|
Is Anoncoin still being actively developed? Is there a roadmap somewhere? A working block explorer?
|
|
|
|
|
Please add multipool.us to your list of pools. Thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
Multipool.us is merge mining Unitus with all of our X11 coins.
|
|
|
|
If LN siphons off the majority of network fees, how will miners get paid?
Your premise wrong, and you have shown to the community you don't understand the subject you are referring to. You didn't answer the question. |
|
|
|
Greg has openly called for full blocks and a fee market (which we have right now). If blocks are empty, then when the reward drops to zero how will miners get paid? If LN siphons off the majority of network fees, how will miners get paid? |
|
|
|
|
block explorer is behind by around 20k blocks, can someone give it a kick please.
|
|
|
|
The new wallet was an update to the codebase. It also included new alert keys for the transition from Balduro to the new team. Aside from that, there weren't any changes to blockchain specifics. The decision to officially cut the old versions(read: hard fork via bridge node update) was made when we found some suspicious mining activity coming from a private address on an older client. It was time to cut the old versions anyway. I'm pretty sure you can read back numerous pages and see where the team told people to update to the newest version. People have had since August to do so. -Fuse Telling people to update is not the same as announcing a fork. Everything was working fine with old wallets until you guys pulled the plug yesterday at 6am. |
|
|
|
I see all Yescrypt found blocks are mergemined, is there any public pool where one can mergemine, or these blocks come from some private initiative?
Also, is there a way to say with coin merge mined the uis block?
Multipool.us has UIS merged with all X11 coins. |
|
|
|
|
Multipool.us is now offering merged mining of Unitus with all X11 coins. Please update OP.
Thanks.
|
|
|
|
And the fact they they are rarely even paying out BTC now. We've totally removed Cryptsy from everything we run because of the questionable state.
Good idea. What alternative with a broad variety of PoW altcoins and enough liquidity is available? We have a broad range at www.zpool.caCheers I mean what exchange you will use as an alternative to Cryptsy. Most exchanges either don't have the suitable coins listed or no volume. Bittrex and Poloniex, combined, cover most of the coins Cryptsy has. But there are a few that are only on Cryptsy. |
|
|
|
|
Something seems odd here??
$ novacoind getblocktemplate|grep -i time
"mintime" : 1469407456,
"time",
"curtime" : 1469416605,
|
|
|
|
|
Anyone have some addnodes? Only six connections on my nodes and 2 are mine.
|
|
|
|
We operate a node that allows older wallets to communicate with the newer wallets. The newer wallets block connections to from the old wallet via the minimum protocol version. The US West node still allows the connections, effectively bridging the old clients with the new ones. It's necessary to not cause a fork between the two versions while we get everyone updated.
Bridge node isn't necessarily the technical term(not sure if their is one), but it was about the best phrase I could come up with. I guess you could call it the transitional node too.
-Fuse
We want to get rid of the old wallets (so we can push notifications in the future when people need to update), we don't have the keys for the old wallets to do this. There will always be a few nodes that will never upgrade. We decided to restrict the connections between the old and new wallets to facilitate this and have a smoother chain fork in the future.
So this is a 'hostile takeover' of sorts? No, this 'takeover' has the blessing of baldur who has pointed his auroracoin.org site to the new team's forum Why can't he give you the alert key then? And the official Github? |
|
|
|
We operate a node that allows older wallets to communicate with the newer wallets. The newer wallets block connections to from the old wallet via the minimum protocol version. The US West node still allows the connections, effectively bridging the old clients with the new ones. It's necessary to not cause a fork between the two versions while we get everyone updated.
Bridge node isn't necessarily the technical term(not sure if their is one), but it was about the best phrase I could come up with. I guess you could call it the transitional node too.
-Fuse
We want to get rid of the old wallets (so we can push notifications in the future when people need to update), we don't have the keys for the old wallets to do this. There will always be a few nodes that will never upgrade. We decided to restrict the connections between the old and new wallets to facilitate this and have a smoother chain fork in the future.
So this is a 'hostile takeover' of sorts? |
|
|
|
|
Is this new wallet a hardfork or is a hardfork planned in the near future?
|
|
|
|
|
I just received an email about a new client, is there a new client? If so please publish this information via official channels.
|
|
|
|
Which is the correct source for this coin ? and wallet ?
Having problems syncing and db errors allover the place.
Best regards,
Bejjan
The database errors are because baritus has no idea how to fix it or is just plain too lazy to do so. Its rather annoying Here is the work around that was not found by baritus. But rather Ahmed_Bodi. Its the bandaid they have been using for the last year or so  1. In the "Argentum" data directory folder, create a file called "DB_CONFIG" without any extension.
2. Copy and paste this into it:
set_lk_max_locks 537000
set_lk_max_objects 537000
3. Save that file.
4. In the "Argentum" data directory folder, delete blk0001.dat, blkindex.dat, database folder, and db.log in the data directory, and restart. Baritus just deleted one of my posts in this thread so he's still around. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
