Forum moderation policy

[JarvisTechnology]

i can comply the all points but the point 3 its more diff for a not native english guy like me that also uses ezquiziofrenia as a excuse for not posting too good interseting comments just the point 3 that is not very good the rest i can comply thanks.

You might want to check all the rules over at the meta sub forum its bigger and more informative these are very outdated and have only been used as a reminder rather than solid rules

[1714904216]

1714904216

[hasmukhh]

I have a question here !
my other account. is banned for 14 days
my posts are of good quality and I had a member account .
what may be tge reason to get banned .

[hilariousandco]

I have a question here !
my other account. is banned for 14 days
my posts are of good quality and I had a member account .
what may be tge reason to get banned .

It usually tells you, but you need to ask over in Meta. If you're banned then all your other accounts are too and this is classed as ban evasion. You can only post in Meta once banned so create a thread over there but we people will need to know your account name to help you but I'm going to guess that it was for insubstantial posts.

[pissedoff]

I have a question here !
my other account. is banned for 14 days
my posts are of good quality and I had a member account .
what may be tge reason to get banned .

It usually tells you, but you need to ask over in Meta. If you're banned then all your other accounts are too and this is classed as ban evasion. You can only post in Meta once banned so create a thread over there but we people will need to know your account name to help you but I'm going to guess that it was for insubstantial posts.

Should we report a person when they are clearly admitting to ban evasion? why has his post not been removed?

[ThEmporium]

+1

EDIT:  Wait, does +1 count as a zero-value post?   

Hey, would you mind tell me what is +1, I have no idea what it refers to, thanks.

[hilariousandco]

+1 is just a way of users saying 'I agree with this' without actually offering any additional comment. It's seen as adding nothing to the discussion and is therefore spam so it's not allowed.

I agree with the post


เล่นผ่านมือถือ โปรแกรมดาวน์โหลดติดตั้งง่าย ไม่เป็นอันตรายต่อระบบคอมพิวเตอร์ โทรศัพท์ หรือเล่นผ่านเว็บไซต์ได้เลย ได้ที่นี่

-1

Very funny. I disagree with this one.

[maheshmahi]

Though then too my threads get deleted.

[gogxmagog]

Does a post still count as insubstantial if it takes over 75 characters to say the exact same thing as +1 or essentially nothing? I find myself doing this but I think it's a form of graphomania more than spam.
I'm thinking about other things mostly

[freedomno1]

Does a post still count as insubstantial if it takes over 75 characters to say the exact same thing as +1 or essentially nothing? I find myself doing this but I think it's a form of graphomania more than spam.
I'm thinking about other things mostly

It would depend on the context in my opinion.
That said a long post to get to the point of +1 would likely include some sort of opinion or reasoning to why you agree/disagree with it.

Since you posted a question posts one as well curious on the referral link
If there was a competition going on say the World Cup and you posted in the gambling forum a link to the gamble with a referral link in it would that count as referral spam or a legitimate gambling post. (Throws in a second condition or if you created that bet and wanted others to join in and posted it in gambling) E.G Since the forums focused on the Greek Crisis some sort of Greek bet on if they leave the EU Stay in it etc, or a dedicated bettors thread with ref links and different bets being posted by different people.

[--Encrypted--]

thank for the inform.
like it. they cant check everyone.
we can make post with nothing else. hope like this ever...

are you saying that we can make low value posts because the mods can't check everyone's posts? 

[Hippie Tech]

At least one moderator has no problem finding the time to search for and delete mine.

edit --> This started not long after my run in(s) with TECHSHARE seen below.

I have also been under attack by a mod with an apparent conflict of interest.

Why is any mod putting this much time and effort into reading my posts ?
Did he/she really spend 6.5 hours on June 19 ?



5 of the 8 deleted posts involve posts by the users TECHSHARE and Wolf0. (see their/my trust ratings for more info)

Here I am defending myself after TECHSHARE posted this slanderous comment.

A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by a Bitcoin Forum moderator. Posts are most frequently deleted because they are off-topic, though they can also be deleted for other reasons. In the future, please avoid posting things that need to be deleted.

