Religion is not dying. Rather it is changing. For example. Evolution theory has been proven false in may ways. The fact that it is theory rather than law shows that there always has been question about it. Yet, people still believe that it is true, and there are many people going around trying to trick others into believing it. And many people fall for the scam. This is the way religious cults work. So, religion is simply changing, often from believing in God, to believing in evolution, or maybe, believing in science.  Faith in God will remain forever, but religion can disappear or become a tradition. Faith and religious currents are the difference of the concept and believe in the existence of a pusher is possible without religion. From #6 at the definition of religion in Dictionary.com: something one believes in and follows devotedly; a point or matter of ethics or conscience:
to make a religion of fighting prejudice. This means that whatever you believe in is religion for you, be it God, or be it science. It also shows that people can't get away from religion in their lives. |
|
|
|
...
Note: The Hammonds are ranchers like the Bundys, but in a different location. Ammon Bundy is trying to help the Hammonds in their government induced plight.
There is a very significant differences. - Bundy want to use land which is owned by the Fed to run his cattle on. Hammond owned his land. Ownership cuts both ways. I personally feel that the Federal govt should own little or no property in the U.S. (and nor should any multi-national corporation) but the Bundy charade(s) are exactly the wrong way to go about achieving this. All the 'operations' achieved was to gain datapoints on individuals, and add weight to the strongly conditioned idea that gun owners and patriots in the U.S. are crazy and dangerous. I've little doubt that the operation was designed to do exactly this and carefully so. The truth is that we don't know what is really going on. If the Government made a deal with the Bundys to let them graze their cattle, and if the Government changed the deal after they made it, the Government may be in the wrong, no matter whose land it is. We don't know the nitty-gritty... or do we? However... The Government is not suppose to hold lands, and if the Bundys knew what they were doing, they could make the Government pay. |
|
|
|
Not nearly as ridiculous as "we live in a snow globe".. With giant spot lights and painted stars. A grand conspiracy dating back to beginning of time. Sounds like a Doctor Who episode. Yeah, the NASA made Dr. Who, just do decept the people. Every country's government and every single TV stations and every scientists are run by NASA, thank God we have some brave and clever youtubers those revealed the truth. Yes. It's about time that we change the deception. It used to be NASA. Now let it be flat earth. |
|
|
|
Religion is not dying. Rather it is changing. For example. Evolution theory has been proven false in may ways. The fact that it is theory rather than law shows that there always has been question about it. Yet, people still believe that it is true, and there are many people going around trying to trick others into believing it. And many people fall for the scam. This is the way religious cults work. So, religion is simply changing, often from believing in God, to believing in evolution, or maybe, believing in science. |
|
|
|
If anyone denies evolution, that someone does NOT understand evolution at all. There is no denying, evolution is merely change, you can talk about evolution and discuss it but denying it entirely it's just plain stupid.
There are hundreds of examples of evolution and it is supported by virtually every scientist, by different types of science like biology, paleontology, radioisotope dating, bio-geography and many more, denying evolution is denying all of them and as I said that is just plain stupid.
