BADecker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3962
Merit: 1382
|
|
August 06, 2018, 01:28:10 PM |
|
Show me the scientific paper exposing how evolution violates the 2nd law of thermodynamics. ''Entropy causes life on earth to be less complex.'' how are you defining complex? Is a baby less complex than an adult?
Cause and effect is a philosophical matter, not scientific. If you think everything has a cause then you know we have no free will which contradicts your beliefs.
Check out the dictionaries and encyclopedias for definitions. Regarding the scientific paper that shows how evolution violates the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics... probably doesn't exist, because evolution doesn't exist. When you feel that you have free will, such feeling only shows the greatness of the Programmer in programming your feeling to be that way... programmed via C&E, of course. You are so silly. Every aspect of scientific observation and experimentation uses C&E. Even the setting up of philosophizing operates through C&E in the mind of the philosopher. No scientific proof for evolution theory evolution, yet? So, evolution is still a hoax, right?
|
|
|
|
Astargath
|
|
August 06, 2018, 01:43:25 PM |
|
Show me the scientific paper exposing how evolution violates the 2nd law of thermodynamics. ''Entropy causes life on earth to be less complex.'' how are you defining complex? Is a baby less complex than an adult?
Cause and effect is a philosophical matter, not scientific. If you think everything has a cause then you know we have no free will which contradicts your beliefs.
Check out the dictionaries and encyclopedias for definitions. Regarding the scientific paper that shows how evolution violates the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics... probably doesn't exist, because evolution doesn't exist. When you feel that you have free will, such feeling only shows the greatness of the Programmer in programming your feeling to be that way... programmed via C&E, of course. You are so silly. Every aspect of scientific observation and experimentation uses C&E. Even the setting up of philosophizing operates through C&E in the mind of the philosopher. No scientific proof for evolution theory evolution, yet? So, evolution is still a hoax, right? Silly boy, clearly Zeus programmed everything, the fact that you are even allowed to type here shows his greatness, silly.. There is no scientific papers because no serious scientist thinks evolution is a hoax, they all know it's real, just like most religious people know evolution is real. No scientific papers for creationism, god, heaven, etc etc.
|
|
|
|
BADecker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3962
Merit: 1382
|
|
August 06, 2018, 01:49:54 PM |
|
Show me the scientific paper exposing how evolution violates the 2nd law of thermodynamics. ''Entropy causes life on earth to be less complex.'' how are you defining complex? Is a baby less complex than an adult?
Cause and effect is a philosophical matter, not scientific. If you think everything has a cause then you know we have no free will which contradicts your beliefs.
Check out the dictionaries and encyclopedias for definitions. Regarding the scientific paper that shows how evolution violates the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics... probably doesn't exist, because evolution doesn't exist. When you feel that you have free will, such feeling only shows the greatness of the Programmer in programming your feeling to be that way... programmed via C&E, of course. You are so silly. Every aspect of scientific observation and experimentation uses C&E. Even the setting up of philosophizing operates through C&E in the mind of the philosopher. No scientific proof for evolution theory evolution, yet? So, evolution is still a hoax, right? Silly boy, clearly Zeus programmed everything, the fact that you are even allowed to type here shows his greatness, silly.. There is no scientific papers because no serious scientist thinks evolution is a hoax, they all know it's real, just like most religious people know evolution is real. No scientific papers for creationism, god, heaven, etc etc. Well, thank you for helping us to see that evolution is a hoax. There are two major reasons why science won't catch up to the knowledge of Bible religion, and the understanding about the God of the universe: 1. Not enough millions of years of time to study the complexity of God, before God brings the end to all this; 2. Too busy trying to prove for things like evolution, which obviously doesn't exist. Evolution is a hoax.
|
|
|
|
Astargath
|
|
August 06, 2018, 04:58:18 PM |
|
Show me the scientific paper exposing how evolution violates the 2nd law of thermodynamics. ''Entropy causes life on earth to be less complex.'' how are you defining complex? Is a baby less complex than an adult?
Cause and effect is a philosophical matter, not scientific. If you think everything has a cause then you know we have no free will which contradicts your beliefs.
