I sent .08485190 to an address and I tried to make the fee as small as possible, not knowing what that would do. It never confirmed, so then I sent .04770378 with a tiny/no fee which also hasn't confirmed. That was the seventh. Today is the twenty third
I have the address these coins were sent to and the transaction numbers, if needed
Transaction IDs would be most helpful. |
|
|
|
Double? Just add one bit to the representation and limits of each.
You should be able to find those lines in Bitcoin Core.
I'm pretty sure that is not how it works. The secp256k1 curve is only for 256 bit private keys. To double the range, you be using 257 bit private keys and that would require an entirely different curve. I was primarily joshing about the code since it really wasn't clear what they were asking without more context. 😀 |
|
|
|
|
Double? Just add one bit to the representation and limits of each.
You should be able to find those lines in Bitcoin Core.
|
|
|
|
thanks
i mean altcoin
You'd have to know which alt and then ask in the appropriate sub-section. |
|
|
|
Is the Bitcoin node on a static ip locally?
It does look like it is still syncing from that screenshot.
Thanks for the responses. Yes, it is still syncing. The IP is "reasonably" static  Dynamic, but hasn't changed for more than a week. If your local IP changing every week, that could be one of the problems because if you are port forwarding to a local IP that is changing then the port forwarding/DMZ setting wouldn't be working if your local IP changes. You should probably set a static IP on the local network (turn off DHCP) and then port forward to that local static IP at the router. |
|
|
|
This won't be helpful because since version 0.10.x downloading the bootstrap has been slower (or at best equal) to just running core. |
|
|
|
|
Is the Bitcoin node on a static ip locally?
It does look like it is still syncing from that screenshot.
|
|
|
|
I create transaction using ba.net utility.Input and output have,after need only sign.Transaction Id I have from previous transaction from my wallet,script(scriptsig) also have.
Sending your private key to a remote web site seems like a very bad idea. |
|
|
|
... I'm also deducting this amount of 0.0001 BTC from the amount my visitors are withdrawing from my site. But during testing, I've tried to withdraw some funds.. 0.0001 was deducted but stood in wallet and it included a small fee of 0.00002260 to the transaction. This means the transaction has no big chance to get in block.
...
Perhaps you can explain in more detail how you are calculating the fees because the part in bold above doesn't sound right. I'm not sure why you are deducting the fees from the withdrawal. |
|
|
|
|
Which version? Does the log say anything?
|
|
|
|
am i correct in assuming that in order to compile a wallet to work on 10.6 and up i need to compile it on 10.6?
I don't think so. Likewise I don't think 0.9.4 was tested on pre-10.7 systems so that may be part of the issue. |
|
|
|
|
Since this is about an alt coin, this is the wrong section.
Edit: good, it is moved
|
|
|
|
... Read-only file system ...
You may want to look into why it says it is read only...that would be the first thing to check. |
|
|
|
|
There are also some other options, limiting the bandwidth that Bitcoin Core uses and also considering running over Tor.
|
|
|
|
sorry for this noob question.
1. When running bitcoind on Linux. what is the difference between just "bitcoind" and "bitcoind -daemon"
2. I try just "bitcoind" and it seems it load forever and I dunno whether it runs or not. so I press Ctrl + C to stop it.
does it stay in the background?
If you want it in the background, use -daemon Otherwise when you hit ctrl-c, you've stopped it. |
|
|
|
...
How do you debug a process that freezes linux like that?!
What distro? Version? Locally hosted? Etc |
|
|
|
I guess that makes sense. I was thinking with a local wallet there is no database, but I was not considering the use of an old fashioned flat file database. The system you described is how I imagined the exchange sites working.
What you described are so called HD (hierarchically deterministic) wallets. They use a seed or master private key from which all other private keys are derived. Examples for wallets/services that use this method are: Electrum 1.x and 2.x, Multibit HD, Armory, blockchain.info v2/v3 (its named v3 in their git repo, but commonly refered to as v2 as Im not sure which is correct), mycelium and many others. Many wallets however do generate private keys non-deterministic like Danny described above, examples are Multibit Classic, Bitcoin Core, blockchain.info and many others. The biggest difference for the user is that HD wallets need a single backup. So in the HD wallets, would there be a way to determine the master key using only a child key and without any of the private keys that are associated with the above? You should be able to find the answers you are looking for here for BIP 32 HD Wallets https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0032.mediawikiand more in general: https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Deterministic_walletAnd some more here for more discussions: https://bitcoinmagazine.com/articles/deterministic-wallets-advantages-flaw-1385450276http://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/36383/hd-wallets-with-an-exposed-child-private-keyhttps://aois.blob.core.windows.net/public/Blockchain%20Programming%20in%20CSharp.pdf |
|
|
|
It was my first transaction multisig.
then I lost my $ 400?
You should move this into the AlphaBayMarket section. As far as whether you lost your $400, it is hard to say without more information. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
