that spike on stamp was test positive of the upper wedge.  |
|
|
|
large buy orders too. I dont see why the price is falling, but will see soon  |
|
|
|
stamp on the dump
Have you let go mexican? I have. this wedge is very risky. Cough, cough  oh seleme you joker.  im a day trader and it's been days since I opened long. not to mention that i made a healthy profit. |
|
|
|
stamp on the dump
Have you let go mexican? I have. this wedge is very risky. |
|
|
|
Itīs gettin real paranoid we have the 9/11 discussion in rpetilias TA thread, and some people in here really believe that Jorge is a paid "troll"(probably J.P.Morgan). Unbelievable. I think a small bull run would cure you all I wonīt imagine the discussions in here when we drop to 100$ NWO and Lizards all over the place LOL fonzie you are spot on. everyone is getting grumpy that bitcoin hasnt transformed their lives into a wonderland. I dont know what number the bottom is at, but I think it's close at hand. |
|
|
|
|
Stamp calling the shots today.
|
|
|
|
|
how to test positive if a person is a witch - tie their hands and throw them in a river. if they drown, they are a not a witch. if they do not drown and escape, they are a witch.
|
|
|
|
 its telling me go short. I do NOT understand why the bottom line is shorter than the top one. You are just trying to line them up with what you consider to be logical points? I am NOT suggesting any manipulation.. I am just wondering, since there seems to be quite a bit of line drawing variation. im not sure what you mean by the bottom line shorter, do you mean why have I shaved off the tip of the low? because Im trying to illustrate what I believe is a wedge to the best of my ability, not because it's shaped like a pretty triangle, but because it is a contracting range, and liquidity is dry. Those lines meet the points of greatest co-incidence. Also notice how the bottom was quickly rejected out of the the territory of 465, and rested on the lower trend line I have drawn. |
|
|
|
breakdown. |
|
|
|
its telling me go short. |
|
|
|
How did the price become so darn stable after being so darn unstable?
it's called a triangle consolidation pattern. but don't worry, we're just about to break out  I know I know....... in fact Im just disappointed that the triangle seems to be breaking downwards. oh well, I guess Ill have to turn bearish again. |
|
|
|
|
How did the price become so darn stable after being so darn unstable?
|
|
|
|
Of course not.. I believe the same terrorist who bombed that building could be monitoring you right now and flying a drone in america and other parts of the world [/quote] well then we have an understanding. But we still dont know who or exactly what for. |
|
|
|
everyone take one last look at my witch craft before I throw some dice and the market goes as I please. and still hodling long from 475  |
|
|
|
|
a healthy little wall at 500 on stamp.
price creeping on low volume, bidders be bidding.
I think time for decision is near at hand.
indeed the bears are greedy and complacent. excellent.
|
|
|
|
Doesnt matter who you thought did it, 9/11 was a conspiracy by definition.
the building imploded without being hit by a plane. is that really suspicious in a 'terrorist' attack? no, they could plant bombs.
What is suspicious, is why the US officials are not open to discussion of this subject. why do they bash the engineers that disprove their theoroies. The US has thus been exposed.
Although the exact identities of the 'terrorists' will never be known for sure, so the US government may as well have nodded along to theories about planned demolition.
I didn't know terrorists nowadays are concerned of the safety of nearby buildings... They bombed that building like a demolition expert Demolition experts can be terrorists, American and white all at the same time. but we will never know for sure. Is that building open 24hrs a day? How could terrorists bring in lots of explosives and drill the columns without anyone noticing it? I think you miss the point. whoever planted those explosives was certainly a terrorist. but have you fallen for the propoganda that all terrorist must be unsophisticated and arabic? lol ^^ |
|
|
|
|
after all, whats the point of 'talking your book' when the market goes two ways and you can make money trading both.
needing to 'talk your book' is the same as being in denial.
|
|
|
|
|
..... 16,000,000 USD is still not a powerful number in this market, be it long or short. but not to contradict myself, I believe short squeezes will affect the market not because there are more or less of them, but because of who has gone short, and where they have gone short. The key is panic, panic moves the market by market orders.
Those traders sitting quite content with longs are not necessarily going to be squeezed if they prove to be stout, 16 million USD can be ignored.
What I see is that the market found a natural bottom after panic selling. that pressure has been relieved, and there is no more until something bad is confirmed by the chinese govt, and even then, the market is partially prepared.
|
|
|
|
no creekbore, I believe they used fundamental analysis and a daily trend line to bring it down, but they never understood afterwards why it collapsed before the plane hit  ... should have studied herd psychology aye |
|
|
|
|
I am expecting a snap back none the less. the market hit a natural bottom after panic selling. this must take days to consolidate or reverse, and shorts are very vulnerable.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
