I don't mind to make a patch if needed- this should be a trivial change. Just deprecate the old functions for the new.

EDIT: ooops mods can you move this to Development? I made an error.

Hey,

getaccountaddress <account> -> getaddress [account]
getnewaddress -> newaddress
sendtoaddress -> send

I think that the get prefix should only be used for getting existing information. Things like making a new address are an action.

These changes will make the API more logical and easier to use. Especially for someone like me who uses bitcoind over SSH and on my local machine also.

sendtoaddress <- the to address part is redundant. Where else would you send it to? (i know IP's are possible but aren't they not recommended/being fazed out?)

getnewaddress <- You have to make a new address before returning it. Therefore you're not 'getting' something that already exists but performing an action.

getaddress should have account be optional. Have the ability to just return an address from the default account "".

Nothing. I just leave it running. MTux has kindly donated the resources to me needed.

Note: you'll need to write a script to delete old files. Shouldn't be hard but I didn't get around to doing it yet as there's plenty of filespace available.

Strange, mi ĵus rimarkis ke la Esperant-literoj malaperas: ĉŭŝĵĥ ĈĤĴŬŜ kiam vi citis min. Bedaŭrinde mi ne povas trinki lakton pro alergio, do neniom da pico por genjix! Kiun projekton de Bitcoin vi nun faras? (nur pro mia intereseco). La renkontiĝo estas ĉi tiu nokto.

Ĉu vi uzas Linukson? Eble vi ŝatos mian vortarilon: https://github.com/genjix/kio

Or google caching the site.

Hey,

I'm working now on another Bitcoin-related project that's closer to my interests. Lots of people keep sending me feature requests and it's a shame because I'm not able to respond quickly and implement them. It'd be sad to see this go to waste.

Bidding closes Saturday morning GMT (or whenever I wake up).

65% goes to me. 35% goes to Kalyhost.

You get everything- domain name, VPS, the setup, copyright, repository access, ...

cya

Por kiu tialo? Ĉu ĝi estas angliismo? Se jes, mi uzus programaron... aŭ aro de programo

Ĉu vi rimarkis pri la nova servo, kiu vendas picon? #pizza4btc . Aŭdinte la ideon, ĝi verŝajne montros bonan aferon. Rimarku ankaŭ mian projekton:
http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/28/internet-poker/rake-free-open-poker-room-run-poker-community-938389/ <-- ĉiom da informaĵo restas tie.

Morgaŭ ni rekontiĝos IRCe, do atendu! je 2200 GMT #pokerface ... Multaj aferoj interese okazas nun. Espere la ŝtato disfalos! Ho terure!

>I can't generate thousands of coins a day anymore

laszlo printing $100 everyday

and... 10k btc (!) for a pizza. more like 160 btc now.

Did I help?

http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/28/internet-poker/rake-free-open-poker-room-run-poker-community-938389/

http://www.liquidpoker.net/poker-forum/940985/support_genjix_s_new_project..html

and I know people have posted it on a bunch of other forums.

Softvaro = programaro
http://eo.wikipedia.org/wiki/Programaro

Do you accept PokerStars$? If so, PM me and I'll instantly do this.

How is that possible? The site has to confirm the payments were received first before it's possible to download the file.

Your other suggestions were all good, and I've updated the site now. A file for 2 BTC costs 2 BTC. The uploader receives 1.96 BTC.

It said that it was taking a share before but I had that line commented out.

I'm lurking #pokerface when not on #bitcoin-dev so let me know of anything else if I don't respond here.

This was just a weekend project. We're working on something else:
http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/28/internet-poker/rake-free-open-poker-room-run-poker-community-938389/
Come to our meeting tomorrow 2200 GMT on #pokerface ... good to share ideas.

cya

Thank you. This is great.

It's also really weird and odd looking.

I had 5 messages and never realised until just now. It's not very obvious. It's be nice to have a plain blue banner at the top like you get on Wikipedia with new messages, not some obnoxious flashing red text though.

Why does IsStandard block this? It's a great idea. If a wallet requires the keys of several people then it's possible to have distributed security instead of placing your trust in one source.

Al la alia afiŝulo supre: la softvaro je la ĉefpaĝo funkcias por mi. Se ĝi ne funkcias por vi, vi provu kompili de fonto per la komando:
make -f makefile.unix bitcoind
Poste vi funkcigu ĝin per './bitcoind' kaj './bitcoind help'

Vi akiros la Blok-Ĉenon de la samtavola reto. Tio okazos iam post bitcoind komencos.

You exchange currency or vouchers for BTC which you spend freely at the shops.

Some trader agrees to redeem these vouchers.

/thread

What I'm asking though, is that with this scheme you're trusting ONE person.

The one person who re-assembles the wallet and does the transaction.

What if he sent all the funds to himself?

How can we have all 8 nodes together confirm to send BTC with each other's consent?

I saw your title and felt sick...

And if one node that has the reconstructed wallet goes rogue and decides to send all the money to themselves- there's nothing you can do.