It seems like you are so many victims. Check out this Reddit thread. You might salvage some useful information from there. The only way of having a chance of recovering the money is if you contacted the exchange with law enforcement agencies to block the hacker's account, but that will cost you a lot of money. If you are thinking of reversing the script or transactions, you are probably dreaming. That money is gone. |
|
|
|
Ronaldo should not be a top priority at Man United because he is old and no longer strong against young players who are still agile, but strangely Ronaldo remains the lone striker that Rangnick uses does he still believe in him for the next few seasons?
This is a little different, I saw when I was at Real Madrid and Juventus, Ronaldo's game was still good, so in Man United a little according to his performance, whether this was due to the age factor or indeed the squad was still not supplying the ball to Ronaldo, so it was a little decreased in performance.
Age aside, Ronaldo is a goal machine. Unfortunately, Rangnick system and tactics have never favored his way of playing. If you recall, Ronaldo was performing so well under Ole doing what he does best.... Scoring goals I can't access the stats right now, but if you see Ronaldo under Ole vs Ronaldo under Rangnick. Ronaldo under Ole was lethal. |
|
|
|
I'm just surprised that these scammers can easily advertise their services here. Hoping new users don't do the same mistake as I did
What more do you want to be done? Account sales are highly discouraged, and the scammers are usually tagged, but you even paid a blind eye to the negative trust given to the scammer's profile.  Someone else was scammed by the same person sometime back; Today one of my client contacted with me and told that he got scammed by Luter01 - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=955479Unfortunately he falled for a small price offer and got scammed. I asked if he has any evidence like chat logs, but it was on telegram and obviously Luter01 deleted everything. I thought that I might do a little digging about this user and see if I can find anything which is worth flagging him so other newbies might not get scammed by him. His thread - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5335715.msg56951783#msg56951783archived - https://archive.vn/iULQ7Feedback quoted from his thread Bought 2 Jr members from op. All good
I buy a member account, and it's good. Thank you.
I buy Sir member today, good merits too.
KoRanAe and laminfofana are connected already as alt accounts and tagged as using alt accounts to give vouch for himself. Most likely it is happening here aswell. He is giving vouch to himself with his alt accounts. Is it worth to give Luter01 a flag? Every DT member can decide if they want to support it or not. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=2776 |
|
|
|
I don't know if this has been reported here before but according to ESPN, Barcelona want to launch their own cryptocurrency to help them fight the current financial woes. Barcelona want to create their own cryptocurrency to help them "survive financially" against clubs owned by big corporations and foreign investors, president Joan Laporta has said.
Speaking at the Mobile World Congress in the Catalan city this week, Laporta said Barca will launch a range of NFTs (Non-Fungible Tokens) in the near future and are also working on entering the cryptocurrency market Why must countries and clubs first have to go through Financial difficulties or wars in order to realize that Cryptocurrencies are actually a good thing? |
|
|
|
Flag it, I'll support it.
Flagged: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=2916
The thing is 3CcF942kYVRotGrfYQxD4QNn4aKVywpRxb had been reported as owned by a scam company since Aug 5, 2021, does this address belong to scammer? Huh, now that's interesting--I didn't even know sites like bitcoinabuse.com existed. However, with respect to that donation address and the complaints I see on the site, there's no proof of any wrongdoing and the site looks very much like the one that had that huge smear against Vod a long time ago (I can't remember what it's called, but basically anybody can post anything about anyone with zero evidence). I'd hope that an address like that, which has received over $4m and has a current balance of over $600k, doesn't belong to a scammer. If it does, I'd like to know what kind of scams they're pulling off. I doubt they'd be charity scams, but I suppose it's possible. The address 3CcF942kYVRotGrfYQxD4QNn4aKVywpRxb belongs to an exchange, more like a hot wallet, so I am certain the past scams used it for exchanging the stolen Bitcoin. The name of the exchange is Kuna.io, a Ukrainian crypto exchange. What I think is happening is that the Official donation address was created from that very exchange, so sent Bitcoins are being automatically spent off to the hot wallet like most exchanges usually do.  |
|
|
|
How about this guy ( SupportUkraine)? He made this post claiming to sell an NFT and the money collected "will be used to help people in Ukraine" Good afternoon, dear crypto community. I propose to unite in this difficult time and launch a flash mob to support democracy, freedom and peace in Ukraine. Your small donation and participation can greatly help those in need. All proceeds from the sale will go to help the people of Ukraine. I will be happy to answer all questions and listen to any suggestions. Please find collection here: https://opensea.io/collection/support-ukraine-2022Is it in order to flag or tag his profile too? |
|
|
|
The accusation of the OP is already solved. I think many exchanger which has scam accusation but all of those are not scammer. For example I used yobit for a long time but they never scammed me directly. Also, I have created post against binance for dogecoin issue but I am still using binance. So, creating a post against a site doesn't mean they are scammer. Almost all the site has such a small issue though all of them are not being posted on this forum.
