You are right, I did nothing to keep it on bittrex. I could care less about bittrex, myself. It is better, at this low volume, to have all volume located in one place, instead of spread-out across two exchanges, making volume look like half as much as it actually is.

As for BTC being "off topic"...

This is the "Bitcoin Forum", and XHC trades against BTC. How do you think I am getting MORE BTC to buy XHC and to get ready for the release of the multipool operations, where I will be buying in bulk?

That is correct, you did not stand-up to assist with taking the coin over. You only stood-up to bitch about it not making you money. It is NOT the PROGRAMMERS job to make you money. I will not get off my high horse, I like the view up here. Why don't you come on up? Instead you persist, as a few others have, in crying about the sky falling. It took bitcoin YEARS to get where it is now, not one week, or month or year. No other coin... NO OTHER COIN... has done that, to date. Though, LTC is getting close. Which, will also be another market that XHC will be part of, in the future. (Well before it is traded for FIAT on an exchange.)

With POW stopped, that makes this a "Stock", not a "mining coin". With POS enabled, that is just a constant drain on value, as it is with all POS coins. (Zero work for coins = $0.00 value for those POS generated coins. However, that is just hidden cost, because it actually costs you to keep the wallet open, and have it mining for the POS blocks with the crappy CPU-miner code, which is where the POS blocks come from.)

I agree that some of the value has dropped, but should I remind you that "NOT ENOUGH VOLUME IS BEING TRADED", which, in essence says, that the value has NOT dropped, because no-one is willing to sell for that price, so that is not the "value". Someone needs to go to trading school and learn what value is. No-one is trading because they are worth more. No-one NEW is buying, because of the "uncertainty", or they have just purchased all they are willing to purchase at the moment, because they are too broke to buy more. If you would like me to go into full detail, I can. But, it is summer time, and I do have better things to do with the majority of my income, like everyone-else in the world at the moment. I do have other priorities besides XHC, which is an "Investment" for me. Thus the investing, and not self-sacrificing and lack of allowing it to completely drain all my income.

Like I said, stop bitching at the one developing the coin now, and go bitch at the one who fucked you over... Not the ones trying to clean-up the shit he left on your hands. Better yet, try adding value to the coin. Who invests in something, without expecting to have to promote it and work for it? Do you really think that bitching at the developer is going to add value to the coin? (Don't answer that, I already know your answer. You have made that quite clear.)

Or You can get your own ass off your block of ice and do something besides bitch that we are not making you money.

Obviously it is not YOUR main priority, unless you count bitching that we are not working for you, as a priority.

BTW, it was MY BTC and LTC that was BUYING the XHC, dumbass. Again, you are welcome. You should be buying more, that will solve the problem of them getting delisted. Coins get delisted, it is not the end of the world for them. They come back, and get traded off-exchange. I can name over 20 coins that have done this, multiple times.

Now that I am settled-in to stupid windows 8.1, and my new hardware, I can put forth more creative effort into this coin. I still have to get my old software to function, and some more hardware setup. (Drivers and compatibility are screwing with me, at the moment.)

I will have those finished vector HD format logo images soon. That was one program giving me trouble, SketchUp. I would attempt to help with the programming, but you really don't have time to wait for ME to develop the program. Trust me on that one.

Though I agree, I too, would be more inclined to invest more, beyond my existing investment, if there were something more than words. However, unless I drive up to meet Jarvis in person, I have to trust his words. But do not blame HIM for not doing, what YOU are NOT DOING yourself. He is also not the reason ALL COINS are going down in value. That is just a normal process of volatility and a result of others getting drained by all the new crap-coins. That will never change until all the stupid people have been drained, and there is a delay in the release of new crap, and new stupid people to drain.

This is part of the reason why I wanted to work on crafting an actual "method", for coin-mergers, to reduce the clutter and regain some of that lost value. Once the scam is over, like has happened to this coin, they all struggle. Some survive and thrive, others do not. Even though they all function perfectly fine. What made this coin IDEAL for a take-over was the simple fact that the wallet and the formula were a complete piece of crap to begin with. That is how most copy and paste coins are.

