Between 0 and 12284 inclusive. If you guess it, you get 1.000 BTC
Rules:
* Users have 12 guesses total.
* I get to guess after each user guess. My guess will be one higher or one lower than the prior guess.
* Entry for next guess is open after I answer "Higher" or "Lower"
* You must be the first to post after my guess for it to count.
SHA of my guess: 80e4062a61884c517282dca48e8b71e9317b4cc9126ecc54d6068bbf6345c792
Status:
Guess #1: 0 to 12284
is the guess SHA1? sha256_hex("my super secret number is 12345! qwuwfyupwf") ah damn, just created a wordlist and bruteforced it lol |
|
|
|
Between 0 and 12284 inclusive. If you guess it, you get 1.000 BTC
Rules:
* Users have 12 guesses total.
* I get to guess after each user guess. My guess will be one higher or one lower than the prior guess.
* Entry for next guess is open after I answer "Higher" or "Lower"
* You must be the first to post after my guess for it to count.
SHA of my guess: 80e4062a61884c517282dca48e8b71e9317b4cc9126ecc54d6068bbf6345c792
Status:
Guess #1: 0 to 12284
is the guess SHA1? |
|
|
|
for 1 BTC?  Btw: what are the guidelines in off-topic? shipping costs included?  Of course!!! that must be getting an expensive trade |
|
|
|
I don't agree with the linked thread, sure if you want an easy way to make money, then GPU mine, but FPGA is the new front of development.
I would like to know if there is something I am missing in my way of looking at it, but instead of unrolling, try and use as few logic blocks as possible and then repeat that many times INSTEAD, as there is no reason why the hash has to be done quickly, many hashes at the same time is just as good.
no, ASIC is sry, still FPGAs are way more fun since they arent hardware programming. |
|
|
|
for 1 BTC? Btw: what are the guidelines in off-topic? shipping costs included? |
|
|
|
TL;DR: intentional lieing and stealing isnt nice and drives honest ppl mad after some time. So why are you spreading all these lies? Trying to earn a place on the troll top 10? sry, besides smoothie (place 1) ur already on place 2. u believe in god who told u not to lie, but 50% of ur posts are lies, so u believe in devil huh? or u get to hell, either of that lol. no simple reason why im sick of u is ur pissing of god devs/ppl who want to help/create awesome stuff. @total ur contraproductive for mostly all devs, tahts my problem with u. if u want to lie around and such this isnt my business (aslong ur not talking BS about me) or if u want to try selling others softwares as own. u are a major thread to bitcoin and its developmet, this is why i dont like u. besides i hate ppl who do lie (so i hate really alot of ppls, but u lie way tomuch in such a bad way) and im alergic against stupidty. this is my (and probably around 90% of bitcointalk users who are wise enough) problem with u, thats it. |
|
|
|
I dunno, kano, I prefer BFGMiner. I find your need for attention to be off-putting. Luke was just trying to give a community member something to look at for his project and you turned it into a ridiculous trainwreck of a thread. Stop trolling and live your life.
its not about attention its about forking software (which is no problem) and then trying to sell it as own developed code and get some BTC donations (which he does). the main problem with Luke-Jerk isnt about forking cgminer, its about hes just a lieing jerk. use the search for "bible bashing" and u find some funny stuff about him. or another thing, hes deleting modifications to the wiki he dosnt like (altcoins, etc). the main problem is nobody does anything about it and this just drives the developers mad with time. if u are working on a project you dont need a guy who forks everything and trys to change it in a way u dont want it or just messing around, this is totaly contra-productive. btw, i think Luke-Jerk is the most ignored user @ developers. TL;DR: intentional lieing and stealing isnt nice and drives honest ppl mad after some time. |
|
|
|
Which has been extensively rewritten coz it was coded so badly and got unnecessary rejects ... that you have since copied a lot of that code to your clone miner (that you also stole the name of from me) You used the easiest interface available serial-USB - which I've had to recently completely re-write with libusb. ...
ckolivas merged all of these into cgminer, so I had no need to release BFGMiner separately at the time, but he had nothing to do with the FPGA code until he forked it.
git doesn't lie, you do. Show this 'fork' in git or GTFO. we all know BFGMiner is just a clone to try getting some BTC donations. you request Luke-Jerk to be honest but u forgot all he can is lieing, u wont get a serious answer. |
|
|
|
I upgraded to the stratum enabled p2pool & cgminer but had to turn stratum off due to massive rise in stale/rejects, even after lowering my intensity on both Linux & windoze rigs - anyone else having these problems?  did you upgrade to latest cgminer? Yup, latest of both..... well then just use getwork, unless u got more than 50 GH/s it dosnt need stratum  Done. Much better results. I was of the understanding that stratum was going to be an improvement ie: less stales/DOA? it should yes, altough if there are problems (since its new and therefore probably bit buggy) u can get worse performance. im running cminer too and i got 0.36% stale, all my shares have been accepted (due to alot of connections) so far with stratum enabled. I had to disable stratum here as well, higher rejects with stratum than with LP. M Interesting indeed. I'm running cgminer/p2pool with Stratum and am not having the issues you and others are mentioning. My reject rate is 2.3% and is the same as it was when I was running getwork. I still show Zero stales on Stratum as I did on getwork as well. p2pool and bitcoind are running on a local server on my LAN. My rigs communicate with them on that same LAN/subnet. I do not use the un-released git version of bitcoind. If you are using an un-released git version of bitcoind or are using a non local p2pool server that could be your problem. I'm not using an unreleased version of bitcoind. I tried it for a while, and it didn't help any. I've come to the conclusion I don't have the bandwidth to run p2pool the "proper" way without getting excessive stales. I've turned off port forwarding for everything - namecoind, bitcoind, and p2pool. My stales are consistently low now, unless someone else starts hogging bandwidth on my network. Tomorrow I think I'll try stratum again and see how things go. M see cgminer thread for my answer |
|
|
|
Not using unreleased version of bitcoind. M well i do, maybe thats why it works so well for me? |
|
|
|
|
just found this, awesome idea (altough i dont need it). keep it up!
|
|
|
|
My biggest complaint about p2pool is the maintenance required to keep a p2pool node up and running. That said, the advantages to p2pool are enough to keep me on it.
