Bitcoin Forum
May 06, 2024, 11:58:02 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 [80] 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 ... 236 »
1581  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: Which pool are best now ? on: October 18, 2013, 01:47:51 AM
Bitcoin-QT

Bitcoin-QT is a terrible pool if you have ASICs Tongue

If your a low end ASIC miner, like me, may as well solo mine on a machine that is running all the time anyway and forget about it for a couple years and see what happens.  Power consumption is low enough to not worry too much about power costs.  Many of us have a machine, or two, that needs to run 24/7 anyway.

That's what I'm thinking of doing anyway.

Low end ASIC would be okay.  The problem comes with trying to solo mine against Bitcoin-QT with a a lot of hash rate.  It doesn't keep up with high speeds (unless bfgminer has been updated to do its own extranonce-rolling when solo mining against Bitcoin-QT).
1582  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: Which pool are best now ? on: October 18, 2013, 01:33:38 AM
Bitcoin-QT

Bitcoin-QT is a terrible pool if you have ASICs Tongue
1583  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [650 TH] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees, Stratum, MergedMining, Private Servers on: October 17, 2013, 08:19:07 PM
No, not EU. Im in Cali.

Then it sounds like a local problem.  All the US servers are still running solid.
1584  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [650 TH] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees, Stratum, MergedMining, Private Servers on: October 17, 2013, 08:09:09 PM
Anyone else having connection issues?

Edit: 6 connection failures and rejects galore.

EU-Stratum?  It looks like the DC out there is having some packet loss at the moment (doesn't seem to be related to any kind of attack).
1585  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [620 TH] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees, Stratum, MergedMining, Private Servers on: October 17, 2013, 03:59:59 PM
On last diff change eleuthria was kind enough to explain what number of blocks per shift would be considered 100% so I knew whatever above 17 was a bonus. Be kind again this time and pull out your calculator and see what is normal for this difficulty?

This is for people like me that have none to minimal brain cell.

12 blocks is very slightly under neutral luck.  13 blocks is a few % above neutral luck.  Based on pool growth, this may be altered slightly before the end of the difficulty (shift 'N' value may be increased due to the speed shifts are completing at).
1586  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [600 TH] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees, Stratum, MergedMining, Private Servers on: October 17, 2013, 03:57:40 AM
Geesh, this pool is on it's way to a Th/s. Hope it can handle it.

History has shown #215613 doesn't always stick around forever.  Maybe this time will be different Smiley?

But the pool will have absolutely no problems handling it.  The stratum protocol doesn't care about miner speed, it only cares about # of connections the server has to handle.  The only thing more speed adds is more database load, however, BTC Guild uses a very scalable database schema which scales nearly as infinitely as the stratum protocol when it comes to faster miners.  In short, the pool could care less about how much speed you toss at it, only how many unique miners it has to provide and log work for.
1587  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [600 TH] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees, Stratum, MergedMining, Private Servers on: October 17, 2013, 02:13:52 AM
Thanks for the quick response.  I quickly went back to check the News (I read every new one you post because of the number badge when something new appears), but I didn't see anything about it.  I thought I missed it, but I still didn't see anything now that I know what I was looking for.  I still couldn't find it.

Maybe you posted it on this forum?  If so, I can easily miss that since there are lots of activity here.

Any ETA on getting ufasoft working?  I know it's probably low priority, but I have lots of CPU miners because electricity is free where I'm at.

