|
That sounds reasonable enough, you want the people who can get a lot done rather than spending an hour checking each post to see if it needs deletion.
|
|
|
|
|
Sign a message with your Bitcoin address and post it in public or in PM to theymos. Makes everything a lot simpler and a lot quicker.
|
|
|
|
That's already in the requirements: Allow users to export/import lists of good posters, hidden posts, and ignored users through three separate webs of trust. Most people will want to use a single trust list for this, though, so there should also be an easy way of editing all trust lists at once. About webs of trust
Each web of trust is composed of data, a separate trust list per user, and a trust limit setting per user from 0 to 100. A trust list is a list of users with associated trust scores from 0 to 100. Users see (by default) only the data of users in their trust networks. Trust networks are calculated from their trust lists.
The trust network algorithm should work something like this: To find a user's trust network, put everyone in his trust list with score above his trust limit into his trust network. Then get the trust network of everyone in his trust network. Combine all of these trust networks into a single list. Ensure that each user is listed only once -- average scores if a user appears more than once. Then for each user in this list, add them to the original user's trust network only if they do not already exist there. There should be some recursion limit.
(This sounds complicated, but there will probably be an easy-to-use UI for simple tasks such as subscribing to a single user's ignore list.) It does sound quite complicated, yes. Thanks for notifying me that this already exists, though. |
|
|
|
|
OP you seriously just need to cool down and accept that you were banned for spam. Pulling the "OMG IT'S NOT THE EXACT WIKIPEDIA DEFINITION THEREFORE IT'S NOT SPAM EVEN THOUGH IT ANNOYS EVERYONE" does not work.
|
|
|
|
|
Surely you could just keep a copy of the wallet stored on your machine in order to scam the person who receives it?
|
|
|
|
|
I'll pay you a dollar towards your music festival if you take a picture of yourself with a shoe on your head and a piece of paper saying "dank 21/04/2014".
|
|
|
|
|
OP, if you are telling the truth then can you provide some evidence of your purchases, conversations, etc?
|
|
|
|
|
You miiight want to make it clear that you aren't affiliated with the Bitcoin casino scam which was bitvegas.net.
|
|
|
|
Strange, although it doesn't change anything it's unlike the human mind to decide that after getting a low your best bet is to bet low the 2nd time round. If she didn't change at all that losing streak wouldn't have happened.
I was thinking that too. And what if that person had started off the other way, they would have won every bet. Each roll is an independent event. Doesn't matter what she chooses. Clearly, you didn't read what I said properly before posting. Like the majority of your posts, probably something to do with your PrimeDice signature, I guess. Anyway, I'm aware that it doesn't matter, I was commenting that it was unlike the human mind to do that. |
|
|
|
I consider all of you spammers. This is a forum, not a chatbox. 10 quoted posts are looking ridiculous. You are lucky other moderators don't think that way.
That is not spam when we are actually discussing the topic raised in the OP. Which you currently aren't, just so you know. A long chain of quotes for discussion purposes is not spam. Anyway, on-topic: There is no need to dis-allow everyone from having a signature. Just dis-allow signature ads or make people damn well know that if they spam for cash, they're going to be punished. |
|
|
|
I stopped putting ads in my signature when I realized it makes me look similar to those who just spam for money. Many people would complain that they can't spam for their $50/month that they get from signature ads, but in the long run it'd be much better for bitcointalk.
BTW I get more around $100-200. The amount isn't the point nor the topic of this thread, it's the spam that it creates. Why not only allow Full Members + to have a signature in the first place? Why should Members and below be blocked from having a signature because people are spamming due to signature ads? Or maybe not allowed to have a link. Truthfully there is no medium. Its either get half of the forum pissed, or get the other half. Those who will be pissed, will be pissed simply because they can't be paid to post? This is a forum for discussing Bitcoin, not for making profit, at the end of the day. If people quit because they can't make money by posting, good riddance I say. |
|
|
|
I stopped putting ads in my signature when I realized it makes me look similar to those who just spam for money. Many people would complain that they can't spam for their $50/month that they get from signature ads, but in the long run it'd be much better for bitcointalk.
BTW I get more around $100-200. The amount isn't the point nor the topic of this thread, it's the spam that it creates. Why not only allow Full Members + to have a signature in the first place? Why should Members and below be blocked from having a signature because people are spamming due to signature ads? |
|
|
|
I stopped putting ads in my signature when I realized it makes me look similar to those who just spam for money. Many people would complain that they can't spam for their $50/month that they get from signature ads, but in the long run it'd be much better for bitcointalk.
BTW I get more around $100-200. The amount isn't the point nor the topic of this thread, it's the spam that it creates. |
|
|
|
should I use What
as collateral
Altcoins, precious metals, etc. Or even physical items such as an iPad, although that's less preferred. |
|
|
|
This thread should be on top , i got this link from some wheres else . and it help a lot .
Yes now they need to do this thread as sticky because its very helpful for all new and old members for all signature campaigns I respect the OP but please mods, don't sticky this. Signature ads cause enough trouble anyway. Mods aren't going to sticky this. Course they won't. Signature campaigns have nothing to do with the forum itself. Precisely my thoughts, that was more because the thread is quite big and well-known. |
|
|
|
This thread should be on top , i got this link from some wheres else . and it help a lot .
Yes now they need to do this thread as sticky because its very helpful for all new and old members for all signature campaigns I respect the OP but please mods, don't sticky this. Signature ads cause enough trouble anyway. |
|
|
|
|
I can't think of a title that accurately describes this so I'll just state my idea here. Rather than x having to publish their ignore lists in public so that people can easily ignore y group of trolls/shills/sockpuppets or whatever they want to ignore, I propose that members should be able to type in the names of those who they want to use the ignore lists of. So if z types in x's name into this section, z will have x's ignore list merged with his own. So:
z's ignore list:
a
b
c
x's ignore list:
c
d
e
z's ignore list after having x's ignore list merged into his own:
a
b
c
d
e
Of course this would not be permanent, if z removed x's name from his ignore merging page or whatever, then it would revert to a, b, c.
Anyway, I think this would be a quick solution for people who complain about trolls and such.
|
|
|
|
|
CoinBet.cc is basically a proven scam & have closed their website. I think it's pretty safe to assume their signature campaign has either turned into a scam or closed now.
|
|
|
|
Interesting, I didn't know you were able to do that. That makes the OP pretty redundant then.
I think that he actually wants to ban "misquotes". But these are often useful, so I'm not going to disallow them. Ah, if he is talking about someone purposefully misquoting a post, then they usually will be called out for doing so by the people on the thread anyway. I can see your logic. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