Also just because you have never been scammed by a platform does not mean it's not scam when other people make complaints about it. They could just carrying out selective scamming. Yobit or Hotbtc for example have never scammed me but I am well aware they have scammed so many people because of the so many legit scam accusations made against them. |
|
|
|
Plagiarism and ParaphrasingProfile: CrypTegridyPost: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5386431Part of the full post. The independence from the government and monetary delegates implied that anyone could gain access to monetary administrations. Regardless, this angle turns out to be one of DeFi's most significant setbacks. Concerns about information security and consistency with the capability of new guidelines for presenting new threats put a lot on the table for DeFi. There is no need to focus on the question of 'Is KYC required for DeFi?' Instead, consider 'How can KYC help DeFi?' The extent to which a DeFi arrangement supplier must address consistency has a significant impact on their options for carrying out (Know Your Customer) KYC on a DeFi arrangement.
Any business person or newly formed firm in the DeFi scene will undoubtedly need to stay on the right side of the law. It will help them gain institutional as well as corporate clients by referencing compliance with new guidelines. Regardless, will the DeFi and KYC mix separate the DeFi establishment?
Indeed, there are a variety of reasons why this is unlikely to be an issue. The new KYC and (Anti-money Laundering) AML guidelines do not imply that DeFi will lose its intrinsic value. Here are some of the reasons why KYC can function in DeFi while still serving as a decentralised method for completing monetary administrations.
....
Fortunately, there are a number of reasons why this isn't necessarily a problem or something that should detract from DeFi's inherent value as a decentralised approach to conducting and receiving financial services. Source: https://101blockchains.com/defi-kyc/The freedom from government and financial intermediaries implied open access for anyone to financial services. However, this aspect turns into one of the most crucial setbacks for DeFi. The concerns of data security and compliance with the potential of new regulations for introducing new risks mean a lot on the table for DeFi. It is not about a question of ‘Is KYC needed for DeFi’ and more about ‘what can KYC do for DeFi.’ The extent to which a DeFi solution provider wants to address compliance has a profound impact on their decisions for implementing KYC on a DeFi solution.
Any entrepreneur or newly initiated firm in the DeFi landscape will obviously want to be on the good side of the law. It will help them bring in institutional as well as corporate customers by citing compliance with new regulations. However, will the DeFi and KYC combination break down the foundation of DeFi?
As a matter of fact, there are many reasons for which this might not be a problem. The new KYC and AML regulations do not necessarily imply that DeFi would lose its inherent value. Here are the reasons which can show how KYC can work in DeFi while retaining its capabilities in the form of a decentralized approach for carrying out financial services.
|
|
|
|
Should always cite your sources. Im sure you didnt composed this one alone. Even though you paraphrase it or add some content to it still you need to put some reference and also dont use too much paragpraph like this, cause some wouldnt bother to read it. Better be direct to the point, or at least make your post more presentable like bold others or title, and make a habit to shorten your idea.
Yeah, OP just plagiarized the text and tried to spin some text but it was still easy to detect. He probably copied from one of the 2 sources: 1. https://101blockchains.com/defi-kyc posted on August 03, 2021 2. https://thewealthrace.com/the-ultimate-guide-for-defi-kyc posted on August 03, 2021 He also has a website on his profile which I think is his and also has plagiarized articles -----> https://www.cryptegridy.com/defi/what-is-kycThis is very dishonest of OP. |
|
|
|
I sometimes wonder to what extent a football player has a certain amount of guilt if he knows that he will almost certainly move to the other team in the new season.
There is no amount of guilt in doing a job you are paid to do  Mbappe is a professional footballer, like many others and so long has he still has a contract with PSG, it's his obligation to perform well even against his future employers. Sometimes I think those payers even go to such matches with extra motivation, trying to prove to their possible new employers why they have to sign them. I think you saw how Mbappe played against Real Madrid in the first leg. Nothing was holding him back. |
|
|
|
|
What exactly are you trying to do.
