Bitcoin Forum
June 22, 2024, 07:49:05 AM *
News: Voting for pizza day contest
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 [96] 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 ... 236 »
1901  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [140'000 GH] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees, Stratum, MergedMining, Private Servers on: August 27, 2013, 06:28:25 AM
what's this
"ERR: sock connected failed www.google.com could not be resolved (2: Server failure)"

everytime i enter the captcha, i get this and after entering the  mainpage and when i want to go to the dashboard or charts, i get the captcha again

Can you screenshot and PM me what you're seeing?  Honestly, I've never seen a captcha with cloudflare, only a javascript interstitial when attack mode is on.  If you're getting these captchas and errors a lot, it sounds like your IP is on the same subnet as some very bad people.
1902  Bitcoin / Mining speculation / Re: Why is the difficulty sky rocking on: August 27, 2013, 04:07:51 AM
In pooled mining if your share goes down you get less reward? Just curious.

in a pool if the pool's hashrate goes up your share of the pool goes down. you get less. if the world hashrate goes up and your pool's doesn't then your pool will make less and so will you.

Not quite.  The only thing that really matters is:  Your hashrate vs Network hash rate.

Beyond that it is only variance, pool reliability, and pool fees.  If the pool you're in is small relative to network hash rate, you'll have more variance (which can be good or bad).  But your expected return is dictated by your percentage of the overall network speed.
1903  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [140'000 GH] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees, Stratum, MergedMining, Private Servers on: August 27, 2013, 03:10:35 AM


How long have you been mining?  The pool hasn't found a block in about 2 hours, so you won't see any rewards show up yet.  And a heads up on PPLNS, your shares takes ~8 hours to be fully paid as blocks come in (which also means if you stop mining, your earnings will still be ticking up for about 8 hours).

oh ok, i thought i made a mistake with the connection/settings.
mining for just about an hour? anyway the webpage for btcguild is still having issues right? no wonder i've been getting a lot of captcha verifications that day and connection issues today.

thanks.

The website has been getting "attacked" on & off all day, yes.  I have to occasionally switch the settings to 'Under Attack' mode which uses those browser verification pages.  The pool itself is unaffected though.
1904  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [140'000 GH] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees, Stratum, MergedMining, Private Servers on: August 27, 2013, 02:57:15 AM
any idea what I should set for the pool's address for avalon

I've tried stratum+tcp://stratum.btcguild.com:3333 but 30mins later, i still don't see any increase in bitcoins.
so i tried http://stratum.btcguild.com:3333 and same thing.

what is the url in numbers? i remember the seller who sold it to me, configured it such that it was stratum+tcp://xx.xx.xx.com:3333 or something.

i completely forgot to copy it down when i switched pools to try.

My Avalon is setup as: stratum+tcp://stratum.btcguild.com:3333 and works great.  Are you sure you put in your worker name correctly?  Also put a password like '123', it might not work if you have it blank.

yeah mine is set at 1234 for password and there's no increase in bitcoins at the dashboard

How long have you been mining?  The pool hasn't found a block in about an hour and a half.  And a heads up on PPLNS, your shares takes ~8 hours to be fully paid as blocks come in (which also means if you stop mining, your earnings will still be ticking up for about 8 hours).
1905  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [140'000 GH] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees, Stratum, MergedMining, Private Servers on: August 27, 2013, 02:43:03 AM
any idea what I should set for the pool's address for avalon

I've tried stratum+tcp://stratum.btcguild.com:3333 but 30mins later, i still don't see any increase in bitcoins.
so i tried http://stratum.btcguild.com:3333 and same thing.

what is the url in numbers? i remember the seller who sold it to me, configured it such that it was stratum+tcp://xx.xx.xx.com:3333 or something.

i completely forgot to copy it down when i switched pools to try.

My Avalon is setup as: stratum+tcp://stratum.btcguild.com:3333 and works great.  Are you sure you put in your worker name correctly?  Also put a password like '123', it might not work if you have it blank.
1906  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Dwolla freezing all financial transfers related to bitcoins?! on: August 26, 2013, 09:13:18 PM
Yes, they definitely are one of bitcoin's main competitors.

Which is funny because the vast majority of their business that even put them on the map was people moving money to exchanges.  When they were posting about their record growth rate in 2011, their timeline was almost a perfect mirror of the BTC:USD exchange rate.
1907  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [140'000 GH] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees, Stratum, MergedMining, Private Servers on: August 26, 2013, 07:24:07 PM
Is there an issue with the GetWork server?  My ASICMiner blade will not connect to btcguild.com:8332 as of about 5 hours ago.  I tried setting up stratum proxy and the blade shows that it is submitting shares but my worker is not showing any activity??

