|
MPOS will support Ethereum, we only need an opensource stratum server that support Ethereum for that matter.
|
|
|
|
Any one of you knows of an opensource Stratum server for Ethereum that is compatible with MPOS or even if it has its own frontend , I know that MPOS would support Ethereum, because there are some pools that already did that, Like supernova or coinmineI don't even mind if it is not MPOS, because there are few pools out there using the same source-code, so there has to be some opensource code out there, like weipool, Alphapool and nanopool.. Any help would be really appreciated. |
|
|
|
Hi, Ethereum seems to be doing well, and I think it has some real potential, I am curious about how much work is needed to make MPOS Ethereum compatible... I saw a few MPOS pools out there with ethereum support, I would like to know if there is any open source code out there for Ethereum pool mining, if not, how much work is needed to make a MPOS fork for ethereum? MPOS pools with Ethereum support: https://eth.suprnova.cc/index.phphttps://www2.coinmine.pl/eth/I just don't get why there is no open source for this out there already ! |
|
|
|
many don't understand that the new code in XT will be active only if 75% of the network actually runs it
And many don't understand that the 75% is not of the network but of the mining pools. And this can be easily manipulated! Anyway, XT altcoin fork is dead now. Block size debate was just a cover up now revealing hidden agenda to introduce among bitcoin users the XT client that is simply an IP logger and blacklist aggregator! Well, I said this few years ago, Bitcoin is not BitTorrent, bitcoin is a financial instrument and will be heavily regulated, you can try to fight it now, but whether you like it or not, these things will eventually happen... or Bitcoin transactions will be deemed illegal and businesses will be forbidden from using it, and there the mass adoption dream vanishes in front of your eyes. just another clueless shill for tyranny. There is a state where there is no real government but people forcing their ideologies upon each other, it is called Islamic State in Iraq and Syria... I would like to see you moving there, and don't forget to send us some feedback about life without a civil government and constitution. Edit: It is the pure wild-west you wish for there, I don't like to see innocent's people heads chopped off on Liveleak in Syria, but I don't mind watching a head of a terrorist going off... and terrorism really vary, the hipster rebels that want to shutdown order and government for their own financial benefits on the cost of masses are considered just as bad as terrorists IMO. |
|
|
|
Well, I said this few years ago, Bitcoin is not BitTorrent, bitcoin is a financial instrument and will be heavily regulated, you can try to fight it now, but you like or not, these things will eventually happen...
Bitcoin is not a financial instrument. Bitcoin is money. Gold is money too, not a financial instrument. Good luck regulating gold... and bitcoin. Some people tend to forget: "Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System" Satoshi Nakamoto Cash is NOT a financial instrument! And never will be... hopefully! Well, to be honest, like you, I have dreams of privacy, but I also have dreams of security and peace, and if I have to compromise, I will gladly compromise some of my privacy rights for the sake of a secure and peaceful world (maybe the fact of having kids changed the way I think), and we both know what Bitcoin can be, don't just think about what you see in Bitcoin, think also about what others sees in Bitcoin, many people will find it an excellent way to launder money, finance terrorism and criminal activities, and the best way to pay for illegal products such as child porn and weapons... I guess you see the big picture here. I know that many people here are libertarians, and I know that they will really hate me for saying this, but I don't wish to live in a world where crime is considered the price or the cost of financial freedom, why not have both security and financial freedom at once? |
|
|
|
In the end the client will be decided by the exchanges not the miners.
What miner is going to mine a coin that then can't be sold on an exchange?
