📡SCIENTIFICCOIN - BlockShow Oscar Winner🎓+ Invest in scientific discoveries 👓

[belechau]

Projects with pre-developed platforms and / or projects under development will be better used in this downturn period, some projects with open CIUs have not raised enough for development and have not developed enough to continue, becoming a paradox

Indeed, those project that depend too much in the money they can raise to continue with their road map (at least in their first stages) are going to have a hard time to survive.

That's right! And that's why I have high hopes for Scientificcoin since they are quite far with their platform development having completed already 60% with their own money.

You are right, besides they will make profit at different times from all successful scientific projects that will be placed on their platform.

Yes, and the way the Platform will operate gives us the security of a continuous and lasting work, even after ICO, because the demand will require professionalism and commitment of the Team, and the profit that will be made on supported projects will be worth it

[maurobiasolo]

Projects with pre-developed platforms and / or projects under development will be better used in this downturn period, some projects with open CIUs have not raised enough for development and have not developed enough to continue, becoming a paradox

Indeed, those project that depend too much in the money they can raise to continue with their road map (at least in their first stages) are going to have a hard time to survive.

That's right! And that's why I have high hopes for Scientificcoin since they are quite far with their platform development having completed already 60% with their own money.

You are right, besides they will make profit at different times from all successful scientific projects that will be placed on their platform.

Yes, and the way the Platform will operate gives us the security of a continuous and lasting work, even after ICO, because the demand will require professionalism and commitment of the Team, and the profit that will be made on supported projects will be worth it

Yeah, I'm quite optimistic about this project since I understand that all factors of it seems on the right track in terms of its development, funds and community and is steadily gaining recognition over time.

We are happy that our community shares the same optimism as we have.

[cevap]

Projects with pre-developed platforms and / or projects under development will be better used in this downturn period, some projects with open CIUs have not raised enough for development and have not developed enough to continue, becoming a paradox

Indeed, those project that depend too much in the money they can raise to continue with their road map (at least in their first stages) are going to have a hard time to survive.

That's right! And that's why I have high hopes for Scientificcoin since they are quite far with their platform development having completed already 60% with their own money.

You are right, besides they will make profit at different times from all successful scientific projects that will be placed on their platform.

Yes, and the way the Platform will operate gives us the security of a continuous and lasting work, even after ICO, because the demand will require professionalism and commitment of the Team, and the profit that will be made on supported projects will be worth it

Yeah, I'm quite optimistic about this project since I understand that all factors of it seems on the right track in terms of its development, funds and community and is steadily gaining recognition over time.

I hope the market situation won't influence the development of scientificcoin much, because that would be a shame. The team seems to be working hard on this one.

[levyashin]

Projects with pre-developed platforms and / or projects under development will be better used in this downturn period, some projects with open CIUs have not raised enough for development and have not developed enough to continue, becoming a paradox

Indeed, those project that depend too much in the money they can raise to continue with their road map (at least in their first stages) are going to have a hard time to survive.

That's right! And that's why I have high hopes for Scientificcoin since they are quite far with their platform development having completed already 60% with their own money.

I love teams with risking their own money. It shows their belief and ambition for the project. There are not many teams showing this kind of attitude for their project.

[sshiddiq67]

Projects with pre-developed platforms and / or projects under development will be better used in this downturn period, some projects with open CIUs have not raised enough for development and have not developed enough to continue, becoming a paradox

Indeed, those project that depend too much in the money they can raise to continue with their road map (at least in their first stages) are going to have a hard time to survive.

That's right! And that's why I have high hopes for Scientificcoin since they are quite far with their platform development having completed already 60% with their own money.

You are right, besides they will make profit at different times from all successful scientific projects that will be placed on their platform.

Yes, and the way the Platform will operate gives us the security of a continuous and lasting work, even after ICO, because the demand will require professionalism and commitment of the Team, and the profit that will be made on supported projects will be worth it

Yeah, I'm quite optimistic about this project since I understand that all factors of it seems on the right track in terms of its development, funds and community and is steadily gaining recognition over time.

I hope that, support from various communities on this platform will provide motivation for team performance and sustainable project development. farmers who grow apples must bear apples that can be sold at reasonable prices.

[levyashin]

Projects with pre-developed platforms and / or projects under development will be better used in this downturn period, some projects with open CIUs have not raised enough for development and have not developed enough to continue, becoming a paradox

Indeed, those project that depend too much in the money they can raise to continue with their road map (at least in their first stages) are going to have a hard time to survive.

That's right! And that's why I have high hopes for Scientificcoin since they are quite far with their platform development having completed already 60% with their own money.

You are right, besides they will make profit at different times from all successful scientific projects that will be placed on their platform.

Yes, and the way the Platform will operate gives us the security of a continuous and lasting work, even after ICO, because the demand will require professionalism and commitment of the Team, and the profit that will be made on supported projects will be worth it

Yeah, I'm quite optimistic about this project since I understand that all factors of it seems on the right track in terms of its development, funds and community and is steadily gaining recognition over time.

I share your optimism. They have a great project which also pays dividend, a great team which beliefs its project and also an oscar which show an outsider admiration for the project. Everything seems great so far.

[maurobiasolo]

There is no ideal platform, everywhere there are dissatisfied users. I think that this project will also have some difficulties. Although the prospects for this idea are really good.

I think its very interesting project!!!

But interestingly your blockchain will be developed?

Our blockchain development is in progress

[maurobiasolo]

Projects with pre-developed platforms and / or projects under development will be better used in this downturn period, some projects with open CIUs have not raised enough for development and have not developed enough to continue, becoming a paradox

Indeed, those project that depend too much in the money they can raise to continue with their road map (at least in their first stages) are going to have a hard time to survive.