If evolution is just change, say "change." why? Because the word "evolution" used to mean, and still implies, random beneficial mutations. There isn't any such thing. Cause and effect says that there is no random. Beneficial mutations have never been seen or recorded... even once. Be clear. Drop "evolution." Say "change." Because evolution is the name of the scientific theory, that's why? Are you fucking dense? I feel like you are not even trying at this point. No one said it was random, I stated the cause, it was the pollution which had a cause which was the industrial revolution which had a cause, human behavior which is random. You believe in God and the bible, right? It says specifically in the bible that we have free will, if we have free will it means our actions are totally random and can't be predicted so your whole cause and effect shit is stupid. Another example of the inequity of Astargath. He agrees that evolution is change. Then he admits that it is a theory (an unknown). Yet he denies by omission the fact that evolution is more than change. Then he brings religion into it. And when he admits to God, he is unwilling to recognize the almighty power of God to use our free will the way He wants. What a slippery snake! A Scientific Theory. Again showing your ignorance not knowing what a scientific theory means and pulling the retarded card of OH ITS ONLY A THEORY HEHEHE. ''A scientific theory is an explanation of some aspect of the natural world that can, in accordance with the scientific method, be repeatedly tested, using a predefined protocol of observations and experiments.[1][2] Established scientific theories have withstood rigorous scrutiny and are a comprehensive form of scientific knowledge.'' You keep dismissing thousands of scientific arguments and articles and choose to believe this one article you keep mentioning for some reason, the mathematical impossibility of evolution. Quick search: Debunked many times: https://www.reddit.com/r/askscience/comments/n832l/the_mathematical_impossibility_of_evolution_can/?st=j3464u23&sh=dfa6ea09http://answers-in-reason.com/religion/mathematical-impossibility-evolution-debunked/http://experimentalmath.info/blog/2012/01/does-probability-refute-evolution/Badecker keeps posting one article here and there backed by 1 guy who said it, he ignores 99.9% of the scientific community because they are all wrong and this one dude that made that retarded argument must be the one who knows. Well there you go buddy 3 articles for you to read, for every single article of bullshit you post I can find hundreds of scientific articles debunking it. The only reason he rejects evolution is because it messes up his fairy tale about how an invisible man far away in another universe created this universe and created this special type of primates who can worship him. Oh, yeah he created everything else as well  Ignoring genetic disorders, cataclysmic events, extinction of whole species, creation of new species, planets, solar systems and galaxies coliding etc. It is a "perfect" design. I like science fiction as well as the next guy. But there is a time when we need to step out of the science fiction of evolution, and get on with reality. Google "why evolution is false" to see lots of reason that it is science fiction. Look here http://humansarefree.com/2013/12/9-scienctific-facts-prove-theory-of.html for 9 reason why evolution is science fiction, and the reasons why it is being pushed in the education systems as truth, even though it is false. |
|
|
|
Lol, massive debt I agree on that one even though it's easily explanable by both the euro and the young population, but third word security? Seriously? xD
Well, yes. Just couple of days ago, there was yet another demonstration in the center of Paris. Working class women are hunted like prey in the streets, while still giving away half of their income to the state in exchange for empty promises. There is something... evil about system like that. https://heatst.com/world/women-in-paris-protest-against-immigrant-men-sexually-harassing-them/AHAHAHAH Sorry man but that's pretty funny xD You know I had trouble finding info about this protest because we have massive protest right now, hundreds of thousands of people protesting against state security (which we consider too high) and for the migrants. This protest you're talking about is a complete bullshit. They're old rich ladies of extreme right wing who never had any problem with migrants as they're living in the most beautiful places of Paris! Those are the same who voted a law to fine people looting the garbage!!! You imagine? There is a part of Paris where poor people scavanging food in the trash ARE FINED! I don't have much respect for those people. I... am. Not all of course but a good part of my profit goes in taxes, that's normal and fair, even though I'd love to be able to control more where the money goes that's for sure. Precisely! You took all the risks, you and only you will be held accountable for failure of the enterprise. So it is not just just but also completely natural, that you and nobody else should decide where profit goes. You can make compromises, but you stopped being slave at plantation of someone else the moment you took full responsiblity for the future of bussiness. And that's where the extortion is important! Because indeed, I could think like you. But that wouldn't be the truth. That would be forgetting that if I have the skills to make money it's because my education was paid by the state. That would be forgetting that if I have the time to make money that's because the state took care of my mother in law sickness. AND THE MOST IMPORTANT I'm not "the only one to be held accountable" as you say. In Franc eif you create a company and it fails, then you'll have tons of help from state to help your recover. You won't be out in the street at all! You'll be paid the time you find a new job (or a new idea) and if you bankrupted hard and have tons of debt, the government can erase all your debt (that's happening to thousands of people every year). The idea is there, you pay if you succeed, but we help you if you fall. Solidarity "Liberté, égalité, fraternité" "Freedom, equality, fraternity" Don't see anything bad here. And what do we do when people who earn lots of money refuse to help?
The problem here you see is the fact that state invest in people.
I'll take my own example:
I'm from a rather poor family (not desperate but not middle class either) and I've made top notch scientific studies and am now an engineer who earns more in a month than both his parents combined. The fact is that yeah sure I became like this thanks to hard working, years of studies and my own skills. But not only.
I should not forget that I was able to do all this also because education is not only free but you're also helped by the state which pays you an appartment and food when you study and you're from a poor family. I should not forget that when my mother in law had a cancer, state paid for her cure during the whole year and paid here a part of her salary.
