|
Guys, no need to post a report for signature campaign, I will check them myself.
|
|
|
|
He basically keeps yelling ADAPTION!!! for every single example of evolution without realizing that, as you said, some traits/genes are not learned, they are genetically embedded in you. He is just a delusional person.
You distract from the topic of evolution - in this case, evolution theory evolution. There is no factual example of species to species change. What is left is adaptation change. However, all change is dictated by cause and effect, just like the motions of the balls on a pool table are dictated by the way the pool player takes his shot... all through cause and effect. There is no example of anything else.  So how do you think there are so many species? They just keep popping into existence? Do you even logic bro? |
|
|
|
Evolution is NOT a hoax! It is a THEORY, or a HYPOTHESIS, if you like, and it used to satisfy people's needs. However, with time, as new knowledge develops, the THEORY is becoming increasingly ironic and, thus, needs adjustments. Evolution is not a theory. Why not? Because the theory about evolution has been disproven many times over. The theory as taught in the schools neglects to take into effect most of the evolution things that have been disproven. Since there is no evolution, there is no Theory of Evolution. All there is, is people saying that evolution theory exists. For example. Imagine that an astronomer was looking through a telescope some 12 billion light years out. He sees something out there, and he gets a bunch of his colleagues and friends to look through his 'scope. They see it, as well. So, the form a scientific theory about what it is. Then other astronomers develop better telescopes and start to look for the object that supposedly is 12 billion light years out there. They look for years, and nobody finds it. Finally somebody examines the telescope used by the first astronomer (who is long dead) and finds a scratch on the lens. Evolution is a bit like that. As far as the science of Darwin's day, evolution could be an absolutely real thing. But as far as scientific advances made since Darwin, evolution is impossible. The universe, and especially life, is way too advanced design-wise for something like like evolution theory evolution to be real. Evolution theory is not really theory, because evolution has been proven impossible. The thing that keeps the evolution idea being referred to as theory is, some people want it to be referred to as theory... to save face, or to continue to make money off it. Evolution is a hoax. Heh, you just keep saying that no factual proof of evolution has ever been found, but at the same time saying that most evolution things have been disproven. So you are disproving things that according to you do not exist in the first place… Of course it’s all balb blab. Evolution is all around you, trillions of examples. That you choose not to see them, does not mean they are not there. Adaptation is a learned trait, by an individual or group (even over a long time). That can or cannot be passed onto future individuals, thereby end up (but not necessarily) as evolution. Evolution per say is not a learned trait, but a born trait, a trait you will have a hard time (or not at all) to unlearn. Example height, dark hair, blue eyes, intelligent and cognitive skills etc. And if you thought the two last ones is something you learn as you see fit, you thought wrong, cause ones way of thinking is already there from the beginning. You can get better though, by training. He basically keeps yelling ADAPTION!!! for every single example of evolution without realizing that, as you said, some traits/genes are not learned, they are genetically embedded in you. He is just a delusional person. |
|
|
|
The idea that something came from nothing is ludicrous. Science is based on the premise that everything comes from something. To think that something originated from absolutely nothing is unreasonable and illogical.
It would be ridiculous to look around us at all the intricacies and complexities of nature and deny the existence of a higher power and to say that all these things happened by random chance.
