|
Have the ratios for next round been announced? Same, 20% for bytes hodlers as in this round?
|
|
|
|
I would like to try something on iota, but you dont seem to have a network in production yet? Seems to be permission based, I need to ask in your slack for peering nodes. Right? Oh I am banned from your alack. Gonna need some assistance on that.
Well, I see you keep lying, so I better stick to the original conditions so you will be unable to accuse me of something. You didnt even specify original conditions. The bet is on only if you pay the bet you lost previously, otherwise it doesnt make sense for me to sign up for another bet where you dont fulfill your end of the deal. Pay up or shut up. |
|
|
|
I know you are. And I'm telling you that you have no right to tell others what to do. They will hold or dump as they please, no matter what you say they 'should' do.
OK Mr ByteCoin, are you the authority on who has the right to give advice on a forum and not? You are wrong again, it _is_ my right to advise others, and responsibly disclose my reasoning and vested interests behind the advice. Did you get permission from someone to express your opinion here? |
|
|
|
@SatoNatomato, is it fine if we do our testing of DB compression ratio on the testnet or you prefer sticking to the original plan (using the mainnet)? I'll need some assistance for the testnet scenario. Or we can just go with the mainnet one, I reserved 5 GB for the fees.
I would like to try something on iota, but you dont seem to have a network in production yet? Seems to be permission based, I need to ask in your slack for peering nodes. Right? Oh I am banned from your alack. Gonna need some assistance on that. |
|
|
|
You are still confusing too many issues, most of your posts are just wrong.
Again, be specific. If you think I'm wrong about something tell me what, and why. And I will either correct it, or explain to you why you are wrong. Newbies, watch out.
That's FUD. Warning newbies about me when it's you that's wrong and not me. First, exchanges can credit their customers gbytes which they got just for having gbytes just like any address in Byteball. This is not due to bitcoins linked by exchange. Every byteball address gets inflated even of you didnt link any btc to it.
I never said that exchanges don't earn the 10% or 20% on held bytes. I said that they can also claim for held BTC. You said they couldn't. I tried to correct you, but you didn't believe me and accused me of FUD. Here's a post from tonych where he says he has no problem with exchanges claiming. He doesn't want their customers falsely claiming on behalf of exchanges because that is considered cheating: Tony, how do you see whales and exchanges linking wallets to get free Gbytes?
Many greedy xchange operators will use Gbyte to just make more money by linking wallets of own exhanges.
We are filtering the exchange addresses when their customers (not the exchanges themselves) try to link them by doing a withdrawal. This is considered cheating. I am not aware of any exchanges that had covertly linked their BTC wallets (Cryptox linked openly, and distributed among its users). If you find one, please let its customers know. No issues with whales, the rules are the same for everybody irrespective of wealth. Second, when posting here " bytecoin" and even getting its currencies wrong, while the topic is most active is just bad form. Rather stay quiet if you arent sure than spread such mistakes and instill confusion, FUD, its in the U, to spread uncertanity.
Yes, you mentioned that already. I apologized and fixed my mistake. Is that the only thing I got wrong? What's your problem exactly? Enjoy your bytes and blackbytes, hodl, Byteball on IoT makes more sense than iota. Just you sit and watch.
Reminder, Byteball has only existed in livenet for less than 6 months. Speaking altcoininvestor-style, its main rocket engines havent even fired yet.
I'm not sure what that has to do with anything. Everyone will hold or dump as they see fit. It's none of your business to tell me what to do with my coins. If I dump too early others will benefit from it. If I hold and sell at the peak it hurts others. It's all a zero sum game anyway, so why would you be trying to try me how to trade? Better effort, thanks. Your a dumbass if you read tonych quote and comprehend it as "exchanges are allowed to link their customers btc and retain profits of bytes for themselves." tonych asks for anyone to tell him such cheating. An exchnge address which containa profits from fees is ofcourse allowed like any business or big whale, i never claimed otherwise. Exchanges are not allowed to cheat and claim their customers btc as their own, just as their customers arent allowed to claim others btcs as their own. Fair and just, so far no exchange has been suspected of such cheating, most just provide a service for their customers, like the good cryptox.pl. I am telling others, to hodl, low price makes BB vulnerable, higher price makes storing illegal or flooding with data more expensive, avoiding such hassle this early is vital. The correct price is 16btc / gb. We need network effect - more new people in Byteball, more btc linked. Btw yes I have business invested in Byteball, so my advice is biased of course. |
|
|
|
This is not ByteCoin, buddy.
