lemmi just paste what the definition of a threat is real quick a statement of an intention to inflict pain, injury, damage, or other hostile action on someone in retribution for something done or not done.
I wanted to a) warn the users in that campaign of what I considered doing and b) gain opinions from other DT users about how to proceed. Leaving negative feedback for scams or advertising scams isn't a "hostile action". It's a concequence of what the user in question did themselves. this is very relevant to your little project, i can see that you are trying to stop spam on the forum but you are going about it the wrong way
Again, it's not. It wasn't even related to spam. The post quality in Betcoin.AGs signature campaign is acceptable, maybe even in the higher area. This was related to the scam I consider their site itself, not their campaign, the posts of their participants, or fighting spam. You cant just go around making threats and harassing people
I didn't harass people. I didn't make threats.
One hiccup doesnt make an entire company a scam and im sure that if you were to leave all the members of their campaign negative feedback, there would be some users who didnt even know about the jackpot thing
This isn't the thread to discuss whether or not betcoin.AG is a trustable site, and whether or not they should be considered scammers. If you want to discuss such things, go to the appropriate threads. |
|
|
|
"I strongly consider leaving negative feedback to everyone who continues to advertise betcoin.ag"
Does that not sound like a threat to you?
Nope. If you got a problem with my past actions, create a Reputation thread. If you got a problem with me being on DT, contact Blazed or two other DT1 guys. If you got a problem with me being part of SMAS, convince Lauda and Yahoo to replace me (good luck with that). Else, stop dragging unrelated stuff into the SMAS effort. |
|
|
|
The fact of the matter is that you threatened dozens of innocent members of the forum with negative trust if they didnt stop advertising a company that you thought were in the wrong. Can you deny this?
Is threatening people here with default trust negative allowed here?
No, I didn't. Go cry to Blazed please. In all seriousness i dont think 1 single manager is giving priority to their "friends". I cannot confirm that from lutpin or lauda but im sure they have no problem allowing you to look over the spreadsheets and see the list of participants. I know i personally obviously have alot of open spots so im not giving priority to anyone.
Lauda can't even pick the users they get, unless they ban everyone else, there would be no way for them to "priorize" anyone. As for me, I try setting up a good campaign, giving advantages to bad posters based on sympathy will ultimatively damage that, hence there's little reason to do so. |
|
|
|
|
Doesn't seem they're using a dedicated camapign manager, so possibly little to no overview on the participants.
Their only high-ranking user, BAGOBO, is SMAS blacklisted.
|
|
|
|
Absolutely childish from Lutpin and Lauda
Both examples are about me, and both are related to betcoin.ag (had a recent look at their trust status). going after everyone who is against their crusade
This had nothing to do with spam/SMAS/signature campaigns, else I would have started with YoBit and SecondsTrade (Know who did that? I give you 3 guesses). Stop pulling in stuff that is unrelated to fighting spam in oder to try discrediting what I am doing. and threatening innocent users with negative trust
I was voicing what I was considering back then, and what I have been discussing with several other DT members at that time. I since decided to not go down that way and as you can see, I didn't leave a single feedback over "promoting betcoin.ag" (funny though, I got a few). Also, I wouldn't call somebody advertising a scam (while knowing well what they are doing) innocent.
Depending on information? the campaign owner can't blame signature managers and signature manager easy to say i don't know why they are not active due i was doing the right thing to manage the campaign.
In that case, you will get fired and replaced. Believe me. Who knows, maybe they just want to keep the forum from going to total shit?
People caring are the worst. Who knows maybe a spammer is just a scenario, which is run by a group due with that they can get something.
Yes, we invented spam to "get something". It is only an illusion. Everything is fine. I just have to close my eyes, and I won't see it anymore. |
|
|
|
The site is lagging like crazy for me, I can barely open anything.
Every message I send on the chat gets sent through at least 5 - 6 times. Same thing for each dice I roll, it rolled 6 times. What the heck, lol
Are you avatar? It seems you're being the only one with troubles such as those, not sure if it's a server related issue or something due to your connection/local side. Best to contact support about it, they can walk through the steps and find the problem together with you. Edit: If you are avatar, that problem seems to be fixed now. |
|
|
|
I didn't know they sold any of the gold ones, thought they were only given to luckybit staff.
The 24k gold plated ones are limited to 10 coins and were only available in these collectors sets. Not sure how many of them are still in the hands of luckybit staff, but I myself am owning one of the sets aswell, and IIRC I know at least one other person who does. Hidden reserve (hashed)= EA099178CF73EDB8E74427737208CC62B5BE3A1354CB4ABA7150035AD12B73D7
Quoted for hidden reserve. Are we doing this now?!
0.16 BTC |
|
|
|
I also want to ask question for campaign mannagers. What do you think about people who are saying: "I will change signature if you accept me" Do you accepting such members? They are not sure that they will be accepted and they don't want to be removed from their campaign if they change signature.
