~BTC4800 on Hooboy till 3000cny what's wrong with that exchange
|
|
|
i sold 2/3 of my stash at 465 am weak Is this when you say, but i bought back in at (insert min price) $461 ?
|
|
|
Damn it was off on the poll by one day! Can we get a new poll now? We need a new target
|
|
|
one moon pic on the previous page and one rocket on this page. IT's STILL GOOD buy Buy BUY!
We agreed on a moratorium banning CCMFs, moons, rockets etc... until after (yet another) $1k party, then it's game on
|
|
|
Should the low volume be concerning? .. for the shorts who are running out of bitcoin supplies? There are plenty of BTC available to shorters, so they're far from running out of bitcoin supplies. Might be running of funds to cover those shorts though
|
|
|
I checked ">450" on the poll so dont make a lier out of me!!
|
|
|
Not many coins showing on Finex after $440
|
|
|
Segwit pull request in main repository - https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7910April ETA Deadline Met!
I expect Segwit to remove from segnet testnet to the bitcoin testnet this month and enter mainnet early may for activation in June/July depending upon the miners hitting 95% Yes yes, lets time it to the halfing Can see the headlines rolling with something like "BTC block limit solved while BTC is about to get more scares as supply halves"
|
|
|
BAM i guess Finex wants to go up
|
|
|
4
Just to confirm we're all ignoring this count down and no one to ask what it's about right?
|
|
|
Folks, looks like the price is heading back to 400 €
It is getting exciting, i would like to see 3000 € /BTC by the end of the year
China needs to get on board
|
|
|
Lightning network is a bunch of sidechains. It will almost certainly not be economically viable until Bitcoin's market cap is orders of magnitude higher than it is now. To achieve that, we need on-chain scaling and we need it before another cryptocurrency diverts the resources necessary to make it happen. This is urgent.
Bitcoin is becoming more and more like a premined coin with the existing monetary base large and growing. Coins are more distributed, but that is a limited advantage because hodlers have less individual incentive to promote adoption due to free riders benefiting who don't participate in that promotion.
Before average blocksize approached the 1 MB limit, something else prevented blocks from filling up besides fees. xactions were effectively free and blocks still did not fill up. That something was orphan risk. Large blocks propagate slower and are at a higher risk of getting orphaned. That is why fears of spam-filled blocks is overblown. That risk is always present. That is a reason why some miners mine empty blocks.
SegWit is riskier than a 2MB hard fork because it is a more radical change to the protocol. I hope it works, but there is uncertainty that needs to be factored in. In my opinion, it is reckless to attempt such a radical change instead of a simple 2MB hard fork because it may prevent the rally that would otherwise occur at the halving in July. Markets hate uncertainty. The more complicated the upgrade, the easier it is for bears and trolls to spread technobabble FUD. The more complicated the upgrade, the more things that can go wrong, similar to a machine with more moving parts.
We are not out of the woods yet. We are just getting to the woods.
Exactly, that's why we need to knock out the "complicated" segwit right now before mass adoption
|
|
|
I just can't see a moonshot until after SegWit because we're hard up against the blocksize limit.
it must happen before.... what will market do when segwit has been out for weeks and it its hit an impasse not able to gain more the 19% hashing power supporting it? CRASH! we must PUMP before we DUMP. Are you against segwit now? Wouldn't bet on network NOT supporting it once its out.
|
|
|
Sergei needs to start another ponzi asap. Then we'll get the price moving for sure. How can MMM ponzi #3478 can still somehow be relevant is beyond me. Just rebrand it as a lottery and let it go
|
|
|
Ahh finally some action and i see NLC is back too
|
|
|
Just shaking out the weak hands. Some serious shaking going on
|
|
|
All the in fighting and trolling is getting a bit too much lately. The way things are currently it looks like we don't all want the same thing which is bitcoin's price to rise right.
I hope to see some kind of consensus soon.
There will never be consensus. There will always be fighting and trolling. You'd better get used to it because this is the future of bitcoin. There will always be some minority like current big blocktards that want to take over bitcoin and ruin or cripple it. Bitcoin's price will rise despite all this! Rise based on what exactly? a permanent conflict between users, miners and coders? a 100% chance of a network congestion failure before we get to the point we were at 27 months ago? the ability of the PRC to nationalize Chinese mines and execute as many 51% attacks as they want? SegWit TestNet results? What the hell makes you think it's going up and who is supposed to be doing the buying? Pump it, and they will come. You can pump anything and get momentum riders, but you have to keep it up indefinitely because as soon as the momentum is lost, they ride it the other way. Sustainable appreciation has to be based on fundamentals. 15 out of the last 20 days were green candles, but the price has only recovered about 2/3 of what it lost in the five days prior to that. That's an enormous amount of pumping, but everybody knows that some spammer can crash the market again by filling blocks any time he wants. Are you saying that bitcoin is dead??
|
|
|
Adam can we get a new poll? May i suggest. Should this poll me censored? Option: Yes or Definite Yes
|
|
|
Anyone mind explaining why ETH has not crashed and burned yet?
well it just broke down from a rising wedge, which is forming the right shoulder of a massive h&s... to answer your question, vitalik spoke at coinbase today, so if coinbase does ether there will be a pump from that. vlad and vitalik have both admitted they don't actually know how to scale ethereum and scaling is still a "research project" . (they've admitted that this year) pretty soon they'll figure out their "idea" for scaling violates the cap theorem. even with zero use their blockchain is already bloating. beyond 'hello world' prototypes theres gonna be a lot of problems and a lot of drama with insiders selling off before announcing their failures to handcuff a bunch of dapps (which are not decentralized) to their platform in any way that scales. With all that they managed to amass almost $1B i market cap. Amazing
|
|
|
|