The AEVO coin was listed today with an approximate starting price of $3.4. I've acquired 17 coins, so that was a quick $50~ within a couple of days; not too bad. I'll hold them for a few days to see how it performs.

The 49th Launchpool project was also announced today, Ether.fi, will be available for farming in a few hours, 14-03-24 00:00 UTC and will run for four days. It will then be listed on the exchange on 18-03-24 at 12:00 UTC.

Wow, did anyone else notice that some posters with supposedly higher ratings have a higher maximum quota? There are a few users with up to 85 maximum paid posts per week. I remember having a 60 post quota, but it seems they've changed their policy and it now depends on your rating, something that I don't recall seeing a few months ago that I had gone through their announcement thread.


On top of that, the reported user borovichok has a score of over 7.5, deeming him as a good poster, by 3 different individuals.

I'm an anxious person myself. When I first started trading a few years ago, I couldn't handle my emotions; it was an emotional rollercoaster. I managed to make decent returns through it by risking relatively reasonable amounts, ranging from $300 to $700 at a time. Although the returns were more than decent, in most cases at least, I couldn't handle the stress, which was one of the main reasons I stopped, along with worrying too much and spending more time than I should have on top of a screen.

I'm now in better shape in terms of anxiety, but I still refrain from trading. The closest I've come is trading the launchpool tokens, which are basically free money; thus, the anxiety factor is non-existent. With that being said, I couldn't imagine someone with a heart condition on the trading scene. Trading is unfortunately not for everyone, especially those with mental issues and uncontrollable stress, let alone someone with something more serious, like a heart condition. Imagine what could happen if you combined both.

Those who have studied economics may fail to apply what they've learned or prove their worth in a job. Someone in IT who's a website developer or who's into data analysis has solid work that they can show to prove what they're capable of.

@OP, I've been in your position because I've studied economics, and there are many times that I look back and ask myself what I could have done differently. To be honest, I'm not sure what to answer. If I were to choose another sector, I'd choose something more specific than economics, such as logistics, anything in the IT sector, or even a handyman's skill, such as electrician, mechanic, plumber, and so on. I'm positive that you get my point.

Personally, I'm now after a data analysis course, not sure if it interests me enough to dig further, nor am I expecting to find a job through the course. I'm simply trying to broaden my horizons and see if I can excel at something specific that the job market requires.

I'm staking FDUSD and some BNB; unfortunately, I don't have too much BNB, which renders staking a lot less profitable, as rewards are distributed 80% on BNB and only 20% on FDUSD. I've done zero research on this project, and if I were honest, I don't do any kind of research on most of these tokens. I just farm my coins there, hoping for the best. I'm trying not to miss a single one, because when I did, it was with the token Fusionist (ACE). Due to my own boredom and postponing, I staked only during the last one or two days. Reading predictions and analyses wasn't helpful either, because most articles I read weren't too promising.

However, it launched with an extremely high price—over $12, possibly more, but I cannot remember exactly—and lost the opportunity to make over $100 within 5 days. For this reason, I've decided not to miss another project.

I feel like such an idiot! I haven't updated the topic with the latest Binance Launchpool project, AEVO, a decentralized derivatives exchange platform (not sure what that exactly means, but that's what Binance is stating). The AEVO tokens are open for farming for 5 days, and trading will open on Wednesday, March 13th, at 10:00 UTC. Some users on Binance are speculating a starting price of over $2 with the anticipation that it will exceed $3 or even $4 shortly after its launch.

Throwback two projects behind. I had mentioned that I hadn't sold my Pixel tokens yet; well, today I did, as it pumped up to $0.80 per coin, which resulted in an almost $100 profit.

Understandable, the online casinos have severely impacted the attendance at physical ones, thus, you can't bet your watch or smartphone when you're behind a computer; you can sell them though, which isn't too different.

Back to you now, at least you're acknowledging that your approach wasn't the best, your text sounds apologetic and that you've regretted it. I'm guessing became a lesson to not get carried away like that again, because you'll only lose in the process. It's a very unfortunate scenario, I'm imagining that these items sold on casinos just to keep gambling are often gifts from loved ones and it just looks too painful to give away something like that.

I've also heard similar stories, and it's quite frequent to hear such superstitions or about positive energy or auras. I don't believe in the concept of luck either; I believe in the mathematics behind probabilities. Some people argue that I'm too dogmatic for not adhering to such beliefs, but throughout my years I relied on scientific evidence, something that can actually be proven in practice.

And to answer your question, yes, the definition of the word superstition describes what you already said yourself: mental reasoning.

Quoting the definition from the Britannica website

Indeed, this weekend isn't as promising as the previous ones. I'm guessing you meant OFI vs. Kifisia, not Lamia, am I right? I'd consider OFI vs. Kifisia. I suppose it's a nice idea to support the local team, but money is money, and it's likely to end in disappointment. It's quite unclear who's going to win, as both teams share similar performances in the Super League. I'm also leaning towards AEK vs. Lamia for now, and I'll perhaps reconsider OFI, depending on the odds.

Even in cases where you're gambling responsibly, a self-awareness check might be necessary after a trivial loss. I lost a bet on football the previous weekend. It came from a match that I least expected, these are the ones that hurt the most, so I was honestly a little mad, but that's how it goes. We can't always win. I started gathering my thoughts. I was also a bit emotionally distressed due to other issues in my daily life, which, combined with dealing with a loss while being upset because of other issues, isn't the most fruitful combination. Thus, a self-awareness check is necessary, in order to gather and organize your thoughts before you go ahead and do something stupid, such as a gambling frenzy session.

