|
loup
|
 |
September 11, 2018, 08:36:10 PM |
|
Well a certain amount of regulations and procedures is a good thing, it ensures that project and our investments have some kinda a guarantee that they will offer the value for our money.
I agree! The community will be the deciding factor for the future of the project. Some regulations and procedures will make the community more trustworthy about the project. Community support will increase the value of the currency. It is no secret that the community determines the progress of the project in the crypto world, investors are not one of the determinants of success but indeed the big community is more than a supporter and can even become friends. Well, I would argue that investors mean less than having a strong community. If this community doesn't support the the project financially, then the projects won't even be given a chance. So investors are pretty important as well. I agree. Without money, i.e. investors, there probably won't be a project to be supported by the community. Imo many factors determine the success of a project, one of them is of course a supportive community but another enough financial means to develop an excellent product. Of course a good community is needed to maintain the attention in the project but for that a good project with and good community manager is also needed. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Make sure you back up your wallet regularly! Unlike a bank account, nobody can help you if you lose access to your BTC.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
ParRus
|
|
September 11, 2018, 09:14:15 PM |
|
I seen this tweet: On August 21, we was successful present our projects: Scientificcoin and Healthmonitor at BlockShow Americas. Also, we became winners of BlockShow Oscar. https://twitter.com/scientificcoin/status/1037311784867319809Can anyone explaine me? This 2 projects both from same developers? What with previous project (Healthmonitor)? They finished developed them or this in ICO stage as well? According to information from Icobench rating platform: Health Monitor ICO was end 31st Jan 2018, they raised: $562,680 value of tokens sold in ICO. |
|
|
|
|
|
mr.robot8
|
|
September 11, 2018, 09:33:35 PM |
|
I seen this tweet: On August 21, we was successful present our projects: Scientificcoin and Healthmonitor at BlockShow Americas. Also, we became winners of BlockShow Oscar. https://twitter.com/scientificcoin/status/1037311784867319809Can anyone explaine me? This 2 projects both from same developers? What with previous project (Healthmonitor)? They finished developed them or this in ICO stage as well? According to information from Icobench rating platform: Health Monitor ICO was end 31st Jan 2018, they raised: $562,680 value of tokens sold in ICO. it seems to me that they have obtained an excellent result with the first project (health monitor) i think they will have the same excellent result also with scientificcoin because the idea of the project is good and i also believe that is winning |
|
|
|
|
|
loup
|
|
September 11, 2018, 09:55:11 PM |
|
I seen this tweet: On August 21, we was successful present our projects: Scientificcoin and Healthmonitor at BlockShow Americas. Also, we became winners of BlockShow Oscar. https://twitter.com/scientificcoin/status/1037311784867319809Can anyone explaine me? This 2 projects both from same developers? What with previous project (Healthmonitor)? They finished developed them or this in ICO stage as well? According to information from Icobench rating platform: Health Monitor ICO was end 31st Jan 2018, they raised: $562,680 value of tokens sold in ICO. it seems to me that they have obtained an excellent result with the first project (health monitor) i think they will have the same excellent result also with scientificcoin because the idea of the project is good and i also believe that is winning I don't know how much money were they planning to raise during that ICO. In january the market started to fall but I think that amount is not that big for that time frame. |
|
|
|
|
|
belechau
|
|
September 11, 2018, 10:08:37 PM |
|
I seen this tweet: On August 21, we was successful present our projects: Scientificcoin and Healthmonitor at BlockShow Americas. Also, we became winners of BlockShow Oscar. https://twitter.com/scientificcoin/status/1037311784867319809Can anyone explaine me? This 2 projects both from same developers? What with previous project (Healthmonitor)? They finished developed them or this in ICO stage as well? According to information from Icobench rating platform: Health Monitor ICO was end 31st Jan 2018, they raised: $562,680 value of tokens sold in ICO. it seems to me that they have obtained an excellent result with the first project (health monitor) i think they will have the same excellent result also with scientificcoin because the idea of the project is good and i also believe that is winning I don't know how much money were they planning to raise during that ICO. In january the market started to fall but I think that amount is not that big for that time frame. I asked him in the previous section about the possibility of integration of the HealthMonitor project, after all, they are distinct and not complementary projects, each amount collected in each ICO has its right place to be applied, I think, bring those numbers another project can lead us to a conflict of information |