Sure hardworking is important and goodwill is better. But now suppose we "let the choice" to people as you say, and I chose to refuse to pay because I don't see the support the State gave me but I only see my own work and my years of struggle and I decide that people should just "work more". Then the virtuous circle is broken :/
Thats the point of contention and we can discuss it. But lets not pretend its completely normal for the system to take everything and (as shown on the example of Paris above) give back nothing. Taxation and redistribution of any wealth should be constantly re-negationed. State is our tool, not vice versa.COMPLETELY AGREED For that I completely agree of course. Time and society change and we should be arranging the system all the time. That's why our poor form of representative democracy is really not suited for a good socialist system. But the system and the ideas are good, the tools aren't perfect though  But people don't change. They still have arms and legs, a torso and head, hands and feet. And they still have good and evil planted in their hearts. At the same time, almost 100% of them are not mind readers. This means that there is at least some little trust of strangers, even though you never know, until you get to know them. Be prepared to protect yourself against the stranger, or against the stray thoughts of people who you consider friends. You know that you, yourself, have had stray thoughts against your friends once in a while. When you know that you can protect yourself, and when you know that irresponsible use of your self protection will bring down worse troubles onto you than petty disagreements and anger, you will use your "self protection" wisely. |
|
|
|
Beside having a Gun Control owners should also be more calm and ensure that their mood won't affect on thwir decision when using it.
This can never be implemented. Mood depends on a lot of things, and you can't predict it. So in gun control, you can't deny license to someone if his mood is not right. Right! A person can harm or kill others in many ways. He can use a club, his fists, a knife, a fork, anything. Are you going to put all people into strait-jackets so that nobody can harm anyone anymore? We all need to recognize that we will die. We need to be aware that bad things can happen. Then, we need to arm ourselves as best as possible to protect ourselves from others. In Africa, when a rogue lion hunts and kills in a village, the villagers get together and hunt the lion and kill it. If a rogue man uses a gun to hunt and kill any one of us, the rest of us will get together and hunt that man and execute him. Like the African villagers, we don't remain in hunt formation forever. Once the job is done, we peacefully put our weapons away, and get on with our business. Look at what is happening in Africa right now because they don't have weapons or training.
The war you've never heard of Six years ago, a deputy commanding general for U.S. Army Special Operations Command gave a conservative estimate of 116 missions being carried out at any one time by Navy SEALs, Army Green Berets, and other special operations forces across the globe.
Today, according to U.S. military documents obtained by VICE News, special operators are carrying out nearly 100 missions at any given time — in Africa alone. It's the latest sign of the military's quiet but ever-expanding presence on the continent, one that represents the most dramatic growth in the deployment of America's elite troops to any region of the globe.
In 2006, just 1 percent of all U.S. commandos deployed overseas were in Africa. In 2010, it was 3 percent. By 2016, that number had jumped to more than 17 percent. In fact, according to data supplied by U.S. Special Operations Command, there are now more special operations personnel devoted to Africa than anywhere except the Middle East — 1,700 people spread out across 20 countries dedicated to assisting the U.S. military's African partners in their fight against terrorism and extremism. Read more at https://news.vice.com/story/the-u-s-is-waging-a-massive-shadow-war-in-africa-exclusive-documents-reveal. |
|
|
|
Religion is poison. They are reasoned by books that have no evidence or witness. and i don't know if there are any cure
And mostly the religion of atheism. They trust blindly in science to keep them alive, but there is no evidence that science can do this. Kirch speaks like dirty communist from USSR. Perhaps he could tell us what point of life there is without any faith at all. Communists more often than not become nihilists aswell taking pleasure at making life of others living hell. Every single civilization in history had culture, that was shaped by moral compass in form of religion. Now, these retards want to repeat mistakes of man killed by syphilis over 90 years ago. Is west really so decadent? To continue what Okurkabinladin is saying... Trust is a form of faith that everyone knows about instinctively. When people come close to forgetting about trust/faith, something usually happens to them that reminds them. Trust/faith in what? In the fact that they have no control over anything in their lives. "But I do have control. I mean, I can walk where I want to walk, talk what I want to talk, even get a gun and shoot it (even if by illegal means)." Except that this is the current state of the universe. It's called order and peace. But just to show that you don't have control, look at the many things that happened to you without your expecting it. Some of them were even against what you wanted. Some of them were even bad. Think of car accidents where people die. They didn't want it to happen. And if they knew that their actions of driving that day were going to kill them, they wouldn't have taken off that day. None of us has any control over things. Rather, it is the order in the universe that gives peace. That order is controlled by God through cause and effect. The point is that we all live by faith, the trust kind of faith. We have faith that things will go on hopefully for our good. But we don't know, because we don't control. We see that we don't control every time we are a little surprised by something. If we were smart, we would consider humbly appealing to God with deep respect for Him. |
|
|
|
'The proof that Badecker is far less intelligent than a rock is' or 'When idiots try to act like scientists':
First of all, this is not a reply to you, Badecker, so I do not expect a reply from you. This is me proving how stupid you are and discrediting your idiotic persona as much as possible. Even if you do reply, I do not give a tiny fuck about what you say anymore.
