wiki is new front page \o/
imma cool wit this
|
|
|
From: http://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4761.0<spam> --------------------------- As per this and this post, me & dissipate have setup a new site: http://bitcoin.cz.ccYou propose features for Bitcoin. The front page shows a mix of the most donated proposals (10) and newest ones (5). Once the feature is implemented in Bitcoin then the bounty goes to the author and the proposal is deleted. Think of it as an experiment into future methods for bitcoin based free software dev. Right now I'm just putting it out there to see what happens. If it grows then we can think about turning it into a bug tracker type thing with tickets, comments, statuses, assignment of tickets and search. ############## For this to work, people have to know about it. Add it to your signatures! "Vote up your favourite ideas to go into Bitcoin" ############## Source code.
|
|
|
done! check it out
I noticed sometimes disqus fails to connect, so just refresh if that happens.
|
|
|
Shouldn't we make the change now, when it is still relatively simple?
I agree. Either variable length or INT128. The beginning 13 bits are not even used and are always 0 even. Maybe they could be used as a flag to indicate another INT64 following the same format on the end.
|
|
|
Rapelay is jaw dropping & looks cool.
|
|
|
Nice! How about a discussion board/comments section under each project? Pretty easy with Disqus. Or use Facebook Connect+fb board and have the discussion posts go down the Facebook newsfeed for extra virality.
I'll integrate Disqus. How easy is it to do? Otherwise I can just slap on comments (it's not hard to do).
|
|
|
So a libertarian/ancap society can have limits on how much property a person can possess?
I think you gotta be able to make these lands productive. It doesn't matter if you don't consume it yourself. I mean, if there's an abandoned factory that nobody was taking for a whole years or that there is no guards for a whole year...then I think it would make sense to take the property and homestead it. Of course, the whole question of stickability of property is a big issue. I think a good rule of thumb is that it should a) prevent conflict b) incentivize the owner/capitalist to develop the property. A good example of this conflict is the Discovery Channel's The Colony. The colonists homestead a factory they thought was abandoned and that nobody was using it. They build a lot of things to make it their. For example, they increase the security of factory. They installed solar panel scavenged from local sources. They construct various apparatus that make life living in the colony more bearable. Of course, the original owner and his girlfriend came. The colonists recognize them as equal co-owners because they have the key to the place. However, they squandered resources so much that the colonist have to kick them out. That's normal anarchism (non ancap) you're describing. You can read more about the 'homesteading' movement, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Squatting
|
|
|
Rubbish. I've looked over a fair chunk of the code trying to understand it (not all of it) and can assure you that it does exactly what it says.
And I doubt it was written by a programmer BTW. My thoughts is an academic of some sorts. satoshi is maybe a mathematician.
|
|
|
Yes, because people develop more and more efficient ways for mining. One guy here even prefabs custom chips.
Also the cost for minting new bitcoins is faaar lower than creating new metal coins/paper money + transporting them + counting them + handling them.
|
|
|
What's the big deal about implementing version numbers in IMPLEMENT_SERIALIZE?
|
|
|
Your links are tenuous at best. I see no indication of a scammer here.
|
|
|
INCOMING FLOOD. BUY NOW Let me take the opportunity to also plug this thread. ----------------- As per this and this post, me & dissipate have setup a new site: http://bitcoin.cz.ccYou propose features for Bitcoin. The front page shows a mix of the most donated proposals (10) and newest ones (5). Once the feature is implemented in Bitcoin then the bounty goes to the author and the proposal is deleted. Think of it as an experiment into future methods for bitcoin based free software dev. Right now I'm just putting it out there to see what happens. If it grows then we can think about turning it into a bug tracker type thing with tickets, comments, statuses, assignment of tickets and search. ############## For this to work, people have to know about it. Add it to your signatures! "Vote up your favourite ideas to go into Bitcoin" ############## Source code.
|
|
|
Bullshit. I use IRC in tons of my programs extensively. It's a good carrier protocol.
|
|
|
Can you set this up so we can see how many people have donated to each fund? 5 people each bidding 1, and 1 person bidding 5, convey different information
Yep. Does it matter if it doesn't show names?
|
|
|
Maybe you just need to interface with the Github bug tracker. I heard they have an API for you to use.
This is actually a very cool idea. By using existing systems, it allows you get up to speed very quickly. Yet at the same time you loose the flexibility and inventiveness from having a blank canvas. Since this is a grand experiment, maybe it's best to keep with the custom solution for now, adding features as we see fit later. Maybe everyone thinks bitcoin is perfect the way it is. Wasnt there a list of bugs gavin was wanting to get people to focus on ?
By putting bounties on each bug fix and feature, Gavin and the other bitcoin developers will be able to tell which features and bug fixes are most urgent. Each part of the project has it's own price! This pricing mechanism for FOSS projects is a radical improvement over the model of putting arbitrary priorities on bugs and features. +1
|
|
|
|