Now, with a complete swap-over, we are essentially unlimited by the bounds of the original programs limitations of operation and crappy operation. (It does not even work on 32-bit windows XP, which is still a decent portion of the market. Since it is POS, that is kind-of critical, but that is also a big negative, because it forces everyone to HAVE to download the huge wallet, just to get POS reward. The faster the blocks, the faster the chain gets to enormous sizes, even when nothing is happening, except a few penny-POS rewards happening.)

The new wallet has more realistic block-times, and POW will be back online, though it would have been better if it were longer. (Once it is done with POW, it falls off all the mining-charts, since you don't actually "mine" POS, though you actually do. That is about 80% of the "advertisement-space" gone. People live off those charts and values and ad-space. Sites like "wheretomine" and "coinwarz". Also, since it can't be mined, that excludes them from many other market-cap sites, that compare to mining-value.)

However, that crap is not NEEDED for the coin to succeed. (Find a value from use.)

I will release that white-paper, which was not a joke. However, this is NOT the time for it. We already have enough on our plates.

Jarvis, if you get something up on git-hub, (not an "official release"), it will be easier to find "free help", to lower the overhead of trying to have a "one man programming team, for hire." It is not like the code is some secret that can't be shared, it HAS to be shared, to be developed after the payments for development stop. It will also be needed, in order to create hard-forks that kill forks and "stuck blocks", when those rare instances arise. (They will happen, they always do.) The coin itself does not need novelty, it only needs basic function, at first. Novelty can come from "other wallets", or from updates.

Ok, going back to take advantage of the BTC/LTC exchange-rate growth gains. Gotta figure-out the next level-up to pull my orders back out. Just like many others are doing at the moment, taking advantage of these small gains. Which is why alts are also seeing a dip and having a hard time rising.

You guys really have to be a little more patient.

I have been gone just over a week, getting my new computer up and running. It is obvious you have trust issues, but that isn't my problem, it's yours. Deal with it.

Jarvis isn't developing the program himself, and like you and I, this is NOT the ONLY coin he is interested in. Though I am sure you are doing a good job of reducing his interest and mine, with your impatient ramblings. Seriously, we don't care about individuals, we are doing what we do for everyone, for the majority.

I just got a personal e-mail from Jarvis, only a few days ago, that the launch is just around the bend. (Asking me to gather my resources to advertise it.) I asked him to post something in the forum, to the effect of this, but apparently he did not, yet.

I am not sure if you noticed, but there is a huge bustling going-on, on the two top coins, as one major BTC farm got knocked-offline and one giant LTC farm came online. Both markets are going through a large change, and thus, all coin-values in ALTs are going to see some changes from this. We are talking months of change here, not minutes. For those who are impatient.

I just made a nice chunk on LTC and soon BTC, and will be reinvesting that, yet again, on the dips. As for XHC, as you see, I have stopped buying, obviously, yet I am not cashing-out, also obviously. Though, I will be buying-up more soon, because there are still a few impatient people foolishly exiting. Same rule applies here, as anywhere where investment is done. Buy low, sell high. (High, not just a little higher than low.)

Now I just hope my bitcoin-runner can be finished, and hunt me down some BTC in time for these nice lows.

Agreed... but that is step #2... We are still at step #1 (Make the coin).

The old wallet does not even work on Windows-XP 32-bit. (The one in the link.)

I assume that was part of the reason the old dev quit. Besides not actually knowing how to program at all, and being a thief.

Good luck with that. Get them while they are high!

Yea, I really need to teach more people how to trade.

TIP #1: Buy low
TIP #2: Don't bash the ones buying the coins you are holding, you limit it from going up and limit others from seeing the value you desire.
TIP #3: Sell high

P.S. Hype = sure-fire failure, unless the hype is generated by a whale, trying to make you believe the hype is not hype, because that's what whales do. Hype alone, is just hype, and cause value to drop when not backed by a whale, who pumps to dump. Thus AIRDROP. (Why anyone believed that giving away free coins would make the price rise, is beyond belief. If you tell me that you are giving away half a million coins for free, the first thing I do is pull all my buy orders, to buy all your freely obtained coins, for a penny or two, since that is all those coins are worth. They are not worth the price of the coins that others had to PAY for, to obtain. The price stays low until all those free coins are gone, and have had value added to them, by way of purchasing debt, which takes a long time, the more you "give away free".)


No-one says...

"Hey I got 1000 coins free... lets go buy 10 more for $100 dollars!... no wait, it went up, lets pay $200 for 10 coins now... no $300... Yay, I'm getting richer! I got 1010 coins now, and it only cost me $300."

