Says the guy with a big SuperNet banner in his sig

Should just rename the Thread title "Innovatiave Currencies with Potential - The BagHolder Guarantee"

If you really want to take your frustrations out you can make accounts on cryptoplays using trash email addresses I think Tiny Bar would agree that this is sensational.

https://cryptoplays.com/topic/77/what-s-with-my-new-avatar/3

10k is still going, doesn't make it failed because price has dropped to 0.

I think the float becomes too high and walls become too big with such high inflation but you can do a lot of things with a crypto. I think it would be cool with an auto supply squish, then you can sell into the market all over again, might even work well using the lottery style Blocks. Then you never can tell exactly how much 10k you will have at any given time! Like this month you have 50 million Coins, next month you have 5000 Coins, and the month after that you have 50 Million Coins again, along with lottery Blocks you'd have total randomness!

lol, I don't see how I'm an asshole for allowing people to say whatever they want without fear of having their posts removed except by forum mods. Think about it like this, I may not agree with your opinion but I can't remove it and even negative opinions still bump the thread and adds post counts. If a thread was self-moderated then that would happen just the same as it'd need the OP to delete the posts, suspicious links would happen in multiple threads so users would just report the link to forum mods anyways and mods would ban the user and have all their posts deleted.

But that is posting links, they quote the topic and change the link. If links were disallowed for new accounts then the quoted topic would have the link dissallowed

It would probably just be better if Bitcointalk in general disallowed links to executable items from low post count accounts. If you need a minimum activity in order to post links in general then that doesn't stop newbies from posting on threads but it would stop them from posting links. It would be better to just disallow low activity accounts to post links, what would be the motive for a newbie account to post a link to an executable anyways? If you really had your heart set on launching a Coin with a new account, you could take the time to wait a week or two and make some posts in general.

No, I don't think that was a 10k holder, it was someone targeting Coins with active threads. People hold lots of different Coins more than just one, it just shows that there is something worth something to choose those Coins. It is important to stamp out stuff like this quickly since new people might click a newbie link and they get burnt by Crypto never to return.

In Crypto there carries risk of loss so we should do our best to help keep everyone safe and mitigate that risk, find new and more secure ways.


For ConStand I had the same thought.

If someone bought a product and sent their Coins, you would have to rely on the trust that the seller would ship the item. On the seller side if he were to just ship first, then the seller assumes the risk and the buyer could just buy the product and have it ship to them and never pay. It wouldn't work to just send Coins directly, you would need an escrow system that can mediate the process.

It should be where you buy the item, pay for it in CON and the escrow management holds the Coins until there is confirmation of received goods in the way it was described and then release funds to the seller. Package tracking numbers can confirm items have been sent and received but not everyone would take the time to just confirm they have received a package so you would take the package delivery send/confirmation through tracking numbers and then have a grace period (1-2 weeks) once it can be shown it was received for any disputes or confirmed by the buyer and then release the CON to the seller.

Fantastic! Maybe if it works you could help to create a claim for other Coins as well.

I think that's what you call a circle jerk as they are all selling to each other, lol

Yeah that could be a good idea, I think hosting with Github would probably be good, could just have someone keeping the wallets downloads safe. You could have lots of trusted sources which host different wallets as a service by donation as a list and then just lick to the source instead.

But that would mean that you'd also have to get the source updated whenever there is a new wallet.

Ok so lets get back on topic,

In what ways would be best for a trusted source? What is the best method for setting up sha checksums?

That's because he was in a thread and clicked one of the links, you don't have to own any of the coins to get hit by it, then he traced where they were coming from and notified threads in which it was posted on.

I quoted a meme from google, in what way was it supposed to be malicious since it's only a visual image?

PYC? you do know that there are many Coins, some with the exact same name.... like for example there is PYC and XPY and both are named PayCoin, and then you have all the Doge, LiteCoin and Darkcoin clones as well.

Omg too funny

You guys know that this thread is the ultimate irony right? People are bored and hang out on the thread, josh posts some bullshit and all kinds of shenanigans ensue except that there is no bad press and posting means exposure so posting helps josh and his infinite superstakers make money.

How can you set a minimum activity to post and ban list without having a self moderated thread? Would that moderate the thread?

I don't think minimum activity to post would work because you do want newbies to be able to ask questions. What if someone found the thread that day and then got the wallet but had questions to ask, you'd have to wait a week or so before you could get a hold of someone.

I'm pretty sure it is limited by the amount of numbers it has, would it not?

If there were trillions of Coins then all coins would trade at 1-2 Satoshi and it becomes like a line-up where orders are continually stacked upon each other. This is not fud btw, this is why I obsrerved with Pennies way back on the Cryptsy market. 1 Satoshi is here! now what happens?

This is really good, I've known the guys running it for quite some time.

Great job on your faucet, keep up the good work!

Crazy the amount of Stake weight, I wonder if it would break the system? I've never seen a coin with such high Stake weight.

You should check out PayCon - Get your Con on!

I think it fits your criteria.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=937480.0

Thank you very much for this, it is a huge service to the community. Something like quoting malicious links has nothing to do with the coins associated and everything to do with helping people not download wallet stealing virus's.

Not all Coins have a secure website for download

What would you suggest for Coins less established that can host more secure wallets? Maybe the Github as repositories and put together a guide or information on how to set that up.

I think competition is fine in the marketplace and people aren't going to stop creating Coins so would be best to atleast help them keep other users safe by helping educate them on best practices.