Yes, the getwork server isn't responding at the moment, trying to fix it.  You absolutely need to upgrade to the Stratum Proxy though, because the getwork server will be shut down within the next few weeks.  How did you start the proxy?  By default it tries to connect to slush's pool.
1908  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [140'000 GH] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees, Stratum, MergedMining, Private Servers on: August 26, 2013, 06:28:56 PM
A few false positives may have been banned during this latest round of additions to the site security.  If you're getting a cloudflare error related to a ban, send me a PM with your IP and I will fix it.


As posted previously, the website performance is not tied to the pool performance in any way.  If you can't load the website at all, but your miners still work, you are fine.  The only time to be worried would be:
A) The pool isn't letting you mine
B) The website is showing you inactive while your miners are running
1909  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [140'000 GH] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees, Stratum, MergedMining, Private Servers on: August 26, 2013, 05:26:44 PM
Website is under attack again by somebody trying to break into accounts using usernames/passwords from database leaks from what looks like hundreds of unrelated websites. I'm working on ways to prevent this attack from slowing down the website still.

As of right now, the website is now in 'under attack' mode with Cloudflare, which seems to have eliminated the slowdown.


These attacks are only affecting the website frontend, not the pool servers.
1910  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [140'000 GH] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees, Stratum, MergedMining, Private Servers on: August 26, 2013, 03:39:14 AM
Please forgive me for question if it's posted somewhere.  Does btcguild support or plan to support GBT?

No plans to support GBT.  It uses significantly more bandwidth for no gains.  GBT has some potential for semi-decentralized mining, but at this time no pool has managed to figure out a way to properly implement a method where users can pick their own transactions for a block, meaning it does nothing that Stratum doesn't do for less bandwidth.
1911  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [140'000 GH] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees, Stratum, MergedMining, Private Servers on: August 26, 2013, 01:44:15 AM
Minor update to the website:  Worker minimum difficulty now allows 512 and 1024, due to the ever growing number of miners in the 500GH-1TH/s (or more) range.  No change on the pool software itself, since vardiff already allowed you to go above and beyond these difficulties.
1912  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [140'000 GH] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees, Stratum, MergedMining, Private Servers on: August 25, 2013, 08:05:38 PM
So with the new block erupter's out by asicminer do you have any more information on them? Do you plan to sell them and if so how much? Freidcat mentioned something about ROI but that would imply a very low price point.

The new block erupters are the same as the old ones, just slightly improved build process.  They're not any faster/efficient.  My inventory is supposed to arrive tomorrow, which will have these minor improvements, to clear out backorders.

EDIT/ADDITION:  There's also no price drop given to resellers yet, but there will be another round of ASICMINER's coupon/promotion program which should provide ALL the remaining 1.05 BTC orders with an extra unity.  Inventory for that program should arrive this week.
1913  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [140'000 GH] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees, Stratum, MergedMining, Private Servers on: August 24, 2013, 09:46:33 PM
This thread is off my watch list.... everytime I look at the update it is in regard to usb erupters, most of thr last 3 pages!
Probably because there's not much news to tell about the pool itself.

Pretty much the above.  The pool is stable, no planned maintenance in the near future.  The only changes recently are either Store related, or the change of default minimum difficulty to 2 for all new workers.  The only upcoming news expected is a brief maintenance next month to migrate the database server to a new machine, and finally killing off the last remaining getwork server.
1914  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: Earnings lower than estimate? on: August 24, 2013, 05:38:42 AM
Quote
1) Variance in the pool. Basically, just bad luck. I would have expected this to have averaged out over 45 days but it seems to me to consistently be underperforming. Maybe I haven't waiting long enough. I dunno.
45 days isn't that long when you're mining on a pool that is a significantly small share of the overall network like Ozcoin.  organofcorti would be needed to give any hard numbers, but being ~15% under in a 45 day period doesn't sound that unusual when dealing with a pool that has only been 2-5% of network hash rate during that time frame.

Quote
2) The hashrate Ozcoin is reporting for my miners isn't the exact hashrate that I am getting when it comes to the number of valid shares I'm submitting. I'm not sure why this would be the case. My "efficiency" is always about 99.5% across all my miners when it comes to valid shares. Maybe everything is actually correct but I'm not actually doing the 100 GH/s worth of work Ozcoin is telling me.
Every pool has its own slightly different method of estimating miner hash rates.  In the end they can only guess based on submitted shares.  Beyond that, each pool does their own slight tweaks in terms of how long they examine share submissions (longer time frame = larger sample = more accurate), whether or not they include rejected shares, etc.  If you are *always* showing up lower than your actual hash rate, and it's any kind of significant percentage, then it may be a concern.

