Bitcoin Forum
June 08, 2024, 01:39:02 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 [107] 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 ... 170 »
2121  Economy / Securities / Re: ROCKMINER - miners using GEN3 ASICMINER chips on: April 08, 2014, 02:49:02 AM

They are beautiful
2122  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: The Wasp Project Collective Information thread. on: April 08, 2014, 01:45:50 AM
I'm confused. How will I be able to get my hands on a wasp/hornet?

Is this a diy kit you will be selling?

Can we buy complete miners?
2123  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: [ANN]ASICMiner Publicly Looking for Potential Customers/Partners for New Chips on: April 08, 2014, 01:08:13 AM
EE received chips thank you gentlemen:

Quote
from Hugo Qin, of Shenzhen Shenkelong Ltd, in business zone of the PRC.

We are assuming that they are AM BE200 samples, since they are in a 65 pad package (QFN64).

Specs are nice - 12GH at 4+ Watts

We sure could use another engineer!

Dang!

Anyone interested in working with our team please contact me via pm or email.

12gh at 4w tested?

Give us the final specs big cat!
2124  Economy / Securities / Re: [Active Mining] The UNofficial Active Mining Discussion Thread [UNmoderated] on: April 07, 2014, 08:22:23 PM
Funny how with $300,000 worth of refunds you can't find a single person who has received their refund yet you can find many who have not.
2125  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: [ANN]ASICMiner Publicly Looking for Potential Customers/Partners for New Chips on: April 07, 2014, 07:21:14 PM
Sample chips received.  They are real.

So what is the difference between the sample chips and the real thing? How far aware from the real thing does this mean we are?

This is basically "the real thing". When you design chips, you have to spend a lot of money and time before you get the first real chips and can be sure, they actually work the way they should. A rough outline showing the importance of the news: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=99497.msg5968245#msg5968245
Afterwards you can order them en masse. Production of a batch takes about a month or more.

So we're still about a month out before they're ready?

Before mass production, yes.
2126  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: [Guide] Dogie's Comprehensive Manufacturer Trustworthiness Guide on: April 07, 2014, 07:16:08 PM
Quote
I believe they are buying parts but the stickers on the boards were a little strange

Please do elaborate.

As for the vmc refund issues, the thing that bothers me is that out of a supposed $300,000 in refunds given there have been a total of zero confirmed cases of refunds.
2127  Economy / Securities / Re: NEO and BEE talk (unmoderated) on: April 07, 2014, 07:06:21 PM
Freezing trading means you don't get to sell for satoshis. If lets everyone clear the panic and protects the investors against manipulations like Neo or whomever buying back cheap shares.

Also, freezing was done on behalf of Neobee, because Neobee _asked_ for it. The re-listing was done unilaterally by Havelock. They have no right to do it and it wasn't done because Neo asked. That created a panic and ppl sold for satoshis. Bascially, Havelock stole all your Bitcoins Neo shares and gave you Goxcoins Neobee.Q shares.

Havelock is not an investor protection service. It is a stock exchange. People use the site to trade stocks and as a shareholder that is exactly what I want to do.

I dont need you or neobees permission if I want to freely trade my shares. If you don't want to trade your shares then feel free to not trade your shares.

Neobee did not have the right to freeze trading simply because there is "suspicious trading" on a seperate trading platform.

And havelock does not need neobees permission to resume trading because there is no neobee.

No company. No ceo. No staff. Nobody to resume trading. Havelock is in charge of the passthrough now that TAT quit.

So should all shareholders be stuck with their shares indefinately and call it a game? Of course not. We should be able to salvage pennies on the dollar if we want and speculators should be free to speculate.

And how is havelock stealing anything? They have earned a whopping 0.1btc in trading fees since enabling trading. Do you really think they care about so little btc?

Quote
If it were a real company, I would seize the SEC or equivalent and get their ass sued to kingdom come.

No you wouldn't because first you need to be invested in neobee which you clearly aren't because if you were then you would not be against unfreezing trading. Second the SEC has no jurisdiction in panama. Thirdly this is the last thing someone would go to the SEC for.

Please stop talking shit.

Realize that havelock is actually a pretty decent exchange.
2128  Other / Meta / Re: Should trust system spammers be banned? on: April 07, 2014, 11:24:25 AM
Don't you understand that accepting bribes to spam fake trust ratings is untrustworthy? That is why you have

Trust:   -1083: -8 / +3(3)
Warning: Trade with extreme caution!

You were fooled by josh.
Are you really so stupid?? If Josh would want to increase his trust rating he would'nt  create the topic...
Turn on your brain!!!

Josh knows his customers are stupid enough to do something like this. Anyone with a brain knows there is no way any trust system can avoid paid shills.

Let me repeat that: there is no way to avoid shills like yourself. But you were stupid enough to shill openly so we all know that you are untrustworthy.

Josh knew you shills/spammers would get banned/ratings removed and he will end the contest and you will have sold your sole for literally nothing.
2129  Other / Meta / Re: Should trust system spammers be banned? on: April 07, 2014, 11:01:04 AM
Don't you understand that accepting bribes to spam fake trust ratings is untrustworthy? That is why you have

Trust:   -1083: -8 / +3(3)
Warning: Trade with extreme caution!

