What algorithm will you guys be using for the mining purpose? Will user be able to mine on CPU and GPU both?
Hello, please google BOINC (it's a Berkeley project) and you can learn all the details. Sorry but I m not so techy |
|
|
|
Projects releated science good opportinity for researchers but there are a few points that i didn't understand. For example what is te proof of research and how will people use this option as miners. Will it be a new coin or just a platform? And from investors perspective, if they invest to your project how they will earn income?
Hi, we will use the BOINC framework: basically, your CPU will help research projects. |
|
|
|
There is no ideal platform, everywhere there are dissatisfied users. I think that this project will also have some difficulties. Although the prospects for this idea are really good.
I think its very interesting project!!! But interestingly your blockchain will be developed? Our blockchain development is in progress I think that an own blockchain is essential to this kind of project. I hope they don't have too many problems with it once it's launched. I think there maybe minor issues that will arise once the mainnet had been launched but I'm confident in the team's ability to resolve it asap. It's popular now for projects to have their own blockchains, brings additional value to the project. Do you guys plan to launch on your own blockchain straight away or you gonna use some in the beginning and then switch to your own later on? Currentl SNcoin are besed on Ethereum: on Feb, at the time of the official launch, we will switch to our own blockchain |
|
|
|
This is a nice project , i joined your airdrop !! And where are your road map team ?
On Feb 19, our platform will be live |
|
|
|
I seen this tweet: On August 21, we was successful present our projects: Scientificcoin and Healthmonitor at BlockShow Americas. Also, we became winners of BlockShow Oscar. https://twitter.com/scientificcoin/status/1037311784867319809Can anyone explaine me? This 2 projects both from same developers? What with previous project (Healthmonitor)? They finished developed them or this in ICO stage as well? According to information from Icobench rating platform: Health Monitor ICO was end 31st Jan 2018, they raised: $562,680 value of tokens sold in ICO. But why this tokens dont trading at exchanges? I cant see at coinmarketcap? ICO finished a half year ago. How going development? It is probably work in progress. They have a limited amount of funds and probably don't want to pay for high listing fees. But without exchanges tokens dont have any value... When ICO of their first project finished? Does scientific coins have some agreements with exchanges already? It is a security token. Investors are waiting for the company gain some money and distribute the profit. Later exchanges probably will be there. You are right, it is strange that the project HealthMonitor still does not have any listing. I Think that team should have explanation on this issue. I've already explained several times: main investors (98% of the capital) agreed to wait for the listing until the first machines are placed in the market to avoid a dump. |
|
|
|
Really good organized ICO, thanks for devs and designers, It's look like pretty awesome.  we try our best!  |
|
|
|
Are Healthmonitor and Scientificcoin projects are linked to each other?
No, I don't think they are directly linked to each other. Just the team of developers is the same. Otherwise, I think those two are independent projects. So, how will they be able to give their time and efforts to both of the project at the same time? Hi, there are +42 people currently collaborating to Scientific Coin. HM monitor team is smaller... Few people are in both projects |
|
|
|
Projects with pre-developed platforms and / or projects under development will be better used in this downturn period, some projects with open CIUs have not raised enough for development and have not developed enough to continue, becoming a paradox
Indeed, those project that depend too much in the money they can raise to continue with their road map (at least in their first stages) are going to have a hard time to survive. That's right! And that's why I have high hopes for Scientificcoin since they are quite far with their platform development having completed already 60% with their own money. You are right, besides they will make profit at different times from all successful scientific projects that will be placed on their platform. Yes, and the way the Platform will operate gives us the security of a continuous and lasting work, even after ICO, because the demand will require professionalism and commitment of the Team, and the profit that will be made on supported projects will be worth it Yeah, I'm quite optimistic about this project since I understand that all factors of it seems on the right track in terms of its development, funds and community and is steadily gaining recognition over time. I share your optimism. They have a great project which also pays dividend, a great team which beliefs its project and also an oscar which show an outsider admiration for the project. Everything seems great so far. What everybody in the crypto community are waiting is that the crypto market will become bullish which could have a very positive impact on this project. I do hope it will come very soon.  It will happen when the crowd will believe in bull anymore |
|
|
|
There is no ideal platform, everywhere there are dissatisfied users. I think that this project will also have some difficulties. Although the prospects for this idea are really good.
I think its very interesting project!!! But interestingly your blockchain will be developed? Our blockchain development is in progress |
|
|
|
Projects with pre-developed platforms and / or projects under development will be better used in this downturn period, some projects with open CIUs have not raised enough for development and have not developed enough to continue, becoming a paradox
Indeed, those project that depend too much in the money they can raise to continue with their road map (at least in their first stages) are going to have a hard time to survive. That's right! And that's why I have high hopes for Scientificcoin since they are quite far with their platform development having completed already 60% with their own money. You are right, besides they will make profit at different times from all successful scientific projects that will be placed on their platform. Yes, and the way the Platform will operate gives us the security of a continuous and lasting work, even after ICO, because the demand will require professionalism and commitment of the Team, and the profit that will be made on supported projects will be worth it Yeah, I'm quite optimistic about this project since I understand that all factors of it seems on the right track in terms of its development, funds and community and is steadily gaining recognition over time. We are happy that our community shares the same optimism as we have. |
|
|
|
There is no ideal platform, everywhere there are dissatisfied users. I think that this project will also have some difficulties. Although the prospects for this idea are really good.
