no need to be paranoid.
Simply check several characters at the beginning of the address and in the end. This is quite enough.
Sometimes they are making very elaborate plans to scam people. You need to be paranoid actually. |
|
|
|
|
Competiton is something you can expect from health industry in the blockchain. It is very normal.
It is healthy and necessary. I am trusting ehealth will rise the challenge and will execute way better than the others.
|
|
|
|
There are other health in blockchain campaign. What do you think about those competitions
Didn't saw other competitiors, do you have a name for us? Actually, there is too many health icos running right now. You can check here; https://icobench.com/icos/healthSome of them not exactly health in blockchain but some are. |
|
|
|
Why is everyone worrying about whether they reach the $10M mark? Do you think it will change things drastically if they do or don't? I would think the amount of funds raised is still plenty to reach their goals.
Interested to hear everyone's thoughts why the $10M is such a determining factor.
It is just a psychological number i guess. People just want to see reaching 10m nothing more. I think it is already a very successful ico. |
|
|
|
Hi Guys, Please take a moment to vote for CryptoFlix if this you think is a good project. Thanks for the #AMA questions, looking forward to posting the video on Monday with Christian, who is the CEO of Cryptoflix! https://wiserico.com/ico/cryptoflixCan't wait for it. Thank you for such a transparency. |
|
|
|
If the AI will work as intended we will have a very nice tool to not get scammed (potentially on everything)
Didn't they promise a very high succes rate? Like 90-95%? Yes i remember the same. They were working on some of truth mechanism to weed out to fakes. |
|
|
|
|
There is some people try to scam your money like in every successful ico out there.
You should double check everything you are doing while participating in an ico.
|
|
|
|
You are trying to curtail piracy by watermarking copies of films with an ID linked to a payment on the blockchain. What happens when you have found the payment? In many cases purchases of pirated content are done with stolen credit cards.
I think it's time to give up on the notion of stopping piracy from happening. it's not gonna happen. best if the dev's focus on having a good platform , rather than ineffective anti-piracy measures. You can't kill piracy. You can reduce it with good services. Cryptoflix can be one of this. |
|
|
|
At what stage is the project now?
Exactly, the only information knownnis that they are in contact with several funds and they got 2 investors. But it's hrd to speculate on how much was rised with that. We will have to wait nd see. There will be Pre ICO from February, 18th - March, 18th 2018. Bonuses up to 40% and price per token will be started from 0.006 ETH. According to the timeline we are currently in pre-ico phase. In July there will be ICO phase 1 and earliest products will be available with the alpha-versions in Dez 2019 if everything goes to plan Earliest products has a long time to publish. I understand that the development cycle of hardware will be long, but I still hope they can speed up the progress. It would be fun to watch all process as an investor. It is a long road but it is promising too many good things at the end. |
|
|
|
Guys, we will not burn any token if there's some left. The reason for this is, some private investors have already agreed to come onboard, and they are willing to buy those unsold tokens higher than the ICO price. Look, our hard cap is 250M USD that figure is not your normal average hard cap that you see every day. Although we are confident that we will hit that target on our own (with community's help) but in an unlikely scenario where we fall short of our goal this is where the unburned tokens will save the project from scrap and cancelation. Case in point, after crowdsale and we only got 200M USD the unsold tokens worth 50M USD will be divided among all private investors. So instead of just burning it and get absolutely nothing out of it, we made something productive out of it. Guys, you have that this project is high tech, it needs tons of money to develop. So we will need all the money that we can muster.
alright. am I right in saying that in that case, no matter what happens, you will reach the hard cap? Yes. But we would prefer if our community will be in a large part of that 250M USD hard cap than the private investors. That is why we have this crowdsale. okay thats great news and understandable. diversifications is everything. nobody wants to be ruled by a few big investors Yeah, if we bring in Bill Gates that won't be much fun right? Because he will get the largest slice of the pie and we will be relegated with just bread crumbs  Thanks for the consideration on general public . Bread crumbs distribution was a good move for decentralized equal wealth distribution Your welcome. Since day 1, it's always been the mindset of Kepler to empower our community more than anyone else. My question is what will happen if all tokens are sold out during the ICO? Would the private investors be still interested if the token price goes up in exchanges? Assuming they all believe in the project's potential... If we hit our mark and got ourselves 250M USD. These private investors can still invest in our project with their fiat money. I see no problem with that. The more money we can get our hands on the better for the project. You have to consider this project is a sucker for RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT money and R and D doesn't come cheap you guys know that. What will you offer them in return? The tokens which you won't sell in the ico? No, it's not that we won't sell them any token, the question being asked is IF all the tokens got sold. And that was my reply. I agree that the more money they can get, the development of the project will able to obtain their goal and most probably, if all tokens got sold, still they can consider private investors to invest in the project because the more investors means success of the project and " what can they offer to the investors in return?" that is the question. Any idea? I didn't get this. If there is not token left and they are not getting anything back, why are they putting their money into this? |
|
|
|
For me,partnership with another ICO project is practicality because I always consider it as a good promotion to the project and an additional knowledge will be implicated.