Shoot, looks like the news didn't mention Ufasoft (GUIMiner was the first reported incompatibility).   I doubt I will update anything for Ufasoft at this point.  If things settle down long enough I may have a direct stratum server available like in the past, but the risk of continued attacks are forcing me to keep the current filtering in place.  There just is no justifiable use for CPU miners anymore.  There is no such thing as free electricity, somebody is taking that bill.  Heck, even GPU mining is completely pointless for BTC at this point which is why a fix for GUIMiner is not high on the priority list.  There is no scenario where a GPU will outpace the electricity cost, and SOMEBODY has to pay for it even if it isn't you.
1588  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [600 TH] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees, Stratum, MergedMining, Private Servers on: October 17, 2013, 01:12:57 AM
I noticed none of my ufa workers are producing any work.  I checked, and all of them are producing these messages:

10/16/2013 7:40:54 PM Result: 12da5903 accepted
Found NONCE not accepted by Target

Sounds like it finds a solution for a share, but the pool is not accepting it.

As posted in the news during the attacks, Ufasoft is not supported by BTC Guild stratum at this time.  The same goes for GUIMiner but I'm working on a fix for that one.
1589  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [600 TH] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees, Stratum, MergedMining, Private Servers on: October 17, 2013, 12:14:59 AM
Who the hell is doing this? 80,680.63 GH/s?

Same guy that was doing 105 TH/s last week at one point.  My guess is it's either part of one of the large private pools (ghash/100TH/KNC) that has BTC Guild as a failover, or an ASIC manufacturer that is using BTC Guild to test.
1590  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [600 TH] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees, Stratum, MergedMining, Private Servers on: October 16, 2013, 10:18:41 PM
I keep getting switched to "[removed]" when i try to connect to 'stratnum.btcguild.com'.

This is expected behavior.  The domain is still btcguild.com, and as such is still safe.  This is one of the many things that have been put into place to keep miners online during DDoS attacks.  If 'stratum.btcguild.com' goes down, miners who have been redirected should remain online.
1591  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [540 TH] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees, Stratum, MergedMining, Private Servers on: October 16, 2013, 05:57:24 PM
I see. Higher pool's hasrate, faster the round ends and less time my crappy little setup has to submit shares - hence lower shares.

True, but you enter more rounds, so it ends up being the same relative payout.  It's been stated before in this thread and many others:  Your expected payout is not related to the pool speed.  Your expected payout is purely related to your speed vs network DIFFICULTY. 

Higher pool speeds reduce your variance, hopefully keeping you close to your expected payouts.  You'll get smaller payouts much more frequently.  Lower pool speeds increase your variance (but still lower it compared to solo mining), providing larger payouts with less frequency.
1592  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [110 TH] BitMinter.com [1% PPLNS,Pays TxFees + MergedMining,Stratum,GBT,vardiff] on: October 16, 2013, 05:21:09 PM
Newsflash: difficulty just went up 41% so your revenue was just cut by that amount.
http://bitcoin.sipa.be/speed-lin-10k.png

Better get used to it.

Just to clarify:  When difficulty goes up 41%, your income does NOT go down 41%.  That's quite obvious when you factor in difficulty doubling is a 100% increase, but you'd only lose half your income not 100% of it.

1 - (1 / (1 + % increase)) = Drop in revenue.  In this case:  1 - (1 / 1.41) = 0.2907, or a 29.07% drop in revenue.  Still hurts, but not as much as a 41% drop would.
1593  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [540 TH] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees, Stratum, MergedMining, Private Servers on: October 16, 2013, 04:56:18 PM
Your hashrate stays the same? You're difficulty is probably adjusting up then. If you look at your miner, does the share difficulty increase from when you start to after the 48 hours or whatever? If the hashrate is the same, it's just increasing the difficulty for you so you are not wasting bandwidth and server load reporting shares too quickly.
Now I'm sitting at 99k shares submitted. I even took an hour break from BTCG but that didn't help. My shares just keep going down. I'm not sure if that is related to network difficulty but somehow think it's likely not related.

Your shares are going down per shift because the pool had a decent spurt of growth in the last 12 hours.  We were 530-550 TH/s most of yesterday, and this morning we're at 590-595 THs.  That's close to a 10% gain in pool size while I was asleep.  This would mean your shares per shift will be ~10% lower than they would have been roughly 12 hours ago.

