Do we think bitcoinist goes down as the last people scammed or is there another act to come?

really surprised he went through the trouble of "launching" btc.com without having another bullet in the chamber, unless scamming bitcoinist was the last bullet.

Wow, in 200 days he earned .002053 btc, or 48 cents at today's prices. Quick, everyone give them all your money, we'll be rich in no time.

I haven't been paying 100% attention to badbitcoin, but I do remember it being ok a few years ago. Is it out of the question that gaw bought the twitter/site like he did to other places/tried to do so many times before?

And another company shoots themselves in the foot by getting involved with Garza.

why on earth would they think Garza wasn't going to fuck them over after their previous attempt and everyone else he's fucked over?

I sort of wish I was a big enough asshole to take some of the money these geniuses are just giving away, it's amazing.

Which idea is stupider? Getting in bed with Garza, or getting inspiration from licensing one of the industry's (not industries bitcoinist, maybe spend the money you aren't giving Garza on a copy editor?) "most expensive domains."

Please actually look at the math before you use that monitor site as evidence to dump a lot of money into an "investment."  They invested a happy meal and have made a tiny btc profit, that is worth less USD than when they started.

We aren't saying they aren't paying, we are questioning if they are actually mining. It's very easy for them to pay out the coins you gave them over time.

They obviously aren't mining.

It's hard enough to make any sort of profit mining, that they would be able to give out that much bonus hashrate is unbelievable. If you think you can find enough suckers to follow you to make money that way, go for it, but there aren't going to be that many suckers in the world.

Pyramid schemes that have actual products aren't the worst thing in the world, but it's pretty obvious that there is no product here, so it will not last.

What is going through his head to keep up the association with GAW?

The millions of offshoots show that people are finally smart enough to stop blowing money on GAW/Josh, so why add that "picking up where GAW left off" line?

Is he stupid enough to think the shills still posting are true believers and not just bagholders trying desperately to hand off their bags of shit?

Is he just super narcissistic and thinks that this card will expunge the failures of GAW and make people forgive/forget follow to the next scheme?

I really don't get why he doesn't just disappear and try to make it so it isn't obvious to everyone that his next scam is connected to him and all the others.

That's the most amazing thing about this entire shitshow.

People are running around making all these plans and talking as if prime controllers are more than special wallets and hashlets are/were more than images and that hashtakers are physical products.

That's definitely what's happening and that doesn't seem like a legitimate mining operation to me. If they are using customer money to buy hardware, they can't pay in an hour because they don't have hardware. If they are using hardware they already own, how do they earn (and therefore payout) so consistently?

Why do they need help selling?

How can payouts start an hour after I purchse if they don't have all the hardware? Seems like something that would apply to a ponzi, not a legitimate mining operation.

Assistance with shipping is one of the only reasons i can think of to need a reseller. i cannot come up with one for a situation like this.

How does the reseller operation benefit the three parties involved (me, them, you)? Why would I buy from you when I can buy from them? What do they get from letting you resell "shares?" Margins in mining are very thin (if they exist at all), how is there enough for all 3 of us to benefit?

If I buy a share is it a share of currently owned hardware or do I need to wait for it to be bought/shipped before I start earning?

VIP shares sounds an awufl like a security to me, will you run into any issues with that?

do you already have 1 PH? Are we buying shares of that or shares of stuff you will be ordering to increase the farm?

What is there an official reseller when there is no actual product being shipped?

Finally realized that no one is going to follow him off the next cliff so he's backing off so that they next "completely unrelated" business he starts up has a tiny chance to be believed.

More reason to not run this sportsbook with the 1% house edge. the only people this will attract are people you probably don't want to be betting against.

People are willing to play with a 5% or higher edge in sports, why offer less?

Why do this when people pay around 5% on most games and way way more on future bets and stuff like that?

I'm perfectly calm because I ask a million questions before entering into business arrangements where people will give me free money for no reason.

I can't help but notice that you didn't actually answer any of my questions, so let's try again, because a BBQ doesn't impress me much.

If I buy shares today, is that for a piece of current hardware or future hardware?

Will the things they say they are going to do for VIP shareholders run afoul of regulators in the US (where I am) or anywhere else?

are they paying you with freshly mined coins?

Why do they need a reseller when they aren't actually shipping anything?

The reseller thing is a good point. Why does someone need to resell shares/virtual miners?

It makes sense for a reseller for actual products. Manufacturer in location x doesn't want to deal with customs/hassle of shipping to a bunch of different customers, so they sell large shipments to a few resellers, and they distribute them to the individual customers. Why add a middleman when there is no physical product moving?

Are you buying a share of the miners they have already? Or paying for the next set of miners they are going to buy? will the "team of highly experienced traders and will be performing market trades to boost profits for those who own “VIP shares (TM).”" run afoul of any securities laws? Why is the guy saying "they are" and "these guys" the same person providing all the "proof" that they are legit on hashtalk?

Why wouldn't you trust the guy that ran a data center that ran up a huge electric bill that never got paid and didn't send the coins to the users who were paying for the miners/maintenance fees?

Or the interim CEO of a company that had no business plan?

Or the guy running a lending website that makes zero sense?

These all seem like trustworthy individuals to me.