Check out the dictionaries and encyclopedias for definitions. Regarding the scientific paper that shows how evolution violates the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics... probably doesn't exist, because evolution doesn't exist. When you feel that you have free will, such feeling only shows the greatness of the Programmer in programming your feeling to be that way... programmed via C&E, of course. You are so silly. Every aspect of scientific observation and experimentation uses C&E. Even the setting up of philosophizing operates through C&E in the mind of the philosopher. No scientific proof for evolution theory evolution, yet? So, evolution is still a hoax, right? Silly boy, clearly Zeus programmed everything, the fact that you are even allowed to type here shows his greatness, silly.. There is no scientific papers because no serious scientist thinks evolution is a hoax, they all know it's real, just like most religious people know evolution is real. No scientific papers for creationism, god, heaven, etc etc. Well, thank you for helping us to see that evolution is a hoax. There are two major reasons why science won't catch up to the knowledge of Bible religion, and the understanding about the God of the universe: 1. Not enough millions of years of time to study the complexity of God, before God brings the end to all this; 2. Too busy trying to prove for things like evolution, which obviously doesn't exist. Evolution is a hoax. 1. Even if god was so complex, scientists would have something at least but they don't, even scientists that believe in god haven't published scientific papers or tried to make any scientific theories for god because there is 0 scientific evidence for his existence as shown in the other thread 2. No one is busy trying to prove evolution, evolution is proven beyond a doubt for quite some time now, thats why even religious people accept it. Creationism is retarded.
|
|
|
|
Moloch
|
|
August 07, 2018, 05:20:27 AM |
|
Wow.. I haven't been here in years and BADLogic still hasn't bothered to spend 5 minutes researching evolution yet?
I can't seriously believe someone has endless hours to "debate" an issue they know nothing about... that's insane
|
|
|
|
Astargath
|
|
August 07, 2018, 11:04:02 AM |
|
Wow.. I haven't been here in years and BADLogic still hasn't bothered to spend 5 minutes researching evolution yet?
I can't seriously believe someone has endless hours to "debate" an issue they know nothing about... that's insane
His brain evolved, heh, to refuse any evidence/proof of evolution, his brain has to dismiss any information that questions or disproves god.
|
|
|
|
nateally054
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 8
Merit: 0
|
|
August 07, 2018, 01:56:12 PM |
|
I don't believe humans come from monkeys if that's the case. But that's my belief, there is still no true evidence for it.
|
|
|
|
BADecker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3962
Merit: 1382
|
|
August 08, 2018, 05:42:33 PM |
|
Wow.. I haven't been here in years and BADLogic still hasn't bothered to spend 5 minutes researching evolution yet?
I can't seriously believe someone has endless hours to "debate" an issue they know nothing about... that's insane
His brain evolved, heh, to refuse any evidence/proof of evolution, his brain has to dismiss any information that questions or disproves god. It's too bad about you jokers. You can't find any proof for evolution, so you badmouth people who show that evolution is a hoax. Well, there have always been false religions like evolution. And there always will be. It's kinda funny. Over the years evolution theory has been changed so extremely much, that it doesn't match what Darwin said at all. The changes have converted evolution almost into adaptation. But there are a whole bunch of evolutionists that keep the old Darwin religion alive, and try to convert unsuspecting people into it. There must be money in it for them, somehow.
|
|
|
|
Astargath
|
|
August 08, 2018, 08:51:25 PM |
|
Wow.. I haven't been here in years and BADLogic still hasn't bothered to spend 5 minutes researching evolution yet?
I can't seriously believe someone has endless hours to "debate" an issue they know nothing about... that's insane
His brain evolved, heh, to refuse any evidence/proof of evolution, his brain has to dismiss any information that questions or disproves god. It's too bad about you jokers. You can't find any proof for evolution, so you badmouth people who show that evolution is a hoax. Well, there have always been false religions like evolution. And there always will be. It's kinda funny. Over the years evolution theory has been changed so extremely much, that it doesn't match what Darwin said at all. The changes have converted evolution almost into adaptation. But there are a whole bunch of evolutionists that keep the old Darwin religion alive, and try to convert unsuspecting people into it. There must be money in it for them, somehow. ''people who show that evolution is a hoax'' Not understanding entropy =/= showing evolution is a hoax. Virtually every scientist, including scientists who believe in god and even non scientists who believe in god accept evolution as real. There is literally nothing to debate here, evolution is a reality and you are only opposed to it because you think it goes against god.
|
|
|
|
BADecker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3962
Merit: 1382
|
|
August 09, 2018, 01:23:27 AM |
|
''people who show that evolution is a hoax'' Not understanding entropy =/= showing evolution is a hoax. Virtually every scientist, including scientists who believe in god and even non scientists who believe in god accept evolution as real. There is literally nothing to debate here, evolution is a reality and you are only opposed to it because you think it goes against god.