That's right! And that's why I have high hopes for Scientificcoin since they are quite far with their platform development having completed already 60% with their own money.

You are right, besides they will make profit at different times from all successful scientific projects that will be placed on their platform.

Yes, and the way the Platform will operate gives us the security of a continuous and lasting work, even after ICO, because the demand will require professionalism and commitment of the Team, and the profit that will be made on supported projects will be worth it

Yeah, I'm quite optimistic about this project since I understand that all factors of it seems on the right track in terms of its development, funds and community and is steadily gaining recognition over time.

I share your optimism. They have a great project which also pays dividend, a great team which beliefs its project and also an oscar which show an outsider admiration for the project. Everything seems great so far.

What everybody in the crypto community are waiting is that the crypto market will become bullish which could have a very positive impact on this project. I do hope it will come very soon.

It will happen when the crowd will believe in bull anymore

[pynetx]

Are Healthmonitor and Scientificcoin projects are linked to each other?

No, I don't think they are directly linked to each other. Just the team of developers is the same. Otherwise, I think those two are independent projects.

So, how will they be able to give their time and efforts to both of the project at the same time?

[maurobiasolo]

Are Healthmonitor and Scientificcoin projects are linked to each other?

No, I don't think they are directly linked to each other. Just the team of developers is the same. Otherwise, I think those two are independent projects.

So, how will they be able to give their time and efforts to both of the project at the same time?

Hi, there are +42 people currently collaborating to Scientific Coin. HM monitor team is smaller...
Few people are in both projects

[loup]

There is no ideal platform, everywhere there are dissatisfied users. I think that this project will also have some difficulties. Although the prospects for this idea are really good.

I think its very interesting project!!!

But interestingly your blockchain will be developed?

Our blockchain development is in progress

I think that an own blockchain is essential to this kind of project. I hope they don't have too many problems with it once it's launched.

[omwibya]

There is no ideal platform, everywhere there are dissatisfied users. I think that this project will also have some difficulties. Although the prospects for this idea are really good.

I think its very interesting project!!!

But interestingly your blockchain will be developed?

Our blockchain development is in progress

I think that an own blockchain is essential to this kind of project. I hope they don't have too many problems with it once it's launched.

Usually projects with their own blockchain are the ones with the highest growth.

[aveon]

There is no ideal platform, everywhere there are dissatisfied users. I think that this project will also have some difficulties. Although the prospects for this idea are really good.

I think its very interesting project!!!

But interestingly your blockchain will be developed?

Our blockchain development is in progress

I think that an own blockchain is essential to this kind of project. I hope they don't have too many problems with it once it's launched.

Usually projects with their own blockchain are the ones with the highest growth.

... or the ones that disappear before others not successful do because their devs did overestimate their potential.

[magisterr]

I seen this tweet:

On August 21, we was successful present our projects: Scientificcoin and Healthmonitor at BlockShow Americas. Also, we became winners of BlockShow Oscar.

https://twitter.com/scientificcoin/status/1037311784867319809

Can anyone explaine me? This 2 projects both from same developers? What with previous project (Healthmonitor)? They finished developed them or this in ICO stage as well?

According to information from Icobench rating platform: Health Monitor ICO was end 31st Jan 2018, they raised: $562,680 value of tokens sold in ICO.

But why this tokens dont trading at exchanges? I cant see at coinmarketcap? ICO finished a half year ago. How going development?

It is probably work in progress. They have a limited amount of funds and probably don't want to pay for high listing fees.

But without exchanges tokens dont have any value... When ICO of their first project finished? Does scientific coins have some agreements with exchanges already?

[Altcoinrusher]

There is no ideal platform, everywhere there are dissatisfied users. I think that this project will also have some difficulties. Although the prospects for this idea are really good.

I think its very interesting project!!!

But interestingly your blockchain will be developed?

Our blockchain development is in progress

I think that an own blockchain is essential to this kind of project. I hope they don't have too many problems with it once it's launched.

I think there maybe minor issues that will arise once the mainnet had been launched but I'm confident in the team's ability to resolve it asap.

[Look Kace]

Hi dev's! Great to hear that we can expect some good news, big hopes I've for this business.This could be some good partnership ann)))

[sargontherockstar]

Really good organized ICO, thanks for devs and designers, It's look like pretty awesome. 

[maurobiasolo]

Really good organized ICO, thanks for devs and designers, It's look like pretty awesome. 

we try our best! 

[rjp55]

I seen this tweet:

On August 21, we was successful present our projects: Scientificcoin and Healthmonitor at BlockShow Americas. Also, we became winners of BlockShow Oscar.

https://twitter.com/scientificcoin/status/1037311784867319809

Can anyone explaine me? This 2 projects both from same developers? What with previous project (Healthmonitor)? They finished developed them or this in ICO stage as well?

According to information from Icobench rating platform: Health Monitor ICO was end 31st Jan 2018, they raised: $562,680 value of tokens sold in ICO.

But why this tokens dont trading at exchanges? I cant see at coinmarketcap? ICO finished a half year ago. How going development?

It is probably work in progress. They have a limited amount of funds and probably don't want to pay for high listing fees.

But without exchanges tokens dont have any value... When ICO of their first project finished? Does scientific coins have some agreements with exchanges already?

I think they want to develop their project more and list after that, i dont think otherwise, what was their soft cap and hard cap ?

btw. bots are here as far as i can see.

[Fgama35]

How is the project roadmap?