothing.  Not only were most of those coins sold off, and bought and sold multiple times, it really doesn't matter.

IANAL, yet appears the end game is perhaps jail time for him and perhaps all you pumpers as well who continue to spread illegal prospectus.


The team behind Dash, including myself, is relentless and will not stop until we reach our goals. If a certain aspect of Dash threatens our survival, make no mistake, we will make every attempt and due diligence until it is fixed. There are no such flaws right now.

The "features" you tout are flaws and you don't even realize it. That is how hopelessly clueless your "worm-class" development team is.


...with Dash currently having the upper hand due to superior technology with self governance and funding.

Liar. Illegal hype.

Taoway is that you? you're the guy that first broke the darkcoin scam are you not? Are you the same person? I heard that you are.

You are the one we should all be thankful too for bringing the outright scam to our attention. You probably helped us stop Dash becoming a MUCH larger problem.

Was he bought off to stop attacking? Attack to force Evan to sell you some cheap DRK and in exchange you agree to become a pumper. Not beyond the realm of plausibility. Only they know.
1059  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: The altcoin topic everyone wants to sweep under the rug on: April 09, 2016, 03:28:50 AM
Yes but you can clearly see that they are saying "and other schemes in which these currencies are used to facilitate fraudulent, or simply fabricated, investments or transactions".

There is still nowhere that says cryptocurrencies as a whole are fraudulent. The statement is that fraudsters are being enticed to use them for fraudulent purposes. It only talks about the rising use of cryptocurrencies. It no way does it label cryptos as illegal securities or warn users (or devs) that they might be in trouble now, or in the future.

How are you interpreting the statement above to apply to any crypto in existence?

Re-read the entire analysis in this thread.

I have. It's all speculation, embellishment, supposition and extrapolation. No-one has produced anything 'official from the SEC' or any other governing body that positively confirms that the issuing of a cryptocurrency is a fraudulent act in itself. Investment funds based on cryptos is another matter...

Posting a link to what someone on this site said earlier in another post is NOT an official statement. As you said, it's just personal analysis of the law. It's not an official statement from any governing body.

The Supreme Court was quoted. Try reading the thread again.
1060  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Dash: The Future Internet Of Money? on: April 09, 2016, 03:17:10 AM
Do they have a world-class dev team and a professional, devoted community?

Correct, Dash does not have.


...its creating a self-supporting and self-expanding ecosystem as well.

Like Tao said, the team Dash has gathered is amazing.  They're nice enough to let me hang around and watch what's going on, and I gotta tell you, it's hard to keep up with their brilliant ideas.  Evan just posted this:

You're on the right track! Imagine instead of just proposals and contracts, we also have category, group, user, company, project, project-report and project-milestone. Then the governance system (what was previously the budget system) will explicitly have a system for tracking what's happening in our economy that we're funding. Imagine the system knows when reports are due, if companies are behind on their milestones...etc. It's the autonomous part of our decentralized autonomous organization. Next we fund other DAOs into existence. I think we'll be able to manage thousands.

This whole structure I'm building is done using a self-referencing tree, so we'll have companies, that can own companies, that have people working for them. These are also the same users for evo, parts of this tree can be flagged to be stored in DashDrive instead of our governance mempool.

This is a huge upgrade by the way. If I'm going to touch the budget system, I'm going to make it as perfect as possible before we continue on. This is a vastly important part of our system.

Now if that doesn't send shivers down your spine, well.... you must not understand.

Shudders not shivers. Evan doesn't understand how to generate network effects.

By running all investment through a funnel which siphons the community wealth through the masternode scam, he is actually killed the network effects.

Dalmation Dogecoin imitation gimicks notwithstanding.

It is really hiralious. Please let Evan continue to clusterfuck his Dash scam.

The instamine means nothing.  Not only were most of those coins sold off, and bought and sold multiple times, it really doesn't matter.

IANAL, yet appears the end game is perhaps jail time for him and perhaps all you pumpers as well who continue to spread illegal prospectus.


The team behind Dash, including myself, is relentless and will not stop until we reach our goals. If a certain aspect of Dash threatens our survival, make no mistake, we will make every attempt and due diligence until it is fixed. There are no such flaws right now.

The "features" you tout are flaws and you don't even realize it. That is how hopelessly clueless your "worm-class" development team is.
Pages: « 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 [53] 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 ... 391 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!