There are investors that will argue that they're got a better performing portfolio if they've got more altcoins than Bitcoin. And here we are that has got more Bitcoin on it and there's no one to stop us and can't convince us to diversify that much. I see people that are too much diversifying because they think that's the wisest thing to do but then, they're hit more by market's volatility. Unlike if you're into Bitcoin-only, you'll just have to chill and wait until the market is being dependent on it because of the cycle, it requires more patience than of the altcoins.

You don't have to trust them, just use them whenever you're in need of their service. You don't keep deposits there as well, so when you trade and wants to withdraw then take it out immediately when you're done doing your trades there. It doesn't have to be big or small amount but just use them as is since they're exchangers. Whether you've got or no problem with them at all and either centralized or decentralized, the lesson from these incidents is that they're just tools for exchanging crypto<->fiat.

We will see once both of them is already there. Right now, we just have to wait for the other team to qualify and that's the Heat which has a high chance that they'll end their series against Celtics by tomorrow. Both teams didn't get any lose from the semis(conference finals) and have performed very well. While Heat has the history of getting in and out in the finals, the Denver Nuggets is gonna get in for the first time in history. They may be lack of experience on that bracket but sure they like challenges. If ever the Heat finishes the game by tomorrow and we're already in the finals, I'm more optimistic with Heat's roster because of these undrafted boys.

This thread isn't about the discussion that you've set OP but about the service that you represent. I guess it's better if you just made this thread as an announcement thread instead of making it look like as a discussion but ends up you want to draw people's attention to coinremitter. Well, as obvious as your username and being a representative of them.

AFAIK, with that time satoshi said that there might be the biggest transaction or no transaction at all.

The first thing that I've thought of are the quantum computers and it's said that this is going be able to easily conquer the blockchains and can attack them in split seconds. That's what I've understood from the speculations that I've read all about it. But then, it's gonna be a long way to go until an attack manages to successfully penetrate a blockchain that's been fully secured through POW and has got a lot of layers of security unlike those POS algo by other altcoins.

It's a good and green country and if there have been invitation to come to them and have those mining and data centers to be established, there are probably some decent and inevitable offers that would be taken by those companies.

I have been amused by this country. It's like a low key and developing country but tourists aren't that much welcomed because of how high the entrance fee they're asking and this is based on some travel vloggers that I've watched. And with that, they could waive those fees and give incentives for those companies that will adhere to their close call.

Agoradesk campaign is now full again.

---

There's something going on with Bettercallraul campaign and Royse decided to halt the campaign indefinitely. The team made it look that they've been seized just as how the known CM has been seized through their website.

One challenge that has been seen and also been mentioned by some about Bitcoin is about connectivity. There's no solution for those that have been in remote areas and they're not versed with using the technology. At least, this is the very one thing that Bitcoin can be said of challenging. There's solution about satellite connectivity but devices and even the connection itself won't cost just a penny but it's more than that.

And one other challenge about still, the most common about many people that are still not yet educated about Bitcoin. The resolution on this one is to keep them informed about Bitcoin but then there goes the other challenge that will made from there, and that's when you're educating the wrong people that are not eager on learning on it as it seems you're wasting your vocals, time and efforts on them.

It's like a band aid solution for most countries but still see them getting that inevitable high inflation rate. But at least with this action, the slowing down of inflation is effective as much as we've seen so these countries got great economists and that's how they come up with such solution. I'm no economists and with such, there's always the domino effect for doing so. We may see the short term solution of increasing interest rates but it won't be as effective as it is in the long term so they have to come up with other solutions wherein, that should have been planned while the effect of interest rates is still there. With what I am seeing, it is the people that are trying to look for solutions on their own like going and working abroad and have that remittances sent to their left relatives.

Yeah, that's possible to happen and it's like going to give the users an "expedite" process for those that will pay the fee.

Well, there have been people keeping their addresses written and saved somewhere else because it's no hassle and if someone asks them, they'll just have to copy and paste it back to them not requiring them to log in to their Binance accounts. And the worse part, they ignore such updates as if they're just like the typical login notifications that we get through our emails and account dashboards. There really are those type of people that don't really verse themselves into updates, I even see people didn't withdraw funds from those closed platforms be it a casino or an exchange and other services despite receiving the notification closure several months away from the actual date.

Addresses don't expire, they just want to use that term so that users will be quick into thinking that this change should be remembered by everyone and it should be taken seriously. There's no negative impact to it but remember that even Binance, centralized exchanges are by no chance of being safe at most times. They've said that if some of these users didn't mind of this update, they won't lose their funds upon sending there but they need to coordinate to them in able for them to get that fund. So, that's another process for them to do and that's why it's gonna force everyone to obey and be obligated of this update. It's not actually a big thing even if they change addresses for the active users.