God made everything out of, what exactly? Vibrations in nothing... empty space. You know that God spoke things into existence. You have read it in Genesis. God, being Who He is, speaks a bit differently that we do. His speaking creates vibrations in empty space, resulting in the energy vibrations that everything is made up of, in their sub-subatomic existence. Part of hiding this knowledge from people, is turning the nothing of empty space into exactly that... nothing. In reality, the thing that we call nothing, or empty space, is an elastic solid through which the vibrations of everything that we are, has been transmitted and carried, by the speaking of God. People of the past knew this, and called it the aether, even though they didn't know what the aether is. We simply claim that the aether doesn't exist, only because we can't seem to get a handle on it. Our science is so weak that it can't do much of anything, and so stupid that it sticks its head in a hole in the sand regarding the things it doesn't understand. So basically, you fabricate some story about vibrations and how god made things without a single shred of evidence and then proceed to say, people know this, even though they don't. Our science is so weak but do not worry, I badecker, a god, know everything and I'll tell you all how it is. Thanks god badecker, we can always count on your infinite knowledge! |
|
|
|
We do not allow multi accounts in this bounty, you are risking getting tagged by a DT member. |
|
|
|
Most vaccination is effected by sticking a needle into a person. Where does something like that happen in nature? Poisonous snakes and spiders and fish that do injection, all harm or kill. And even some thorn bushes of various types are poisonous. Essentially there is nothing in nature that suggests injecting somebody to keep him well and safe. At the same time, you can look all over the world and see how nature provides people with teeth, food, a digestive system, and all kinds of immunities in the forms of their natural immune systems. And all of this without injecting them. So, why would injection be better? Are we improving on nature? Consider. Nature reproduces life in quantities... by the trillions. We can't even figure out how to make one single life form from scratch. Why do we think that we are smart enough to inject people to heal them, when nature - which is a lot smarter than we are - doesn't do that?This gotta be up there with the most idiotic arguments in the history. You really need to start recognizing the difference between fact and argument. Or are you across the hall from notbatman?Stick to religion, leave science for smart people. ''Where does something like that happen in nature?'' Poisonous snakes and spiders and fish that do injection, all harm or kill. And even some thorn bushes of various types are poisonous. Essentially there is nothing in nature that suggests injecting somebody to keep him well and safe. Next time someone allergic to a bee ''injection'' get's ''injected'' tell him not to inject himself with epinephrine, let him die because injecting epinephrine cannot possibly be good because nature shows us it's not. You are fucking stupid lmao. |
|
|
|
''Gravity is a fact! How do we know? We know because people and cars don't float off the surface of the earth.'' Silly boy, we know evolution is a fact, we know animals and humans evolve, they don't just pop off into existence
We know gravity is a fact because we all use it all the time. Now, please don't jump off the top of the Empire State Building just to show that gravity might not exist. LISTEN to me for once, and don't do it. Evolution theory evolution has not been proven to exist, even once. Yet, scientific attempts have been made for almost 200 years or longer. It wouldn't be a theory if it wasn't proven, for 200 years the evidence has been piling up, more and more evidence against creationism, more and more evidence showing evolution, yet somehow your brain thinks creationism beats evolution. |
|
|
|
Don't bother with this idiot... he doesn't even understand HOW to prove a scientific theory incorrect
The only way to prove a scientific theory incorrect, is to provide a BETTER theory... that's literally the ONLY way
The new theory must explain all the observed facts of the previous theory, and more... The new theory must provide valid reasoning and testable, falsifiable, hypothesis... you must provide valid science and experimentation which clearly demonstrates to someone knowledgeable on the subject that your new theory fits all the data, and provides better predictions of future events than the previous theory... this is the only way to disprove a theory... you cannot simply claim "Evolution = proven to not be possible in any way we can theorize", without actually providing a better theory to explain the OBSERVED FACTS of evolution, lmfao
This is no different than saying, "The Theory of Gravity is wrong" without providing a better explanation for the OBSERVED FACTS of gravity, i.e. why things are attracted to massive objects, orbits of planets, etc... to disprove a theory, you need to provide a BETTER theory... (technically you provide a hypothesis... it only becomes a theory once it stands up to decades/centuries of peer review, prediction and scientific experimentation)
Poor little Moloch. He can't even tell the difference between something of substance, and the theory about the hows and whys of that thing of substance. He uses the Theory of Gravity as an example. He can't even tell the difference between gravity, and the Theory of Gravity which explains how and why gravity acts as it does, and where it comes from. Gravity is a fact! How do we know? We know because people and cars don't float off the surface of the earth. We know because the earth doesn't explode due to its centrifugal force. We know because somebody who jumps off a cliff falls to his death on the rocks below. We know because gravity causes your car keys to land on the table when you toss them there. Gravity is completely a fact, no matter what it is made out of. The Theory of Gravity is different. How is it different? The Theory of Gravity is an attempt to explain where gravity comes from, why it works the way it does, and maybe even how to influence it to cause changes in it. The Theory takes the gravity fact, and tries to explain why gravity works as it does. The Theory of Gravity doesn't dispute the fact that gravity exists. It simply attempts to explain a bunch of things about gravity that aren't readily apparent. How does this translate to evolution. Like this. There is the Theory of Evolution. But nobody has found any evolution example that is for-a-fact evolution. Like the Theory of Gravity attempts to explain things about gravity, so the Theory of Evolution attempts to explain things about evolution. The big difference is that gravity abounds all over the place, and is observed and used trillions of times by billions of people and animals. Evolution is not known to factually to exist at all. The Theory of Gravity changes as we scientifically find out more and more about the gravity that we use every day. The Theory of Evolution changes as we find out more and more that evolution doesn't exist. The Theory of Gravity can go on and on, because gravity is a known thing... known and used by everybody. The Theory of Evolution should be put to rest, because there isn't any evolution that anybody has found, and all usages of it are only guesses about its existence. The thinkers in science know this and state it. Yet evolution keeps on being promoted as fact - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1917510.msg43768381#msg43768381. Evolution is a hoax. ''Gravity is a fact! How do we know? We know because people and cars don't float off the surface of the earth.'' Silly boy, we know evolution is a fact, we know animals and humans evolve, they don't just pop off into existence |
|
|
|
Most vaccination is effected by sticking a needle into a person. Where does something like that happen in nature? Poisonous snakes and spiders and fish that do injection, all harm or kill. And even some thorn bushes of various types are poisonous. Essentially there is nothing in nature that suggests injecting somebody to keep him well and safe. At the same time, you can look all over the world and see how nature provides people with teeth, food, a digestive system, and all kinds of immunities in the forms of their natural immune systems. And all of this without injecting them. So, why would injection be better? Are we improving on nature? Consider. Nature reproduces life in quantities... by the trillions. We can't even figure out how to make one single life form from scratch. Why do we think that we are smart enough to inject people to heal them, when nature - which is a lot smarter than we are - doesn't do that?This gotta be up there with the most idiotic arguments in the history. |
|
|
|
... "In the event that I am reincarnated, I would like to return as a deadly virus, in order to contribute something to solve overpopulation."
- Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh
Not sure how you got such great confidence in these types of 'leaders'. I'm still guessing that you are a garden variety retard rather than someone who agrees with the ways and means of these evil fucks. There is nothing to gain from poisoning and killing us, nothing. Why does 'overpopulation' become a fixation of these ultra-wealthy and/or 'elite' people then? It clearly is if you study their work even a little bit. You also have to be willingly blind to not notice that sick people in America are a cash cow of epic proportions to the medical/industrial complex as well an increasingly significant portion of our economy generally. Hi medical bills also happen to be a great way to siphon the lifes savings of the middle class into the hands of the upper class. This may be an accident of fate, but I doubt that it goes unnoticed by the beneficiaries. Pharmaceuticals are indeed pretty evil sometimes, raising the cost of their products and so on, however from to that to, government controls and makes all vaccines harmful on purpose, is a big leap. Overpopulation? Don't make me laugh, overpopulation is not and will never be a problem. More than half of the population already lives in 2 countries, china and india and they are perfectly fine. Also big difference between those 2 countries even though they have a lot of population indicating how little population affects anything, not to mention that in 50-100 years we will be living on mars ;^) |
|
|
|
|
Remember to include the week number: Week Number: _________ otherwise I will not count your stakes, thanks!
|
|
|
|
Considering there is 0 evidence of creationism, no hypothesis, no theory, no scientific evidence compared to the overwhelming evidence that supports evolution, that even if you think all the evidence for evolution is wrong, you still shouldn't believe in creationism considering there is 0 evidence for it.
Cognitive dissonance.
Okay, let's get to the point. Where did everything including life come from? 1. Creation = proof not generally accepted; 2. Big Bang = Takes into account only a tiny fraction of what exists; 3. Evolution (evolution theory evolution: ETE) = proven to not be possible in any way we can theorize; 4. Something else = not defined; 5. Something else = not defined; 6. Something else = not defined; etc,. This thread is about evolution - ETE - being a hoax, not about where life or other things came from. Oh, that's right. Evolution is a impossible. Evolution is a hoax. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1917510.msg43768381#msg43768381''proven to not be possible in any way we can theorize;'' This guy :^) who proved that exactly, did I mention that virtually all scientists from all fields already accepted and proved evolution? Never mind badecker always knows more than all of them combined, he must be a savant, 300 IQ. |
|
|
|
...
The gluing of these two words together into the string 'conspiracy theory' and demonizing it was demonstrably a psychological construct to help preserve and expand their existing power structure in the U.S.. The tactic targets the weak minded, and it works like a dream! The trouble is that not everyone is weak minded. What's a good social engineer to do? Getting mercury, fluoride, aluminum, lead, etc into the central nervous system of most of the peeps? Perhaps.
Aluminium and lead was also present in a ton of things everyone uses everyday, like deodorants, I guess the government is making deodorants with poisonous materials on purpose too, am I right? Hmmm. Deoderants. Who do you suppose owns controlling interest in Unilever Corporation? I doubt it is mother Theresa. I'd be surprise if Prince Bernhard or his 'house' didn't have at least a voice in the activities of this multinational corporation. You know Prince Bernhard, right? Or is cousin Prince Philip? "In the event that I am reincarnated, I would like to return as a deadly virus, in order to contribute something to solve overpopulation."
- Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh
Not sure how you got such great confidence in these types of 'leaders'. I'm still guessing that you are a garden variety retard rather than someone who agrees with the ways and means of these evil fucks. There is nothing to gain from poisoning and killing us, nothing. |
|
|
|
A conspirator is somebody who names people who disclose his conspiracy, conspiracy theorists.
A 'conspiracy' is just two or more people having a plan which doesn't benefit everyone and which they keep secret. To deny that this happens is absurd. A 'theory' is the post enlightenment method of discovering factual truth. Nothing to be ashamed of at all. Just the opposite in fact. The gluing of these two words together into the string ' conspiracy theory' and demonizing it was demonstrably a psychological construct to help preserve and expand their existing power structure in the U.S.. The tactic targets the weak minded, and it works like a dream! The trouble is that not everyone is weak minded. What's a good social engineer to do? Getting mercury, fluoride, aluminum, lead, etc into the central nervous system of most of the peeps? Perhaps. Aluminium and lead was also present in a ton of things everyone uses everyday, like deodorants, I guess the government is making deodorants with poisonous materials on purpose too, am I right? |
|
|
|
''people who show that evolution is a hoax'' Not understanding entropy =/= showing evolution is a hoax. Virtually every scientist, including scientists who believe in god and even non scientists who believe in god accept evolution as real. There is literally nothing to debate here, evolution is a reality and you are only opposed to it because you think it goes against god.
What you will find is scientists protecting their jobs at the universities by claiming nothing when they are questioned about evolution. Most of them know that evolution is not possible in any way we can figure it. And what are religious people protecting exactly? There are plenty of scientists who believe in god and still have their jobs, your argument is garbage. The Roman Catholic Church has long accepted – or at least not objected to – evolutionary theory. Pope Francis is not the first pontiff to publicly affirm that evolution is compatible with church teachings. In 1950, in the encyclical “Humani Generis,” Pope Pius XII said that Catholic teachings on creation could coexist with evolutionary theory. Pope John Paul II went a bit further in 1996, calling evolution “more than a hypothesis.” '' According to a 2013 Pew Research Center survey, 60% of Americans say humans have evolved over time'' And Americans are heavily religious.  2% of scientists believe in young earth creationism and even the public, it's only 31% compared to 22+32 = 54% belief in evolution of some kind. Get over it badecker, you are delusional. On occasion you make reference to Zeus. There is a lot of evidence that people of the past believed in Zeus and the other ancient Greek and Roman gods, like they are real. Some people still believe in Zeus. The point? People believe all kinds of strange religions. Evolution doesn't really even make sense. But now that it has been scientifically prove to be a hoax, it will take time for people to come to understand that evolution, the religion they have been believing in, is a false religion. So, why do you want to continue to promote the false evolution religion? Don't you ever want to come to the knowledge of the truth? Are you being paid by your promoters to continue this evolution lie? What kind of an unethical joker are you? Evolution is a hoax, and you know it. Considering there is 0 evidence of creationism, no hypothesis, no theory, no scientific evidence compared to the overwhelming evidence that supports evolution, that even if you think all the evidence for evolution is wrong, you still shouldn't believe in creationism considering there is 0 evidence for it. Cognitive dissonance. |
|
|
|
We, BountyCloud, are relaunching the bounty for Argentas and will be managing the bounty entirely.
For 1 week till the end of bounty campaign? Seems strange. Or campaing will be continued? It will be continued until the end of September. |
|
|
|
''people who show that evolution is a hoax'' Not understanding entropy =/= showing evolution is a hoax. Virtually every scientist, including scientists who believe in god and even non scientists who believe in god accept evolution as real. There is literally nothing to debate here, evolution is a reality and you are only opposed to it because you think it goes against god.
What you will find is scientists protecting their jobs at the universities by claiming nothing when they are questioned about evolution. Most of them know that evolution is not possible in any way we can figure it. And what are religious people protecting exactly? There are plenty of scientists who believe in god and still have their jobs, your argument is garbage. The Roman Catholic Church has long accepted – or at least not objected to – evolutionary theory. Pope Francis is not the first pontiff to publicly affirm that evolution is compatible with church teachings. In 1950, in the encyclical “Humani Generis,” Pope Pius XII said that Catholic teachings on creation could coexist with evolutionary theory. Pope John Paul II went a bit further in 1996, calling evolution “more than a hypothesis.” '' According to a 2013 Pew Research Center survey, 60% of Americans say humans have evolved over time'' And Americans are heavily religious. 2% of scientists believe in young earth creationism and even the public, it's only 31% compared to 22+32 = 54% belief in evolution of some kind. Get over it badecker, you are delusional. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
