Everybody discussing walls and prices ... bear shows up and shit dumps a bunch of bcash shitposts  anyhooo .... but check out that 2000 btc wall on bitstamp, don't see those very often anymore! Is it gone don't see it, was it a bid or ask wall? |
|
|
|
Blah blah blah larger block blah blah
You have bcash and bsv with larger blocks, go there you have options. What part of we don't want larger blocks is so hard to comprehend |
|
|
|
A nice alternative of BitcoinWisdom.com: Cryptowat.ch
Thanks for the link. I use the Cryptocoin price index site, but I liked the quick clean interface of BW more. However it's been falling apart for awhile, guess the last API links finally dropped dead. Such is change. As was posted before give https://bitcoinwisdom.io a try |
|
|
|
|
Lol at Finex walls. BTC1200 bid @ $5069, and ~BTC1000 ask @ $5150 someone trying to corner the market? Oops i might be in a wrong thread
|
|
|
|
Can we just not let the arguing with jbreher polarize sides as if there was no middle more reasonable field?
Bitcoin is scaling the right way. But that doesn't mean it won't have a moderate and reasonable block size increase in the (near?) future.
L2 is the way to go, but block size will also need some (linear, not exponential as that's what L2 is for) capacity upgrade sometime.
and are we really just giving blockstream inc. a pass? I am not sure what you mean. Some say blockstream wants to focus on L2 (something that I consider extremely important for scaling) and also that they won't ever allow a block size increase (something that I am not sure if it is just FUD, because that sounds simply stupid). My point of view is that Bitcoin needs both L2 and a gradual blocksize increase, being L2 responsible for most of the massive scaling and block size increase enough to support L2 and bigger/not so frequent tx's directly on-chain. Also I am pretty sure whatever is done need to be done via CONSENSUS. Other than that would not be Bitcoin, but just a worthless copycat (and we already have enough of those, don't we?) No, just no. If you want to even consider the idea of BTC being the scale of say settling world's oil trades, your priorities need to be decentralization and security above all else! That needs to be built into the core design from the ground up, and current developers seemed to be aligned with that vision. If you're willing to compromise on those fundamentals "just a tiny bit" so you could buy your bubble gum on the blockchain right meow  or being manipulated by that logic to unknowingly exert pressure on the developers for said compromise, you're on a wrong train. |
|
|
|
Moscow bought over 10% of all of the BTC in circulation? What clown think tank he claims to work for? |
|
|
|
... Incidentally, while BTC is up 14+% in the last 24 hours, BCH is up over 27% in the same time frame.
Bitcoin's rising tide lifts all altcoins, which tend to go up higher because they are considered to be more risky investments. This has always been the case. BCH and SV aren't rising on their own merits. I suspect they will continue to lose positions in the CMC ranking because their primary marketing tactic continues to be confusing newcomers into thinking they are "the real bitcoin." Its been a failure for them so far and there's no reason to believe that will change in the future. Put yourself in the shoes of the average business owner who is still skeptical of cryptocurrency and is only beginning to consider adopting BTC for their business... Then along comes this chatter about how BCH and SV are better, and they look into it, only to discover that now they have to learn how to use and install 2 more wallets that aren't compatible with BTC, in the hopes that they will have customers who want to pay in BCH and SV. Largely, nobody still wants to pay in BTC, so there's little chance they're going through the hassle of bothering with coins that are not _actually_ bitcoin. With "low" stagnant BTC prices bitmain doesn't have the profits to prop up bcash, so bcash was being priced to go bye bye into the night. Unfortunately BTC going up gives bitmain fatter margins to continue keeping its pet project afloat, so bcash shorts got burned this time around. Gambling on shitcoins being leveraged BTC will burn a lot of "traders". |
|
|
|
We won't need any of that today for the shorts |
|
|
|
WTF happened last night ? Fuck, I'm torn. I've been waiting for this for a looong time but... I was also going to buy today ! What to do, what to do...  We started the uptrend, someone big picked up on that and pulled the trigger hard. Expect others to follow unless this get dumped on hard. Or someone front running good news from Bakkt/ETF etc... Or honey badger |
|
|
|
|
This can get dangerous quick
|
|
|
|
Verified!
Hope we get to read through the submitted forms when the inevitable "leak" happens.
I am 100% sure there are a few non westerners putting in real data. So this may not be for the best. They gotta learn somehow |
|
|
|
|
Hmm i was hoping to see Bitmain go belly up before the next bull run
|
|
|
|
Can anyone tell me what this is? Not really related to anything other than it says a trip to the Moon on the case it came in. Seriously though..what the hell is it? There is a ongoing debate around the house as to its function. A microscope, a telescope and or a sextant have all been postulated and tbh I have never seen anything like it. While not precision made, it is quite sturdy and appears to be made out of some sort of brass. Looking through the optic sight there is not much magnification so I doubt its a telescope. Same for being a microscope, and it lacks the typical features of a sextant so I am at a loss. Another theory is that its just a fake steampunk sort of thing. Can the great hive mind of the Wall rescue me from this predicament?  The book Twyla Tharp indicates dancing. The device looks like a portable magnifying device. No compass or measuring on device. No compass. So not a scientific device. I assume this would be used to view dancing when stuck in a skybox... Or for a choreographer.... Maybe correcting eyesight only... so pre glasses My guess.... I believe it's art. Critical 2018 was an art festival similar to the burning man festival. The theme for 2018 was "A trip to the moon". https://www.criticalnw.org/If it's their product why not just email them and ask? |
|
|
|
It's like watching two titanics run into each other |
|
|
|
Who is holding most BTC from WO family?