For those not in the know, IFC's real dev is and always was, muddafudda. He, zackclark and the rest of his cryptsy buds staged everything from the very expensive client update to the IFC vs IFCv2/COL drama queen parade.

And they are STILL at it with CON vs PYC, COLv2.. ect..

I have talked with Hippie Tech personally for an extended period of time. I believe him to be a paranoid schizophrenic (not kidding).

Keep slandering me dude. This may end up as part of some class action lawsuit someday.

And to think.. I almost gave up on trolling your fat cryptofiat asses ! lolz

 

A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by a Bitcoin Forum moderator. Posts are most frequently deleted because they are off-topic, though they can also be deleted for other reasons. In the future, please avoid posting things that need to be deleted.

For those not in the know, IFC's real dev is and always was, muddafudda. He, zackclark and the rest of his cryptsy buds staged everything from the very expensive client update to the IFC vs IFCv2/COL drama queen parade.

And they are STILL at it with CON vs PYC, COLv2.. ect..

I have talked with Hippie Tech personally for an extended period of time. I believe him to be a paranoid schizophrenic (not kidding).

Keep slandering me dude. This may end up as part of some class action lawsuit someday.

And to think.. I almost gave up on trolling your fat cryptofiat asses ! lolz

 

 It is not slander if it is true. I am sorry that you have psychological issues and that you are offended that I am calling you out on it in public. I honestly believe this to be your issue, and I hope you get treatment. The negative trust rating was not appropriate either BTW.

Does the word, credibility, mean anything to you ?

The fact that you were removed from the forum's default trust, is in itself, a damn good reason to leave you negative trust.

His post and others where he has repeated these sentiments, have not been deleted .
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=356065.msg11394231#msg11394231

****************************************************************************************************

Does today's deletion imply that I/we should tolerate racism ? This would be understandable had I dwelled on it. Or maybe this mod failed to see how I replied by editting the original post.

A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by a Bitcoin Forum moderator. Posts are most frequently deleted because they are off-topic, though they can also be deleted for other reasons. In the future, please avoid posting things that need to be deleted.

Dev is just like the real Greeks drunkass, prescription junkie, sheeple infested "free" world. Promising a lot, but when the have to do it, they aren't there.

[lottery248]

hi dud, i am gonna have some of the suggestion for this kind of sub forum:
increase leniency of profanities, because majority of the profanity do not involve violence, unless they are explicitly harming/harassing someone; otherwise we don't need to do this, this will only encourage arbitrary, instead of actual freedom.
put off-topic threads into the suitable forums, instead of just deleting, so that the people will understand.
regulate zero value threads harsher in this "bitcoin discussion" session in order to prevent encouragement of spamming, however, if those zero value threads' contents in which a certain forum would be the most suitable for them, take those thread into those suitable forums, instead of banning and/or deleting.

bitcoin forum is a place of freedom, not a place for arbitrary to execute their stuff which is zero-value or harmful to the "commoners".

[shorena]

-snip-
put off-topic threads into the suitable forums, instead of just deleting, so that the people will understand.
-snip-

That actually happens. If you see a thread thats in the wrong section report it to the mods and they will move it in the proper section. Only a few threads that are unrealted to crypto might get deleted instead of beeing moved to off topic, or other sections that allow these kinds of threads like economics.

[lokos1913a]

because right now I am aware in this forum

[ScoobieDoobie]

1. Free speech
5. No NSFW content

Please read 5, then read 1, then read 5, then read 1 and tell me if you see a problem.

Can I say "fat cock" if I present it in a calm and polite manner?

lol! As long as you take it from the top!

[mg7778]

NSFW content not allowed? theres many posts in speculation sub forum which aren't allowed then

[Mitchell]

NSFW content not allowed? theres many posts in speculation sub forum which aren't allowed then

It's allowed, but needs to be tagged as such.

[hilariousandco]

NSFW content not allowed? theres many posts in speculation sub forum which aren't allowed then

Such as? NSFW content is allowed in the appropriate subsections and if clearly marked.

[Afromoney]

No NSFW content

what is nsfw?

[--Encrypted--]

not safe for work. or sometimes, wife.