|
Your topic says "Bitcoin mining" and then you ask about Monero? News flash: Monero ain't bitcoin.
|
|
|
|
Not yet, but I want to buy, it cost $30-40 on ebay $30-$40 too much. |
|
|
|
fuck bitmain. Thousands have lost money because of them. We certainly know they will never do anything to fix this mess. We are just trying to find any way to recover investment. .
I believe that nearly all D3 owners will pay for multialgo miner willingly.
Most people say this is ( adding more algo to D3) impossible. I just need to hear this from a professional
As I've already said, I don't know anything about other algorithms and am not interested in working on anything besides bitcoin I'm afraid. |
|
|
|
I've tried multiple orders on 3334 and 3333 and it's always stuck at 4000 diff  Perhaps there is a way to add another port with a higher diff for the hashpower Not possible without restarting the pool. I can add a custom proxy port but that will lose your workernames and combine them all into one username only. Will that suffice? |
|
|
|
...Or start with a small order and increase it.
Last time I tried that, it made it worse. They even use that stupid ass ratio with a 25TH order  Every time I see this issue reported on multiple threads, it's a different minimum diff as well so there's no consistency here. Does this mean no one is currently renting here any more? |
|
|
|
I'm receiving pool check verification fail with nicehash on port 3333 and 3334
Any help?
Received mining.set_difficulty... Pool difficulty too low (provided=4000, minimum=65532)
Waiting for pool to send higher difficulty.
Received mining.notify work... OK
Received mining.set_difficulty... Pool difficulty too low (provided=4000, minimum=65532)
Waiting for pool to send higher difficulty.
Received authorization result... OK
Error: Read timed out
Keep trying. Stupid nicehash if it idles for a bit changes what it considers the minimum difficulty. Cancelling and starting a new order or pausing it may fix it. Or start with a small order and increase it. |
|
|
|
can I mine with nicehash on here?
This is the ckpool SOFTWARE thread. You want the ckpool.org or solo.ckpool.org mining pool thread and the answer is yes. |
|
|
|
|
These are ancient asic technology by today's standards and woefully inefficient. They'll cost you 10x more to run than they mine. Salvage the cubieboards, power supplies and cables and toss the rest.
|
|
|
|
Hi friends
I m not sure that I am at the right place but could you please confirm that
this thread belongs to the cgminer which is used for D3 Antminer units of Bitmain ?
if so , We ( thousands of people ) are in trouble with this shitty units, because of low profitability, we also looking for a solution to additional algorithms via firmware update .
Could you share your professional toughts regarding if adding algo's to D3 is possible or not ?
There is another thread about that , also an change.org campaign still ongoing
Bitmain and anything not bitcoin has nothing to do with me. Go seek help from those morons. |
|
|
|
|
Lightening is when the head engages during pregnancy, positioning the baby lower and relieving the pressure on the lower rib cage. It usually happens around week 36.
But I guess you mean the lightning network. You know, as in thunder and lightning. Not sure why everyone misspells this.
|
|
|
|
I´m talking about buying Mining Pools from Biggest Mining companies.
Where? No mining pool is for sale? I think you're confusing cloud mining and pools. |
|
|
|
Nice work and very good first post  |
|
|
|
Aww  Well good luck to them, they needed one too. The reward's still hefty at 18ish. |
|
|
|
Not orphan. Invalid. 2017-11-11 04:31:23 CreateNewBlock(): total size: 1089769 block weight: 3996706 txs: 2844 fees: 416742649 sigops 26195
2017-11-11 04:31:35 ERROR: AcceptBlock: bad-blk-weight, ContextualCheckBlock : weight limit failed (code 16)
2017-11-11 04:31:35 ERROR: ProcessNewBlock: AcceptBlock FAILED
2017-11-11 04:31:35 ERROR: AcceptBlockHeader: block 00000000000000000093cc2a72c8ae2db421fb2316145ceba3f951b3296fc741 is marked invalid
2017-11-11 04:31:35 ERROR: ProcessNewBlock: AcceptBlock FAILED
My guess at this point is that p2pool is not correctly calculating the weight of the coinbase transaction, and needs to remove a few more transactions from the block template. As a temporary workaround, I suggest adding this to ~/bitcoin/bitcoin.conf: I'll look into what actually went wrong and try to get a full fix this weekend. It's possible that this bug affects mainnet as well. When your generation transaction is factored in, your block size is too large. |
|
|
|
The genious of Satoshi is at work again...assuming that all the greedy powerful mining conglomerates leave BTC, then the levels of hashing difficulty will come way down - hence people with a decent home computers may have a shot at mining again. Wouldn't that ease off the bitcoin traffic jammed and release the demand for bigger side blockchain ? do I miss something here ?
Yes you're missing a lot. For mining to be possible with ordinary computers again, the difficulty needs to drop a trillion fold. Mining difficulty rises fast but drops very very slowly. If ASIC miners all jumped ship now and only PCs were left mining, it would take over a hundred years for it to correct back to PC levels. |
|
|
|
I've never seen the reward so high...
"reward": 25.466,
It seems to be stuck on that number  Edit: or was stuck on 25.46601 for a number of blocks, now it's 25.49952295  ck chucking in a bonus? Nope, I've checked the work the bitcoin daemon is providing and it's definitely showing up to 13 btc in transaction fees. It seems I've picked up some transactions that haven't yet been mined that are worth quite a lot. There are consistently over 4000 transactions in the work and some of those transactions seem to be quite old. The spam filtering on mine works different to the regular bitcoin daemon so perhaps that's how those transactions got overlooked. |
|
|
|
|
READ THE WEBSITE LINKED PLEASE.
It says nothing about segwit2x, it's about a service that sounds like it and is a forked WEBSITE and says nothing about forking bitcoin. Why does everyone just get on the bandwagon and say the same things all over again.
|
|
|
|
Ever think about asking in their thread? It's located in the software section...
Please do this. Locked. |
|
|
|
Yes fine.
Thank you ck. I've pointed my small fleet at your pool. Huzzah! [/quote] Welcome aboard! Let's smash this one out. |
|
|
|
|
End game for the fork which could have destroyed bitcoin if they went ahead with it now. Everyone get back to work now. Unstickying this thread. Nothing left to say about it with regards to mining.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
