Many casino are aware that minors do play bet with their company but they don't really care because what they need is money. When you login into there site they will only tell you gambling is for 18+, no strict verification to access users. It will be good for casino to make verification requirements strict to control the rate which minors play gamble.
KYC has pros and cons, some gamblers agree with it but the majority of gamblers definitely don't want that. the impact of gambling sites that do not require KYC is a minor that will definitely play on the site. the times are getting more sophisticated, in my city, there are still many minors who are already playing gambling with a capital of hundreds of bucks, besides using their parents' identities, the minors must also use their parents' money to play gambling. I started gambling as a child. At that time the Internet was very poorly developed and did not allow to play gambling, so we played various card games with friends on the street. Just as now we played for money as it increases the excitement. So even if we completely ban gambling it is not the fact that children will not find opportunities to play the same poker. |
|
|
|
It is absolutely normal to have mindset like that where you keep gambling and losing money yet you have fun doing it.
Even I do gambling some times and while I know I am going to lose my money I still proceed with that.
I gamble the money which I can afford to lose which is the reason why I have fun while gambling.
If gambling is not fun then there's no point doing it.
I completely agree with you. Of course I am not happy after losing a gambling game, but I am pretty good at restraining my emotions and my environment is unlikely to notice any changes in me. I believe that the likelihood of losing at a casino is higher than the likelihood of winning moreover I am aware of all the risks so I take it easy enough to such an outcome. |
|
|
|
^
These days, even teenagers know how to use a VPN, so the introduction of digital IDs for gambling just makes no sense. They can easily register at a gambling site that does not require these innovations and play there. So I think that a waste of budget money or this initiative has deeper motives aimed at the interests of the state and the protection of children is only a reason to push this initiative among the public. |
|
|
|
|
In my opinion, such campaigns are just an attempt to chase a trend, so I do not think that this will lead to a wider dissemination of the beer brand. These NFTs don't have any utility and will eventually come close to zero in value. I try to avoid such NFTs as they have no liquidity and therefore carry high risks for the owners.
|
|
|
|
Не обьязательно, что так будет, просто прошлые годы эфир ждали по 500 с перспективой на рост, а сейчас это ожидание движется сверху. В следующий раз эфир может допереть до 7-8к и потом просесть на 2-3к, это как пример, но каждый раз этот уровень будет подниматься. Ну и даже сейчас не ясно упадет ли эфир так низко в этом цыкле, или все таки сможет удержать уровень около 1к.
Тест ETH 2.0 вроде бы проходит успешно. Эфир ниже 1000 мы, скорее всего, увидим только при неудаче теста в сочетании с иными неблагоприятными условиями... Так что, вполне возможно, сейчвс - самое дно эфира ... Дно таким не бывает. На дне все разочарованы, много сожаления и недовольства. Вряд ли кто брал по 4К льет сегодня по 1.1К. Я думаю немного вверх, его начнут покупать, а потом вниз до 500-700. Дно, это когда у хомяков нет денег для покупки. Тоже придерживаюсь того же мнения. Какой-то серьезной паники пока не наблюдается, судя по чатам многие были готовы к этим событиям и ждут дальнейшего снижения, пережидая в стейблкоинах. На мой взгляд BTC просто обязаны свозить на 12-15k, возможно и ниже. |
|
|
|
Since i just partake in gambling just for fun,i usually bet on high odds.It's always fun betting for the underdog,when they win,it bring much more joy than betting for the usual winning team.I'm not interested in low odds because it's just the usual predictable outcome,no fun in that and boring.
It would be interesting to know your stats if you keep them. How often do you bet and how many of your outsider bets are successful? In all my practice I have only been able to win a few times by betting on an underdog. That's why I don't see the point in betting on high odds. I'd rather earn less, but the probability that I won't lose my money is higher. |
|
|
|
I don't think any of them are to blame, but they all need to pay attention to it and counter fraud. Casinos make money at the expense of their customers, so they have to provide safe storage of user funds. But most casinos buy software from software creators and don't have such a high level of technical specialists as cheaters. Customers should understand that because their private keys are kept by the casino.
but in case the abuse is not detected early, it is the casino itself who will suffer the most. so for me, it is the responsibility of the casino to secure their filters for such abuse. because let's admit the fact that these people will always try to exhaust the bonus given, and will find loopholes in the site to get as much as they can. if you are a site which has long-term goals, you will invest in your security and other protection protocols. you can't tell the abusers to stop but you can restrict them with your security measures. What security measures? If any gambler abusing the bonus system can register several accounts on his relatives - wife, brothers, sisters, etc. and use a proxy so that in case of inspection the casino could not prove abuse. As we know today, even the most advanced security systems cannot resist this. |
|
|
|
A lot of people take a scientific approach to gambling - the best strategy is to avoid it  All the rest who invent "systems", "strategies" and so on are only engaged in self-deception and in fact they are ordinary gamblers. The only exception category is bettors, but there are very few professionals among them also. That's right, because this kind of thing has no strategy, tactics or anything related to science because we already know that gambling is luck in the end. Regardless of what you will get from the approach taken, it is not a strategy but only based on stimulus or suggestions to yourself in order to gain confidence there, after that it's not there anymore  Yes, it all depends on the math. If the mathematics of the game is correct (and it is almost always correct), then the casino has an advantage and it inevitably manifests itself at a distance. In rare cases, players find a bug in the mechanics (or software) of the game and can win until the bug is found and removed. I think the likelihood of finding such bugs are minimal, so count on it does not make sense. Well, if someone manages to find a bug and beat the casino because of this, he obviously should withdraw funds more often as it is likely to displease the owner of the gaming platform, and most likely this player will quickly banned. |
|
|
|
|
There will always be people who are hacking or looking for an opportunity to cheat a gambling site in order to make money on it. This endless process of struggle, which on the one hand forces attackers to find errors in the system and on the other hand to eliminate these errors and strengthen the protection of the software. In my opinion, this process forces to increase the level of technical knowledge of both parties. I do not think that either of them is at fault.
