Bitcoin Forum
June 16, 2024, 04:05:55 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 [100] 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 ... 296 »
1981  Economy / Services / Re: [NEW]★☆★ 777Coin Signature Campaign ★☆★ Up to .0007/Post (Jr-Hero Accepted) on: December 27, 2016, 03:21:43 AM
Payments have been sent (435b612f952558493fe14ce9433d9eec6c0437b52fa3d1c83049624a381fc97d).



Am I accepted now? I sent an answer on your previous post but you did not reply.
I had already enrolled you for the last round, you just didn't meet the minimum requirement.
PM me if you still want in.

First I don't understand this probation thing, I know that it means I am that I am not like those that have been 'regularized' but I don't know how to be regularized.
Probation is a note for me, nothing you should worry about.

Next is that I have 4 post denied out of 51 posts.
Posts like this:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1386604.msg17213048#msg17213048
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1477759.msg17276866#msg17276866
You should not expect to be paid for them.

Lastly, this will be a YOLO inquiry. Christmas Bonuses will be a great incentive.
Not my place to issue those, sorry. I'm bound to the rates given to me.

Edit: And if I may, I wanted to be in for the Bonus Pay.
There's no special pay rates for your rank.

Please upgrade me to Hero Member.
You'll be upgraded to hero rates as soon as you adjusted your signature.



User: bravehearth0319
User: leonair
user: data1
Enrolled.

User: xLays
Set your things up.
1982  Other / Archival / Re: free 10$ of bitcoin :) on: December 26, 2016, 09:55:28 PM
No one reported this yet..?
I did, and you should have aswell. Instead of asking for it, just report it yourself.

Moderators, please lock this thread. Everyone knows that this is just a spam.
We'll have to wait for somebody to get around and handle the report.
1983  Other / Meta / Re: [Marketplace] Seller deleting and reposting bumps to hide rule violations. on: December 26, 2016, 08:38:01 PM
Not directly related, as the seller is not deleting the previous bumps, but still a rule violation, and I need a reference for my report, so here we go.



Seller 5: LGG4

Thread in question: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1728122.0
Archives of their violation: http://archive.is/XQMtv#90% (Thread being bumped 4 times in a matter of 24 hours)

Another thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1727616.0
Archives aswell: http://archive.is/oPuXU#65% (Aswell been bumped 4 times in 24 hours)

And one more thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1728085.0
Archives aswell: http://archive.is/Vkfz8#88% (Same here, bumped 4 times in 24 hours)

Next thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1729130.0
Archives aswell: http://archive.is/UZK2G#80% (Thread made today, bumped 2 times already)

Going on: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1726711.0
Archives aswell: http://archive.is/cqg97#75% (Bumped 4 times + 1 answer to a question)



Further, those are all for digital accounts of some sort and might aswell be listed together.
1984  Other / Meta / Re: [Marketplace] Seller deleting and reposting bumps to hide rule violations. on: December 26, 2016, 08:03:36 PM
Been some time, anyway.



Seller 4: ustradebitcoin
Thread in question: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1702560.0
Archives of their violation: http://archive.is/eLKJL http://archive.is/Zw0DR
Another thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1697285.0
Archives aswell: http://archive.is/4oB5n http://archive.is/xvC8L

Another similar thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1704601.0 (http://archive.is/xhQVQ).

Besides violating the forum rules by this kind of bumping, their threads are reasonably similar (all for domains) and should be listed together in the first place (at least in my opinion).
1985  Other / Meta / Re: Requesting DT members to have a clear stance on buying & selling accounts on: December 26, 2016, 06:47:19 PM
At the same time I dont see it as a big issue regardless, as Salty said (paraphrasing what I understood as the gist of it): you shouldnt trust any account unless you can verify its still under control by the same person. Expecting the account to be traded will improve your personal anti-scam radar way better than any negative rating can.
I agree to always being cautious, and I think you and me both are (aswell as a lot of other experienced users).
It's a little hard teaching that to newbies though, at least in my experience.

I hope, u re-consider your action within December 31, 2016. Else, I'll be forced to escalate. Thank You.
That blew any chances you might have had left.
1986  Economy / Services / Re: [BitBlender] Signature Campaign - Seniors and up (CFNP) on: December 26, 2016, 12:18:15 AM
Payments have been sent (153d5a1a8280d8100603be884d4d96d4acaff39a2700354413524d51c0a7e141).
I'm wishing you all a (little late) merry christmas, in case you are celebrating it, and some nice calm days for the end of the year.

(Next payments will be on new years, please excuse, if they run late a bit. I might be a little hung over that day Smiley )
1987  Other / Meta / Re: TO THEYMOS :Why ? on: December 25, 2016, 09:52:03 PM
The post like:
Quote
And people will move to other forums like girlbtc.com/bitcoinforum  , girlbtc is not good guy with general matter( threats people) .  but their try to challenging you by start a forum just like you is right.
Are you yet another alt account of the permanently banned girlbtc.com ?
If so, the answer is pretty easy: You are evading a ban and that results in being banned on your "new" account aswell.
Further, plain advertising as you did is not tolerated either. Your post can be considered as "Ad-Spam", and I would have reported it aswell, had I seen it.
(Before you try coming up with some dodgy excuses as always, how's your connection to girlbtc and why are you advertising their forum?)
1988  Economy / Services / Re: [Crypto-News.net] ★ Signature Campaign ★ | Senior - Legendary [FULL] on: December 24, 2016, 11:57:47 PM
Also i wants to let you know that i turned Legendary 4 days ago
Noted, will have to check back and let you know in a day or two.