It's all part of the game; you'll make mistakes, no matter how experienced you are. I'm not exactly sure, but I've lost bets due to internet hiccups or simple glitches such as bets not registering or not cashing out on time, which happened to me once on Crash Game. I'm not going to name the platform, though. The worst mistake, however, is not taking risks and avoiding action. I've missed several opportunities at football games in which I didn't participate for stupid reasons such as forgetting to place the bet or giving up after a loss.

I'm not saying that these scanners are 100% accurate, try testing a few more websites on your reported posts, which as I mentioned already, looked AI-written, does mine look like it was written by an AI? Probably not, you can also ask other members. You believe that I want to prove my point but I actually don't. I'd rather be proven wrong and that your posts are actually human written, because it would suck seeing someone lose their spot in their signature campaign and/or in the forum.

Most AI writers have a very specific way of typing—too formal or robotic—using certain expressions and words and some other characteristics. Your posts fit perfectly with what I'm referring to. It seems that you have nothing to say in your defense; if it were just one or two posts, I could possibly claim that it was a false positive, even though they look AI-written; however, Nutildah reported 9, which all fit perfectly into the category I just mentioned, and multiple detectors have shown the same results, so it's not my, his, her, or someone else's opinion.

I don't think we should expect much when the maximum quota is at 60 posts, and you're receiving a 20% bonus on each post made on the gambling board. The gambling board is flooded with nonsense. It's extremely common to see replies that have nothing to do with the subject of the topic!

I don't doubt that there are participants who create decent posts, but there's a large number of them who're after the maximum they can receive. I'm not going to jump into assumptions to judge their financial situation, and I'm referring to users from third-world countries, but I'm going to remain to the statement that you cannot write constructive and contributing posts when you're after such a quota. I personally couldn't imagine myself writing so many posts and remain on-point; I'd have to spend all day on the forum and still, I would either run out of subjects or a large number of my posts would be of substandard quality.
I think it would be better to own up your mistake and move on, and perhaps, you'd be forgiven by your campaign manager, community or whoever else. The deleted posts were 100% written by an AI software, I can distinguish if it's written by AI without even checking it with any kind of scanner. Most of the times I'm on point, I've reported a handful of users in the past and can now recognize them with decent accuracy. You've been caught, and this isn't the first time either. You don't seem to be learning from your mistakes.

Unfortunately, with the advance of technology and online casinos, it has become quite common in our society. I personally haven't witnessed such a case myself, but I have heard similar ones from acquaintances and, of course, on local news internet pages. However, I've seen quite a few people my age being addicted, gambling great amounts of money till they basically go broke—no exaggeration, without a care in the world. All they care about is how to obtain money and from whom they're going to borrow or have money sent to them (such as their parents) in order to gamble again.

Even in such cases, the victim isn't only the gambler himself; it's their friends and their family as well. Imagine doing that when you have a partner or a family of your own.

I've never been to a physical casino, and I'm not planning to, but I'm dumbfounded that people actually do this. Has anyone witnessed himself seeing someone trying to sell their watches, phones, or other gadgets they're using just to continue gambling after already losing a large sum of money? I believed that it only happened in the movies; that's the only place I've seen it, but I hadn't realized that this is probably something that isn't unusual in the real world. I didn't see many replies claiming to have witnessed it, so that at least makes me a little more optimistic that it's not happening too frequently. However, it's not too different from selling your personal belongings in order to acquire money to gamble., which unfortunately is a common behavior addicts engage in.

I don't understand how your reply is relevant to my post or to the thread itself. The topic of this thread is regarding dealing with market volatility when using valuable coins such as Bitcoin or Ethereum.
Well, we've all made mistakes, especially when starting out, and we occasionally still do, it's inevitable. Gambling's nature isn't really predictable either. We keep seeing posts claiming that they're in for the entertainment. Even though I personally believe that the most important aspect is entertainment, gambling without the money making aspect cannot be considered gambling, and no one would be interested in it without it.

Wow, Panathinaikos vs. Olympiakos, the eternal rivals of the Greek Super League; it'll be a hell of a match, and certainly one I'm going to stay neutral for my own sake. I'm more confident that Olympiakos is going to win, but I'd rather not take any sides. AEK vs. Lamia looks like a safe bet. I'd also consider going for PAOK vs. Aris, supporting PAOK, but they're both great-performing teams, and the outcome can hardly be predictable.

What's your take regarding OFI vs. Kifisia? Both have had decent performances in the past few matches. I'm more optimistic about OFI, but it sounds like a risky option if you ask me. This weekend doesn't look as fruitful as the previous ones.

We're not anticipating thousands or millions of dollars worth of rewards when gambling on other games, which is why our chances are considerably better. Moreover, most gambling games have very specific outcomes (see roulette, dice, football betting, and so on), while the lottery is composed of numerous tickets with only a few actually winning anything of value. Add the low purchase cost and the large audience you mentioned, and your chances are statistically close to zero.

Personally, I'd rather use that money towards something else; these insignificant amounts we're discussing now can easily add up to reasonable amounts that could be used elsewhere.

I'm not sure if upset is the right word here, but we had plenty of time and opportunities to acquire more Bitcoin. The bear market lasted quite long, with prices even below $20,000 that lasted months. Opportunities were endless, but unfortunately, I wasn't in the best situation to purchase and stuck to signature campaign earnings. I guess you're right about my approach; the truth is that with an average purchase price of $29,000, I've more than doubled my money and will possibly even triple it in the near future.

The only thing I'm missing is earning more than 3 mBTC per week. Due to the lower value, accumulation was a lot faster than it is now, but that's okay.