1. u made the mixining on chipmixer and
2. then sweep the private keys to a new wallet
so where is the connection between 1 and 2 related to the blockchain ? I think you're confused by the names used. In short: Import: add a private key to a wallet without moving the funds. Sweep: use the private key to move the funds from the old address to a new address in your own wallet. "Import" happens off-chain. "Sweep" happens on the blockchain. Long version: See for instance 99bitcoins.com. |
|
|
|
I need the daily number of new posts You can get a pretty good estimate by finding a post around the same time each day, and subtracting post numbers. It's easiest to find them by date if you look in one of the many altcoin ANN (spam) threads. Kinda like I did here. and daily number of new members. See Open scraped data of all the users - SQL Lite DB - 2.481.270 users |
|
|
|
|
What data are you looking for? New registrations can be counted by checking profiles, and total number of posts can be counted by checking when a certain post number was made.
|
|
|
|
I mean i can show a lot of high ranked account who are activ on that forum and posting many updates about crypto but don't receive merit.
Why do they don't own a vote ? I can think of a reason: the account farmers from before the Merit system shouldn't be able to use those accounts for voting power. 2 more videos of that low quality and he will be a DT1 Receiving Merit alone doesn't put him on DT1, it gives some voting power at best. Last Saturday, nobody had included Crypto-DesignService, and he didn't create a custom Trust list either. |
|
|
|
I simply never understood why all of you fight one another. That's the politics/power-part that I hate most about the current DT-system. On the one hand it means DT doesn't just accept things from other DTs, on the other hand it now means some of the biggest names on the forum are fighting each other. I do believe the forum and Bitcoin ecosystem would be better off following theymos' advice: All that being said, I still discourage retaliatory ratings, and with these changes I encourage people to try to "bury the hatchet" and de-escalate rather than trying to use any increased retaliatory power you now have. - You should be willing to forgive past mistakes if the person seems unlikely to do it again. oh I added
OgNasty
suchmoon
sidehack
frodocooper
Lauda
to my list the last few days
of course I now jump back up to 671 trust number vs 221 Adding people to your trust list heavily changes it from DT-view. You're currently at 128: -0 / +13. One of the reasons I dropped almost everyone off my list was I don't know:
real names phone number and addresses
makes it harder to trust if I can't get to them. Interesting approach. I don't know nor care about real names or addresses, and I'm certainly not willing to provide mine. |
|
|
|
you have us on ignore There is no "us" on my ignore list, it's individual users. Most of them are cheaters from the time I was running giveaways, only recently I've added a troll. Not "all of you" as you claim. why should we trust you ? That's up to you to decide. I couldn't care less if you don't trust me, but you're missing my point: you should make your own judgements based on the actions you see from people. Or at least: that's how I've created my trust list. lauda thinks you support him has you on his list i agree So does OgNasty. OgNasty and Lauda don't trust each other, and yet, they both trust my judgement. i dont see any of your circled merits voting for our cause I don't Merit users for voting power. I Merit users for posts that are worth reading. you ever speak out against lauda ? Does this count? switzerland cult member I'll take it  I try to stay away from controversy. cult confirmed How many of ch's posts have you read? |
|
|
|
I don't think that's helping your "cause". What happened to using arguments to include/exclude someone? |
|
|
|
if you dont want to be excluded on this mass list remove your inclusion of lauda tman and owlcatz and it will be updated without your exclusion And yet, I'm on the list. May I challenge you to show any feedback left by me that you disagree with is incorrect? |
|
|
|
Aww sorry I didn't know about that dafqq Im so noob , letter O will do hehe tinkyuuu again xD A capital O isn't allowed either. Please read the complete post next time before posting (it's in bright red). Public Key: 0405AAACBB9C50038A27582ADBA77921298F1B655F7EF3F53E880EB8986C72FB15DED5B5407AD11 85B3E0586CEDC633FB7BAFA027F04EEE50DB1DA3D51A873711A
Preferred Prefix: den0k I got you this: Address: 1 denokAin9b3Por1LnyKGrG8unWpqVD1b (Balance:  ) PrivkeyPart: 5JahRFEUrbWf492DVLWgsYnGts3vGPVF6rFS4jAuNSvtM5BNf4W |
|
|
|
how can merit sources have users on ignore ? Contrary to popular belief, I'm only human. I'm not obligated to read everything anyone posts, and if it bores me, I stop reading. Also: this isn't the place to discuss this, please do that here. |
|
|
|
a lot of effort was put into this post but it received no merit This is why:  After about 1500 posts rambling on for many months about how unfair merit is, many users have put him on ignore. I don't want to read more of the same. I hope you can help Please remove the code-tags. |
|
|
|
Awarding merits for political reasons, this is totally partiality while judging peoples here. The evidence was pretty clear: You need 10 earned merits to vote right?
I can provide you with that to be eligible for voting. Not many but some of the supportive and abused, Jr.member and newbies can vote because of my help which is an honour for me. Giving merit to a political post that's worth reading is okay, but (as a merit source) giving merit for voting rights is abuse. |
|
|
|
I prefer the current sorting. I just figured it would be easier to sort it by changing the list to being sorted alphabetically You can copy your list into a word processor, sort it, make your changes, and replace your old trust list with it. When you click Update, it's sorted by userID again. |
|
|
|
I hope as prefix if posslibe Zerbis
Pubblic Key:
043FB934D71867CD09D791D222AC2D9C67A9875361082FE0364DEA944435281181942C2A6850BD4 0D7F6F349042A04F0581B2873321575DBED0A3D7D2E2EE0DD9A Case insensitive: Address: 1 ZerbiSVF9DVpHM6Qfu2tRELf7C9Ucge8 PrivkeyPart: 5HvbdQGPTqrxQhJxpd6LAZ4LXuz3tnMraiBoifeJ2zPdKixayWH (Balance:  ) Preferred Prefix: den0k A 0 (zero) isn't allowed. |
|
|
|
I hope as prefix if posslibe Zerbis I can do this case-insensive, case-sensitive takes too long for this giveaway (or I can do it for a fee). |
|
|
|
Let me quote this for attention: All that being said, I still discourage retaliatory ratings, and with these changes I encourage people to try to "bury the hatchet" and de-escalate rather than trying to use any increased retaliatory power you now have. - You should be willing to forgive past mistakes if the person seems unlikely to do it again. It seems to me the opposite is happening since the DT-changes. |
|
|
|
How about OGNasty vs Lauda   |
|
|
|
It's really up to them
Is it though? It feels like they have to sign their names to other users and potentially be associated with their actions, and it's possible that nobody has met their criteria to be added onto their trust list. It doesn't seem fair that they should be excluded, because they are conservative with their trust list. Maybe I am being naive to the importance of this criteria. Part of being on DT1 is adding users to DT2. If you're not adding anyone, why would you be on DT1? They're still included on DT2 anyway. |
|
|
|
I find it extraordinarily strange that members like minerjones and philipma1957 have found themselves no longer part of DT1. That doesn't seem appropriate and I hope it changes soon. It's really up to them: - Your trust list must include at least 10 users, not including ~distrust entries. More than enough users included them, but they didn't include enough users by themselves: |
|
|
|
You want me to show you where current DT members got their merit from ? Edit: Am I included in you "current DT"? . I'm taking this opportunity to promote my Trust list viewer, which is received well by the community, but I think most users don't know it exists. And it was quite some work to create, so use it  |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