you got that wrong my friend, if the miners switch to the new client, exchanges wont have any other choice but to follow, because the old chain will be dead... don't forget, miners are the sole of the network, Bitcoin rely on POW, so having X% of the mining power means controlling X% of the voting power in Bitcoin's network |
|
|
|
many don't understand that the new code in XT will be active only if 75% of the network actually runs it
And many don't understand that the 75% is not of the network but of the mining pools. And this can be easily manipulated! Anyway, XT altcoin fork is dead now. Block size debate was just a cover up now revealing hidden agenda to introduce among bitcoin users the XT client that is simply an IP logger and blacklist aggregator! Well, I said this few years ago, Bitcoin is not BitTorrent, bitcoin is a financial instrument and will be heavily regulated, you can try to fight it now, but whether you like it or not, these things will eventually happen... or Bitcoin transactions will be deemed illegal and businesses will be forbidden from using it, and there the mass adoption dream vanishes in front of your eyes. |
|
|
|
1BTC = 2BTC soon
After this crash XT fork is basically dead. I doubt Core devs will even discuss whatever block size increase now. I've been following in the shadows for months now, the block size debate is not going to stop just like that, it is a real issue that needs a permanent solution, in fact I think the heat of this debate will increase in the next following weeks. For now XT seems to be the only real solution available, all the sidechains and lightening talk is not so "productive", these can't be solutions while they are just theoretical... many don't understand that the new code in XT will be active only if 75% of the network actually runs it (beside the planned fork time)... but anyhow, how the fork will effect the price? of course there will be some panic like always, and the price might go down, but I don't think Bitcoin will be dead, in my opinion a fork means that we still can do things to improve Bitcoin and make adaptable for mass adoption, a planned fork is not that bad in my opinion.... just to remind people here, this is not the first Bitcoin fork, in 2013 we had an accidental fork, trading and all transaction were halted for 48 hours... and before that there was a bug in the code that allowed for massive Bitcoin generation that was also fixed by a fork, so I don't see why a planned fork is more dangerous than an accidental one?! BTW, Today I saw a block that was found by an XT client( Slush's pool using v3 already), this means miners are switching slowly and many nodes did switch as well, and Chinese miners said that they support the new block size so there you got a massive user base switching, it is only about time... |
|
|
|
|
I found the trick, it was my mistake, I made a mistake with the magic, I mixed the mainnet one with the testnet one.... make sure you have the right magic or your daemon will reject connections
|
|
|
|
Have you tried restarting insight or clearing its databases to resynce? That might help, otherwise, I don't know if what the problem is. Also, if you search for the latest block, it will still show the data even with the error.
OK, I tried re-syncing, but I see the same problem !!! all suggestions are welcome, maybe I am missing something really small here... Could you post the log here? I don't remember where it is but it shouldn't be that hard to find. > insight-bitcore@0.2.7 start /root/insight
> INSIGHT_PUBLIC_PATH=public node node_modules/.bin/insight-bitcore-api
____ _ __ __ ___ _
/ _/___ _____(_)___ _/ /_ / /_ / | ____ (_)
/ // __ \/ ___/ / __ `/ __ \/ __/ / /| | / __ \/ /
_/ // / / (__ ) / /_/ / / / / /_ / ___ |/ /_/ / /
/___/_/ /_/____/_/\__, /_/ /_/\__/ /_/ |_/ .___/_/
/____/ /_/
v0.2.18
info: insight server listening on port 3000 in development mode
info: Bitcoin Core version v1.3.0.0-L32a928e-leo-enhanced
info: Using RPC sync
info: Resuming sync from block: 000004ad126411624468754033d92580bb636ce441a752032408dafa71747487 #969
info: Could not find block files at: /root/.LEOcoin/testnet3/blocks/blk*.dat. Disabling file sync.
info: Got 969 blocks in current DB, out of 605210 block at bitcoind
info: syncing from RPC (slow)
info: Starting from: 000004ad126411624468754033d92580bb636ce441a752032408dafa71747487
info: status: [0.16%]
info: NEW TIP: 000004ad126411624468754033d92580bb636ce441a752032408dafa71747487 NEED REORG (old tip: 000004ad126411624468754033d92580bb636ce441a752032408dafa7174$
info: Reorg Case 1) OldNext: 000004ad126411624468754033d92580bb636ce441a752032408dafa71747487 NewHeight: 969
info: Unconfirming 2 Txs
info: status: [0.2%]
info: status: [0.3%]
{ '0': 'connecting to 127.0.0.1:5837' }
info: status: [0.399%]
info: status: [0.499%]
info: status: [0.599%]
info: status: [0.699%]
info: status: [0.799%]
info: status: [0.898%]
info: status: [0.998%]
info: status: [1.098%]
info: status: [1.198%]
info: status: [1.298%]
info: status: [1.397%]
info: status: [1.497%]
info: status: [1.597%]
info: status: [1.697%]
info: status: [1.797%]
info: status: [1.896%]
info: status: [1.996%]
info: status: [2.096%]
info: status: [2.196%]
info: status: [2.296%]
info: status: [2.395%]
info: status: [2.495%]
info: status: [2.595%]
{ '0': 'disconnected from peer 127.0.0.1:5837' }
info: status: [2.695%]
info: status: [2.795%]
info: status: [2.894%]
info: status: [2.994%]
info: status: [3.094%]
info: status: [3.194%] I removed HTTP calls |
|
|
|
Have you tried restarting insight or clearing its databases to resynce? That might help, otherwise, I don't know if what the problem is. Also, if you search for the latest block, it will still show the data even with the error.