That statement scares me! xD...

"HD wallets"... "incorporated in many wallet clients"... "minimal info(easy) to recreate(hack)"...

xD What scares me is that there are generators that make valid-invalid addresses... They generate a valid address, thus you can spend to it, but it can't be spent, because the public and private keys do not output a valid hash. Money in, then you are stuck there forever... Unless you find/hack a key-collision that creates a valid output to spend it. I feel bad for those who got stuck depositing into those addresses, and they don't even know it yet, because they never tried to spend the balance. (Guess it pays not to skip that "test spend" phase in the generation sequence.)

Wow, that looks like a pile of 100% easy money to steal if anyone uses that. xD

No, but thank-you for the post. That is not what I am looking for... but, it is similar to what I want to do. Just not with all that huge security risk.

I believe the javascrypt I am using, actually uses that HD crap, which is why it is overly complex, and why I am struggling trying to follow all the cryptic bloat it has. The code is the same that the online wallet generator uses, and that states it uses HD crap. Just not sure if it uses it for all the code, or just for the special bulk-wallet generator things.

I like reading the part about, "Don't share your public or private keys, as there is a risk..." Um, wait... sharing the public key is a risk, then you are screwed, because you public key is in the block-chain, your public key is the address that you give to people, so they can add funds to the address.

This, I realize is just some poor wording, but the risk is real. Those are talking about the internal "generation keys", which the system uses, not the "wallet key pairs", which it did not elaborate on. However... the intention was to use multiple wallets across multiple systems, that can be recreated as one giant wallet, by those keys and extensions.

Let me elaborate my thinking on what I just said above... You have one giant wallet with millions of potential addresses. However, gaining access to one key, or the other, opens you to risk of another person being able to recreate all the addresses of all the wallets. (These, you have to share, to the systems, so they can create the addresses they need from the wallets. Thus, you have to share what you should not share, across multiple systems, with multiple potential leaking exposure.)

What I wanted to do was record something like this...

"Freddy goes to mars"

Then that creates all my addresses and keys, from that data. That text actually tells my program to create 100,000 addresses, starting from logical sequential position 8349994, but skipping 45, then 28, then 840, then 98532. Using the pass-phrase "seagull" then "soda", then "glue", then "snickers"... All just from the text, "Freddy goes to mars". To anyone without the program, those words are useless. To me, with the program locked away, I can recreate all the data I need.

Thus, no out of box program will suffice my needs there. However, I do need it to NOT be randomly generated, which all these stupid things do, and do horribly with pseudo-random predictability. That is the part I need stripped away, so I can insert my sequential data. However, they use some crazy ass javascrypt to do this, and seem to only allow some specific size and range of 58-bit data. But they do not tell you what it is, or how long it has to be, or what format. (I found one key that was valid to use, it was a 58-bit conversion of some long number, but 0 would not work, or any other number that was equally as long, so I am at a loss as to what they were looking for.)

That is not a good sign if it has a limited number of input for anything. That translates into a lot less variations then they portray. That is like saying, well there are a trillion times a trillion possibilities if you use A-Z ^45 ^200... But then say, but the letters have to all form words, and the words have to all be only latin, and the latin words have to all start with S and the s words have to all be under 5 letters. Well, then that leaves you with like 10,000 possible solutions, not a trillion by a trillion. That is essentially what they are doing there.

Just like sha256(sha256()), it does not create more variation, the output is still the same finite results, but now there is more potential collisions, not less. Exponentially more collisions than one can even imagine. (More, since there are invalid possibilities between the outputs that never get created, thus, not part of the output of finite results that they calculate.) But I digress, that is the reason Satoshi/everyone abandoned it, and warned everyone heavily that they have to split all stored coins into multiple addresses, for security, so they don't all get stolen when someone finds one of these many-more collisions, randomly. Thus, causing the network to grow exponentially full of dust in the future, to unmanageable size. (This too, a topic of one of my whitepapers, is what I am working on having fixed.)

Free coins had NOTHING to do with why the price was high. You wouldn't pay MORE, knowing that the dev was going to give away your value, (thus degrade value)...

If the air-drop happened, it would have had the same effect as what happened... The dev dumped a bunch of free coins. The only difference was, he got the value, not you.