Is it any different from making sure the conventional pool is working? I just saw someone griping the pool he was using didn't tell him his miner was offline for 10 days. I saw another one who was complaining the stats are wrong. It seems to me the upkeep is the same between conventional and unconventional. M Syke is just a troll, simply put him on ignore. Despite the fact that there is already a public script who auto updates p2pool in combination with cron. |
|
|
|
From: http://www.downforeveryoneorjustme.com/blockchain.infoIt's not just you! http://blockchain.info looks down from here. Mods, you have my permission to move this thread to its appropriate section. And since I may have one of your's attention, which ever mod/admin is currently available, please PM me, for another member (seriously,not me) desires to whitelist a new account using his real full name. Thanks in advance regarding this request. ~Bruno K~ its not down, it accepts TCP Requests (SYN, ACK, SYN-ACK), the webserver is just laging as shit so either its waiting for some background process to complete or its being DDoS'd. so right now its strugling  Whatever you did, it's now working. BTW, what was it I was hunting when I discovered it was down? Now I have to start my day all over again to figure it out.  well, i didnt do anything i hope u find out, otherwise ur brain just got DDoS'd and u lost some information  |
|
|
|
I upgraded to the stratum enabled p2pool & cgminer but had to turn stratum off due to massive rise in stale/rejects, even after lowering my intensity on both Linux & windoze rigs - anyone else having these problems? did you upgrade to latest cgminer? Yup, latest of both..... well then just use getwork, unless u got more than 50 GH/s it dosnt need stratum Done. Much better results. I was of the understanding that stratum was going to be an improvement ie: less stales/DOA? it should yes, altough if there are problems (since its new and therefore probably bit buggy) u can get worse performance. im running cminer too and i got 0.36% stale, all my shares have been accepted (due to alot of connections) so far with stratum enabled. |
|
|
|
grep SHARE p2pool/data/bitcoin/log
2012-12-31 07:26:37.637027 GOT SHARE! toy.gpu 005461de prev 7f752c8e age 1.00s
2012-12-31 09:41:22.081034 GOT SHARE! toy.gpu 5bb6c97b prev 28ae9b73 age 10.18s
2012-12-31 11:42:48.881662 GOT SHARE! toy.gpu 498af61a prev a690bd70 age 1.22s
2012-12-31 15:27:47.966547 GOT SHARE! 1FooBarwPJBCHENtafHz7UCfSK15FTh8wm 7c447bf4 prev 33c2552f age 0.78s
2012-12-31 16:17:29.271429 GOT SHARE! toy.gpu eaf9f045 prev 46eef6d5 age 1.84s
Shares: 5 total (5 orphaned, 0 dead) Efficiency: 0.000%
Mean GBT is 0.2s
WHY all orphaned???
something wrong with ur bitcoind Recompiled to latest git and restarted, will see. Nothing wrong i see in bitcoin log anyway. a share being orphaned means it dosnt fit the rules (did include wrong transactions, etc) or just really unlucky. therefore something wrong with ur bitcoind, restart it. i found that using the latest git is working well, but u shouldnt mine to a address in the wallet of the git bitcoind since its not declared stable yet. i got a VM running with every altcoin in it and bitcoind, p2pool is connecting to this and payout is set to another adress. |
|
|
|
Where can I locate the function in one of the old miners source code to add interface to fpga processing? Or which mining software is the easiest to use as reference design (learning purposes)?
BFGMiner's device API is pretty straightforward. u mean cgminer's lol Yes, cgminer also uses the device API that I created for BFGMiner - though an older version. is there proof that you did this API and not ckolvias? |
|
|
|
From: http://www.downforeveryoneorjustme.com/blockchain.infoIt's not just you! http://blockchain.info looks down from here. Mods, you have my permission to move this thread to its appropriate section. And since I may have one of your's attention, which ever mod/admin is currently available, please PM me, for another member (seriously,not me) desires to whitelist a new account using his real full name. Thanks in advance regarding this request. ~Bruno K~ its not down, it accepts TCP Requests (SYN, ACK, SYN-ACK), the webserver is just laging as shit so either its waiting for some background process to complete or its being DDoS'd. so right now its strugling |
|
|
|
I upgraded to the stratum enabled p2pool & cgminer but had to turn stratum off due to massive rise in stale/rejects, even after lowering my intensity on both Linux & windoze rigs - anyone else having these problems? did you upgrade to latest cgminer? Yup, latest of both..... well then just use getwork, unless u got more than 50 GH/s it dosnt need stratum |
|
|
|
I upgraded to the stratum enabled p2pool & cgminer but had to turn stratum off due to massive rise in stale/rejects, even after lowering my intensity on both Linux & windoze rigs - anyone else having these problems? did you upgrade to latest cgminer? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
