Bitcoin Forum
June 15, 2024, 10:21:57 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 [114] 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 ... 570 »
2261  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: [POLL] Possible scaling compromise: BIP 141 + BIP 102 (Segwit + 2MB) on: March 07, 2017, 08:44:34 PM
Code them up together, but allow each component to be activated *separately* thus allowing clients to choose which component they wish to support... I suspect support for BIP102 will be a lot higher now (yes I know about quadratic scaling issue.)
2262  Bitcoin / Mining / Re: Mining on VPS on: March 07, 2017, 01:35:04 PM
This topic's been done to death, nothing but sigspam haven now so I'm locking it.
2263  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: My payouts for KANO pool are different from what I actually receive in my wallet on: March 07, 2017, 06:57:41 AM
Please use the support thread
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=789369.0
/locked
2264  Bitcoin / Mining support / Re: bash: ./bfgminer-o: no such file or directory on: March 07, 2017, 06:56:18 AM
Hint: Space before -o

Use the support thread please:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=877081.0

/locked
2265  Bitcoin / Mining support / Re: Im a noob Im using slush pool and my workers are off or disabled how to fix??? on: March 07, 2017, 06:55:22 AM
There's a good chance you're not aware that your computer doesn't do the mining; you need ASIC MINING HARDWARE to mine bitcoin.

Slush support thread if you are actually mining, please use it:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1976.0

/locked
2266  Other / Archival / Re: Mining pools list on: March 06, 2017, 12:56:00 PM
Until I can figure which column to remove to fit in a new one, I've pasted in the OP pie charts which label pools and preferences (from coin.dance).
Thanks... ironically you left out the graph for segwit blocks. Freudian? Smiley
2267  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Egad. 81,000 + Transactions Unconfirmed. Again. Ugh! on: March 05, 2017, 10:25:03 AM
Ok, i should wait for ~ck to show his evidence that other pools were also including these tx's.

Just go to a page of transactions to the same address at an earlier time since ALL those transactions are from the same block you're looking at. eg.
https://blockchain.info/tx/cbc7997a133b606c77831b6898ad05b256e9329f3cb553355d2b544e689e4e83
Mined by BTCC
2268  Bitcoin / Mining software (miners) / Re: CKPOOL - Open source pool/database/proxy/passthrough/library in c for Linux on: March 05, 2017, 09:33:24 AM
Tried to set up ckproxy on a Raspberry Pi. Threw these errors while making

Code:
stratifier.c: In function ‘read_userstats’:
stratifier.c:5126:2: warning: passing argument 1 of ‘json_get_int64’ from incompatible pointer type [enabled by default]
ckpool.h:371:6: note: expected ‘int64_t *’ but argument is of type ‘__time_t *’
stratifier.c: In function ‘read_workerstats’:
stratifier.c:5179:2: warning: passing argument 1 of ‘json_get_int64’ from incompatible pointer type [enabled by default]
ckpool.h:371:6: note: expected ‘int64_t *’ but argument is of type ‘__time_t *’
stratifier.c: In function ‘read_poolstats’:
stratifier.c:8487:2: warning: passing argument 1 of ‘json_get_int64’ from incompatible pointer type [enabled by default]
ckpool.h:371:6: note: expected ‘int64_t *’ but argument is of type ‘__time_t *’

ckpool/proxy is 64bit only. Did you compile it on a 32 bit environment?
2269  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Egad. 81,000 + Transactions Unconfirmed. Again. Ugh! on: March 05, 2017, 02:17:53 AM
All tx paying 0.0001btc fee,
All are straight into a block - no waiting, (are they even in the mempool numbers?)
All blocks found by bitfury.
There's a good chance they were lingering for a very long time before being mined by bitfury. Just because they're not seen elsewhere doesn't mean they were just sent that instant. Many nodes will simply not have had the transaction in their mempool but they could have even been sent a week ago. While most nodes tends to have the same high fee transactions in their mempool, when the network is busy the lower fee transactions visible on each node are wildly different.

There must be at least an equally good chance they were not lingering in the mempool.
This clearly needs further investigation.

Funny if they are all shown to be in bitfury blocks, unseen by other nodes. (queue jumping)
I haven't got time tonight, maybe you, or someone else will look properly?

No worries, it's all on the blockchain.