Transferring BTC from your coincorner wallet to an external Bitcoin address in a wallet like Electrum?
or
You mean converting the GBP in coincorner to BTC?
|
|
|
|
You may not receive a lot of offers despite the good rates, so I suggest you try using p2p exchanges like localcryptos.com or binance p2p if you don't mind KYC so that you avoid getting scammed like the guy whose reply is above mine Binance p2p link for your local currency - https://p2p.binance.com/en/trade/sell/USDT?fiat=UAH&payment=ALL |
|
|
|
But does kucoin care about your citizenship or you location? What about your IP address?
It does, but they are not yet strict. For example, my Country is one of those that are in Kucoin's blacklist, but I still use the platform to make small exchanges and withdrawals. I can not however perform other things that require KYC like p2p trading and buying crypto using fiat. |
|
|
|
Will the pro-Ukraine alliance be forced to ban Bitcoin as a subsequent step?
And how exactly will they ban Bitcoin use in Russia? Maybe there is a point I am missing. I mean if the powerful Governments have failed to get rid of Bitcoin after all those years then why do you think this time round they will be able to ban it this time round? |
|
|
|
I am referring to at which time they start calculating the professor or loss percentage, for example when stock market closes the closing price is used for comparison for next day whether it is going on profit or loss. Now crypto market never close, so i meant is at what time the day ends for crypto and new day starts, I mean do binance follows UTC timings for that. I think question should be which time zone does binance, coinmarketcap and coin gecko follows and do they all follow different timezones.
If you are talking about the 24-hour profit or loss calculations then for crypto market there is time reference in respect to market close because the markets are always OP. The percentage profits or loss you see is the percentage price change in the last 24 hours. For example, if the 24-hour BTC price increase is 10% right now (2:20 PM UTC), it will be in reference with what the Bitcoin price was yesterday at 2:21 PM UTC |
|
|
|
What's the definition of inconsistent I will tell you that is when you are behaving like Tottenham, good victory today but you would wonder why did they drop point against Burnley,they were good against Leeds United but they don't look serious against Burnley. That's how they have been for most of the season. I am even surprised they won tonight's game with such a huge margin. manchestar United were luck it would have been a lose
They did have chances, though, but their inconsistency shouldn't go unnoticed. As a neutral fan, to be a Manchester United fan, one would rather be an Arsenal fan  |
|
|
|
I have heard revolut but I am not really familiar about it so I don't know if they ask a KYC.
They actually do ask for KYC -- https://blog.revolut.com/what-is-kyc/I don't know why OP is afraid to use no KYC p2p exchanges like localcryptos.com. When purchasing Bitcoin, there is no way a bank may know that you used the money to purchase Bitcoins since I will just look like sending money to another individual. |
|
|
|
It won't turn into a third World War,
If the Putin Maniac continues to invade other Countries, then it might as well turn into World War III. I don't think other Countries, especially those in Europe, will keep watching as Russia keeps invading their neighbors. |
|
|
|
They won't get involved until some US troops start dying. Well, no US troops can die if they aren't deployed in Ukraine The attack on any NATO member nation is what I think will trigger US to get involved directly, and Putin knows that. IMO Biden doesn't want to get involved because he wants Russia to do the same in case of a US-China conflict. I hope you remember when there were US carriers going towards China last year and we all know that China wants to take over Taiwan and they showed it once again by saying that Russian move into Ukraine was not an attack. They want to do the same with Taiwan in the near future and this could trigger a move from the US. Biden talked with Putin before the attack on Ukraine and Putin begun to be even more aggressive towards Zelensky after talking with Biden, which suggests they struck some kind of deal.
It's also more to do with their recent change in policies in the Biden administration, like withdrawing troops from Afghanistan. Now, sending troops back to fight in a Ukraine war in less than a year would be ironic. |
|
|
|
|
I think US made it clear that they won't be directly involved in the war between Russia and Ukraine. At least that what I saw in the news. They will try to support Ukraine via arms, funds, Aid and slapping sanction to Russia.
The only way they may get involved in the direct war is when big-headed Putin tries to attack on of the neighboring NATO countries. In fact, they have already ordered deployment of 7,000 troops to Germany
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