Your shares per shift represent how much of the pool speed you make up.  If the pool speed goes up, your shares per shift go down, but the shifts complete that much faster, making it end up in balance.
1594  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [540 TH] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees, Stratum, MergedMining, Private Servers on: October 16, 2013, 04:42:35 AM
Website should be back up under Cloudflare again within a few minutes.  Currently got a new wave of attacks hitting.  Public stratum address is moving back to the proxy/filtering servers.  As with the last attack, once you start mining you should be safe/reliably connected.
1595  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [540 TH] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees, Stratum, MergedMining, Private Servers on: October 16, 2013, 03:51:48 AM
Small note for the upcoming difficulty change:  The luck graphs will stop updating when the difficulty changes.  I haven't automated the luck graphs for the period where difficulty changes (since the shifts will include blocks/shares from both difficulties).  So for a few hours (if it happens before I wake up), the graphs will not update.  It's not perfect, but it's better than the old method where if I went to sleep without turning it off the luck would show something like 180% for every shift until I fixed it.
1596  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [540 TH] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees, Stratum, MergedMining, Private Servers on: October 16, 2013, 03:44:32 AM
Eleuthria,

Is it possible to not use vardiff on my KNC Jupiter?  Currently, whenever the diff changes, my jupiter produces tons of errors.  I've now submitted 1.1 Million error'd shares due to this issue. (over the last 5 days).


It appears that under my worker config, I only have the ability to set a min diff value but can't lock it in place.  If it is possible to set a static value, could you please set the dhenson_1 worker to 357? (500GH / 1.4)

Thank you.

256 should lock it into place.  BTC Guild only supports difficulties in power of 2.  500 GH/s *shouldn't* cross the shares per minute threshold at 256.  The alternative is just going up to 512.  Either one is going to end up making you the same in the long run (SLIGHTLY more hourly variance, virtually unchanged 24 hour variance).
1597  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [540 TH] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees, Stratum, MergedMining, Private Servers on: October 15, 2013, 10:12:13 PM
eleuthria is bull on price. BUY BUY BUY!

Note:  Any attempt to listen to my statements and predict the market from them may result in disappointment, headaches, and possibly bankruptcy if taken to the extremes.  If you have a heart condition, consult with your doctor.


But this is a somewhat serious issue.  If we do have a decent rally and/or bubble, the last thing anyone wants is to have their coins stuck for up to a few hours because a bunch of people carrying 10+ BTC balances all withdrew at the same time and emptied the hot wallet as a result.
1598  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [540 TH] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees, Stratum, MergedMining, Private Servers on: October 15, 2013, 08:37:19 PM
As we enter what looks like another Bitcoin rally, please remember that pools are not banks, and in the event of large simultaneous withdrawals, your coins may not be immediately available due to a depletion of the hot wallet storage.  BTC Guild, along with any major bitcoin service which keeps balances for users to withdraw on demand, uses a hot/cold storage system to minimize the amount of funds at risk in the event of server compromise/server failure.

Make sure you set your auto payouts or run manual payouts regularly.  It not only makes sure you have complete control over the majority of your coins, it makes sure that others will still be able to receive their payouts on demand without any delay to move funds from cold wallets to hot wallets.
1599  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [540 TH] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees, Stratum, MergedMining, Private Servers on: October 15, 2013, 01:12:07 AM
Yep, still getting it.

Which browser?  Try doing a forced page refresh (Ctrl+F5).  The SSL cert from Cloudflare is valid if you're hitting Cloudflare, the SSL cert from BTC Guild is valid if you're hitting BTC Guild.
1600  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [540 TH] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees, Stratum, MergedMining, Private Servers on: October 15, 2013, 12:36:03 AM
What happened? Getting this now. "There is a problem with this website's security certificate."

Still getting it?  Moved the site to Cloudflare as a temporary measure.  The regular website reverse proxy was having problems.
Pages: « 1 ... 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 [80] 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 ... 236 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!