First, Badecker said : 'We simply don't understand the programming because it is so extremely complex.' to which Astargath replied with 'Im sorry but you keep saying we simply don't understand it, then how is it that YOU understand it? If you say something is not understood how can you claim it's true? You realize the logic fallacy, right?'. What comes next is a bit shocking because we rarely see people that get so stupid while trying to scientifically prove something: Badecker replied to Artargath with this ' - Are you trying to be funny? First, who is the we? Second, if anyone says it is not so, they have suggested that they don't understand it. It isn't me stating that you don't understand it. At least not until after you suggested it. Third, who says that it is not understood? I understand it. There are lots of things that some people understand while others don't. This doesn't make them to be not true. However, if this is the extent of your ability to think, it is easy to see why you don't understand.. Let us analyze for a second: first, Badecker said we don't understand the programming. The same Badecker then asked who is the we, which proves that he barely knows what is coming out of his primitive brain. He actually stated something and then asked what was that about. After that, Badecker claims that if someone says something is not in a certain way, he suggests that he does not understand it. Logic failure example: if someone states that the flying spaghetti monster does not exist that actually means that the person is just suggesting he does not understand it. After that Badecker denied the fact that he stated that Astargath does not understand it...although he just did say that about all of us. Right after that he asks who said it is not understood proving to us again how stupid he is and not realizing that he just said it is not understood. Next thing, he claims he understands it, basically doing exactly what Astargath said he was doing, the logic fallacy. Later on, Badecker went full retard by stating evolution doesn't work not knowing parts of the evolution are now used even in computer technology, the very thing that he is typing from, which means it actually works. Not to talk about medicine and other science that uses the principles of evolution successfully. But hey, you can't expect to see butterflies coming out of a piece of shit, can you? Another thing to notice is this: Badecker is part of the apologist idiots who say that they can not trust in evolution because 'evolution theory is still a theory because blah blah blah'...but they believe in God, which is not even at the level of theory, it's a myth, it's primitive science fiction. Logic fallacy again. This is how Badecker ended: 'God set everything in place according to cause and effect... even the cause and effect that made the pollution. But don't blame God for pollution. He only acted according to the request of people, many of whom didn't even know that they were requesting.'. God is the cause and everything we know is the effect, he says, even the pollution. But he is not responsible for the pollution, people are...although he is the cause. However, he only acted at the request of people, even though when he created everything there were no people, but somehow he predicted their request which was not really a request because people did not know they were requesting. In conclusion, God is the cause of pollution but he is not responsible because some people who were also an effect of God were requesting while not knowing they were requesting it. If there would have been a prize for the most insanely stupid person alive at the moment, I would hands down hand it to Badecker. This brainless creature tries to bring 'scientific proof' for God and he actually demands that we take it seriously. That is the effect of religion on some people, mostly dumb ones. I bet that if you give him a gun and the 'legal' right to shoot those who do not believe in his God, he would immediately slaughter at least as much as any islamic terrorist does. Thank you for your time and remember: Badecker is as stupid as a pineapple covered slice of pizza, there is no way he could ever scientifically prove anything. Stay tuned for more soon.