Payments have been sent. Happy holidays, guys!
(f3fc882f0b65a5c0c313b7a539a9eed21ddb5aac2e4408a85a873e2f05649aac)
1989  Economy / Services / Re: [Crypto-Games.net] ★Signature Campaign★ | Best Rates | Senior - Legendary[CLOSE] on: December 24, 2016, 11:55:16 PM
Payments have been sent (3294554ee943898224c5e8284767f47ec16b224064c20b11deb3a89fb17b32dc).

Happy Holidays!
1990  Economy / Collectibles / Re: Merry Christmas Raffle! on: December 24, 2016, 07:29:57 PM
Merry Christmas, guys.
Tree isn't bitcoin themed, you may blame MJ for that, where are those stockings? Cheesy

(feel free to disregard me for the raffle.)



And here's the tree:

1991  Other / Meta / Re: Accuracy down to 98% on: December 23, 2016, 06:53:26 PM
What if someone has reported a thread as being posted in the wrong section, but a staff member spots it without looking at the reports and move it to the right section himself, will the reports then vanish, or will they remain active even though the thread has been moved to the right section. If the report stays active, and a moderator or other staff member sees that the report shows "wrong section" while it has been reported before the move, then it's obvious that the report will be market as a bad report.
When I make reports like that, they usually look like this "Wrong section -> Section to be moved".
If by any chance the thread gets moved before my report gets handled (eg by a mod, or even by the OP), whoever handles this report usually marks it as good anyway, or just doesn't handle it at all. However, most mods don't mark reports bad in those cases (unless it indeed was a bad report).
1992  Other / Meta / Re: Accuracy down to 98% on: December 23, 2016, 05:50:37 PM
The numbers may be wrong, but you get the general idea. You need a lot to move those percentages up.
Something Lauda did not mention is, that accuracy numbers are rounded, which means, you only need to reach 97.5% in order for your accuracy to show 98%.
It however also means, you currently could be as low as 96.5%, while still being shown 97%.

(theymos changed this a few times, but I'm pretty sure this is the current way things are working)
1993  Other / Meta / Re: Accuracy down to 98% on: December 23, 2016, 05:41:56 PM
For a long time, my accuracy is stuck at 97%. What can be done about it?
How long is that? As long as reports don't get handled, you accuracy will not change from them.
There is a certain backlog on reports (especially those that need to be handled by global moderation or above).

As Lauda pointed out, keep making good reports, and eventually, your accuracy will increase.
1994  Economy / Games and rounds / Re: ►►►Crypto-Games.net | Presents from Santa | FREE up to 0.01 BTC ◄◄◄ on: December 23, 2016, 05:39:15 PM
In case mods are allowed to participate aswell:

Lutpin
1995  Economy / Services / Re: Paying $2 for a simple design on: December 23, 2016, 02:19:03 AM
Might not be exactly what you're looking for, but I figured mentioning it here anyway:
I really like the designs from bitcoinpaperwallet.com, they got a special christmas theme aswell.
https://bitcoinpaperwallet.com/holiday-design/index.php

1996  Economy / Services / Re: [Crypto-News.net] ★ Signature Campaign ★ | Senior - Legendary [FULL] on: December 22, 2016, 09:51:34 PM
Some of you might have already noticed our next payround is scheduled for christmas' eve.
As I won't be available for the regular time, we'll delay payments by a few hours. Maybe a few more Smiley
1997  Other / Archival / Re: Updated Overview of Bitcointalk Signature-Ad Campaigns on: December 22, 2016, 09:28:59 PM
I've updated the OP and added CGC project. I know that it looks sketchy, but it's not up to me/us to decide if a user should join or not. I was thinking about giving it a *, but seeing as it doesn't have problems yet, there is no good reason to do so (except suspicion).
The thread is currently locked and they are not accepting participants/asked all participants to remove their signatures.
I think there is no reason to list them before they come up with new signatures and open their thread again/start accepting users.

Anyway, I've also sorted all the entries in the table on alphabetical order which is always nice.
Didn't we use length of terms first, and then alphabetical for those that have the same terms?
Not that I would mind, it's just unusual to see YoBit at the bottom Smiley
1998  Economy / Services / Re: [Crypto-Games.net] ★Signature Campaign★ | Best Rates | Senior - Legendary[CLOSE] on: December 22, 2016, 05:23:01 PM
Hey guys,

just a quick heads-up: Our next payout is scheduled for christmas eve.
As most Europeans (including me) celebrate christmas that day, I won't be around for the regular paytime.
Payments will be sent by myself either late night that day or early morning the next.

I whish everyone a nice, calm weekend, and those celebrating happy holidays.
1999  Other / Meta / Re: Requesting DT members to have a clear stance on buying & selling accounts on: December 22, 2016, 05:03:17 PM
In case, the DT members conclude that it is not allowed, I'm hereby requesting Lauda to remove my Red. In that case, I wont be involved in account trading on BitcoinTalk anymore...
You mistake DT as unit that has to make unanimous decision everybody has to keep up to. It is not.
Members on DT can and will disagree with each other from time to time. Not everybody has the same approach/makes the same decisions.
2000  Other / Archival / Re: Updated Overview of Bitcointalk Signature-Ad Campaigns on: December 22, 2016, 07:32:19 AM
A self moderate topic is a no-no for me.
Another big issue was the straight copying of signatures made by medUSA/owned by lightlord (those we currently use in the 777Coin campaign),
which is the main reason why the campaign got put on halt (I pushed for it).
Let's hope they will come back with an unique design they commissioned/made themselves and not with another copy.
Pages: « 1 ... 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 [100] 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 ... 296 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!