TELEGRAM Bitcointalk username: levyashin Telegram account: @levyashin99 Friends Telegram account:
|
|
|
I really love bountyhive. So far it paid out great for me. Some people should be sad about they didn't get tokens they hoped for but they are definitely legit.
|
|
|
Whether or not the team here has a lack of communicating with the community, I'm still supporting them because the idea is good. Any time there is the ability to make forward progress in healthcare, I'm all for it. Hopefully all this disruption in the healthcare industry will trickle down into America where the system is so focused on their greedy bottom line that they dont give a shit about the people that they are supposed to be helping.
I am not happy with the lack of communication here but at least they are active in telegram. Also i believe they can add lots of things to health industry so i can live with they are not active in here.
|
|
|
We are in last minute of the ico. It seems it was a success too.
More than 62 million tokens were sold. Indeed a very good result. wow, they indeed more than doubled their sales from a day ago. Really impressive. They didn't change the ratios you are getting alax so most people waited the last day. But most of the crypto get value so, they invested more fiat comparing the people paid in first days.
|
|
|
#Proof of Authentication: Telegram username: @levyashin99
|
|
|
Cryptoflix will be successful in countries where people buy content and are ready to spend their money for digital entertainment In countries where audience use torrents and isn't punished for that - no Just mu opinion
I guess time will come that anti piracy laws will be enforced strictly on most countries so that people will be encourage to use this platform instead.Imho. I think that the platform would work good in developed countries, because people can afford to pay for such services and sometimes because in such countries it's prohibited to use torrents. If the price/quality ration will be good and content will include new movies, I don't see a problem. Yes, but their main goal is to get people in undeveloped countries Mostly bankless people. So it would be hard to convince them to spend their little money for cryptoflix. Yeah, only some of them will pay even low prices even if there will be no other alternative. However, this tendency may be changed later. But Cryptoflix won't just concentrate on unbanked people or I'm mixing something? As far as I remember, they plan to operate in emerging markets and to support local movie industries, but they don't limit their audience to just unbanked people. Yes they are not limiting themselves with that but their primary target is bankless people. Was it already answered how people without a bank account or credit card will be able to purchase the tokens? Now almost everyone has a credit card, so this is not a problem. Soon everyone will pay through the phones. Someone who is unbanked will not have a credit card. You are talking about the developed countries (and even there not everyone has a credit card) but that is not the area where Cryptoflix wants to start. They stated they want to go for unbanked markets first, so the question is still legit. I don't think it is a must to have a credit card to reach crypto. So it wouldn't be a problem for them.
|
|
|
The pictures in the opening post are still missing... It would be nice if the team could arrange a reupload.
Yeah, you are right. It can cause a bad first impression for possible investors.
|
|
|
We are in last minute of the ico. It seems it was a success too.
|
|
|
So I cannot participate if I'm a US citizen? I got an eth address, but now I can't proceed because I cannot be from the US. Is there's something I can do?
The only thing you can do for getting tokens is exchanges after tge is over. Or you need some friend outside of US, buy for you.
|
|
|
There have been other ICOs last year that raised more than 100 million. It's not impossible. But those project were hyped. I don't see such a big hype for EHF yet.
Well, most of them were overhyped. And they hurt their investors at the end. I really not sure any ico raised more than 100m $ and make their investors happy at the end.
|
|
|
Cryptoflix will be successful in countries where people buy content and are ready to spend their money for digital entertainment In countries where audience use torrents and isn't punished for that - no Just mu opinion
I guess time will come that anti piracy laws will be enforced strictly on most countries so that people will be encourage to use this platform instead.Imho. I think that the platform would work good in developed countries, because people can afford to pay for such services and sometimes because in such countries it's prohibited to use torrents. If the price/quality ration will be good and content will include new movies, I don't see a problem. Yes, but their main goal is to get people in undeveloped countries Mostly bankless people. So it would be hard to convince them to spend their little money for cryptoflix. Yeah, only some of them will pay even low prices even if there will be no other alternative. However, this tendency may be changed later. But Cryptoflix won't just concentrate on unbanked people or I'm mixing something? As far as I remember, they plan to operate in emerging markets and to support local movie industries, but they don't limit their audience to just unbanked people. Yes they are not limiting themselves with that but their primary target is bankless people.