Definitely looking into it... I see other pools have mined transactions to the same address; only the ones that were mined on the same block coincided with the same pool (obviously.)
2270  Other / Archival / Re: Mining pools list on: March 05, 2017, 01:34:42 AM
This is hardly the place to argue your opinion. I'm simply asking OOC to list what the pool supports. The terminology is up to him, I don't care what you call it, legacy or whatever you want... "current" maybe?
2271  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Egad. 81,000 + Transactions Unconfirmed. Again. Ugh! on: March 04, 2017, 11:43:05 PM
All tx paying 0.0001btc fee,
All are straight into a block - no waiting, (are they even in the mempool numbers?)
All blocks found by bitfury.
There's a good chance they were lingering for a very long time before being mined by bitfury. Just because they're not seen elsewhere doesn't mean they were just sent that instant. Many nodes will simply not have had the transaction in their mempool but they could have even been sent a week ago. While most nodes tends to have the same high fee transactions in their mempool, when the network is busy the lower fee transactions visible on each node are wildly different.
2272  Other / Archival / Re: Mining pools list on: March 04, 2017, 10:17:10 PM
OOC, given the block size debate is currently an issue, would it be too much to ask to signify what pools are running? legacy, segwit, BU or miner's choice?

Sure, is there an already existing list available that I can add to the tables?
Not as far as I know, but I think the following is what I see from signalling (of the public pools):

Segwit: BTCC, Bitcoin India, Bitclub Network, Solo ckpool, Bitminter
BU: btc.top, bitcoin.com, gbminers, ViaBTC
Option: Slush
Legacy: Everyone else?


EDIT: Check here:
https://coin.dance/blocks
2273  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [14000Th] Eligius: 0% Fee BTC, 105% PPS NMC, No registration, CPPSRB on: March 03, 2017, 09:40:27 PM
Finally got the block.   Cheesy
I was just perusing which pools are signalling segwit yet and notice this one is still not signalling segwit (though I recall you saying something about doing it at some stage in the future?) And it's an empty block despite being almost 2 minutes after the previous block D:
2274  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [∞ YH] solo.ckpool.org 1% fee solo mining USA/DE servers 228 blocks solved! on: March 03, 2017, 02:16:22 PM
Does solo.ckpool work with usb asic with 8 suggested difficulty ?
An Antminer R1 is running with diff 4 on solo pool
Nice to know that
But when i connect it shows diff 4000

--suggest-diff 8

It will switch to 8 as soon as it can with that. Otherwise, just wait and eventually the diff will adjust down anyway.
2275  Bitcoin / Mining / Re: [Question] What hash rate am I going to get with 1 x GTX 950 on: March 03, 2017, 02:06:59 PM
Mining bitcoin with GPUs is not remotely fun these days and hasn't been for many years. You'll probably get about 500 megahash, though there is no point even finding out exactly... which will earn you nothing but cost you heaps in electricity and heat strain/wear on your GPU. Bear in mind an average ASIC miner on sale today starts at 6 terrahash; that's 12 thousand times faster than your GPU for about double the power consumption of your GPU.
2276  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Pools (Altcoins) / Re: What happened with Ypool . on: March 02, 2017, 07:50:03 AM
I've never heard of them, which is a bad sign in the first place.
2277  Bitcoin / Mining support / Re: Cointerra Terraminer IV CTA 1 ALIVE but not hashing on: March 01, 2017, 06:06:14 AM
I am having the exact same issue. Did you ever figure out a solution?
These devices had a very high failure rate with time and considering you're responding to a post that is almost 2 years old, I would say the answer is no. Mine died completely within a few months.
2278  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Bitcoin Node CPU Spikes on: March 01, 2017, 05:38:15 AM
You're on linux so bring up 'top' while it's happening, press H to enable thread mode, and see what thread(s) is/are consuming CPU at the time. The bitcoin daemon has lots of threads that are named so you may be able to track which particular thread is consuming CPU and hence figure out what it's doing.
2279  Bitcoin / Mining support / Re: My % to payout stopped increasing with block completions on: March 01, 2017, 01:06:21 AM
I suggest you put your post in the support thread for whichever pool you mine at instead of listing details that mean nothing by themselves.
2280  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: new antpool payout types PPS+, PPLNS+, PPS -3 on: February 28, 2017, 08:26:59 PM
Please use the antpool thread:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=855548.0
Pages: « 1 ... 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 [114] 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 ... 570 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!