My bad. The names are pretty similar and I get them mixed up. I fixed my original post. Exchange-addresses are filtered out no matter if its their users or exchange operators.
Some exchanges let their users claim their byteballs. Do you seriously think they would be doing that if their addresses weren't being credited? There is so much fud in your post
There is none. Maybe you are misinformed about some things. If you tell me what you think is "fud" I will address it. no need just buy bytes, not byteballs, not bytecoins, like everyone else.
What are you saying there is no need for? I can't understand what you're trying to say. This is Byteball and its native currency is bytes. Blackbyre is the first defined private asset.
OK. I'm sorry if I got the names wrong. It's kind of confusing. So it's "bytes" and "Blackbyre". Got it. [/quote]You are still confusing too many issues, most of your posts are just wrong. Newbies, watch out. First, exchanges can credit their customers gbytes which they got just for having gbytes just like any address in Byteball. This is not due to bitcoins linked by exchange. Every byteball address gets inflated even of you didnt link any btc to it. Second, when posting here " bytecoin" and even getting its currencies wrong, while the topic is most active is just bad form. Rather stay quiet if you arent sure than spread such mistakes and instill confusion, FUD, its in the U, to spread uncertanity. Enjoy your bytes and blackbytes, hodl, Byteball on IoT makes more sense than iota. Just you sit and watch. Reminder, Byteball has only existed in livenet for less than 6 months. Speaking altcoininvestor-style, its main rocket engines havent even fired yet. |
|
|
|
The linked address is not an exchange, exchanges arent allowed.
The dude who is loaded with 54k deserves his bytes just as you do. Stop being jelly.
Exchanges are allowed. What's not allowed is exchange users pretending to own exchange hot wallet addresses by making withdrawals from the exchange hot wallet to the transition bot. what happen if I put my btc address with a byteball address, but then I change my wallet and put the same btc address? I will receive byte only in the last one?
you shouldn't be able to link the same BTC address to two different Byteball wallets, (as far as i know) But I will receive bytes only in one? I guess If you link one BTC address to multiple ByteCoin addresses you will receive nothing at all. That is to prevent the attack I described above. You should move your BTC to a new address and link that to just one ByteCoin address. Anybody knows what is the fee to send blackbytes? It's surreal that I had to ask this in a forum to complete a transaction...
The fee is one bytecoin per byte of transaction size. Note that fees are paid in byteballs and not blackbytes. This makes sense; if the fee was paid in blackbytes the network wouldn't be able to validate that the correct amount of fee was paid due to blackbyte transaction amounts being opaque. the typical fee for a transaction seem to be about 535 bytes. That is not a huge amount given the current value of a single byte (its negligible).
He was asking about the fee for blackbyte transactions. I think they tend to be more expensive than regular transactions on account of blackbytes being distributed in discrete units of various fixed sizes. I've seen blackbyte transactions up to 10 or 20kbytes in size (and hence in cost). how much i get if i link 5 btc? there is a calculator somewhere? thanks
You get 62.5 MB per BTC. There should be a calculator on your phone or computer. But I can help you out: 62.5 times 5 is 312.5. This is not ByteCoin, buddy. Exchange-addresses are filtered out no matter if its their users or exchange operators. There is so much fud in your post, no need just buy bytes, not byteballs, not bytecoins, like everyone else. This is Byteball and its native currency is bytes. Blackbyre is the first defined private asset. |
|
|
|
they already did ........there is one account with circa 54k btc in it ......  The linked address is not an exchange, exchanges arent allowed. The dude who is loaded with 54k deserves his bytes just as you do. Stop being jelly. |
|
|
|
Guys what is the difference between GBYTE, Byte and blackbyte?
I may think Gbyte is 1000 Byte, but cant find anything on blackbyte
Please suggest how they are different and how to find more about black byte
See the wiki at https://wiki.byteball.org/GBYTE is the ticker name of Byteball native asset called bytes. 1 byte is 1 000 000 is 1MB is 0.1GB. The first private asset is called blackbytes. https://wiki.byteball.org/blackbytes |
|
|
|
Actually I have found out why, I always set up my Electrum as 2FA wallets, that means that they are Multisig and start with 3.