|
|
|
a lot of attention is also needed, the hartcap is probably quite high. so 100 millionen?
yes but unsold tokens will be burned. so its reasonable to set a high hardcap, so you have a lot of tokens (which will be created on coin creation, irreversebly) for investors and raising the coinvalue by burning the unsold tokens. That's actually a very good point, I never thought about it in this way. But on the other hand, hardcaps shouldn't be too high, because then they simply seem unrealistic and discourage investors from investing. $ 100 million is a lot but in December almost any whitepaper could achieve that. given the scope and the long roadmap $100 million does not sound so unrealistic. I am not sure about it. If it was a security and giving out dividends it may reach but for a utility, 100m is a hard target to reach.
|
|
|
You have plans to add ALX on Bancor as well? By the way it's not only 3 exchanges, you forget forkdelta and idex, which I like a lot and I hope to see more decentralized exchanges like idex in the near future
On Idex however you don't always get added automatically, for example they are not adding all those shitty airdrop from shit projects Exactly, but if you're a legit project there's no problem to be added there, basically every good project is there. I'm sure that ALAX won't find any problem to be added Many good exchanges do not allow the early announcement of the listing, so there is a possibility that ALAX team does not yet reveal all the secrets. And many exchanges ask a huge amount of money for listing. I can totally live with the exchanges that are announced so far. Better safe the money and use it for the development of the platform. We can easily say that, connections are worth more than money. Otherwise listing would cost fortune for them.
|
|
|
Instead of buying cards with ALA in them from retailers have you ever thinked of a debit card with some kind of autoconversion (in ALA) when you recharge it?
That wouldn't really work for unbanked people and emerging markets is the core audience for this project. I think cards that you can buy in multiple stores work well for emerging markets. Exactly. Also in my country, there are cards for unbanked people (teeangers mostly) and lots of people are using them.
|
|
|
I have to admit, that I haven't really heard much of David Drake before. But from that description it seems like he is the perfect man for UrAllowance. With all the business connections he got, he can definitely help to make this projecta complete success.
Same for me. But i prefer someone with good connections and do some work for the company instead of just names like Paris Hilton and Mayweather etc.
|
|
|
A good and unique project, which for a long time will not be equal in the cryptocurrency market. Absolutely fantastic project, with enormous future.
Heard that that in every project . But the long roadmap is something different I agree with you. But the road map is not an indicator either. The demand in the market and the trust of users are important. Afaik, their presentation of roadmap is somewhat realistic even though it takes longer time than the average crypto project. I also think they've done it with good faith which is way much better that lying to the community and for that, they have my trust. Yes, they are honest about the time line. This might prevent traders from investing but in the end the community will probably be more patient and interested in the project. Honesty is an important quality in crypto. To avoid that traders dont invest, they should define clear milestones. The best motivation for investors is a coin which grows, when milestones are reached. Then it is not so important how long the roadmap is. You are right how important is honesty. I saw many projects promised so much but didn't deliver anything years later.
|
|
|
Cryptoflix will be successful in countries where people buy content and are ready to spend their money for digital entertainment In countries where audience use torrents and isn't punished for that - no Just mu opinion
I guess time will come that anti piracy laws will be enforced strictly on most countries so that people will be encourage to use this platform instead.Imho. I think that the platform would work good in developed countries, because people can afford to pay for such services and sometimes because in such countries it's prohibited to use torrents. If the price/quality ration will be good and content will include new movies, I don't see a problem. Yes, but their main goal is to get people in undeveloped countries Mostly bankless people. So it would be hard to convince them to spend their little money for cryptoflix.
|
|
|
It doesn't show the viewer count now.
Is it a bug or a permanent change?
|
|
|
|