a guy called realr0ach has more bitcoins than all of us put together he's not close family, more like the retarded inbred mountains-dwelling second cousin It's actually very impressive, i heard he dedicates about 10% of his resources to troll the hell out of BTC in order to suppress the price and shake out the weak hands while he quietly accumulates. He actually admitted buying at $10k, $15k, $18k and hodling till $19k while trolling everyone else. |
|
|
|
At least Adam used to delete Roach when he got too out of hand, for some reason infofront is providing a platform for them
Infofront's got more of a life probably, just that. Often busy with his day job and always with his newborn. Personally speaking, I like his relaxed style. He does have a go at cleaning up once in a while. I agree roach and others are a nuisance with their slavering rants, so when things become uncomfortable we have that useful ignore button.  Thanks. I've been staying up with the thread, but not posting much. The boring BTC action tends to nurture these side conversations as well. I don't personally find the discussion of Muslims going on here to be any more off topic (or offensive) than the discussion of mathematics that's been going on for several days. Also, one thing I look for when determining if someone is trolling is the amount of engagement. Is the person just shitposting, or engaging in conversation? With r0ach, for example, it's often a mix of both. So we're cool with providing platform to proposals for murdering babies and wiping out this or that class as long as some PM pushing is sprinkled along the way? cause you know not allowing someone to push their propaganda on a BTC forum would be like communist censorship and such  My ignore list of people quoting idiots got to a point where i just see full pages of ignored users |
|
|
|
Our family doctor is a muslim. I've been going to him since I was a kid. He hasn't tried to kill me yet.
Which doesn't change that muslim terrorists are a result of their religion and that so-called "peaceful" or "moderate" muslims side with them over us when they are forced to make the choice. Perhaps. I have trouble declaring an entire group as an enemy when only some of them are clearly at war. Kind of like the jews. We all know jews have started or are deeply involved with almost every evil institution to come out of the west in the last 500 years, etc. However, most of them are just living their lives like the rest of us. OTOH, I'm reminded sometimes of the "Rwandan Genocide". Hutus and Tutsis lived next door to each other. They had each other over for dinner, watched each other's kids, etc. But when ethnic tensions boiled over, they were hacking each other's families up with machetes. "Some of them" are a product of "all of them" and have the support of the majority, silent or otherwise. We simply can not coexist with them within the same culture. They don't want to, even if we did. Which we don't, not when they become numerous enough to enforce their will as per the above link. Whether you are correct or not (actually I am giving you too much benefit of the doubt with your hate filled phoney baloney), why the fuck don't you get back to talking about bitcoin or at least attempting to make some points in this thread that relate to bitcoin. Did you know what thread you are in? So, anyhow, based on your 20 pages non-topical focus and your pissing off of a lot of active on-topic participants in this thread, including distracting from the topic, I think that it would be good if infofront would delete your last 20 pages of myopic baby-penis non-acceptance focused hatred posts... just to teach you a lesson that a little off-topicness might be o.k. and tolerable, but you are on an emotional based obsession, which likely alienates a decent number of people who are involved in bitcoin.. believe it or not there are some muslims of various levels of belief and practices and some are involved in bitcoin... jewish peeps, too.. At least Adam used to delete Roach when he got too out of hand, for some reason infofront is providing a platform for them |
|
|
|
Our family doctor is a muslim. I've been going to him since I was a kid. He hasn't tried to kill me yet.
Which doesn't change that muslim terrorists are a result of their religion and that so-called "peaceful" or "moderate" muslims side with them over us when they are forced to make the choice. Perhaps. I have trouble declaring an entire group as an enemy when only some of them are clearly at war. Kind of like the jews. We all know jews have started or are deeply involved with almost every evil institution to come out of the west in the last 500 years. However, most of them are just living their lives like the rest of us. OTOH, I'm reminded sometimes of the "Rwandan Genocide". Hutus and Tutsis lived next door to each other. They had each other over for dinner, watched each other's kids, etc. But when ethnic tensions boiled over, they were hacking each other's families up with machetes. Ha and what is a Hutu and what is a Tutsi? Social groups defined by Belgian colonists by the amount of cows one owns? Ethnic tensions between social classes defined by Catholic Belgian? Wasn't Hilter born a Catholic? Funny how one can easily structure any argument pretty much any way they want to a typical low educated reader. Roach/Ibian have countless posts attempting to justify their baby killing propaganda...on a BTC forum. Anyone with half a brain cell ignored them a while back |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
