I'm not entirely sure what standards Poloniex use. I mean, after I saw Colbert coin listed there, it was almost like... okay, any coin can be listed. No idea if btc (nice way to say it would be a 'bounty') passed hands, but there have certainly been coins listed on Poloniex in the past where you scratch your head wondering how it got listed.

Sometimes I think with the death of Cryptorush + CoinEx, that Polo is in a position of a bit too much power nowadays. It's sort of the middle gateway between Bittrex (and lower exchanges) to MP/Cryptsy. It can be bypassed, but only typically by voting, and that sometimes takes a bit of time. There is definitely a need for more mid-sized exchanges, just to provide more options.

Anyway, I see no reason for DCM to not eventually be added based on its merits. It has an active dev team, which by itself, is more than probably a lot of current coins on their exchange.

This what you are looking for?



The coin moved up pretty quickly there. Not bad.

Agreed, but polo should be very doable.

I think getting the coin up for MP voting would be worthwhile, however. A lot of people simply don't use bittrex.

Umm... I think people were primarily upset due to copying the announcement. But the dev here apologized for that and updated the thread. As of now, the matter seems to have been dropped by most people, so no idea why you are bringing it up again.

And no alt coin probably will get into mainstream currency usage, unless its by an indirect means (coinpayment processor), at least for the seemingly near future. I don't even think btc will be used by the mainstream for a while, if ever. Still, marketplaces have their place and can be useful.

Okay, so anonymity is not guaranteed before the team gets their btc.

As for the other question, what sort of anonymity solution are we talking about exactly?

I am still curious about the anonymity questions I asked earlier.

Centralized mixer or true decentralized solution?

And will you agree to bittrex not releasing btc funds to the team until the anonymity features have been verified?

Yeah, it is. The only thing I can suggest is if you happen to be in an area with btc atms, I guess that could be one option.

There is lindencoins (assuming that trick still works), and I have seen small amounts of doge on some sites for sale via paypal, which if the price is decent, could be used to convert to btc. But if you want 1K+ in btc immediately, no idea how you can manage it.

Coinbase is what I have used, and just did a very small amount via linked bank account, mostly to just see how it worked. It took like a week for me to get it... and by then btc dropped in price like 20%.

I must have missed your reply, as I don't recall seeing your post.

As for MP/Cryptsy, maybe get the coin up for voting? Vol won't increase to 400btc/daily while on bittrex only... might as well get some voting going. I know you feel that the coin will be added organically, but it may require votes.

I understand the idea about not going after other exchanges so quickly out of respect for bittrex, BUT... this new ipo schedule of theirs would make me think that respect only goes so far. I wouldn't leave the coin on bittrex as the only exchange for more than a week or so, due to repeat ipos possibly causing problems. Basically we may end up with repeating pump and dumps, where people move funds from the previous ipo coin whenever it hits profit, into the next one.

It's less an issue with harmony and things like mil coin, as to be honest, they aren't exactly the strongest contenders (no disrespect meant towards the coins)... just that they seem iffy to me. But as more and more ipos come along, it may not be best to keep all of your volume in one basket.

I don't think it's a big deal for him to ask where to buy btc immediately. The only places I am aware of are things like that linden coin swap place, or perhaps buying small amounts of doge via paypal, then selling that doge for btc. But it's hardly a direct way and I expect less than optimal prices.

I'd be more concerned that he doesn't have a credit card, than him asking how to get btc quickly.

Will you agree to bittrex not releasing any btc funds to you or the dev team until the anon functions are verified as working?

Far too many coins make anon promises and don't deliver. Or some flat out lie.

Since the anon functions are listed in the title of the ann itself, it doesn't imply it's some far off goal, or will be added at a later date. If listed in the title, it means it should be functional upon release. To me, it's only fair to agree to the release of funds only when that promise has been kept.

Also, what sort of anonymity are we talking about? A simple centralized mixer or real decentralized anonymity?

I think I asked several times too, and no response either. I also put a polo request in, as well.

Perhaps the fact they ran the ipo on bittrex means that polo won't take it right away? Or out of courtesy to bill (bittrex) they plan to leave it there awhile... or simply because polo is currently running an ipo? Although since bittrex decided to jump in with another ipo so soon (beats me as to the thought process behind that decision), I wouldn't necessarily think there is any loyalty there.

At the very least, they should get MP/Cryptsy voting going.

Bittrex is certainly better than it once was, but it is still on the small side.

A humble bundle type of setup would be great, where people can decide how much coin they wish to donate. You can maybe target devs whose work may not be quite up to humble bundle standards, but still have decent games.

Or go full retro, sort of like GOG, and look for bundles of older indie games.

The way the prices were set up. Really low volume orders, lined up in a fashion get the price down. There was the seemingly obligatory 'big sell order', but it was way back in the order book... sort of the same way pumps have the fake buy orders, but far enough back in the order book to never really get hit. I saw those on the XBC pump the other day, so it works both ways.

Of course I can be wrong, and it's just a coincidence that everything was set up in some bizarre manner that mimicked manipulation. But it basically fit all the criteria.

That actually makes sense.

If a coin ipo promises anon functions, they really shouldn't get the money until the anonymous functions are verified working. Way too many coins lately state 'anonymous' as a feature, but it's 'being worked on', or is a feature in name only. LibertyCoin, DreamCoin, BankCoin... zerocoin promises or in the latter case, DarkSend (which wan't even opensourced yet when they mentioned its inclusion).

The reason people think of anon as a fad is basically because every other coin is promising it, and very few even have working features. Most are simply flat out lying.

So yeah, if the coin promises anon features, it certainly seems fair to me to say that Bittrex shouldn't release any funds to the devs until it's been verified working.

I was watching the prices late last night, wondering what was going on. Then I noticed the pattern of sales... yeah, it's price manipulation. It was weird seeing people dump decent amounts of coins based on it, and at really really low prices.

One of my low buy orders got hit, the other missed by 100 sats... oh well.

I do think larger exchanges should be the next target. Not that price manipulation still won't occur, but maybe it'd be a bit more stable. Any word on Polo or getting listed on voting for MP/Cryptsy?

The problem is, if a person ever wants to trade on an exchange, you sort of do need to leave some coins there.

If you want people to hit buy orders, you need to leave btc. If sell, you need to leave the coin there. Simply saying leave it all in a wallet, move it when you want to trade, doesn't typically work the greatest ... you'll get much worse prices.

Although for small exchanges like this, I guess it certainly would have been better to just take the worse prices than risk the owner walking away.

I don't want to sound harsh, but what is even the point anymore? That Sharex guy can dump the coin to smithereens if it ever did become worth something. It's almost pointless to even get it on another exchange now.

Trying to change the subject again (I would think the devs would realize harping on childish bickering hardly helps the coin)... how does it go with getting the coin listed on polo? Any progress?

Any smaller exchanges planned for the coin too?

You aren't trolling.

But at this point, any further discussion of this matter does appear like childish bickering. If any members have a problem with one another, please handle it like adults and in private.

My comment was simply some typo fixes and asking what vendors would be listed, which you basically answered. Prepaid visa/mc is a nice one... I also suggest amazon + newegg gcs if you can get them.

I also like how Noble set up their marketplace with a discount if their coin is used. I am not sure how you can do that exactly, but if you could manage it, a discount for using the coin could certainly spur on sales.