That would not have brought anyone here, except someone looking for a hand-out. When was the last time a bum, looking for handouts, came and contributed to your value after you gave him some. This is not a charity organization. It is not our job (mine or the current devs), to see that you are comfortable, or to invite more poor people here, who will just complain that the free coins we gave them have no value because half the people we gave the coins to, dumped them before they could dump them.

You are confusing HONOR with CHARITY. One has nothing to do with the other. Though being charitable may be honorable, charity is not honor.



You are neither charitable, if you are crying about "what you get", as charity is selfless not selfish, nor are you honorable, as you are bashing your own holdings worthiness and don't respect shit, and are doing nothing but asking for more free stuff. Stuff you will obviously just dump.

If waiting for a week is "so long", then you are in the wrong field my friend. How long have you waited for BTC to rise? How long are you still waiting for LTC to rise?

We have a plan, now we are waiting, just like you, for others to do what they have to do, to accept the wallet. It has been announced, and repeated several times. Go outside, do some yard-work, or something productive, since you are doing nothing productive here yourself. If you spend all day watching the clock, it takes longer for time to pass. What is your hurry? Didn't you INVEST? Oh, no, I guess not, since you seem to think that a few days is a long time, because you obviously want to get out, and take our investment. Take what you are being offered, or invest in the actual development. You didn't invest in the development, you invested in yourself, and you are not turning your investment into anything of value.

You want to invest in accelerating the development, there is a donation address for you to use. You want to invest in some of this "value" (discount coins), then buy some more. You want to invest directly, then program a wallet and get it submitted to the exchanges for review. If you can't do any of that, then you have no choice but to wait. Silence is golden. You want to keep hurting your investment, then feel free to give your coins away to someone doing something to help.

Since you obviously have no interest in adding value, it is safe to assume you are trying to make it lower. Have fun with that. If you are holding, you are screwing yourself. If you are trying to lower it, to buy, you are still screwing yourself. If you are not doing one of those things, then you are just trying to screw us, and you are failing miserably at it.

The coin hit the active exchange on June 6th 23:00. BTC value at the time, $640/BTC. Real-average exchange rate: 0.00000550 BTC/XHC.

Current BTC value: $655/BTC. Current real-average "selling" value of XHC on the exchange for the last 2 weeks: 0.00000380 BTC/XHC. (So part of this drop was the natural balance in USD value. Just as part of the value from the spike, was due to BTC falling, which made them have to ask for more BTC to get the same USD value.)

The highs were a pump, and not the "real value". However, they did bring the "value" (The real-average value), up to 0.00001200 BTC/XHC. (You should NEVER expect that you can sell your coins for the pumped price, which was a "sacrifice", to make the sale of 0.00002400 BTC/XHC look like a "deal". Just as you should never expect that the lowest low, where one or two coins are being sold, is "your value", or the value of all coins. That is why market-cap is a horrible assessment of value. Because the highs and lows are not the coins value, which is what they portray and assume.)

This would have been higher if the original dev didn't rob us of our value. However, that is over now, and we have moved-on. With prices this low, it is "safe" to buy, at the least, up to 0.00001200 BTC/XHC, because that is where the majority have added "value" up to. This includes the miners who spent a lot less in electricity, producing the coins.

Once mining has started, this average will rise to nearly twice that, easily, bringing the "value", a lot closer to the pumps average of around 0.00002400 BTC/XHC. The AVERAGE, not counting for obvious pump-levels that could easily double that.

The wallet, being POW enabled again, should bring-in more miners to invest. The multipool will bring-in more miners to invest. The rest of the value will eventually come in time. The longer we stay mining, the more exposure we get from the mining-value pages. Without that, there is only exposure from the exchanges and the horrible market-cap pages which, are, for all essence, a poor representation of value, at best. Value is measured at the average price where the average volume has been spent. That is why we have no problems buying coins on these lows. That is why they buy millions of BTC at $350/BTC to $680/BTC, and higher now.

So what format should I setup my whitepaper in?

PDF, TXT or should I just make a fancy HTML setup?

Should I claim some sort of title to the document, and make it public, or make it exclusive to just XHC, until it some of the things can be integrated into the coin? (Though, this kind of stuff should be reviewed and voted-on, before implementation. Even if only to get more fine-tuned starting values and parameters that the majority can agree with.)

