So...show us?

---

No, we're asking for it because it's not...

BTC or (freedom-)dollarz?
Sounds like somebody overpaid either way.

Payments for the round have been sent (8496d4565a888729b70772200789da021f7eda06b26d8ad62336e382958a7d74).

Sorry for the delay, we had set up the escrow initially to be passive, however, after discussion, it seems things are easier if I make the payments directly, hence an active escrow.
Had to discuss a few further things with the runner, which caused the delay. Anyway, payments have just been made (20eb88242d991118ce82f0b27e5a480b989b228ecd3f192574fc47e67764da82).

That's bullshit and you know it. If not, please show me.

You're right, fixed.

Let's add a few more coins to my list (I've edited my post, but reposting to confirm)

#12 - 0.01
#13 - 0.01
#14 - 0.01
#16 - 0.01
#42 - 0.01

#12 - 0.01
#13 - 0.01
#14 - 0.01
#16 - 0.01
#42 - 0.01

(sorry for the edit, I can repost if necessary)

I've added you for the avatar bonus starting this round. You'll get 50% with your next scheduled bonus payment (for 2 rounds).

Wouldn't call contributing to the forum competition.
I mean sure, you take a peek left and right what the other (active) reporters are doing, but in the end, everybody is doing what they are abled to,
and any reporting activity (given it's good reports, not spamming or whatever) is a good thing, no matter how high the numbers.
That being said, I'd eat shorena for breakfast any given day

I wouldn't be abled to bet on that one, huh?

Yes and no. Indeed, posts in wrong sections are quite a big junk of my reports, not to mention the annoying backlink spam for whatever products.
Another thing I can't stand is when marketplace seller either don't delete old bumps or violate the 24h bump rule, so I report those very often aswell.
However, there is one group of threads/spam/reports, which is somehow related to btc price movements.
In case of big jumps, aswell as crashes (like the little one we had earlier today), the Speculation FUD spam gets significantly more active.
Those threads ("bitcoin ponzi scheme", "2014 all over again",...think we all know the hits) make up for a big part of my reports aswell.

Yeah, that's totally related to the thread...

---

What Lauda said covers the situation pretty good.
Having multiple accounts is allowed by the forum, but discouraged by a part of the community.
It also depends on how you intend to use the accounts, but that's striving too far.

As this thread was linked in the SMAS thread to show how "all" campaigns rely on SMAS now, I agree it would be worth pointing out whether or not a campaign supports SMAS.
We could do that either with an additional column, or with some color coding (for example: (Lime)green -> SMAS camapaign; Yellow -> Uses the SMAS list; Blue/black -> No status).

---

Updated both lists and the combined list in the first reply.
Laudas list currently covers 203 users, the one by yahoo includes 182.
In combination, 283 users are included on the blacklist.
I neither used the list with inactives from yahoo, nor the one with rulebreakers from Lauda, so this is a pure list of spammers.

I can't count posts in local sections for one simple reason: I can't tell what they say.
At our rates, I want to ensure I enroll people who write posts of a quality I can appreciate. Given the payments and spots, I can allow myself to be picky.
I can't simply tell by the way a post looks, whether or not it is constructive/up to my quality standards. I need to be abled to actually read and understand the content.
Exceptions to this rule apply (some local boards allow english posts, others posts in languages I am fluent in), in those cases, I usually ignore the rule and count these posts anyway.
Bottom line though, I can't pay for what I can not read.

I got it, just didn't run the numbers yet. If there's anything to settle, I will do that with the next payroll.

You'll be upgraded for the next round starting Sunday.

Looks like the coin anduck was selling here -> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=332353.msg3563558#msg3563558

There's already been a big group being weeded out right before they had to restart their campaign.
I don't think much changed though, so there is quite possibly another group (or further alts from the same person) still taking advantage of that campaign.

They've been the first campaign/advertiser to be warned by Staff (hilarious in this case) about what they are doing.

Being in charge of the 777Coin campaign, I'd like to comment here, this is my personal opinion, and not representing SMAS/the other members.
I didn't set up the campaign and the rules were made like that when I took over. I however accepted the rules like that and am running the campaign in this way right now.
I think a bonus payment system is way better than systems like FortuneJack or others, which require a certain amount of posts in the gambling subsection.
It's indeed giving an additional incentive to post in gambling sections (which obviously is the goal of it), but unlike the others, it still gives the users the option not to.
You're free to disagree on this.

Thanks for the support.

---

Been some time since the last update, laudas new list came out yesterday and yahoo should have an updated version available aswell,
I'll update the thread tomorrow morning and create the combined list.

Been asked to escrow and set everything up, signed messages following.

---

Thanks.

---

Thank you.

Here's a special combination, thanks to CJB for making the second one