Currently 3x1070 with OC makes 5000 coins per day (suprnova) - it's less profitable than zcash
Suprnova estimates are wrong, you are going to make less than that.
|
|
|
people are pretty anal about getting 'hijacked' - using still Windows as a miner OS, usually ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) they should really move to linux on USB stick then, long time ago... (e.g. KopiemTu ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) ) Linux is more targeted and easier (because they can look in sources) to hijack, just you do not know that you were hijacked, because you need specialistic knowdlege to trace hacker in your system and trust me it is not easy task untrue. having the sources means that the whole world can fix vulnerabilities. and guess what? they do.
|
|
|
Linux, always making things slower. HAha ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) that's because they do windows first, as it's the most difficult to do ;-) jokes aside, thanks god we've got (OS) choice.
|
|
|
I've updated it to 128, it'll be active at the next scheduled restart of the stratum (in about 5h)
Thanks! And the daemon is slow because diff adjust is too smooth, hence block time can descrease sensibly for long periods of time.
|
|
|
In order to lower server load, may I suggest higher initial diff? 64 is way too low, I'd use 256 or more.
64 is only the initial diff and it's usually ramping up pretty fast after the first 15 seconds, so that isn't a big problem. The main load is done by the daemon itself, not the stratum here surprisingly. (mem leak ?) on initial connect, and on a stratum disconnect, it may hang and send tons of stale shares, then the worker gets banned, rinse and repeat. please at least 128 :-) the daemon is heavier than usual and I think this is due to the minichain (additional work for every block received, and block time is pretty low).
|
|
|
In order to lower server load, may I suggest higher initial diff? 64 is way too low, I'd use 256 or more.
|
|
|
980 Ti could easily reach 400 Sol, but we are not developing it for 980 Ti, rather pascal cards and mid range maxwell2.0, so there may not be optimal ratio of resource usage.
I have some 980 Ti, I can help you with tuning.
|
|
|
maybe we should try to mine less for some days. until the bittrex wallet is updated, it's better to stay below block height 630000.
|
|
|
what is best pool for mining xcn?
there is only one pool actually, and that is suprnova, but you can try to solo mine with this even with a single rig, since the net hash is not very big there is (was?) xcn.1gh.com too.
|
|
|
To download the new blocks to 1.3.2, but the rewards 0
It is zero until block 629000. We had to do this in order to avoid forks. I know that you meant block 630000. It is now Block 629256; 744 blocks to go. Expecting today's total block count to be more than 200 blocks, the magic block number should be reached within 2-4 days. Thank everyone for the good jobs. ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fc-cex.com%2Fi%2Fs%2F9.gif&t=663&c=alJwuhUOXWaYcg) ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) True it's 630000 :-) How could I get it wrong LoL
|
|
|
so sp you destroyed the coin basically now nethash is 10G(now 8G), even at 30MH it has the same profit at zcash, at 36MH with the pallas miner would be slightly above zcash, not worht it anymore
It's not sp_'s fault. Blame his customers ;-)
|
|
|
To download the new blocks to 1.3.2, but the rewards 0
It is zero until block 629000. We had to do this in order to avoid forks.
|
|
|
36 Mh/s @ 125W, almost 40 @ 200W why is it here? one or two cards?
One card, private, not for sale.
|
|
|
sync and solo ok. i wonder what's that crap in cryptoid 1.3.2 nodes info: addnode= 127.0.0.1addnode=2gnctntasm2ndmlb.onion addnode=fqkbs7d6bxqv2sgs.onion They are probably messing with tor nodes.
|
|
|
Why this topic? Because I took the old djm34 miner and made it compatible with cuda 8, improved and optimised it. Speed is up to 18 Mh/s on 1070.
|
|
|
I've just notified bittrex about the new wallet. I know that the windows and Mac wallets are ready, is the OP updated?
|
|
|
36 Mh/s @ 125W, almost 40 @ 200W
Do you want to sell this private miner? No, sorry. If I sold to everyone who asked, I'd have killed the profit in a couple days.
|
|
|
Also i am half tempted to grab sp private miner he offered . but its still 30% ish slower than pallas's private one .
30%? Try 100%. were you able to increase it even further, like 40ish? 36 Mh/s @ 125W, almost 40 @ 200W
|
|
|
Also i am half tempted to grab sp private miner he offered . but its still 30% ish slower than pallas's private one .
30%? Try 100%.
|
|
|
But for the rest who can't program, my modded miner is the fastest on windows. 40% faster than djm34's version on the 750ti.
I remember back in the days that the opensource m7 miner by Catia did 5 Mh/s on the 750ti (the only maxwell card which was available).
|
|
|
|