I have a vanity address that starts with 1, but I dont trust that enough as I generated it online.
I have made a new Electrum wallet without 2FA, I might move my coins their, now sure yet.
Move them, sign, wait 24h - the next snapshot block is mined then. Move your coins back, enjoy Bytes and Blackbytes. |
|
|
|
I'm apparently an idiot, I can't get it to work.
a) Only P2PKH addresses are supported
is the error I get when I add my electrum address to the chatbot
b) in Electrum, when I try to sign the address, no signature is generated. Using 2.7.12
c) I thought I'd just pay, but it wasn't accepted as it is a dust payment...
I just used the adress listed (I only use one) in the Adresses tab. Then I went to the Adresses tab in Electrum, right clicked my adress, then Sign/Verify Message, filled in my Byteball address as the message, clicked Sign, then copy/pasted the signature to the bot. All of my Bitcoin addresses start with a 3 and apparently can't be signed, or added to the Chatbot. I'm not too keen to make a new address and send everything there, my coins seem nice and safe where theý are now. No idea why my addresses are like they are, or why they can't be accepted. Typical. Bitcoin addresses starting with 3 are script-hash addresses, see https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Pay_to_script_hash. Usually this kind of addresses is used for multi-signature. |
|
|
|
Hello guys! I am totaly new here. If I try to sign my Byteball address I see this message:  And if I try to prove my BTC address by paying 0.000865 I see this:  Please help me! The bitcoin addresses beginning with 3 are problematic. Do you have another one which begins with 1? The tx you tried to send to prove ownership/link, is too small - try to increase the amount sent. |
|
|
|
This is one of the few serious projects in the altcoin space, looking forward to the next round distribution.
Yeah and this project isn't a promise, it's a working software ! The most differentiating fact from the rest of coins. |
|
|
|
Anyone else working on porting Byteball to other languages/implementations?
What do you mean, c/c++, java? Yes, C, Java, any Rust developers up in here? What would be the advantage of a reimplementation? It is still under heavy development by tony. Advantage: if any nasty bug affects byteballcore, fucked. Another implementation on the network? Smooth storm sailing. Risk, another implementation discovers/uncovers nasty bug or introduced its own. |
|
|
|
Anyone else working on porting Byteball to other languages/implementations?
What do you mean, c/c++, java? Yes, C, Java, any Rust developers up in here? |
|
|
|
|
Anyone else working on porting Byteball to other languages/implementations?
|
|
|
|
Maybe the joke is on us? Price already dropping. Kudos to him!
Well, it did go up a lot in the past week(s). But I noticed the same, it started dropping at about the same time this address joined. At the price he joined at, he's looking at $3 million in Byteball on Friday. It's a flaw in the way the airdrop works, but I can't think of any way to prevent the huge windfall to rich Bitcoin holders either. Imagine this scenario: If one person (let's call him whale) gets enough bytes to sell through all buy support at bittrex, it can potentially decimate the price. That would be an opportunity for others to buy cheaper bytes, but we all know the whale will get the same amount next month. If the price goes up, he'll dump again, making it a very bad investment, so there's a strong motivation against buying. This is of course pure speculation, and a whale didn't become a whale by dumping his Bitcoins. He could very well HOLD his bytes too. The problem is: we can't know what he's going to do. All we know is one guy gets a much larger share than even the creator. Tony gets a very moderate 1% of all bytes. In my opinion, the modesty of the developer is more or less wasted if whales get a larger share. If its not bitcoins made from scam, if it is indeed just his bitcoins sprinkled by spiteful/jelly people with dust, play on, game is same for everyone. Cheap bytes for all. Thank you whale! |
|
|
|
I would be happy to see some form of a self-executing smart contract that would put at least part of fees earned by a witness to any beneficial purpose we choose - like charity or any fund beneficial to society or community. If a witness was running on condition to such contract it would be much more acceptable to our community to choose it instead of a witness that keeps all earnings to itself.
MEJ witness is redistributive, 50% sent back to its users. The other 7UL... Witness has pledged to support EFF Wikipedia and others. |
|
|
|
There is no actual 'time' in any cryptocurrency, and any things you might find in blocks called 'time stamps' are not to be trusted because in a p2p environment, nodes lie. This is what satoshi solved in his paper - a time stamping algorithm called POW.
Byteball does not use timestamps at all. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
