No one look at Communism btw, those hundreds of millions of dead don't count as leftist violence!

It is totally irrelevant. The point is the record of attacks. This is not a matter of opinion or sources.

I'm curious on your position on this situation tbh.  Would you consider the baby to be an American citizen if birth right citizenship was revoked?

You're not entitled to live anywhere besides where you have citizenship. I just don't understand how some people can defend illegals who are completetly trying to bypass the immigration system. That's a complete and utter slap in the face to people who have came to countries legally.

He wants to stop the Caravan because that's the law of the land, it's crazy thinking that a President can't do this sort of thing. I don't get it.

Millions of undocumented people have been flooding in for years.

More Mexicans Leaving Than Coming to the U.S.

Net Loss of 140,000 from 2009 to 2014; Family Reunification Top Reason for Return

More Mexican immigrants have returned to Mexico from the U.S. than have migrated here since the end of the Great Recession, according to a new Pew Research Center analysis of newly available government data from both countries. The same data sources also show the overall flow of Mexican immigrants between the two countries is at its smallest since the 1990s, mostly due to a drop in the number of Mexican immigrants coming to the U.S.

From 2009 to 2014, 1 million Mexicans and their families (including U.S.-born children) left the U.S. for Mexico, according to data from the 2014 Mexican National Survey of Demographic Dynamics (ENADID). U.S. census data for the same period show an estimated 870,000 Mexican nationals left Mexico to come to the U.S., a smaller number than the flow of families from the U.S. to Mexico.

Nobody says that. Anyone can apply for the immigration visa and immigrate to the US legally.  

Don't forget smallpox, it would be such a shame if the caravan was able to bring that back into the US eh?  That might threaten hundreds of millions of Americans!

(don't even bother reading this)

[propaganda snipped]
They don't have rights to asylum, even if they did, Mexico is a safe harbor country which has offered them asylum. By passing thru Mexico they have no right to claim asylum here, EVEN IF they had a valid claim.

Trump and many GOP candidates have claimed that they are trying to illegally enter the country. But a look at the most recent caravan, which reached the U.S. border in April, paints a very different picture.

According to data and congressional testimony from U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services officials, 122 members of that caravan were caught trying to illegally enter the country. But 401 members of the caravan presented themselves at ports of entry and requested asylum.

Federal officials interviewed those asylum-seekers and found 374 of them, or 93 percent, passed their initial "credible fear" test. That’s higher than the 76 percent approval rate that all asylum-seekers received in fiscal year 2018, according to Citizenship and Immigration Services data.

Mad because his source is bullshit, read it if you want
#FakeNews

A person who owing to a well-founded fear of being persecuted for reasons of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group or political opinion, is outside the country of his nationality and is unable or, owing to such fear, is unwilling to avail himself of the protection of that country; or who, not having a nationality and being outside the country of his former habitual residence as a result of such events, is unable or, owing to such fear, is unwilling to return to it.

Surely there is nothing good in those points. But leftists usually use it just to blame trump. They always decide to be pacifists (only on words) when they need. It is nothing but lies. For example John McCain (which is considered as a "hero" by many Democrats) has been "fighting terrorism" while being in a close friendship with Saudi Arabia. Maybe it is better to fight terrorism whey you are inside their system?
I'm sure that everything could be way worse if another candidate, which received huge donations from Saudi Arabia during her elections, won the elections.

The leftists lead by Merkel and Macron had decided that the EU should open its borders to refugees...

Rights and responsibilities of parties to the Refugee Convention

In the general principle of international law, treaties in force are binding upon the parties to it and must be performed in good faith. Countries that have ratified the Refugee Convention are obliged to protect refugees that are on their territory, in accordance with its terms. There are a number of provisions that States parties to the Refugee Convention must adhere to.