Hey, man. Thanks again for helping to support the fact that God exists, as proven by the proof at the links, by not being able to refute the science: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1355109.msg14047133#msg14047133https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1662153.40https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1054513.msg16803380#msg16803380. And thank you, also, that you are constantly proving yourself to be a troll by going to great lengths, and taking great pains, to attempt to tear somebody else down, simply because he is a bit smarter than you. We all really want to know the kind of people we are talking to. So, thanks for proving yourself. I know, I know. Your masters are probably getting after you for being paid by them, yet not being able to refute the fact that God exists. You are in danger because of this. After all, denying God, no matter what the reasons, leaves you open to His wrath and punishment. Your choice, however. |
|
|
|
...
Awesome. Sign me up for the government that is so good I would voluntarily pay for their services. And it would be so awesome that they would not need to use extortion to get you to pay.
Where is this magical fairy land?
Historically fiat money is part of the same mechanism that involves enforced consent for taxation. Most people in fiat economies do not protest what money is spent on because they are all appendages of the beast, their will is projected onto the bureaucrats whose will is projected onto the construct. If you ask them if it was right to spend trillions of dollars killing millions of people thousands of miles away, they will stare blankly ahead, not even blinking to clean their eyes, and say "huh?". The crypto economy hopefully will oblige people to think about currency or pay a price for their zombieism. Yet, there is nothing wrong with money that is simply used as a means of exchange. It makes barter a whole lot easier in many circumstances. The bad part comes in when some shrewd people use it to slyly steal from unsuspecting, honest users of money. |
|
|
|
If anyone denies evolution, that someone does NOT understand evolution at all. There is no denying, evolution is merely change, you can talk about evolution and discuss it but denying it entirely it's just plain stupid.
There are hundreds of examples of evolution and it is supported by virtually every scientist, by different types of science like biology, paleontology, radioisotope dating, bio-geography and many more, denying evolution is denying all of them and as I said that is just plain stupid.
If evolution is just change, say "change." why? Because the word "evolution" used to mean, and still implies, random beneficial mutations. There isn't any such thing. Cause and effect says that there is no random. Beneficial mutations have never been seen or recorded... even once. Be clear. Drop "evolution." Say "change." Because evolution is the name of the scientific theory, that's why? Are you fucking dense? I feel like you are not even trying at this point. No one said it was random, I stated the cause, it was the pollution which had a cause which was the industrial revolution which had a cause, human behavior which is random. You believe in God and the bible, right? It says specifically in the bible that we have free will, if we have free will it means our actions are totally random and can't be predicted so your whole cause and effect shit is stupid. Another example of the inequity of Astargath. He agrees that evolution is change. Then he admits that it is a theory (an unknown). Yet he denies by omission the fact that evolution is more than change. Then he brings religion into it. And when he admits to God, he is unwilling to recognize the almighty power of God to use our free will the way He wants. What a slippery snake! |
|
|
|
No one know what actually looks like the evolution unless there's a man who lives until now or reincarnation and remembered all what happens during the day and what really happens to human kind no ones who created everything as the scientist said it all created by science but how when they don't have a creator,
The universe knows nothing but everything a human knows everything but nothing.. Evolution is random when will it rain When will the wind blow when will lighting strike and where when will the earth make a river So much we don't know that we will know always .. But all because religious bible crazies cannot get over the fact god never made man..  Video for Best of Christian Nonsense- the Crazy Christians compilation▶ 26:32 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F1ibEaIPtMkThe funny thing is that only religious extremists are the ones denying evolution at this point. A study found in 2007: Religious Differences on the Question of Evolution (United States, 2007) Percentage who agree that evolution is the best explanation for the origin of human life on earth Buddhist 81% Hindu 80% Jewish 77% Unaffiliated 72% Catholic 58% So 58% and that was 2007 so I'm guessing it could be at 70% by now or even higher, there is no point right now to deny it. Badecker is a perfect example of religious extremist that denies every single scientific discovery, he denies many different science branches, he denies every single proof and evidence for evolution and the only thing he does is link flawed studies or people who ''claim'' something. For some reason he believes them, oh a guy claimed evolution is false, I better believe this one guy, he must know better than pretty much everyone else, right? Oh he doesn't have any kind of evidence, oh well, all the evidence scientists have is fake. And that's his logic. BADecker has shown over and over scientific reason why evolution is provably false. For one of the better reasons, see https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1454732.0. Astargath is simply jealous that he can't prove the evolution he WANTS to exist. So he badmouths others who prove that evolution can't exist. This shows you what kind of person Astargath is. |