OK, I tried re-syncing, but I see the same problem !!! all suggestions are welcome, maybe I am missing something really small here... |
|
|
|
Have you tried restarting insight or clearing its databases to resynce? That might help, otherwise, I don't know if what the problem is. Also, if you search for the latest block, it will still show the data even with the error.
I see, it got messed up again... |
|
|
|
They are the same, I am starting it with npm start .
Edit: I get the net stats and block height, the problem is that insight doesn't submit latest blocks in the network
Do you start it with in the command because if you don't then it will default to testnet and it won't work properly. yes it is on the live net, in fact I have the same config for both livenet and testnet. as you can see www.mmitech.info it is showing the main net |
|
|
|
Did you set the rpc user and password correctly both in the config file and in the environment variables when starting Insight?
I did set it in the config file at insight/node_modules/insight-bitcore-api/config/config.js is there any other config file that need to be changed beside that ? Make sure it the user and password are the same as the ones that you put into the coind config file. Also, what command are you using to start insight? They are the same, I am starting it with npm start . Edit: I get the net stats and block height, the problem is that insight doesn't submit latest blocks in the network |
|
|
|
Did you set the rpc user and password correctly both in the config file and in the environment variables when starting Insight?
I did set it in the config file at insight/node_modules/insight-bitcore-api/config/config.js is there any other config file that need to be changed beside that ? |
|
|
|
I am struggling with this for a couple of hours now: Can't connect to coind to get live updates from the p2p network. (Tried connecting to bitcoind at 127.0.0.1:5837 and failed.) in the log I see { '0': 'connecting to 127.0.0.1:5837' } after a while { '0': 'disconnected from peer 127.0.0.1:5837' }.I can telnet 127.0.0.1 5837 and 0.0.0.0 5837 telnet 127.0.0.1 5837
Trying 127.0.0.1...
Connected to 127.0.0.1.
Escape character is '^]'. I double checked the magic again, and it is d9e6e7e5 exactly like in the source code https://github.com/Leocoin-project/LEOcoin/blob/master/src/main.cpp#L3023The Protocol version is 70000 same as in the code "version" : "v1.3.0.0-L32a928e-leo-enhanced",
"protocolversion" : 70000,
"walletversion" : 60000,
"balance" : 0.00000000,
"newmint" : 0.00000000,
"stake" : 0.00000000,
"blocks" : 605091,
"moneysupply" : 65289528.44299800,
"connections" : 9,
"proxy" : "",
"ip" : "217.26.192.84",
"difficulty" : 0.18828001,
"testnet" : false,
"keypoololdest" : 1439130316,
"keypoolsize" : 102,
"paytxfee" : 0.00001000,
"errors" : "." but I can't get it to work !!! any suggestion ? did I miss anything ? |
|
|
|
Everything on the chart is telling me that we are heading to double digits, the walls popping up and down are just a desperate attempt to hold the sinking ship, or a delusion of missing the opportunity of buying the bottom... the only healthy way for Bitcoin to survive is for this bubble to finally burst which can allow for a new path... and leave all the limitations (of course they have to be fixed first ) and the dark history behind.
And you think that with Bitcoin at double digits there will be no more trolls here yelling Bitcoin is doomed and we'll be seeing single digits soon? There will be even more of them then and they will be louder. Also what dark history are you talking about and how does Bitcoin trading at double digits leave that behind exactly? There will always be trolls trolling at any price or any moment...besides, in most cases, what you consider a trolling I consider a different opinion....you really didn't see what trolling looks like. It seems that we live in different worlds, the history I was talking about is the history of heists and crimes, drugs and paid murders, failed and amateur businesses, shitty scams and ponzi schemes, shitty wallets and lost funds, extreme volatility...... and the list goes on, when Bitcoin hits new lows many people will lose confidence (of getting quickly rich) and abandon the ship and forget about the whole scene, the media wont mention it very often, which can allow developers and serious people (like me) to work on the obvious limitations (that most get rich kids wont admit to) and prepare it for the real mass adoption... the current user base will be almost gone in a short time, and it will be gone disappointed and burned. |
|
|
|
Laughing at bears - check Cheap coins - check Short squeeze incoming - check I I I I V Sub 200 incoming  I HOPE you're right. 5 BTC for a grand, can you believe it? I can't wait. Gives me a boner just thinking about it. still overprice IMO. |
|
|
|
|
Everything on the chart is telling me that we are heading to double digits, the walls popping up and down are just a desperate attempt to hold the sinking ship, or a delusion of missing the opportunity of buying the bottom... the only healthy way for Bitcoin to survive is for this bubble to finally burst which can allow for a new path... and leave all the limitations (of course they have to be fixed first ) and the dark history behind.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