Since the coin/wallet is the focus at the moment, that is the focus of this whitepaper. The other one I am working-on, is related to the multipool, which is obviously semi-dependent on the existence of a wallet that can be mined to, initially. (Semi-dependent, because a wallet isn't actually needed if the coins are on the exchange. However, since POS is part of the wallet, and POW is being reinstated, it does have that tie to the wallet desire.)

P.S. The publication will be copyrighted, though with generous rights expressed. I don't mind open-source, but I do not like when people don't give credit where credit is due. Already had that issue with DogeCoin and various other coins that take others ideas as their own, take credit for the ideas, and then screw it up, then point the finger at the other person when they screwed it up. Instead of using the idea, the way it was intended, developed with the contributor, and giving them credit where it was due. (If only so they continue to contribute. xD)

You obviously have no idea how long it takes an actual coin program to be made. Not just have a value changed from someone-else's work, that took them weeks to months to make. So, please, unless you want to contribute something, go back to shutting the fuck up.

It really doesn't bother others when you quit. Honestly, it doesn't. We reap the rewards while you accept the loss. We, on the other hand, who have not accepted the loss, have lost nothing.

Devs don't make value, they make programs. You make it valuable. Thus, you have made your holdings invaluable. Thank yourself for doing nothing, and getting nothing in return.

You have done nothing to develop the coin, and it is only right that you get nothing for your lack of effort to support it. You are obviously here only because you were convinced you could take value from the coin. Why would we ever sympathize for you. All you do is talk about wanting the price higher so you can cash-out, on money people are thinking about investing. You are the reason you don't have anyone buying your coins. I agree with the rest, you are a moron who doesn't know what support is, and doesn't apparently understand how trades and value or coins work.

The devs didn't make BTC rise, or LTC fall. Why would you believe that is the duty of the programmer making the transaction device? That is like blaming the exchange or your bank, for your own dollar value not rising. You know what makes your dollar valuable... What you do with it, or what YOU convince others it is worth, which is based off what YOU put into earning it. At the moment, you have done nothing to earn it, are convincing the people you want to sell it to that it has no value to you, and are doing nothing for it. Thus... You lose.

Me, I have purchased over a million of these coins, spending over $3000 USD, in purchased BTC. Giving those who wanted to quit, something for the prices they were offering. I have no doubt that I will see 10x returns here, just as I will see 10x returns from BTC this hike. Makes a nice total of 100x returns, or 1000% when compounded together, from my initial investment. I really don't want a noob who cranks-out copy-paste coins to be in control of my value. That is why I trust the direction Jarvis is headed.

P.S. I buy a lot of coins on the floor, after they fall 90%, they usually rise back up at-least 50% to 150% from the floor, after people like you have all left. That's what we do. That's what you do. That's why coins exist in the first place. Thanks for doing your part. Now we can do ours, without you bothering us.

P.P.S. I am not a developer/programmer (I am, I just don't make coins). I am the guy who is going to make these remaining users/holders/supporters money. I'll be the one buying the other coins you abandon, and do nothing for also. Until I have your last dime, and have distributed it to the holders of XHC. Because I roll like that.

That is partly because everyone is waiting for the conversion, and to see the effect mining will have on the value.

If you have a dollar to spare, buy some up. Each dollar you buy, is a $10 coin above you just lowered to $5... Two more, and you lowered that to $2.50. I am still ready, with my team (not the XHC team), to help get the word out, once there is a word worth spreading. We may be a little more patient than others, but that is only because we have been in this game long-enough to know this is normal.

It isn't like all the other coins are rising. They all drop as BTC rises, initially. The more BTC rises, the cheaper people can sell alts for, to get the same USD. There is a strong focus on BTC at the moment, due to the rise. (Nothing special to me, because I expected it. But there were many who believed BTC was going another level down, or just going back to a down-trend. Nope, $6,000, and it's right on schedule, as always. Denial hits them before they realize what is going-on. They will stupidly start selling alts, then alts will rise with BTC as whales eat the low values. Then they regret selling, but can do nothing about it, as they have cashed-out for USD, and now have to buy back in to get BTC at a higher price than they cashed-out for.)

Same will happen to XHC. By the time they decide to jump-in, they will have lost that major gain advantage, having sold-out too low, and too early.