|
|
|
|
|
magisterr
|
|
September 12, 2018, 04:20:31 AM |
|
I seen this tweet: On August 21, we was successful present our projects: Scientificcoin and Healthmonitor at BlockShow Americas. Also, we became winners of BlockShow Oscar. https://twitter.com/scientificcoin/status/1037311784867319809Can anyone explaine me? This 2 projects both from same developers? What with previous project (Healthmonitor)? They finished developed them or this in ICO stage as well? According to information from Icobench rating platform: Health Monitor ICO was end 31st Jan 2018, they raised: $562,680 value of tokens sold in ICO. But why this tokens dont trading at exchanges? I cant see at coinmarketcap? ICO finished a half year ago. How going development? |
|
|
|
|
levyashin
Sr. Member
 Offline
Activity: 980
Merit: 276
$CYBERCASH METAVERSE
|
|
September 12, 2018, 06:06:00 AM |
|
I seen this tweet: On August 21, we was successful present our projects: Scientificcoin and Healthmonitor at BlockShow Americas. Also, we became winners of BlockShow Oscar. https://twitter.com/scientificcoin/status/1037311784867319809Can anyone explaine me? This 2 projects both from same developers? What with previous project (Healthmonitor)? They finished developed them or this in ICO stage as well? According to information from Icobench rating platform: Health Monitor ICO was end 31st Jan 2018, they raised: $562,680 value of tokens sold in ICO. But why this tokens dont trading at exchanges? I cant see at coinmarketcap? ICO finished a half year ago. How going development? It is probably work in progress. They have a limited amount of funds and probably don't want to pay for high listing fees. |
|
|
|
maurobiasolo (OP)
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 602
Merit: 101
http://scientificcoin.com/
|
|
September 12, 2018, 08:47:35 AM |
|
I seen this tweet: On August 21, we was successful present our projects: Scientificcoin and Healthmonitor at BlockShow Americas. Also, we became winners of BlockShow Oscar. https://twitter.com/scientificcoin/status/1037311784867319809Can anyone explaine me? This 2 projects both from same developers? What with previous project (Healthmonitor)? They finished developed them or this in ICO stage as well? According to information from Icobench rating platform: Health Monitor ICO was end 31st Jan 2018, they raised: $562,680 value of tokens sold in ICO. But why this tokens dont trading at exchanges? I cant see at coinmarketcap? ICO finished a half year ago. How going development? It is probably work in progress. They have a limited amount of funds and probably don't want to pay for high listing fees. It was a decision taken with main investors... to wait for HM to generate revenues. Being on exchanges now, would be like sure death |
|
|
|
maurobiasolo (OP)
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 602
Merit: 101
http://scientificcoin.com/
|
|
September 12, 2018, 08:48:38 AM |
|
I seen this tweet: On August 21, we was successful present our projects: Scientificcoin and Healthmonitor at BlockShow Americas. Also, we became winners of BlockShow Oscar. https://twitter.com/scientificcoin/status/1037311784867319809Can anyone explaine me? This 2 projects both from same developers? What with previous project (Healthmonitor)? They finished developed them or this in ICO stage as well? We are quite a large team... |
|
|
|
|
wissy
|
|
September 12, 2018, 09:14:13 AM |
|
I seen this tweet: On August 21, we was successful present our projects: Scientificcoin and Healthmonitor at BlockShow Americas. Also, we became winners of BlockShow Oscar. https://twitter.com/scientificcoin/status/1037311784867319809Can anyone explaine me? This 2 projects both from same developers? What with previous project (Healthmonitor)? They finished developed them or this in ICO stage as well? According to information from Icobench rating platform: Health Monitor ICO was end 31st Jan 2018, they raised: $562,680 value of tokens sold in ICO. But why this tokens dont trading at exchanges? I cant see at coinmarketcap? ICO finished a half year ago. How going development? It is probably work in progress. They have a limited amount of funds and probably don't want to pay for high listing fees. It was a decision taken with main investors... to wait for HM to generate revenues. Being on exchanges now, would be like sure death If investors are on board with this, then I don't see a problem. If I'm not mistaken you said that there were only big investors, right? You have to do what you have to do in order to survive these times. |
|
|
|
|
pynetx
|
|
September 12, 2018, 09:33:21 AM |
|
Are Healthmonitor and Scientificcoin projects are linked to each other?
