Of course online casinos and betting shops have some advantages for gamblers, which mainly save our time, but none of them can not convey the atmosphere of the same Las Vegas or other major entertainment centers, where you can not only play a variety of gambling games, but also to spend time in a friendly company.

Personally, I think that the casinos should be more clear about what exactly is included in the prohibited activities that are offensive, and limit the use of cranes at the software level.

We all know that machines as well as people make mistakes, so we can't exclude the situation when an account gets banned if its owner didn't violate any rules and didn't abuse the platform. Casinos have to be more loyal to their users and treat their complaints and requests more carefully.

We've already seen Mbitcasino and BitStarz casinos in the list of the best casinos several times, although many users have complained about them. In my opinion there are more worthy casinos to be in the list of the best that's why I think this list is not quite right and these two casinos definitely shouldn't be there. So it's better to bypass them and always independently research reviews about this or that gambling area and not trust such lists.

А мне кажется, что их идея с борьбой проектов за слоты парачейнов стала уже неактуальна, т.к. в настоящее время многие сети с радостью принимают разработчиков к себе на борт, помогают не только финансово, но и проводят бесплатные обучающие программы. Слишком они уж перемудрили с этими парачейнами, тем самым сами себе замедлили развитие экосистемы.

Personally, I don't see the point in sharing winnings posts on social networks, unless the person has a personal gambling channel where he helps to understand gambling, communicates with the community and shares ideas, reviews, etc. And if a person publishes his winnings just for self-affirmation in the eyes of the public, it certainly does not make any sense (at least for me). Besides, such behavior carries some risks for underage users of social networks.

The idea is that if a gambling company does not have that kind of money, they should limit the maximum possible winnings at the software level. The fact that they deleted the winnings information shows that they are trying to cheat this guy. It will be very difficult to prove that he really won, but if he has money for good lawyers, he could win in court and get his winnings, albeit with a delay. 

Про Near также говорили во время хайпа, только хайп закончился и сейчас Near можно прикупить по 3$, только уже появляется вопрос, а есть ли смысл вливаться в эту экосистему. На самом деле сложно предугадать как поведет себя рынок в дальнейшем, т.к. им управляют великие манипуляторы из ФРС. Именно поэтому считаю, что заходить в Aptos по 9-10$ достаточно рискованно. По крайней мере в настоящее время их сеть не показывает каких-то явных преимуществ по сравнению с конкурентами.

Уже в который раз замечаю, в последнее время больше всех выносят в основном криптаны, занимаются мультиаккаунтингом и пишущие полезные скрипты, автоматизирующие эту деятельность. Если не ошибаюсь, читал до этого статью о том некая команда выносила с сейлов на CoinList. Ноды тоже ребята мультили очень жестко.

---

И хочется и колется зайти в Aptos. Наверное буду подбирать, но только если свозят в район 1-4$ за монету.   

In my opinion, if a gambler is still trying to win back his losses, it is absolutely irrelevant whether he will publish information about losses/wins in social networks, because it certainly will not change his principles. In fact, such people only need to understand that losing at the casino or betting is a completely natural phenomenon. And if you look at the statistics gamblers lose much more often than they win. So it's better to play for fun and not to keep track of their statistics.

Если посмотреть на рынки в целом, то многие криптовалюты укатали от пиков на 70-90%, а уж от IDNA, которая не имеет какого-то реально применения, а соответственно и широкого спроса, ожидать чего-то другого явно не приходится. На самом деле это очень грустно, т.к. у проекта реально крутая идея и но, к превеликому сожалению она так и не была реализована за пределами блокчейна. Сдается мне поэтому все и льют монету по рынку. 

Может быть все угодно, ведь большие дяди всегда играют против ожиданий толпы.

---

Не успел еще потрогать Aptos, поэтому интересует несколько моментов:

1. Сколько максимально выжимали TPS в основной сети?
2. Сколько на сегодняшний день стоит транзакция? 
3. Чем привлекает сеть пользователей, кроме возможности получить дропы на ранней стадии запуска экосистемы?

Если все позакрывают рты, то Алексея Перцева будут и дальше держать в заключении. Пока в мире есть люди, которые борются за свои права и помогают другим, то шанс что-то изменить все же существует, пусть и очень маленький. На мой взгляд анонимность это право, которое должно быть у каждого, но как оказывается, корпорациям и государствам это не выгодно и плевать они хотели на нас. 

I am also a supporter of anonymity and also prefer to remain in the shadows, but if we look around, we see that quite a large number of people live without hiding their wealth and personally I do not observe such a trend that they are constantly robbed. Each of us knows bloggers, streamers, artists who earn big money. They behave openly enough with the society and flaunt their wealth. Why don't they get robbed, but if you win a large sum of money in a casino, you are bound to be visited by intruders?

The guy doesn't owe this girl anything except $10,000, which he stole from her. If I were her, I would stop communicating with a man who steals money altogether. But most likely she is mercenary and the money can turn her blind eye to her boyfriend's illegal actions. I think their story will end when the guy runs out of money, and he will run out quickly if he's already gambling with other people's money.

I also prefer not to tell anyone about big winnings except my family. But I'm actually more concerned that as few people as possible know that I gamble than that criminals might be interested in my winnings. Everywhere in the world there are neighborhoods where very rich people live. I don't think it's more difficult to rob such people than a person who won a lot of money in a casino.

I believe that the reputation of an honest man is worth more than $ 50,000, in addition, a litigant can claim compensation for moral damage and defamation, but as I understand defamation can be proved only after winning in court. That's why many people who know they are right are willing to spend money, effort, and their precious time to prove their innocence. Personally, I respect that attitude in life.  

It seems to me that there is a certain share of bettors who follow other people's opinions, and to a greater extent this applies to beginners because they are not able to take responsibility for themselves. If they win they take credit for their winnings and if they lose they just blame the person or organization they were advised by.

Personally, I don't see the point in this kind of betting because in this situation the main point of betting is lost - personal analysis. 

If I won a large sum of money in a casino, I would prefer that my personal data not be disclosed to the public, because otherwise it could be considered a violation of privacy. In my opinion, in such a situation, the decision should be made by the person who got lucky. If he wants to brag to the public, why not give him the opportunity to do so. But someone who values his privacy would never agree to that.

А мне кажется что в STEPN есть и идея и интересные механики, просто нужно понимать, что заработать в таких проектах всем не получится и заработок сильно зависит от удачи, а не только времени входа и количества вложенных средств. Если разработчики будут время от времени подкручивать механики, то проект может жить еще долго, ведь основная задача этого проекта вознаграждать людей за здоровый образ жизни и тот кто бегает ежедневно может играть в несколько подобных игр одновременно и получать бонус к здоровью. 

If you favor anonymity then do not use casinos that are registered in jurisdictions that require KYC/AML. For this you need to read the TOS of the casino. True, this is not a panacea, as some casinos do require proof of identity and income after a serious win. I can not advise you how to protect yourself from the transfer of personal data between casinos, but it seems to me that if they transfer data it should be spelled out in the TOS. So you have to read the TOS carefully.