The majority are all obviously still holding. There is only a few, or just one, trying to devalue it, but it isn't working. He is just giving someone a bunch of cheap coins. xD Because no-one is going into a panic.

Should I submit a whitepaper about my block-chain-reducer, auto-dust-killer, Collect-or-return spends, Tagged receipt spends, network wide-distribution, anti-dominance flooded-deviation-killer and anti-stale vacancy-block-killer?

I like gold more... It'll be a goldpaper, to match the logo. Gold is the new white. White is so yesterday.

Sell you an early peak for 2-BTC. Sell you exclusive "first release rights", for 50-BTC. Otherwise I will just be vague, let everyone screw-up the concepts, again. xD

Potential securities and gains:
 - Historic through-put privacy (Not anonymity. Pure eradication of distribution-paths.)
 - Smaller block-chain size (Size reductions beyond 99% potentially, without loss of holdings or funky compression.)
 - Faster block-chain downloads (Due to smaller size, and an additional method of structure.)
 - Faster block-chain exploring and balance-checking. (Again, due to the major redundant reductions.)
 - Reduced block-sizes from the dust-killer. (Allows for more tx's to be delivered in less space.)
 - Less over-mined blocks, within a time-frame, which leads to abnormal and undesired forking and ultra-low diff-adjustments that hurt the network.
 - Less stale-blocks, ensuring that tx's are never stalled due to an unrealistic and unjustified ultra-high diff-adjustment that hurt the network.
 - Less branching and unfair rejections from slow and distant isolation of network participants.
 - Fast-block coins, without the headaches normally associated with fast-blocks, and all the advantages of fast-blocks. (Shorter delivery, and less potential invalid transactions or double-spends.)
 - Spends that MUST be collected, or they get returned to the sender. (Spender security)
 - Proof-of-purchase, with a "must accept or return" and "return to sender", tag. (For buyers and sellers)

No, I would not expect ANY of that to be implemented by the time of the new wallets release. That is just some of the results/concepts that have been the focus of my studies for the last few years. I commend those who tried to implement some of them, but the solutions they use are lacking in creativity and full of unneeded complications. Some are new, some are old, all are desired and needed for mainstream production.

No sleep! JK...

Didn't re-check... but the alternate thread in the cryptocoin place? (Never go there, but that had the old info too.)

Yup, it's a scam, you saved us.  

Glad that was finally picked-up by someone.  

Where would we be without your guidance?

Funny that you keep making an appearance. No sense telling us it's a scam, we are the ones who were scammed. But, I guess you have not picked-up on the fact that the scam was identified two-weeks into the coin. The point when we (the community) took it over.

Wait, are you calling US the scammers? (Again, point lost on us, as we are the ones buying it and supporting it, and taking it over.)

Since it is an obvious scam... Then sell. I am buying. Oh, that's right, so are you. Why are you investing in a scam? If you are not investing or selling, then what is your point. Do you have turrets syndrome? Is your medication not working?

You still don't grasp the fact that preaching to the choir has no effect. We went-over the changes, which are not going into effect until the wallet has been accepted by both the exchanges, and then released. Thank-you for reminding us that the website needs to have the same reflections as the thread. However, since you are the first to point it out... Obviously, it has not been visited since the original suggested outline. It has only been a few days since the changes have been made, and the winner of the contest was selected. We do have jobs in the real world to ALSO tend to. Please be a little more compassionate towards our efforts. (However, I assume you have not invested a dime. That, or you hope to only invest a dime, to make a quick dollar from it.)

Are you the original dev? Is that why you are so mad? Sorry that you dumped, and now the price is about to rise. Let me share my deepest sympathy for you.  

Too tired to keep replying. Though it was fun the first few times.

P.S. Thank-you for the donation. (Not you...) I don't want to mention the persons name without permission, but I did want to let (the community) know that a generous donation was put forth towards some of the cost of the takeover. I have let Jarvis know of the donor, and suggested that a record, of some form, should be published of all donors, where they wish to be identified. (Though, donors can remain anonymous.) To date, that was 0.15 BTC which has been donated. (BTC is preferred, as donations of XHC would have to be cashed-out, at the moment, which would lower the value.)