|
|
|
|
|
levyashin
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 980
Merit: 276
$CYBERCASH METAVERSE
|
|
September 12, 2018, 09:54:00 AM |
|
I seen this tweet: On August 21, we was successful present our projects: Scientificcoin and Healthmonitor at BlockShow Americas. Also, we became winners of BlockShow Oscar. https://twitter.com/scientificcoin/status/1037311784867319809Can anyone explaine me? This 2 projects both from same developers? What with previous project (Healthmonitor)? They finished developed them or this in ICO stage as well? According to information from Icobench rating platform: Health Monitor ICO was end 31st Jan 2018, they raised: $562,680 value of tokens sold in ICO. But why this tokens dont trading at exchanges? I cant see at coinmarketcap? ICO finished a half year ago. How going development? It is probably work in progress. They have a limited amount of funds and probably don't want to pay for high listing fees. It was a decision taken with main investors... to wait for HM to generate revenues. Being on exchanges now, would be like sure death If investors are on board with this, then I don't see a problem. If I'm not mistaken you said that there were only big investors, right? You have to do what you have to do in order to survive these times. Well, i can understand their decision. I would make the same decision either. Exchanges are deathly right now. Nothing survives. |
|
|
|
|
wissy
|
|
September 12, 2018, 10:26:07 AM |
|
Are Healthmonitor and Scientificcoin projects are linked to each other?
No, I don't think they are directly linked to each other. Just the team of developers is the same. Otherwise, I think those two are independent projects. |
|
|
|
maurobiasolo (OP)
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 602
Merit: 101
http://scientificcoin.com/
|
|
September 12, 2018, 10:43:09 AM |
|
Are Healthmonitor and Scientificcoin projects are linked to each other?
Part of the HM dev team is working on Scientific Coin too (which is a much bigger project). HM was a validation for the scientific coin project |
|
|
|
maurobiasolo (OP)
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 602
Merit: 101
http://scientificcoin.com/
|
|
September 12, 2018, 10:43:57 AM |
|
I seen this tweet: On August 21, we was successful present our projects: Scientificcoin and Healthmonitor at BlockShow Americas. Also, we became winners of BlockShow Oscar. https://twitter.com/scientificcoin/status/1037311784867319809Can anyone explaine me? This 2 projects both from same developers? What with previous project (Healthmonitor)? They finished developed them or this in ICO stage as well? According to information from Icobench rating platform: Health Monitor ICO was end 31st Jan 2018, they raised: $562,680 value of tokens sold in ICO. But why this tokens dont trading at exchanges? I cant see at coinmarketcap? ICO finished a half year ago. How going development? It is probably work in progress. They have a limited amount of funds and probably don't want to pay for high listing fees. It was a decision taken with main investors... to wait for HM to generate revenues. Being on exchanges now, would be like sure death If investors are on board with this, then I don't see a problem. If I'm not mistaken you said that there were only big investors, right? You have to do what you have to do in order to survive these times. There are maybe 3-5 smaller investors who put less than 1 ETH each.... |
|
|
|
|
loup
|
|
September 12, 2018, 12:21:14 PM |
|
Are Healthmonitor and Scientificcoin projects are linked to each other?
Part of the HM dev team is working on Scientific Coin too (which is a much bigger project). HM was a validation for the scientific coin project What does that mean? Is HM a secondary project and scientificcoin the main project? |
|
|
|
|
maurobiasolo (OP)
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 602
Merit: 101
http://scientificcoin.com/
|
|
September 12, 2018, 12:30:29 PM |
|
Are Healthmonitor and Scientificcoin projects are linked to each other?
Part of the HM dev team is working on Scientific Coin too (which is a much bigger project). HM was a validation for the scientific coin project What does that mean? Is HM a secondary project and scientificcoin the main project? Both projects have separate budget and investors. Of course, any projects fall into different category in size |
|
|
|
|
the_donald
|
|
September 12, 2018, 12:36:25 PM |
|
Are Healthmonitor and Scientificcoin projects are linked to each other?
Part of the HM dev team is working on Scientific Coin too (which is a much bigger project). HM was a validation for the scientific coin project What does that mean? Is HM a secondary project and scientificcoin the main project? Both projects have separate budget and investors. Of course, any projects fall into different category in size I like the fact that HM is a separate project that is going really well so far. It shows credibility from the team. |
|
|
|
levyashin
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 980
Merit: 276
$CYBERCASH METAVERSE
|
|
September 12, 2018, 01:03:54 PM |
|
Are Healthmonitor and Scientificcoin projects are linked to each other?
Part of the HM dev team is working on Scientific Coin too (which is a much bigger project). HM was a validation for the scientific coin project Are you from the team or a community manager? Really want to thank you for answering every question and being that active. Most of the projects are not acting like this. |
|
|
|
maurobiasolo (OP)
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 602
Merit: 101
http://scientificcoin.com/
|
|
September 12, 2018, 01:33:17 PM |
|
Are Healthmonitor and Scientificcoin projects are linked to each other?
Part of the HM dev team is working on Scientific Coin too (which is a much bigger project). HM was a validation for the scientific coin project Are you from the team or a community manager? Really want to thank you for answering every question and being that active. Most of the projects are not acting like this. I'm from the team... helping with community management |
|
|
|
|