This has recently become a little discussion in one of my campaigns: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1680574.msg16882152#msg16882152Yahoo and I got a similar stance to this topic, quick quote of his post: I want to chime in here for a sec, then ill let Lutpin do his thing.
The problem i see with alot of users is theyre chasing a paycheck. I see ppl whining i cannot change my sig because this person has hired me. Or whatever other reason. Then i just read ipanks response about messaging said manager out of respect to say i want to try to be hired elsewhere.
These reasons are SHIT folks. Quit chasing a paycheck and stick to a campaign that you were already hired in. I dont give a fuck if you live in a poor country and that extra 2$ will help you out. You asked for a job and you should at the very minimum stick with that campaign that hired you til payday. Thats the respectful thing to do.
You should weigh the options of all the campaigns available. Choose the campaign that best fits you and apply. If hired show some loyalty and stay with that campaign. If i see users moving from campaign to campaign chasing money, ill reserve a spot on the blacklist for ya.
Signature campaigns are not meant to supplement your income. Theyre a passive way to earn a few dollars a week. Take your lazy asses out and get a job if you want to make more money
|
|
|
|
If only I knew 6 months ago that Cyrus can recover accounts and not just theymos.
6 months ago, Cyrus coudn't recover accounts. You should verify your identity by posting a signed message with today's date.
Signed messages have been provided in PM and they verify. Seems the account is back in control of its original owner. |
|
|
|
Did anyone receive their payment? And if so, on the website or to their wallet directly?
Payments will be made during the next hour, once again via the addresses. |
|
|
|
Lauda , Lutpin and yahoo are weird guys.
guys? girls? apache helicopters? They will misuse their trust ratings and will destroy your trust ratings.
Even yahoo who isn't in any relevant DT level currently? They are the real criminals.
For realz? By what laws? Might wanna think about crowd-funding a lawsuit against us in that case. Real criminals belong into jail or at least sentenced. Their trust ratings should also be spoiled.
I get the pitchforks, you bring the torches, ok...wait, what? |
|
|
|
not received untill now,SCAM
everyone submit their BTC addresses (as I don't have IMPS coins and having IMPS have no sense anymore) and give me some Time. I am sorting out this issue. Was this paid since the last update? |
|
|
|
How did you find this!?!?!
How did you miss this? You have to wager 2000 BTC before getting a 0.8% house edge, while crypto-games.net offers a 0.8% house edge on dice the second you join. "Our house edge is determined based on your total money wagered. We start off with a default house edge of 1%" |
|
|
|
Unbelievable is Bitsane payment not yet confirmed moreover, for manager is Mr. Yahoo.
All campaigns are listed as PNYC until they complete their first payout. A campaign could be managed by satoshi themselves, it would still be considered PNYC in that initial period. But I don't know, why signature campaign betcoin.ag still available but the manager got trust -128.
Betcoin.ag is a shady site, if you would have taken the time to check their feedbacks, you would know why they got the trust they have. That being said, their campaign seems to be well-ran (besides the fact that there is a strong ethic dilemma about the product being advertised). That's the reason why the campaign is still listed, although marked with a red warning asterisk. |
|
|
|
All sites have autorolls but to make proper usage you need Seuntjes bot.
Is there any site that allows you to autoroll with increase/decrese bets BUT has option to stop at X money won?
Crypto-Games.net features an option "Stop if balance higher than X", which would be simple to use in the way you intend to. |
|
|
|
11. Rollin: 0.8% (variable)
12. crypto-games.net 0.8%
Let me know if there are better ones that should be higher or lower on this list. Also if you have played on any of these sites.
So a variable house edge that starts at 1% and decreases to 0.8% is lower than a fixed 0.8% house edge all the time? Interesting. |
|
|
|
Trust me , you do. Else there will be a dis-satisfaction spreading over. People will say you bribe and its justificable.
Because not feeling the need to discuss every decision I make is the same as being corrupt, right? Don't start bullshit about bribes, no, that's not "justificable" unless you have either proofs or indications for it. There are neither, you can't bribe me. Rules are made for the convenoence of people and not for creating a problem.
It would be more convenient for everyone else on this forum if you would have stayed away. Your violating of the rules is what causes this very problem currently, not the rules themselves. I know but I tried to minimise your guilt. You will have to take it, as you deserve it.
As do you with my denial, and my negative trust. Better understand what you are doing. If I am a problem for forum, I will eventually get banned.
You already did get banned. Over and over again. but who the hell are you to decide someone's future?
If you think signature campaigns on this forum are your "future" please go outside. Search for a job or visit school. Don't be pathetic. You have got no right to do this.
As an assigned campaign manager, I have every right. The owner gave me that right when hiring me to manage their signature campaign. You failing to understand this each time someone is trying to explain it to you is starting to get old. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