You were fooled by josh.
2130  Economy / Securities / Re: NEO and BEE talk (unmoderated) on: April 07, 2014, 09:52:57 AM
Is there any official+"legal" basis for Havelock to re-list the asset unilaterally? ("legal" because, well...bitcoin...)

Freezing the trading was a good decision, re-listing unilaterlaly with the .Q added is just scammy.

Can't wait for decent people to make a decent exchange...


How is freezing trading a good decision?

And why is allowing people to trade their shares scammy?

Neobee loses 10k btc and 2k in bitfunder and you say havelock is scammy?

Get real.
2131  Other / Meta / Re: Should trust system spammers be banned? on: April 07, 2014, 07:22:12 AM
But Inaba is hiring multiple people to create these ratings. It is impossible for me to determine whether these ratings are "real" or not, so I'm not going to delete them.

I disagree with it being impossible. It is blatantly obvious who is spamming trust. Looking at inaba's profile it takes me a few seconds to see which people are posting fake positive feedback daily.

There are only like 10 of them.

In fact a list has already been compiled of the spammers:

2132  Economy / Securities / Re: ASICMINER: Entering the Future of ASIC Mining by Inventing It on: April 07, 2014, 07:07:35 AM
What do you guys guess per share dividends will total over the next year?

400,000 btc at least.

1btc/share
2133  Economy / Securities / Re: Neo & Bee talk (spam free thread) on: April 07, 2014, 03:18:34 AM
Did danny really buy a bently?

That would really add to the value of the company when everything is liquidated.
2134  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Asicminer??? on: April 06, 2014, 09:09:24 PM

I believe Rockminer (Rockminer.com) is the new Asicminer.


No they are just reselling AM hardware.

AFAIK they chose to not release their new gen - it didn't turn out as well as it could have. They're waiting until they can deliver something perfect.

Edited for clarity: I'm referring to the now 'old' 55nm refresh. I have no comments about the 40nm (yet Wink).

Old news. Gen2 was skipped around November.

Gen3 40nm chips are in hand and functional. We still don't have the final specs but if they meet their target it will be the king.
2135  Other / Meta / Should trust system spammers be banned? on: April 06, 2014, 08:42:04 PM
As many of you already know, josh (inaba) is running a contest to win a monarch if you post positive trust on 3 bfl accounts and leave negative trust on 3 critics accounts every day. This is not a temporary problem because the contest is never ending so it needs to be dealt with. (ends when they begin shipping)

More about the contest: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=549403.0

I think this is spam and abuse of the trust system. Josh seems to think this proves that the system is flawed but I disagree. Blatant trust manipulation can be dealt with by mods/administrators with little effort.

So should those who have sold their sole and dignity for the chance to win some vaporware be banned?

Maybe they should be banned until monarchs finally ship?
2136  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: Swedish ASIC miner company kncminer.com on: April 06, 2014, 08:21:29 PM

thanks

"" We are serving more than three million dollars a day to resell the bitcoin we break ourselves," said Sam Cole , founder and vice president of KNC Miner with 80 employees and offices on West Higgins Road in central Stockholm. "

Impossible...3600 BTC a day at $450 will be just $1.62mil total market output. Cannot be $3 mil/day.

It has to be impossible. What organization has that kind of money to buy all that bitcoin daily? NONE.


It's only 360 btc or about $150k USD now.
2137  Economy / Securities / Re: NEO and BEE talk (unmoderated) on: April 06, 2014, 08:08:36 PM
How many times have I told you that I have several accounts?  Why is this still a novelty to you?

What are you even doing here?

Do you really have such a boring life that it is more entertaining to constantly troll bitcoin securities forum day after day after day after day?

Do you admit that you are crumbs? He is the only other person in bitcoin history who dedicated so much time to trolling.

If you don't get paid for this shit I feel sorry for you..
2138  Economy / Securities / Re: MPEx owner in danger of being extradited to US to face charges on: April 05, 2014, 11:22:44 PM
Let me know when the share price drops. Then i'll pick up some cheap shares.

Why dont you just ask MP? He is the only one trading/pumping his own stock.

You call it a company but the rest of us call it a scheme one guy from romania set up in an afternoon.
2139  Economy / Securities / Re: Neo & Bee talk (spam free thread) on: April 05, 2014, 10:14:36 PM
@pedrog

Not in this case. Neo's liquidity problems started with the Bitfunder IPO funds, probably frozen or retained in a pending gov investigation.

Danny claims "only" 1600btc lost in bitfunder. Where did the other 10k btc go?
2140  Economy / Securities / Re: Neo & Bee talk (spam free thread) on: April 04, 2014, 10:29:02 PM
Have they actually even filed for bankruptcy?
no, they haven't done anything.  The branch is abandoned.  Danny is MIA

So isn't that rather asshole-ish of Havelock to put a "Q" after their ticker when that is supposed to mean they are in bankruptcy proceedings?

When a company is involved in bankruptcy proceedings, the letter "Q" is added to the end of the company's stock ticker symbol.

Is there a letter for when the CEO runs off and the entire company staff quits?
Pages: « 1 ... 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 [107] 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 ... 170 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!