it is a good way to promote a project. I've seen multiple projects partner up to great success. Yes, it is one of the best ways. You are getting good publicity regardless of partnership conditions. |
|
|
|
You are right only a very small percentage o the bitcointalk community is able to speak Russian and nearly everybody English.
but i get the feeling that like 90% are russian here, which can speak english ofc many projects are from russians too I think it is ethereum effect. Most successful ico is Russian so it is not a surprise too many Russians in here. |
|
|
|
Does the referral need to register or does he need tro buy to earn the 50 token? Anyone can help me out.
I only used it at the start. At that time it was only needed to register. But i don't know the rules are the same or changed. |
|
|
|
Yes i also think like many people here that the cap is high. The soft cap is 30 million, it’s a huge amount, maybe developp AI and Robotics things are very expensive. We will see if the amount is reached and what the team can do with that.
I think they said earlier that it doesn't matter if they hit the mark or not because they have private investors on standby that will make up the difference. Must be nice to have a line of people waiting to give you couple hundred million bucks. Could also be part of their strategy to make the project look even more interesting. I would like to see the cap not being reached in order for them to be forced to prove that there is in fact a group of private investors making up for the gap to $30 million dollars. Why are they not activating private investors in any case? It looks like there are more conditions in the background otherwise they wouldnt say no to more initial capital. I am sure they know what are they doing and would only make decisions to benefit their company. they were mentioning they don't want a huge investor to influence too much the direction of the project if i remember correctly Yes, because of it, they are not going with investors want to put some big amount to their project. They want to have a community. |
|
|
|
I think too it’s a project for long term holding, but the result will also depend of the sucess of the development. Also it will depend of the marketing and of the hype level.
The value will grow also with the different module of the platform coming online and being used by people in particular. Also the adoption of the platform will result in an increase in price of the tokens and the adoption will increase with the modules available. The key is to produce an effective product that is attractive for people to adopt Isn't it too early for a platrorm right now? I think the final variant of it should be prepared in the end of the ICO so the devs may have enough time to do everything correct. As of now, it is ok to have a website, documentation, and some promos And keep the community informed about the progress, also give some idea of what platform will be like later. If we can see the progress , waiting wont be boring. The tokens will be available in December 2018. From that point, it will take a year until the apps come out so there's quite some time between it. So you are saying someone who invested in the pre-sale now will only get his tokens in December? Are you sure about that? That sounds like a huge time span. Well, the project will be ready in 7 years so investing in ehealth is coming with some patience. People should act, knowing this. |
|
|
|
I like the project. If I had to give any criticism, it would be the tokens for downloading the app part of the plan. It just makes a giant list of people that will not actually use the platform. I think it creates a messy start to a social media app. Look at alphabet social platform for example. It's a spam fest and I already have more followers there than I do on twitter. Without even trying because they offer tokens for every friend you confirm.
Tokens for joining I think are still ok, it's pretty much the same as bounty campaigns. Despite the fact that some people won't use it, it still spreads the word. Giving tokens for confirming friends is however a little too much. I agree about this. People should get something for joining. It is a nice motivation. It shouldn't be huge but it is way more logical than telegram airdrops and etc. |
|
|
|
|
Any update about partnership statement?
The thread is very crowded so i don't want to miss it.
|
|
|
|
i guess this project iwll be a good long term hodling thing. you wont make fast money out of it, but you will do it later for sure.
Depends on the level of hype it will achieve .. I think its not just the hype that is needed but the actual product development is very critical for this project. Major development milestones should be published or announced accordingly to create awareness to the project. Yes, but it is not now later. Now it is the funding time and they need hype to become a success. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