P.P.S. You can also donate directly to the community, by simply purchasing some XHC. Preferably above the asking price, but below asking price does actually help too. Even if it is a cold-gesture simply showing interest, by listing an order for 0.00000001 BTC, which will never get filled. That raises the "Buy Volume" total desire. You will see mine floating around, as I move it from coin to coin. I have a nice stock of other coins, ready to sell, when they peak, to get BTC to contribute to XHC, in the multipools.

Just checking-in from my horribly ancient computer. Had to sell a few things to get more BTC. Then I had to sell some BTC to get another computer to replace this old thing. Guess I didn't miss much.

Sorry Josh, and everyone-else I was chatting with, for the abrupt departure. Unfortunately, this computer can not run skype. It barely runs a browser. Will be back around tuesday when the rest of my computer arrives.

Still not much to report-back. Can't find any shorts, not seeing any actual failed components, and I still can't get the boards to initialize (be seen by the ras-pi). Will be sending those back, in hopes of getting the new ones, when they are ready. I would even settle for the old ones, if I had more like the two cards that are still running flawlessly. Short of reworking the boards so they have the same exact components, I am at a loss.

Jarvis is looking for some BTC support, if someone thinks they can contribute a few dollars for some of the adding-up expenses... It WOULD be greatly appreciated. You can PM him for some details of the things he is looking for support with, or visit the IRC chat (Listed on the first post), and send him a message there.

He is not asking for us to PAY for all expenses, just asking for some kind assistance with SOME of the expenses. Mine, are currently being used to help sustain the coins lows from going lower, until we are ready for launch. This, in addition to the personal funds I am spending on hardware. There is only so much that we can do as individuals.

Don't be afraid to ask what your funding is going to be funding. Where possible, when the time comes, all my expenses will be itemized, for the record, but not for reimbursement. Just so that we all have a solid understanding of the solid value of XHC as a whole. That is the best way to measure the growth of the network, as we expand.

Love the replies "Honor is dead"... Are you a mosquito? You live only a month, than die, yourself... The coin is only a few weeks old on the exchange. Hell, your account is only a few weeks old on the forums. Stop attempting to inform people who have been here for years, of what is "dead". You clearly have no idea what you are talking about. (If you are on a new alt account, thus the few posts and newb status, then your guidance has no merit. You hid for a reason... More than likely a bunch of other wrong calls.)

Again, there is no point announcing that the coin is dead, unless it is some pitiful attempt to get more cheap. If it is dead, as you say, then go away, it's dead. Why do you have an interest in a dead coin? (Because you actually believe that FUD works, and FUD actually has nothing to do with anything. Might be why you keep finding yourself investing in the wrong coins, because you listen to FUD and HYPE, and think it actually dictates the market. You couldn't be further from the reality of things. FUD and HYPE controls YOU, not those who make money. Those are the ones playing off FUD and HYPE that you follow. Unfortunately, if you don't have finances to play the FUD and HYPE, you just look like an idiot crying wolf.)

P.S. Found more servers that we might have at our disposal, if only for more nodes. I didn't realize there was a strong private tech-world in Jacksonville, Florida. Who knew!

Obviously the ones holding coins would not be screaming "Sell". The only ones who would be yelling "Sell", are those without coins, trying to get them cheaper. That is like yelling at the football team to win. It does nothing but generate noise that stops what you want from happening, from actually happening.

I have pulled another great pool-operator into the mix. Well, he was already eager about helping, so it was more of just an invitation to the open-house.

Multi-pool #2 is being developed, to assist with Multi-pool #1 that was already being developed by the existing devs. Now I just have to bring them together.

There is something bigger happening here than many realize. XHC will hopefully be the launching-grounds for a whole new breed of things to come. My new computer is on the way and things should begin to move-along faster on my end, once it arrives.

Those who have good trading skills/minds, please visit the IRC chat-room and send me a message, or PM me in the forums. We will need more fresh sound minds when the multi-pool launches. Collectively, we should be able to assist multiple markets, for mutual gains.

If anyone has any ideas about coin-adoptions, that we may possibly merge, permanently, into XHC... voice your ideas. (Talking about permanent acquisitions to reduce the number of coin markets, including the wallets.) I have a few ideas, but they are hardly perfect. Acceptable and possible, yes, but hardly perfect. (The more coins we acquire and remove without loss, the more focused our trading market becomes. The more we grow, the faster we can expand the future of this investment.)