Adoption or no adoption, no be church go fit carry this cross. In fact no be wetin church suppose concern herself into for the main time. This tithe of a thing dey always worry church even though I know say e dey biblical but dem dey always chase shadow.

If church begin dey ask members to pay tithes with btc see, well me I no see see as adoption because we go still dey where we dey, P2P. After all dem go still convert am to Naira before use or dem go push am go pastor wallet him go con hodl and wait for halving and bull run, chai see business avenue for inside church parol 

Abeg adoption na when we begin use btc pay bills for government parastatals, remitta, electricity etc.

Anyway, I no know if op make up this post but him too no arrange am well or is that happening for your own church. If you get link for the info, make you drop.

I thought there was a twist to the story from your topic, like maybe a payment was made wrongly into a gambling account and you want to report it but reading the body of your post, the contrary is the case. It is a deliberate act that you submitted your gambling account address to be paid on your signature campaign, so how is there a mistake?

You have submitted your gambling address to be paid on it so that it would be easier for you to have a bankroll to wager from  

Seriously, you don't tempt a dog by leaving a bone for it, when you don't want to eat a meat then you don't need to use your teeth as a knife to cut it. In other words, you have been tempting yourself with your weekly pay to double it but unfortunately you are at the other side being battered and brushed by your no luck.


Some others can wager from their signature campaign payment and win. It is just that way, so the solution if you want that to stop is to pm your campaign manager or write on your campaign thread that you desire to change your wallet address and follow the process.

Except payment must be sent to your gambling account if that is the pattern of payment otherwise, you can change it.

Looking at this title and the analysis you made, I think they didn't really tie up together.

If I understand your analysis, it is more of lactating mother and not a pregnant woman. Breast milk and or cow milk are all about feeding the new body. So I didn't see where the pregnancy comes in into advantage against the man at least.

Maybe I didn't understand the intent of your post anyway.

I think it would still be difficult to prevent such shooting occurrence in American casinos because of the legal status of carrying guns. What happened in that casino is not different from the school shooting that has been rampantly witnessed in America with the most recent about 5 months ago.

Such incident will be difficult to totally be controlled by casino security. A situation where someone has license to a gone, he could just open fire if he wakes up on the wrong side of the bed and casino to me is a spot for illicit and bad intention minded people hang out, there might still be fight breaking out within enemies.

What you are talking about is fair hearing for both parties. It is not a nice thing to only hear one side to a dispute because one party might have been the cause of the dispute, that is why they say there is no smoke without fire.

In all fairness too, I believe must users here have been trying to lean towards the side of fair hearing when some newbie accounts open up an allegation thread against a casino especially those that we know that are reputable here and most times you find out that the complainants have not followed the ToS of the casino or have contravened other conditions leading to the casino taking a punishment action.

When allegations are brought against casinos here, most responses always want to be sure of the claims of the one sided story by asking for screenshots of conversation, screenshot of issues in question and other proofs to ascertain the claim of the complainants and most times require the casino to respond where the complainants seem to have a case but if the complainants doesn't have any case, the complaints are dismissed with the flip of the palm. So I think it is a balance report here between the gambler complainants and the casinos.

Somebody who thinks of getting more money through gambling is a gambler because he is not doing it for the first time, he probably is doing it as a regular not for the purpose that he doesn't have money. Gambling is not a business venture neither is it an investment but a risk that you take based on luck. The general view is that gambling is for risk to double what you have even where some still consider it as fun but you don't catch fun when you are trying to take from somewhere to add to yours at the risk of losing yours too.

No doubt that availability of jobs will get many youths out of the street and that will reduce their exposure to vices as they say that an idle mind becomes the devils workshop, just meaning when you don't have meaningful things or positive things to do then you are likely to get into wrong things. So job creation will shift the focus of some youths away from gambling because many don't profit from it and when they see an alternative in jobs, they are likely going to throw in the towel on gambling and face their jobs.

However, the picture you painted in the body of your post that the effect of gambling is the reason of anger and maltreating of the siblings, this I doubt. That boy may have that gen from the parents especially from the father. He has anger spirit and nature of being wicked, except gambling failure only amplified it. Otherwise, every gambler who loses money should beat their wife's up, their mother or girl friends.

You have already listed the two likely solution and all other responses would be drawn from those two. You either save and continue to work to complete it or like you said to invest it and expect to complete it as the profit comes but I won't advise you to go invest in a small business first because the business may drop with the effect of inflation.

My own advise though which should be the third of what you have listed is you can go for loan. My advise for loan is because you are already close to the needed sum of money for the business at least you already had around 75% of the capital. And if you are not investing in crypto it is better at least you can monitor the business physically. To take 100% loan for business or investment is not a good idea but if you have more than half of the capital and you believe you have a place for repayment if incase the business fails then you can go on, at least you can resell some of the structure or material to repay the loan.