He didn't specify it so it's up to him and know it on his own if the example that I've given suits the need he wants to have for taking a loan. But I am sure that he's aware that when he takes a loan, there's for sure a collateral that he needs to have and yes, a collateral that should be liquid and not just random collateral that the exchange won't agree. But we know that if someone who wants to take a loan but doesn't have any collateral to give and there's a possibility that he'll just default it. Let's just conclude it to him and to those that are thinking of the same if ever that's the case, that lending in crypto and lending in the bank is not entirely different at all.

For exchanges - yes, they do. Just check out Binance for this: https://www.binance.com/en/loan
All details are already there but this has to be specific borrowing to be used on their own platform and for you to trade into their all types of market. Read the FAQ from there.
OKX has also that loan feature: https://www.okx.com/loan

Aside from that, we've got the Lending section of the forum and there have been reputable people that are allowing people to take loans from them. If you're known and you ask to have a no-collateral loan and they agree, they'll grant you. But for the majority, there should be a collateral that you can place on and it should be more than the value of what you're borrowing.

This is the rat race and that's why we're just like living day to day just to survive and have bare minimum. As long as there's no change, we'd be on this cage forever. Taking a step to change is a good start if you've discovered something that will push you out of 9-5 jobs. You can have some skills that will make you work freely anytime you wish for. We're in the digital and gig economy where it has been possible plus the understanding to Bitcoin and the crypto market.

It's possible but it varies depending on our skills and passion. Don't think that we're doomed for that forever unless you've already accepted your path and that's like to live like that way forever.

I am satisfied with my life for now but that doesn't stop me for wishing and aiming for now.

Ask yourself what's your passion and purpose in life and maybe from there, you'll see some opportunities that would be your ticket to a life changing opportunity. But majority of us already have seen that with Bitcoin but at least for you, there could be something else.

How I wish that my bank will also gives me that incentive.

It's rare to see that a bank is like this. Most of the banks wouldn't care about their customers unless you're a big time depositor, loaner and good payer to them.

It's not guaranteed that even other banks follow the same thing and procedure but, this is a desirable strategy for many banks that we use.

I'll advise you to keep that part time job, since you're still testing how the market will be you've got no assurance through it. You can learn while working with it and that's why whether you've got full time or part time job and you want to sacrifice it, don't do that yet. Or much better that even if you become good in trading as if that's the plan that you're trying to set, still keep on working with those until you're decided that you're leaving for it.

You can be successful in accounting and while you're earning there, try to learn about dollar cost averaging for bitcoin. That's the best thing that you can while working for those two jobs of yours.

Thanks for this tool bitmover. I'll test it now on this post after looking at the mempool.space as the fee sucks again.



After the test: it's a great tool and tells exactly the same thing. If there could be another tool to lessen the fees LOL, as if there's one tool that shall do that but it's for sure that there's none.

I have always been bullish and such analysis like this is certainly giving the positive vibes for everyone that thinks that there's nothing happening in the market lately. And that is because of the price of Bitcoin don't move a lot and instead of moving forward, we get some corrections.
It's real that there are more people that don't want to sell their Bitcoins and want to hold it instead. That is because everyone have learned already on how the market cycle goes, with this, everyone is anticipating a better value for bitcoin in the coming years and even for the upcoming bull run. It's known that many do like to hold even at least 1 BTC but it doesn't stop there and having the word of hyperbitcoinization, he or they can address it depending on what they see in the market. But I like it when he said that it's gonna be a luxury to obtain 1 BTC soon while many are saying that buying it now is expensive.

Sorry of what happened to you but that's the pay that you'll have to do if you do the same mistake of just googling casinos to gamble with. It won't take a lot of time for researching before entrusting them with your money. And with all of those links given by other members on how skethcy they were, that's more than enough that you don't have any chance of getting back your money. IIRC, I've seen them make a bounty before in the forum years ago but didn't know that they're turned to the other side of scamming people.

Good luck in doing that and you might also want to update the thread with this format:

It's not about morality or so. He has to understand that there are jobs and tasks that can really be done at home with certain tools provided by the company. He's aware of the WFH setup and that has been there even before the pandemic triggered. I don't know why he has to make this such a wide discussion and have to make bold statements about vague comparisons. He may be entitled to his own opinion but he's off and entirely wrong with that comparison. If people choose the skillsets that they have which will allow them to work at home, why stop them?
While those people chose the skills that will only be done inside the company's premises through working on site. There's no violation, there's no discrimination with the choice of anyone whether to work at home or to work on site.