Quote
3) DGM is underpaying because that of the nature of the algorithm (which is more complicated than most). It seems to underpay even when the pools finds the expected number of blocks each day. I'm not sure why.
DGM *should* pay out at expectation given proper implementation and neutral luck.

Quote
4) People are cheating the pool. I always wondered how a pool prevented miners from lying and submitting invalid shares. Obviously the pool can't check every single one, right? They would require to have a hashrate as high as all the miners participating in order to do that, correct? The pools seems to have many more days where it doesn't find the expected number of blocks given the pools reported hashrate. What if people are submitting fake shares making the pool like it has more hashrate that it really does and taking a bigger share of the Ozcoin pie.
The pool can check every single share, and should be.  When you submit a share, that is a single hash you found that is appropriate for difficulty.  The pool only has to do one double-sha256 hash to determine if the share was valid or not, whereas the miner (on average) does ~4.2 billion hashes in order to find that share.

Quote
5) There are other hidden fees I don't know about. Or perhaps I am calculating my expecting earnings incorrectly. My calculations do seem to match up with what ozcoins own utility bots (in its IRC channel) seem to tell me.
No hidden fees on Ozcoin.

Quote
6) Ozcoin itself has some problems. The pool has gone down on occasion and has had problems where the statistics were unavailable for a time (though the owners claimed it was still processing shares correctly). There could be some bugs in its software.
While pool downtime will hurt your earnings if you don't have a backup, pool downtime should not actually impact overall pool luck.  Mining has no "memory", so if the pool goes down, there was no "progress" towards the next block that was lost.  Having a proper backup pool is always recommended to avoid downtime affecting you, no matter which pool you use.  For the second part, it is always possible that software bugs are causing the downtime, so there's always a chance that can lead to negative trending luck.

Quote
Which of these seem most likely? I'm probably going to give another pool a shot for a while and see if it is any better. I do really like Ozcoin though and I want to continue mining there.

What is the experience that other people have when it comes to expected earnings vs actual earnings?
Mining in the pool you like the most (interface, features, etc.) is always preferred for someone who isn't in it as a primary source of income.  The more of a business mining is to you, the more other factors come into play (variance, reliability, notification features, security, etc.).
1915  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Howcome so little traction in online porn world? on: August 24, 2013, 12:06:41 AM
1) No way to run a subscription service [huge amount of porn revenues are from trial accounts that auto renew at full price]
2) No way to verify age from a Bitcoin address
3) Primary users of Bitcoin know where to find lots of it for free legally
4) Primary users of Bitcoin know where to find the rest of it illegally
1916  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [130'000 GH] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees, Stratum, MergedMining, Private Servers on: August 23, 2013, 06:22:20 PM
The support page for Block Erupters has been updated with new links to bfgminer after Luke-Jr's previous server went offline.  If you were having problems downloading the Win32/Win64 binaries, they should work now.

1917  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [130'000 GH] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees, Stratum, MergedMining, Private Servers on: August 23, 2013, 06:16:57 PM
Just to clarify, MY understanding is "all the old orders" still only applies to the orders sold by BTC Guild at 1.05 BTC, not 0.60/0.50.  That is the main reason I'm holding off on distribution, because I have no idea how many are showing up (they just said they're sending the rest).
1918  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [130'000 GH] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees, Stratum, MergedMining, Private Servers on: August 23, 2013, 06:08:12 PM
Not that I really want to stir the pot, but just as an FYI SilentSonicBoom is now offering the .1 promotion to anyone (yes, 100%) of his customers who purchased at .7 or above...  It's posted in his most recent group buy threads.  Has anything changed since yesterday?

ASICMINER did confirm that we'll be getting coupon units for all the old orders, but I'm not distributing those until I actually have them (my understanding is they either haven't shipped, or only shipped out in the last 24 hours).
1919  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [130'000 GH] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees, Stratum, MergedMining, Private Servers on: August 23, 2013, 05:57:51 PM
is the website down for anyone else

edit seems to be back up now

Our old friend, the idiot who has hundreds of thousands/millions of username/password leaks and a botnet is back, doing a mass distributed login attempt.  Added a few more twists & turns to the login process to identify his attack before it even bothers connecting to the database and verifying the login information.  Hopefully the site performance impact should be gone now.
1920  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [130'000 GH] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees, Stratum, MergedMining, Private Servers on: August 23, 2013, 05:15:10 PM
but I also didn't factor in that I gave out over 8,000 coupons.

This just hit me.  You mean to say you have sold over 8,000 Block Erupters?!?

9,732 as of this post Smiley.
Pages: « 1 ... 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 [96] 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 ... 236 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!