|
|
|
No one know what actually looks like the evolution unless there's a man who lives until now or reincarnation and remembered all what happens during the day and what really happens to human kind no ones who created everything as the scientist said it all created by science but how when they don't have a creator,
The universe knows nothing but everything a human knows everything but nothing.. Evolution is random when will it rain When will the wind blow when will lighting strike and where when will the earth make a river So much we don't know that we will know always .. But all because religious bible crazies cannot get over the fact god never made man.. Video for Best of Christian Nonsense- the Crazy Christians compilation▶ 26:32 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F1ibEaIPtMkThere isn't any random. We simply don't know what is happening in nature because we are so weak at understanding what causes the effects. Lightening strikes because of a bunch of things that happen in the atmosphere and on/in the ground. We just don't have the ability to track them. None of them are random. They all follow very precise rules of physics. If they didn't, lightening would strike anywhere at any time, inside the house while you are eating a meal, under water, between trees in the woods, back and forth between the steering wheel and the seat belt in your car, anywhere. Because you state that random exists in these things, you show us that you have a long way to go in understanding why evolution does not exist. |
|
|
|
After destroying millions of children with psychiatric drugs, the industry now... Some people think that electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), also known as electroshock, is one of those horrible treatments from yesteryear that civilized societies no longer undertake. However, approximately one million people around the world are given electroshock every year, including 100,000 Americans. Perhaps most disturbingly, some of the people who undergo this terrifying and risky treatment are children.
This statistic is set to rise as the American Psychiatric Association (APA) pressures the Food and Drug Administration to allow ECT to be used on children who are resistant to current drugs and therapies. The FDA is considering the draft rule, which will downgrade the risk of ECT from the highest category, Class III, to the only moderately risky Class II, placing it in the same category as condoms and contact lenses. That hardly sounds suitable when you consider the fact that the treatment entails sending jolts of electricity into the child's brain, purposefully inducing seizures. It has been associated with serious side effects, including permanent memory loss, manic symptoms, heart problems, cognitive problems, confusion, breathing problems, brain damage and even death.
Should the FDA ultimately grant the request, more children will be subjected to this degrading and archaic treatment, which is said to have gotten its inspiration from the way pigs were given an electrical shock prior to slaughter to make them more docile and easier to kill. It is typically used on people who have depression, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, and even autism. Read more at http://www.naturalnews.com/2017-05-23-after-destroying-millions-of-children-with-psychiatric-drugs-the-industry-now-wants-the-fda-to-expand-electroshock-therapy-on-children.html.
|
|
|
|
Each organism is unique and it is impossible for all to apply the same method of treatment. For some, there may not be anything wrong with the vaccine, and others may have a negative reaction.
And it is the same with vaccines. A few don't have mercury in them. A few are made without "monkey" cells in them. The medical has so polluted the whole vaccination scene, that you would have to examine each shot individually, chemically, to determine if it was okay to use. |
|
|
|
Gun control must implemented and ristricted to other even they will get license to carry a gun this can be avoid terrorism on each country to avoid accident too and killing without acceptable reasons nowadays people can kill people like animals.
We need to start with the right education in childhood, and not with a license. After all, there is no guarantee that a person can be balanced in any situation and not have fun with weapons. First of all, all legal conversations of weapons are first of all organizations that want to engage in activities with the presence of armed people. This in some countries will give an opportunity to organize and legalize illegal armed formations and then they will become quite legitimate. It seems to me that this is one of the main aspects on the agenda regarding the legalization of weapons for citizens of any of the countries. Aren't you dexcribing Government? Look at China over the last 3,000 years. We call it China, but it has changed governmental form many times, and all of its borders have changed over and over. Legalization rises and falls all over the place. Yet people want their self-protection. |
|
|
|
Personally I smoke cannabis once a week.
Either friday or saturday night.
It has removed a lot of stress and some inflamation on my arms that keeps coming when I am stressed.
Now its completely gone.
So for me its a 50/50 when it comes for the high and medical benefits.
Perhaps in moderation sometimes it helps to heal the disease, but just for the thrill you do not need to use drugs even lungs like children do. But we should be free to choose. If we mess up our lives, especially after being warned, it's our own fault. Don't make other people pay for our mistakes. Certainly not Government. Let us die. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