What you will find is scientists protecting their jobs at the universities by claiming nothing when they are questioned about evolution. Most of them know that evolution is not possible in any way we can figure it.
|
|
|
|
Chestt
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 17
Merit: 0
|
|
August 09, 2018, 08:30:37 AM |
|
I don't believe humans come from monkeys if that's the case. But that's my belief, there is still no true evidence for it.
When I look at some peoples' behavior, I just can't help thinking that yesterday (or last week/month, etc.) they were still apes Kidding, of course, but some people really make me think that way
|
|
|
|
BADecker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3962
Merit: 1382
|
|
August 09, 2018, 12:58:14 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Astargath
|
|
August 09, 2018, 01:43:23 PM |
|
''people who show that evolution is a hoax'' Not understanding entropy =/= showing evolution is a hoax. Virtually every scientist, including scientists who believe in god and even non scientists who believe in god accept evolution as real. There is literally nothing to debate here, evolution is a reality and you are only opposed to it because you think it goes against god.
What you will find is scientists protecting their jobs at the universities by claiming nothing when they are questioned about evolution. Most of them know that evolution is not possible in any way we can figure it. And what are religious people protecting exactly? There are plenty of scientists who believe in god and still have their jobs, your argument is garbage. The Roman Catholic Church has long accepted – or at least not objected to – evolutionary theory. Pope Francis is not the first pontiff to publicly affirm that evolution is compatible with church teachings. In 1950, in the encyclical “Humani Generis,” Pope Pius XII said that Catholic teachings on creation could coexist with evolutionary theory. Pope John Paul II went a bit further in 1996, calling evolution “more than a hypothesis.” '' According to a 2013 Pew Research Center survey, 60% of Americans say humans have evolved over time'' And Americans are heavily religious. 2% of scientists believe in young earth creationism and even the public, it's only 31% compared to 22+32 = 54% belief in evolution of some kind. Get over it badecker, you are delusional.
|
|
|
|
BADecker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3962
Merit: 1382
|
|
August 09, 2018, 01:58:24 PM |
|
''people who show that evolution is a hoax'' Not understanding entropy =/= showing evolution is a hoax. Virtually every scientist, including scientists who believe in god and even non scientists who believe in god accept evolution as real. There is literally nothing to debate here, evolution is a reality and you are only opposed to it because you think it goes against god.
What you will find is scientists protecting their jobs at the universities by claiming nothing when they are questioned about evolution. Most of them know that evolution is not possible in any way we can figure it. And what are religious people protecting exactly? There are plenty of scientists who believe in god and still have their jobs, your argument is garbage. The Roman Catholic Church has long accepted – or at least not objected to – evolutionary theory. Pope Francis is not the first pontiff to publicly affirm that evolution is compatible with church teachings. In 1950, in the encyclical “Humani Generis,” Pope Pius XII said that Catholic teachings on creation could coexist with evolutionary theory. Pope John Paul II went a bit further in 1996, calling evolution “more than a hypothesis.” '' According to a 2013 Pew Research Center survey, 60% of Americans say humans have evolved over time'' And Americans are heavily religious. 2% of scientists believe in young earth creationism and even the public, it's only 31% compared to 22+32 = 54% belief in evolution of some kind. Get over it badecker, you are delusional. On occasion you make reference to Zeus. There is a lot of evidence that people of the past believed in Zeus and the other ancient Greek and Roman gods, like they are real. Some people still believe in Zeus. The point? People believe all kinds of strange religions. Evolution doesn't really even make sense. But now that it has been scientifically prove to be a hoax, it will take time for people to come to understand that evolution, the religion they have been believing in, is a false religion. So, why do you want to continue to promote the false evolution religion? Don't you ever want to come to the knowledge of the truth? Are you being paid by your promoters to continue this evolution lie? What kind of an unethical joker are you? Evolution is a hoax, and you know it.
|
|
|
|
Astargath
|
|
August 09, 2018, 06:46:43 PM |
|
''people who show that evolution is a hoax'' Not understanding entropy =/= showing evolution is a hoax. Virtually every scientist, including scientists who believe in god and even non scientists who believe in god accept evolution as real. There is literally nothing to debate here, evolution is a reality and you are only opposed to it because you think it goes against god.
