Не совсем понятно для чего изначально было делать настолько долгим время разделегации монет, ведь явно за это время с ценой актива может случиться что угодно. На мой взгляд идеальным вариантом является разделегация монет по истечении текущей эпохи, в случае с Polkadot, текущей эры. В противном случае стейкинг действительно становится очень рискованным.

I can't find the information about the fees charged by coinbase to transfer money to other platforms. Does anyone know the best way to transfer USDT from coinbase to Bitget? And which network should I use? And what fees would I be charged?

On the other hand, if I click on send/receive it doesn't let me choose the network...it just gives me the option to copy the address and that's it....

In my country (Germany) it is not legal to do business with children in the age 0 to 18.

From 0 to 7 it is forbidden, and from 7 to 18 there are some minor differences, But overall and away from everyday life things, in Germany it is not allowed to sell children (age 11, 12, 13) and young people (age 14, 15) bigger things. For example, if I want to sell a television set to a 13 years old person, it is not allowed and I have to give back the money the 13 years old was paying me for the TV set.

In the case a 13 year old is selling me something with Bitcoin, it is easy to handle. I get the TV set back (from my example) back, and I have to pay back the Bitcoin or the money therefor (at the market price).

But my question or my reason to discuss:

If a 13 year old children is mining BTC this is not allowed in Germany. The question of the hour is, not just for Bitcoin - for all POW coins: How to protect chuldren from mining coins? Is there a statistic about how many coins (BTC) were mined by children or persons under 18 years? And how to compensate this unlawful behavior?

Is there a mining protection for children on the Bitcoin core?

SEC is a hypocrite. Why don't they start with the USDT (or USDC) first and then sue BUSD? The answer is, they don't want competition. It is OK when Binance issuing USDT like a mad man and when somebody else does it oh no suddenly it is the end of the world. Shutting BUSD would potentially harm binance and if binance gets harmed every other US crypto exchange will benefit from it.

Вот как зайдёт шалун, как выкупит стакан, как не оставит хомячью не сатошика)
Господи, какое же фомоёбство.
Пусть выкупит уже весь стакан, даст возможность разрабам об него разгрузиться.

Я так понимаю что теперь разлок полки будет происходить за сутки, вернее вообще сразу?

Астар хоть и вырос, но вообще парачейны сейчас конечно в полнейшей заднице, особенно у кусамы дела плохи... Кстати, хоть один парачейн полки принёс что-то реально полезное для экосистемы?

Do you think they don't check the source of the funds? They do, as well as the banks involved in both sides (since it's also their job).
Do you think Kraken doesn't do that while it has a Money Business registration.
Why do you think they all have paragraphs about AML on their ToS,

Is it a surprising news to you? If yes, then you were probably living under the rock. Slowly every nation will make rules to ban anonymous payment or privacy coins. It's just a matter of time. Anonymity is the biggest headache for the governments and this is effectively delaying the crypto adoption of many governments.

Dubai is usually known for their lenient rules and regulations. But when they are emphasizing on registering the crypto companies, they might have a plan for them. Let's just hope that the plan is favorable for the crypto market.

The article does not mention AML anywhere, it is only about the fact that the rules regarding the registration of crypto companies in France should be tightened. Laws on money laundering are already mandatory throughout the EU, only some member states do not implement them in full, but allow transactions of a certain value to be made without KYC.

Every serious business person respects the law and pays taxes, and I don't see any problem there for anyone, not even for ordinary people who legally trade with cryptocurrencies. Besides, why sell something at all if you can use it as currency - maybe not in France, but you can take your digital assets with you anywhere - go live in El Salvador or on an exotic trip to Boracay where no one will ask you about the origin of what you pay with.

Why would hodlers have problems?
Nobody knows that you're a hodler until you tell them about it. Even if you tell someone there's no way to prove it, unless that person also knows how you got your coins or you paid for it by sending money from your bank account to a centralized exchange.

Then what happens if they told people and there's AML rules?
Again nothing. AML regulation is not a ban. They can't ban bitcoin because they're a member of the EU the EU already has laws regarding it. Bitcoin companies like ATM operators are already a part of EU AML procedures.