2x R7 370
zcashclient-0.2.2
Getting this with silentarmy
found platform[0] name = 'AMD Accelerated Parallel Processing'
<info> found 2 devices
Using device 0 as GPU 0
Using device 1 as GPU 1
[GPU 0] T=-1C A=-1% sols=6.492
[GPU 1] T=-1C A=-1% sols=12.390
[GPU 2] T=-1C A=-1% sols=6.288
[GPU 3] T=-1C A=-1% sols=10.644
GPU 0: core=-1MHz mem=-1MHz powertune=-1 fanspeed=-1
GPU 1: core=-1MHz mem=-1MHz powertune=-1 fanspeed=-1
Where is another GPU getting from?)
CPU can support opencl as well. |
|
|
|
|
terminate called after throwing an instance of 'config4cpp::ConfigurationException'
Aborted (core dumped)
server = "xpmforall.org";
port = "6666";
address = "AMgtSW8ge2mvqxaiWo11GqTKx6rQ2J57yA";
latest from git.
|
|
|
|
ZCASH FOR CUDA--
I downloaded the Windows binaries from the NiceHash GitHub repo, they work fine with my 980ti and i7 CPU. However, after following the trivial steps to build nheqminer on Linux, and making sure to checkout the latest commit, I find that there is no CUDA support in the resulting executable file. It will mine only on the CPU.
Perhaps I am missing a "make" flag? I think the build instructions were for the "release" version. The latest "pre-release" version has the CUDA support for GPUs. Any help here? My CUDA cards may be better off on Zcash than ETH. --scryptr
I think the sources do not include cuda support. I suspect they can't/don't want to let people modify the cuda code to make the miner faster. |
|
|
|
|
the new cuda zcash miner is there, but what about the sources? both github and the provided tarball do not seem to include them.
|
|
|
|
|
Burning or not burning, it will not affect ESP2, unless the not-swapped is swapped by the team, which AFAIK is not going to happen.
So please everybody recalibrate all your thought and views.
|
|
|
|
ASICs actually ARE good from a network security standpoint. But that's neither here nor there - most people can take the time to learn how to utilize AWS, don't blame others for your laziness.
The thing that gets lost in all of this is mining SHOULD be hard, it's not easy to mine gold, why should crypto mining be the same? To me the more difficult to accomplish such a task, the more value it gives to it. I work hard at my dayjob to accumulate extra funds to buy crypto, likewise why shouldn't a miner have to put in a little work to get their share as well? If it's too easy, everybody will do it and it will be devalued. That's how everything works: a balance is always found, given enough time. |
|
|
|
|
original link of that miner please?
|
|
|
|
|
Since we want to let the old chain die, there is no sense in using unswapped coins. You probably can't even sell them all, and the price will be very low.
I'd burn them, so they can't call scam.
|
|
|
|
Doesn't this fork support setting custom intensity with -i command?
No, sorry. But best intensities are selected automatically for 970, 980Ti, 1070 and 1080. The remaining cards are set as if they had 2GB of ram. |
|
|
|
Please make the new addresses incompatible with the old ones.
I'd love to hear your arguments for that. J.V. To avoid confusion and lost coins. I.e. people sending vlt1 to a vlt2 address or vice versa. |
|
|
|
|
Please make the new addresses incompatible with the old ones.
|
|
|
|
So - does anyone have a working Windows wallet of XCN yet? Meaning one that can sync?
Did you try downloading a chain snapshot? Please advise how to do that? See the last pages of the xcn official thread. |
|
|
|
So - does anyone have a working Windows wallet of XCN yet? Meaning one that can sync?
Did you try downloading a chain snapshot? |
|
|
|
|
maybe you should rephrase it, doesn't make a lot of sense: "look ON the drops, we share, ....."
|
|
|
|
Well thinking about one thing. If one will have dual cpu xeon server with say 32gb ram, could it be used to create own virtual cloud to mine zcoin?
I have a dedicate server dual xeon 12 core(24 threads) with 32GB ram and I also mined this pool suprnova but it's not good . Ocminer is new as pool operators. give hime some time to learn how to not be ddos Really? :-D I don't think so. He's been running pools for years. And if you know how a ddos works, you understand that there are no countermeasure that always works. |
|
|
|
|
I love how crypto selects people.
|
|
|
|
|
addnode 104.237.0.79
addnode 120.27.116.34
addnode 1.204.240.210
addnode 144.76.237.39
addnode 173.24.153.52
addnode 198.245.50.213
addnode 5.157.115.132
addnode 5.189.187.91
addnode 59.94.139.124
addnode 73.52.48.254
addnode 78.70.227.24
addnode 79.129.152.17
addnode 85.145.32.75
addnode 86.138.185.154
addnode 87.148.190.218
addnode 89.235.159.60
addnode 93.228.78.14
addnode 95.42.230.127
|
|
|
|
Looks like ocminer doesn't care about his pool since 2 days already confirmed blocks and transactions are still marked as unconfirmed etc.
No reaction to email or twitter..so i assume he is not interested anymore in maintaining his pool?
I think he is fixing it right now. |
|
|
|
Yes i tried this already but it still stays German.
I also have problem to remove the cuda 8 rc junk...so I need a fresh install anyway :-D
you don't need to remove cuda 8 rc, just install cuda 8 final over it. |
|
|
|
|
I just got this answer from poloniex:
"I am not sure where exactly you heard the rumour about delisting XCN but I can assure you we have no current plans to delist any coins."
@ocminer: now you can remove the red message ;-)
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