What you will find is scientists protecting their jobs at the universities by claiming nothing when they are questioned about evolution. Most of them know that evolution is not possible in any way we can figure it. And what are religious people protecting exactly? There are plenty of scientists who believe in god and still have their jobs, your argument is garbage. The Roman Catholic Church has long accepted – or at least not objected to – evolutionary theory. Pope Francis is not the first pontiff to publicly affirm that evolution is compatible with church teachings. In 1950, in the encyclical “Humani Generis,” Pope Pius XII said that Catholic teachings on creation could coexist with evolutionary theory. Pope John Paul II went a bit further in 1996, calling evolution “more than a hypothesis.” '' According to a 2013 Pew Research Center survey, 60% of Americans say humans have evolved over time'' And Americans are heavily religious. 2% of scientists believe in young earth creationism and even the public, it's only 31% compared to 22+32 = 54% belief in evolution of some kind. Get over it badecker, you are delusional. On occasion you make reference to Zeus. There is a lot of evidence that people of the past believed in Zeus and the other ancient Greek and Roman gods, like they are real. Some people still believe in Zeus. The point? People believe all kinds of strange religions. Evolution doesn't really even make sense. But now that it has been scientifically prove to be a hoax, it will take time for people to come to understand that evolution, the religion they have been believing in, is a false religion. So, why do you want to continue to promote the false evolution religion? Don't you ever want to come to the knowledge of the truth? Are you being paid by your promoters to continue this evolution lie? What kind of an unethical joker are you? Evolution is a hoax, and you know it. Considering there is 0 evidence of creationism, no hypothesis, no theory, no scientific evidence compared to the overwhelming evidence that supports evolution, that even if you think all the evidence for evolution is wrong, you still shouldn't believe in creationism considering there is 0 evidence for it. Cognitive dissonance.
|
|
|
|
BADecker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3962
Merit: 1382
|
|
August 09, 2018, 08:09:56 PM |
|
Considering there is 0 evidence of creationism, no hypothesis, no theory, no scientific evidence compared to the overwhelming evidence that supports evolution, that even if you think all the evidence for evolution is wrong, you still shouldn't believe in creationism considering there is 0 evidence for it.
Cognitive dissonance.
Okay, let's get to the point. Where did everything including life come from? 1. Creation = proof not generally accepted; 2. Big Bang = Takes into account only a tiny fraction of what exists; 3. Evolution (evolution theory evolution: ETE) = proven to not be possible in any way we can theorize; 4. Something else = not defined; 5. Something else = not defined; 6. Something else = not defined; etc,. This thread is about evolution - ETE - being a hoax, not about where life or other things came from. Oh, that's right. Evolution is a impossible. Evolution is a hoax. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1917510.msg43768381#msg43768381
|
|
|
|
Moloch
|
|
August 10, 2018, 02:29:23 AM |
|
When someone proves a scientific theory incorrect, they win a Nobel Prize... Where is your Nobel Prize?
|
|
|
|
Astargath
|
|
August 10, 2018, 08:52:42 AM |
|
Considering there is 0 evidence of creationism, no hypothesis, no theory, no scientific evidence compared to the overwhelming evidence that supports evolution, that even if you think all the evidence for evolution is wrong, you still shouldn't believe in creationism considering there is 0 evidence for it.
Cognitive dissonance.
Okay, let's get to the point. Where did everything including life come from? 1. Creation = proof not generally accepted; 2. Big Bang = Takes into account only a tiny fraction of what exists; 3. Evolution (evolution theory evolution: ETE) = proven to not be possible in any way we can theorize; 4. Something else = not defined; 5. Something else = not defined; 6. Something else = not defined; etc,. This thread is about evolution - ETE - being a hoax, not about where life or other things came from. Oh, that's right. Evolution is a impossible. Evolution is a hoax. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1917510.msg43768381#msg43768381''proven to not be possible in any way we can theorize;'' This guy :^) who proved that exactly, did I mention that virtually all scientists from all fields already accepted and proved evolution? Never mind badecker always knows more than all of them combined, he must be a savant, 300 IQ.
|
|
|
|
Moloch
|
|
August 10, 2018, 02:37:36 PM |
|
Considering there is 0 evidence of creationism, no hypothesis, no theory, no scientific evidence compared to the overwhelming evidence that supports evolution, that even if you think all the evidence for evolution is wrong, you still shouldn't believe in creationism considering there is 0 evidence for it.
Cognitive dissonance.
