why don't they take them off after we have concluded that they are not an alt or a scammer?
i am the one. 

 people won't believe us that we are legit, and people created campaign, but monopolising the others.
my signature is for others because i understand people could not promote his stuff easily by himself, rather than joining a sign campaign.

i mean the windows 10 is still in beta, we don't know what bugs would occur, and we still don't know if the windows 10 is safe(secure) for universal usage. i don't wanna get my personal data shared due to the unexpected bugs.

block size increasing would encourage transaction spammers to spread all of the zero value txs into the blockchain.
also, this would not get the bitcoin to be sustainable.
the demand of storage would be skyrocket in order to sustain bitcoin. merchants would get to raise the price of the HDD like what ASIC just did.
not all of the people could afford the HDD and the blockchain size increase.

this is just a matter, not affecting us to use bitcoin.
unless they are cheating of sign campaign, otherwise it is no use.
if you did not get paid of your sign campaign, and you qualified all of the rules, there would be no reason not to pay to what you just did.

hi dud, i am gonna have some of the suggestion for this kind of sub forum:
increase leniency of profanities, because majority of the profanity do not involve violence, unless they are explicitly harming/harassing someone; otherwise we don't need to do this, this will only encourage arbitrary, instead of actual freedom.
put off-topic threads into the suitable forums, instead of just deleting, so that the people will understand.
regulate zero value threads harsher in this "bitcoin discussion" session in order to prevent encouragement of spamming, however, if those zero value threads' contents in which a certain forum would be the most suitable for them, take those thread into those suitable forums, instead of banning and/or deleting.

bitcoin forum is a place of freedom, not a place for arbitrary to execute their stuff which is zero-value or harmful to the "commoners".

op is creating zero value posts, just leave him alone.
this guy is spamming for loan while without a legitimate reason, plus this is an alt.
scamming isn't helpful to yourself: you would understand that what you gained is useless, man.

i will agree, i will remain using windows 7 until it vanishes, but my reason is not exactly the same.
windows 10 is limited free, but cannot be sure if the corporation is hiding something important with the windows 10.
i cannot see anything really good with windows 10, windows 8 is better than windows 10 for me.
unless microsoft announced that the official version of the windows 10, otherwise i would not really wish for windows 10.
i don't wanna get trapped by something random.
guys in my opinion you'd better remain using either windows vista, 7 or 8.

i don't really know if this guy is gonna come back for the blocksize debate.
duh, it wastes the time. if he was actually getting here, he would announce, however, satoshi is banned, i doubt that if he is getting to clear.

if your HDD did not break, it would help you to sustain with bitcoin Qt for at least 27 years.
wow that's weird. however, if with bitcoin XT, your HDD would be full within 8 years as estimated due to the block limit doubles.
i don't wanna see 20 million transactions per block in which more than 90% of the transactions were with little output(especially if they did not put any fees), in the future with XT.

that is correct, why? because the only ability (as far as i know) to change this supply and control them is to do the 51% attacks, without this kind of control, it will be when pigs fly to control the bitcoin network. i am dead with banks, i am gonna put more money onto bitcoin.

$6 is fair, if you had choice to choose the physical books, that would be at least $10.
2 years of research, worth it i have a such book under my computing table, it charged me $10.

yeah, plus one.
censor others = with the people under the censorship.
but bitcoin XT is really horrible that will encourage fork transaction spam.

normally i will do 5 to 10, but if i am active on something, i will  be at least 30 posts a day.
really, but i am choosing random stuff to do.

op, i just like you when i was a newbie, and then, i am almost screwed.
giving this kind of negative trust makes no sense to figure out if he is a scammer, unless he/she is exposed to be an scamming alt, otherwise this kind of act is just harming newbies.
lending is not a place of pawnbroking, but under the "rule", it is just a pawnbroker to protect lenders, not loaners.
 

IIRC this is a collapsed ponzi, and probably the same result with what cloudminr just done.
this guy is gonna AWOL, so the self-moderated is gonna be bullshit.

china used a wrong way to protect their so-called country; luckily, i live in hong kong - nothing banned from this site!
china is just absolute garbage, rebel them is right.

i smell zero value thread.
please do not promote zero value stuff, it is no use man.
if it is really good to us, please lemme know what's good with that.

bored, let's talk about some of the future prices of some of the alt coins instead.
 look at the www.coinmarketcap.com

first i wanna talk about a cryptonote-based alt coin: bytecoin (BCN), in the early 2015 it was not too great and the market cap was just around a million; IIRC since someone kicked the BCN up, the price has backed to the climax as of today and even the top 10 (we were dreaming BCN "to the moon" once, lol). idk why BCN went up rapidly? is that the end? or is that gonna beat his enemy, dogecoin?

next, for my favourite: ReddCoin (RDD), the first social currency. look, the first ever PoSV! few of them joined that movement, market capitalisation was a million, today, it just a bullshit as you wanna say, duh. why a social currency could not be raised up? wtf just happened? IIRC this coin would be at least 0.1 bit due to what china just did. let's see what will that be.

(that's all for mine, you? btw i am putting more "speculation" on this by editing this thread.)

i am a virgin because i am not above the legal age.