hard times for brave devs ... :-) I admire devs that have a "can do attitude" and always optimistic. These traits are essential for every successful project. Yeah, best thing for devs is not to moan about the hard time but do their best and focus their efforts on developing their project. I agree. You have to accept that the golden days when you could collect millions of Dollars in a heartbeat are over. You either adapt or you perish. We will see better days for sure, but nowadays even the better projects are going to struggle to get funds. You are right, I think the best crypto days are yet to come - there will be at least one or two inflate bubbles, because really big players have not yet entered in this market. Adaption is steadily growing. Many projects have partners. It is only the regular guys that are missing for mass adaption. In order to reach mass adoption crypto needs to recover some, because nowadays the stateof cryp to market only comes with depression. Hope you're right and better days are really in front of us. Market will recover (one day), but it doesn't mean that coins who lost 90% of value will recover.... Only the basic coins will be restored: Bitcoin, Ethereum, Ripple - the cost of the remaining ICO tokens will be determined by their real progress in fulfilling promises according to the roadmap and demand at exchanges. I'm quite sure about BTC... some doubts about the other two... |
|
|
|
There is no ideal platform, everywhere there are dissatisfied users. I think that this project will also have some difficulties. Although the prospects for this idea are really good.
hard times for brave devs ... :-) I admire devs that have a "can do attitude" and always optimistic. These traits are essential for every successful project. Yeah, best thing for devs is not to moan about the hard time but do their best and focus their efforts on developing their project. I agree. You have to accept that the golden days when you could collect millions of Dollars in a heartbeat are over. You either adapt or you perish. We will see better days for sure, but nowadays even the better projects are going to struggle to get funds. You are right, I think the best crypto days are yet to come - there will be at least one or two inflate bubbles, because really big players have not yet entered in this market. Adaption is steadily growing. Many projects have partners. It is only the regular guys that are missing for mass adaption. In order to reach mass adoption crypto needs to recover some, because nowadays the stateof cryp to market only comes with depression. Hope you're right and better days are really in front of us. Market will recover (one day), but it doesn't mean that coins who lost 90% of value will recover.... |
|
|
|
There is no ideal platform, everywhere there are dissatisfied users. I think that this project will also have some difficulties. Although the prospects for this idea are really good.
hard times for brave devs ... :-) I admire devs that have a "can do attitude" and always optimistic. These traits are essential for every successful project. Yeah, best thing for devs is not to moan about the hard time but do their best and focus their efforts on developing their project. I agree. You have to accept that the golden days when you could collect millions of Dollars in a heartbeat are over. You either adapt or you perish. We will see better days for sure, but nowadays even the better projects are going to struggle to get funds. You need to be a little bit creative and look outside the crypto world (which is, indeed, a little bit small) |
|
|
|
There is no ideal platform, everywhere there are dissatisfied users. I think that this project will also have some difficulties. Although the prospects for this idea are really good.
hard times for brave devs ... :-) |
|
|
|
I've noticed that you have allocated 5 percent of tokens to unforeseen events! So, what do you consider as unforeseen events?
well, a sort of stock options for employees, hiring an advisor, partnerships with universities, etc etc |
|
|
|
Are Healthmonitor and Scientificcoin projects are linked to each other?
Part of the HM dev team is working on Scientific Coin too (which is a much bigger project). HM was a validation for the scientific coin project Are you from the team or a community manager? Really want to thank you for answering every question and being that active. Most of the projects are not acting like this. I'm from the team... helping with community management |
|
|
|
Are Healthmonitor and Scientificcoin projects are linked to each other?
Part of the HM dev team is working on Scientific Coin too (which is a much bigger project). HM was a validation for the scientific coin project What does that mean? Is HM a secondary project and scientificcoin the main project? Both projects have separate budget and investors. Of course, any projects fall into different category in size |
|
|
|
I seen this tweet: On August 21, we was successful present our projects: Scientificcoin and Healthmonitor at BlockShow Americas. Also, we became winners of BlockShow Oscar. https://twitter.com/scientificcoin/status/1037311784867319809Can anyone explaine me? This 2 projects both from same developers? What with previous project (Healthmonitor)? They finished developed them or this in ICO stage as well? According to information from Icobench rating platform: Health Monitor ICO was end 31st Jan 2018, they raised: $562,680 value of tokens sold in ICO. But why this tokens dont trading at exchanges? I cant see at coinmarketcap? ICO finished a half year ago. How going development? It is probably work in progress. They have a limited amount of funds and probably don't want to pay for high listing fees. It was a decision taken with main investors... to wait for HM to generate revenues. Being on exchanges now, would be like sure death If investors are on board with this, then I don't see a problem. If I'm not mistaken you said that there were only big investors, right? You have to do what you have to do in order to survive these times. There are maybe 3-5 smaller investors who put less than 1 ETH each.... |
|
|
|
Are Healthmonitor and Scientificcoin projects are linked to each other?
Part of the HM dev team is working on Scientific Coin too (which is a much bigger project). HM was a validation for the scientific coin project |
|
|
|
I seen this tweet: On August 21, we was successful present our projects: Scientificcoin and Healthmonitor at BlockShow Americas. Also, we became winners of BlockShow Oscar. https://twitter.com/scientificcoin/status/1037311784867319809Can anyone explaine me? This 2 projects both from same developers? What with previous project (Healthmonitor)? They finished developed them or this in ICO stage as well? We are quite a large team... |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