Governance is not about religion but to implement the right policies for the benefit of all the people and to be sure this policy and rule of law work properly, it has to be backed with institutions that are not biase. Institutions make governance to reach even the poor of the poor because it protects everyone's right under the law but just being religious as a leader, you are going to be biase in the policies you implement, you will like to favour your religious minds and therefore the government will be a charade and nepotism, favouritism will be the other of the day.

The problem of Nigeria no be religion but na the people wey dey for government dey preach religion dey take am do campaign and dey create enemies among different people just for selfish gain. If you look at the election wey dey for court, we go see say the youth and majority of the people wanted to kick the APC out irrespective of say even north and south wey be Muslim still no support them. Nigerians want good system and not wetin religion be or wetin e no be.

My brother you try for the thread about Nigerian independence but the truth be say me too don ask questions for the street about this independence and guys no see any reason to celebrate anything about am. If na before wey Nigerians never wake up for the way wey dem dey run this country, people for still dey sheepishly celebrate, buy clothes, do different attire on their own to celebrate but na only government fit do all those once now and do all the showbiz for television. I wonder how many people go listen to the broadcast because now we sabi say everything na wash. No road, no refinery, no security, no job etc everything na lie. So you no fit flog pikin make you still tell am say make him no cry. At least we still know about the jakpa syndrome, the cheating is too much.

I mean how does op intend to enforce this even if he gets prove of cheating or scam against the gambler? Is he going to get the FBI to enforce it and take the casino and the owner to court and ask for compensation or damages? This is a pretty difficult assignment that he is wanting to embark on because some gamblers may also drop their accusations at the middle just as it is known with court cases that the accuse would later drop the case for one reason or the other. However, I wish him good luck for trying to raise an army to protect gamblers.

Well big wins don't hunt my mind if I understand what you mean. Rather big wins increase the anxiety of gamblers to play more and increase their risk because to want to double their winnings like you are trying to explain too and that is the debacle of it all. As you win and try to win more, their is no guarantee for that and instead of gamblers to keep going steady on the size of bet they played before the winning, they will increase it and lose out faster. This is especially the challenge of newbie gamblers and those old gamblers who are not able to control their emotions.

You are welcome, that is thoughtful and a good site. So how have you confirmed this above. You boost of being able to see your luck before playing with your money, so how are you sure you will win when you play real money with the casino.

How can you be sure your game will not be reset before you cash out, I'm asking if probably your website covers such research. I still believe plinko is lucky game.

Me I think say na judiciary spoil everything. That court judgement wey even uphold INEC plea say them fit throwaway bivas and irav uploading of results real time, na them I blame. The court confirm say them don already select the person wey be next so the only thing to do na to enter street but them sabi say naija youth no go like risk their lives. Electronic voting and transmission of result wey INEC themselves introduce wey law back am up, them still no use am especially for presidential because dem no say the person wey them want for government no win.

For the voters card collection, people dey even burn theirs . Why will you risk your life go vote wey be say at the end of the day , where election no hold dem go bring result wey favour their person.

The Jennifer Seifegha woman wey thugs carry bottle stab for eyes still dey voters mind and people no go want stand against who dem don select to win. Make dem just do wetin dem want as deir wish.

There is a lot that government is responsible for these points you raised. It is the government that force someone to be responsible. Whether you are married or not, the government does not permit you to become a nuisance to the state and so you would find yourself behind bars if you don't conform to the societal norms, values and laws . If you evade tax is already a crime that you can be punished on.

There are roles that government should take in supporting the family system like giving out scholarships and other social responsibilities, it is important and that is why governance is a social contract.

What a coincidence around you lol. That is how gambling play out sometimes like when you are losing, someone else is winning vice versa and the next time it can turn to favour you. This is why for many gamblers, it is a luck game and not what you can depend on for a daily living. That friend who sold his bike to gamble may exhaust all the money from the bike in playing gamble but never wins anything from it and he could express regrets and curse everyone and the casino but sometime when he didn't expect, winning will also come his way. But I can't sell my property to gamble no matter the profit potential or promise because it can still fail, there is no guarantee to win in a gamble staking.

There is a possibility on this as suggested. So you have to first check on your history to see if it was recorded and if you see it there as recorded while you didn't trigger it by yourself then it might be you need to let CS know about it, it could be the automatic betting so either you deactivate it or they help you with resolving it. Well if you don't understand what is happening you can still get to support. Hope you get it resolved before playing again.

That is slot game and your doubts is nothing to worry about. Maybe you can reveal what casino you took the screenshot from so that users can also do a check on that but I think there is no concerns about manipulation from just the screenshot you displayed, if you could drop the casino that will help to check if they are manipulated but the shots are not unusual.

I think whether you play more games or one game, if you will spend more money you would because one game still doesn't have guarantee for winning so if you lose you can still want to repeat it and again again which might still be loses. Having control of our emotion is what works.


Not really.


Maybe possible because much games could limit the winning chance like they say out of twelve, there will be a Judas.


Not really, like I said it depends on the control you have, playing more games or single game isn't a guarantee .

But over all, gambling all the time can lead to being an addict but it doesn't depend on different sports we play but how much control we have.