Okay, let's get to the point. Where did everything including life come from? 1. Creation = proof not generally accepted; 2. Big Bang = Takes into account only a tiny fraction of what exists; 3. Evolution (evolution theory evolution: ETE) = proven to not be possible in any way we can theorize; 4. Something else = not defined; 5. Something else = not defined; 6. Something else = not defined; etc,. This thread is about evolution - ETE - being a hoax, not about where life or other things came from. Oh, that's right. Evolution is a impossible. Evolution is a hoax. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1917510.msg43768381#msg43768381''proven to not be possible in any way we can theorize;'' This guy :^) who proved that exactly, did I mention that virtually all scientists from all fields already accepted and proved evolution? Never mind badecker always knows more than all of them combined, he must be a savant, 300 IQ. Don't bother with this idiot... he doesn't even understand HOW to prove a scientific theory incorrect The only way to prove a scientific theory incorrect, is to provide a BETTER theory... that's literally the ONLY way The new theory must explain all the observed facts of the previous theory, and more... The new theory must provide valid reasoning and testable, falsifiable, hypothesis... you must provide valid science and experimentation which clearly demonstrates to someone knowledgeable on the subject that your new theory fits all the data, and provides better predictions of future events than the previous theory... this is the only way to disprove a theory... you cannot simply claim "Evolution = proven to not be possible in any way we can theorize", without actually providing a better theory to explain the OBSERVED FACTS of evolution, lmfao This is no different than saying, "The Theory of Gravity is wrong" without providing a better explanation for the OBSERVED FACTS of gravity, i.e. why things are attracted to massive objects, orbits of planets, etc... to disprove a theory, you need to provide a BETTER theory... (technically you provide a hypothesis... it only becomes a theory once it stands up to decades/centuries of peer review, prediction and scientific experimentation)
|
|
|
|
BADecker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3962
Merit: 1382
|
|
August 10, 2018, 09:26:14 PM |
|
Don't bother with this idiot... he doesn't even understand HOW to prove a scientific theory incorrect
The only way to prove a scientific theory incorrect, is to provide a BETTER theory... that's literally the ONLY way
The new theory must explain all the observed facts of the previous theory, and more... The new theory must provide valid reasoning and testable, falsifiable, hypothesis... you must provide valid science and experimentation which clearly demonstrates to someone knowledgeable on the subject that your new theory fits all the data, and provides better predictions of future events than the previous theory... this is the only way to disprove a theory... you cannot simply claim "Evolution = proven to not be possible in any way we can theorize", without actually providing a better theory to explain the OBSERVED FACTS of evolution, lmfao
This is no different than saying, "The Theory of Gravity is wrong" without providing a better explanation for the OBSERVED FACTS of gravity, i.e. why things are attracted to massive objects, orbits of planets, etc... to disprove a theory, you need to provide a BETTER theory... (technically you provide a hypothesis... it only becomes a theory once it stands up to decades/centuries of peer review, prediction and scientific experimentation)
Poor little Moloch. He can't even tell the difference between something of substance, and the theory about the hows and whys of that thing of substance. He uses the Theory of Gravity as an example. He can't even tell the difference between gravity, and the Theory of Gravity which explains how and why gravity acts as it does, and where it comes from. Gravity is a fact! How do we know? We know because people and cars don't float off the surface of the earth. We know because the earth doesn't explode due to its centrifugal force. We know because somebody who jumps off a cliff falls to his death on the rocks below. We know because gravity causes your car keys to land on the table when you toss them there. Gravity is completely a fact, no matter what it is made out of. The Theory of Gravity is different. How is it different? The Theory of Gravity is an attempt to explain where gravity comes from, why it works the way it does, and maybe even how to influence it to cause changes in it. The Theory takes the gravity fact, and tries to explain why gravity works as it does. The Theory of Gravity doesn't dispute the fact that gravity exists. It simply attempts to explain a bunch of things about gravity that aren't readily apparent. How does this translate to evolution. Like this. There is the Theory of Evolution. But nobody has found any evolution example that is for-a-fact evolution. Like the Theory of Gravity attempts to explain things about gravity, so the Theory of Evolution attempts to explain things about evolution. The big difference is that gravity abounds all over the place, and is observed and used trillions of times by billions of people and animals. Evolution is not known to factually to exist at all. The Theory of Gravity changes as we scientifically find out more and more about the gravity that we use every day. The Theory of Evolution changes as we find out more and more that evolution doesn't exist. The Theory of Gravity can go on and on, because gravity is a known thing... known and used by everybody. The Theory of Evolution should be put to rest, because there isn't any evolution that anybody has found, and all usages of it are only guesses about its existence. The thinkers in science know this and state it. Yet evolution keeps on being promoted as fact - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1917510.msg43768381#msg43768381. Evolution is a hoax.
|
|
|
|
|