|
|
|
|
it is hard to win because people doesn't have a "scientific approach" or a professional approach to the gambling. I think that addiction in gambling is a serious issue that could create a lot of other problem in real life, like drug addiction or any other dependance. Here there is not "overdose" but it could be really easy waste big sum of money in a short time  that sounds equally as a complete disaster for the well being of a person. A lot of people take a scientific approach to gambling - the best strategy is to avoid it All the rest who invent "systems", "strategies" and so on are only engaged in self-deception and in fact they are ordinary gamblers. The only exception category is bettors, but there are very few professionals among them also. I absolutely agree with your statement. My experience allows me to understand that none of my strategies has been more profitable than others and everything depends only on luck. The only strategy that increased my chances of winning is when my friends and I followed the slot machines in the casino and played those for a long time did not give the winnings. Although it may also be a misconception and luck was just on our side at that moment. |
|
|
|
|
I don't think any of them are to blame, but they all need to pay attention to it and counter fraud. Casinos make money at the expense of their customers, so they have to provide safe storage of user funds. But most casinos buy software from software creators and don't have such a high level of technical specialists as cheaters. Customers should understand that because their private keys are kept by the casino.
|
|
|
|
^
Cases of casinos going bankrupt are quite common as well as any other business whose success is directly related to the economic situation in the world and the amount of free money in the population. I am sure that during a war/pandemic/crisis the number of gamblers at land-based casinos decreases significantly and casinos are forced to incur losses, which can later lead to bankruptcy. |
|
|
|
^
Any gambler who bought BTC or any other volatile cryptocurrency during the last six months has lost some of his money because of the falling rate. Even if you have a deposit in such cryptocurrencies you already lost a part of their value. That's why the best solution for gambling is Stablecoins. They are not as volatile but have all the advantages of cryptocurrencies - speed of transactions and low fees. |
|
|
|
|
I have lost several times in a row betting on high odds and after the experience I try to minimize my risks, so I prefer low odds as low odds are placed on the favorites of the match. Of course even in this case no one guarantees a hundred percent victory, but the probability of it is higher than betting on the outsider with higher odds.
|
|
|
|
|
The fall in the price of BTC is a natural phenomenon that repeats from time to time. If a gambler holds BTC for a long time and gambles with these coins, then of course he loses more than someone who buys BTC right before the game. In such times it is profitable to buy BTC and be ready to hold on to coins for several years.
Personally I don't use BTC for casino deposits, preferring other cryptocurrencies with lower transaction costs.
|
|
|
|
^
На мой взгляд Web 3.0 не коим образом не сможет повлиять на передачу власти от корпораций в руки простых смертных. Скорее всего криптовалюты это своего рода тестовый полигон технологий, которые в дальнейшем будет применяться не в наших интересах. Все это приправляется соусом под сладким названием децентрализация, но на практике оказывается, что децентрализация заканчивается там, где нарушаются интересы сильных мира сего. |
|
|
|
^
Рынки слишком раздуты ожиданиями и когда наступает момент истины (кризис, пандемия, война и т.д.) многие переоценивают эти активы и избавляются от них в пользу более привычных ценностей. И так будет продолжаться бесконечно, т.к. криптовалюты создавались в первую очередь для использования, а не спекуляций и сохранения в них ценности. |
|
|
|
~ Тем более как я понимаю функция МВ опциональна...
Опциональна, не опциональна, это мало волнует регуляторов. Есть возможность скрыть транзакцию от наблюдателя значит площадка, предлагающая торговлю этим активом попадает под спрос со стороны государства. Крипто сообщество все больше оттачивается под интересы государств. Раньше мы все ждали когда появятся децентрализованные площадки, они появились, но государства и их начали прогибать под свои интересы. |
|
|
|
^
Весь рынок падает, удержаться в таком случае достаточно сложная задача). Я думаю что STEPN еще рановато хоронить. В любом случае найдутся люди которые будут ходить/бегать при любой цене токенов проекта, ведь и в Axie Infinity до сих пор играют, несмотря на значительное снижение дохода. |
|
|
|
Learning starts from home so we, as parents, should educate our kids about the risks of gambling as early as possible. If we enlighten them about the possible effects of gambling, they would learn how to get rid of it. We should let them know how gambling works and as much as possible, tell them to avoid it so that in the future, they won't be the government's problem.
It can be double edge sword because not all kids can understand what does his parents talking about especially if he's a close minded person. He wouldn't care anything what does the parents say, he will try to gamble and if he like it, he will continue until he lose all his money. This will lead him become an addict, so it's completely hard to choose which good strategy for parenting. Yes, children don't always listen to their parents' advice because you can't have someone else's experience. We almost always want to explore on our own things that parents tell us about. Think back to your childhood and adolescence. I'm sure you explored a lot on your own, despite your parents' prohibitions. But it is necessary to talk to children, because only a parent can really teach a child responsibility to himself and his loved ones. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