Refugees shall
    abide by the national laws of the contracting states (Article 2)

The contracting states shall
    exempt refugees from reciprocity (Article 7): That means that the granting of a right to a refugee should not be subject to the granting of similar treatment by the refugee's country of nationality, because refugees do not enjoy the protection of their home state.
    be able to take provisional measures against a refugee if needed in the interest of essential national security (Article 9)
    respect a refugee's personal status and the rights that come with it, particularly rights related to marriage (Article 12)
    provide free access to courts for refugees (Article 16)
    provide administrative assistance for refugees (Article 25)
    provide identity papers for refugees (Article 27)
    provide travel documents for refugees (Article 28)
    allow refugees to transfer their assets (Article 30)
    provide the possibility of assimilation and naturalization to refugees (Article 34)
    cooperate with the UNHCR (Article 35) in the exercise of its functions and to help UNHCR supervise the implementation of the provisions in the Convention.
    provide information on any national legislation they may adopt to ensure the application of the Convention (Article 36).
    settle disputes they may have with other contracting states at the International Court of Justice if not otherwise possible (Article 38)

The contracting states shall not
    discriminate against refugees (Article 3)
    take exceptional measures against a refugee solely on account of his or her nationality (Article 8}
    expect refugees to pay taxes and fiscal charges that are different to those of nationals (Article 29)
    impose penalties on refugees who entered illegally in search of asylum if they present themselves without delay (Article 31), which is commonly interpreted to mean that their unlawful entry and presence ought not to be prosecuted at all
    expel refugees (Article 32)
    forcibly return or "refoul" refugees to the country they've fled from (Article 33). It is widely accepted that the prohibition of forcible return is part of customary international law. This means that even States that are not party to the 1951 Refugee Convention must respect the principle of non-refoulement. Therefore, States are obligated under the Convention and under customary international law to respect the principle of non-refoulement. If and when this principle is threatened, UNHCR can respond by intervening with relevant authorities, and if it deems necessary, will inform the public

Refugees shall be treated at least like nationals in relation to
    freedom to practice their religion (Article 4)
    the respect and protection of artistic rights and industrial property (Article 14)
    rationing (Article 20)
    elementary education (Article 22)
    public relief and assistance (Article 23)
    labour legislation and social security (Article 24)

Refugees shall be treated at least like other non-nationals in relation to
    movable and immovable property (Article 13)
    the right of association in unions or other associations (Article 15)
    wage-earning employment (Article 17)
    self-employment (Article 18)
    practice of the liberal professions (Article 19)
    housing (Article 21)
    education higher than elementary (Article 22)
    the right to free movement and free choice of residence within the country (Article 26)

As predicted, you don't care to have a debate, you would rather inject other side topics over and over again. Why? because you know you have no argument, so you have to manufacture an opinion for me for you to defeat. The left has no grounds calling for blame over rhetoric let alone violence based on the past several years of their own behavior.

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-10-30/brief-history-leftist-political-violence-year

our method: pseudonymous speech

anonymity is a shield from the tyranny of the majority...

the right to remain anonymous may be abused...

On the 27 March 2012, Daniel Ivandjiiski was named as a co-conspirator in a civil complaint regarding complaint for damages and equitable relief
(...)
On the 24 September 2015, the SEC charged a number of senior executives of GEROVA, and a number of major investors in GEROVA with a stock fraud scheme, for which several, including the former company Chairman and President, Gary Hirst, received jail sentences in 2017

Any proofs?
IMHO democrats are in close friendship with Saudi Arabia (and also receiving donations from them during US elections) which is the main sponsor of terrorism in its region.
Democrats were working with terrorists in the past. They are way closer to terrorism rather than democrats.

And most extreme left-wingers need war to spread their ideology... So if you don't follow them you used to be counter-revolutionary, later on trotskyist/titoist and nowadays you are 'hateful'...

That's a cute delusion. BTW, if anyone was wondering the KKK was created by and heavily supported by Democrats.

We have a moral duty to be honest. This duty is especially important when we share ideas that can inform or persuade others.

Intellectual honesty is honesty in the acquisition, analysis, and transmission of ideas. A person is being intellectually honest when he or she, knowing the truth, states that truth. Intellectual honesty pertains to any communication intended to inform or persuade. This includes all forms of scholarship, consequential conversations such as dialogue, debate, (...)

(...) After 1985, following the dismantling of both groups, one source reports there were no confirmed acts of left-wing terrorism by similar groups.

See also: Domestic terrorism in the United States
(...)
New America's tally shows that since September 11, 2001, incidents of right-wing extremism have caused 86 deaths. Incidents causing death were:
(...)
(check link if you care)